Skip to main content
  • Educational Review
  • Open access
  • Published:

Multiparametric MRI evaluation of bone sarcomas in children


Osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma are the most common bone sarcomas in children. Their clinical presentation is very variable depending on the age of the patient and tumor location. MRI is the modality of choice to assess these bone sarcomas and has an important function at diagnosis and also for monitoring recurrence or tumor response. Anatomic sequences include T1- and T2-weighted images and provide morphological assessment that is crucial to localize the tumor and describe anatomical boundaries. Multiparametric MRI provides functional information that helps in the assessment of tumor response to therapy by using different imaging sequences and biomarkers. This review manuscript illustrates the role of MRI in osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma in the pediatric population, with emphasis on a functional perspective, highlighting the use of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI at diagnosis, and during and after treatment.

Key points

  • Volumetric determination of tumor ADC reflects lesion heterogeneity better than cross-sectional analysis.

  • Treatment response is based on the evaluation of ADC histograms of the tumor.

  • Time intensity curves, together with DWI and conventional sequences, help in the characterization of bone sarcomas.


Bone sarcomas are infrequent neoplasms with an annual incidence of 8–9 cases per million children, accounting for up to 6% of all pediatric malignant tumors [1, 2]. However, they comprise the majority of primary bone tumors in children.

Osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma usually have a varied clinical symptoms and radiological presentation depending on two factors: age and location of the tumor within the bone. Radiography plays a paramount role for the initial workup and diagnosis of bone tumors due to its sensitivity to detect bone matrix. Classical signs related to malignancy on conventional radiography include “sunburst periosteal reaction”, “onion skin periosteal reaction”, “Codman triangle” and “permeative pattern” [3, 4]. Radiography should be followed with cross-sectional imaging for initial evaluation of the tumor and also for treatment response to therapy.

MRI is the preferred imaging technique for the study of bone sarcomas, which is accomplished by using anatomic and functional MRI techniques [5]. Anatomic MRI sequences provide anatomic information for accurate assessment of the local disease including extent of intraosseous involvement, soft tissue component, neurovascular bundle involvement, skip lesions and lymphadenopathy [6]. Nonetheless, anatomic sequences remain inadequate to monitor residual and recurrent disease after treatment.

Traditionally, tumor response assessment in pediatric bone sarcomas has been performed using three-dimensional measurements as defined by the ESMO-PaedCan-EURACAN Clinical Practice Guidelines [7] and more recently using one-dimensional (1D) measurement based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1) [8]. Lesion measurements on RECIST 1.1 have to be assessed either on CT or MRI, since radiography, PET and bone scans are only used to confirm the presence of a lesion. However, the (RECIST 1.1) criteria suggest to measure only the soft-tissue component and in one dimension. Measurement of bone marrow tumor is not valid in RECIST 1.1 and cannot be used to assess [8, 9].

Multiparametric or functional MRI provides additional information to that provided by the conventional sequences, including cellularity, vascularity, fat content and metabolism (Table 1). In pediatric bone sarcomas, techniques such as diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) have shown to provide valuable information for treatment response assessment.

Table 1 Multiparametric MRI techniques and type of information provided

Multiparametric or functional MRI adds value to the anatomic or conventional MRI. In clinical practice, it is crucial to evaluate conventional and multiparametric MRI techniques, due to the valuable information that they provide for the study of treatment response.

In this article, we review the clinical features and illustrate the conventional and multiparametric MRI features of osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma of bone in children, with emphasis on DWI and DCE-MRI.

Imaging protocol

The imaging protocol used at our institution (Table 2) using a 3-T MRI scanner (Ingenia; Philips Healthcare, Best, Netherlands) combines conventional (anatomic) and functional or multiparametric sequences.

Table 2 MRI protocol for the study of bone sarcomas in a 3-T scanner

Multiplanar images are acquired using T1-weighted spin-echo sequence (TR, 700 ms; TE, 10 ms) and T2-weighted fast spin-echo sequence (TR, 3300 ms; TE, 80 ms). For fat-suppressed images, DIXON is preferred as it provides more homogeneous signal intensity (TR, 3200 ms; TE 60 ms), although STIR or fat-suppressed T2-weighted images are routinely used in institutions where it is not available. All images are obtained with a slice thickness of 3 mm with 0-mm interslice gap [2, 4, 10].

DWI is routinely performed in the axial plane using single-shot or multishot spin-echo echo-planar imaging sequences (TE 9000/TR 78 ms; 3-mm slice thickness; and 0-mm interslice gap) and b-values of 0, 500 and 800 s/mm2 (Table 2). Factors such as field of view and matrix may vary depending on the region of interest and age of the patient [5].

DCE-MRI evaluation is performed using a THRIVE sequence (T1-weighted high-resolution isotropic volume excitation, fast gradient, 3D and fat saturation) with the following parameters: TR 4 ms; TE 2 ms; slice thickness 1.5 mm; 0-mm interslice gap.

The evaluation of bone sarcomas in children at diagnosis and also during and after treatment requires a detailed MRI assessment, which includes anatomic and multiparametric MRI techniques (DWI and dynamic MRI study), because the imaging results may affect the patient management (Table 3).

Table 3 Qualitative MRI features of biological processes involved in bone sarcomas

Conventional MRI

Anatomic T1-weighted and T2-weighted or STIR MR images provide relevant information for diagnosis, staging, and surgical planning [2, 10].

Bone sarcomas are usually iso- to hypointense to muscle on T1-weighted images, and heterogeneously hyperintense on T2 DIXON or STIR images, due to the presence of hemorrhage and necrosis [2, 6, 9, 10].

On T1-weighted images, osteosarcoma usually shows a sharp transition from normal fatty marrow to hypointense tumor marrow involvement. In contrast, Ewing sarcoma shows a wide intramedullary transition between the tumor and the normal bone marrow [2]. Furthermore, Ewing sarcoma is associated with a soft-tissue mass in 96% of cases [11, 12], while osteosarcoma tends to expand the medullary cavity with bone formation.

MRI of osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma should include the primary tumor site, the entire bone in which the tumor is located and the two adjacent joints (proximal and distal to the affected bone) in order to identify any potential skip lesion [6]. This is usually achieved by imaging in the coronal plane on T1 without fat suppression and on fat-suppressed T2 using a body coil for the initial evaluation. Then, a dedicated examination of the tumor is performed with a surface coil. T1-weighted images are very helpful to delineate the boundaries of the bone marrow involvement, whereas gradient echo sequences are not sufficiently accurate. The length of the tumor is usually measured on T1-weighted images from the articular surface to the point at which marrow signal intensity changes from abnormal to normal. This information is helpful for planning the construction of the individual prosthesis for the patient. Longitudinal measurement is routinely performed on T1-weighted images because DIXON or STIR sequences may significantly overestimate the bone marrow involvement, as edema and marrow hyperplasia show high signal intensity similar to that of tumor [10].

Multiparametric MRI

Diffusion-weighted imaging

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is a functional MRI technique based on the random Brownian motion of water molecules within a voxel of tissue. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) is a quantitative method to evaluate tumor cellularity, which can be of substantial importance when assessing treatment response: high cellular tumors are represented by low ADC values, whereas lower cellular tumors are represented by high ADC values. As a consequence, DWI provides quantitative functional evaluation of the cellularity, allowing the potential differentiation between benign and malignant lesions as well as improvement of the MRI assessment of treatment response [5, 13, 14].

The viability of the tumor can be characterized by longitudinally monitoring changes in ADC tumor heterogeneity at different stages of treatment. Both necrotic and solid parts of the tumor need to be routinely included in the sample to facilitate reproducibility of this method [14, 15].

The ADC values are dependent on the MR system including the vendor, magnetic field strength and sequence parameters and usually cannot be directly translated to other MR scanners. However, ADC can be calibrated between different MR systems using phantoms in order to ensure some comparability [16].

There are different methods to measure ADC values. ADC is usually acquired by drawing a region of interest (ROI) in the most cellular area of the tumor, and this may provide information about the mean value or ADCmean, minimal ADC value or ADCmin and the maximal ADC value or ADCmax. ADCmin represents the most cellular component of the tumor [17]. ADCmean and ADCmax include non-viable necrotic and cystic portions of the tumor. ADCmean represents the mean tissue composition and has been correlated with proliferation potential of the tumor, while ADCmax has been associated with low cellular component of the tumor [18,19,20,21,22,23].

Volumetric determination of tumor ADC (ADC histogram) shows better the lesion heterogeneity, compared with a single, cross-sectional lesion region of interest (ROI) analysis [15, 16]. ADC histogram using a volumetric determination of the lesion analysis is useful to evaluate treatment response in soft-tissue tumors and also in patients with malignant bone tumors [15,16,17]. Moreover, ADC volumetry applied only on areas of high cellularity that correlates with restriction of the tumor after chemotherapy may be used as a way to estimate the volume of viable tumor [24, 25].

ADC histogram is a valuable tool to assess response to treatment in patients with bone sarcomas. Hence, it needs to be performed not only at diagnosis but also during and after completion of the treatment in order to evaluate treatment response. Therapeutic response correlates with the degree of movement of the histogram through the horizontal axis to the right. In the event of significant response to treatment, ADC values of the tumor tend to increase and the histogram displaces to the right of the graph. However, in the event of no therapeutic response to treatment, there is usually overlap between histograms or no movement of the curve through the horizontal axis. [23,24,25,26,27].

Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) is based on the acquisition of DWI with b-values below 200 s/mm2. Thus, the images become sensitive to the motion of water molecules in the intravascular space (i.e., perfusion) in addition to water molecules diffusing in the extracellular and intracellular compartments [28]. Quantitative IVIM analysis of DWI signal may distinguish the perfusion component from tissue diffusion and this may help in better tissue characterization and treatment monitoring [28].

Perfusion MRI

Perfusion MRI can be performed using unenhanced sequences such as DWI, or with enhanced sequences such as DCE-MRI, which requires the use of contrast material [29, 30].

DCE-MRI relies on the use of TRICKS or TRAK sequences that are characterized by a low temporal resolution acquisition usually less than 6 s for 5 min [29]. Analysis of DCE-MRI sequence can be done using various postprocessing techniques, in a quantitative or qualitative manner.

Quantitative assessment of DCE-MRI allows the measurement of tissue microvasculature properties. A meta-analysis performed by Kubo et al. [31] showed that the curve slope derived from DCE-MRI is useful for the assessment of treatment response after chemotherapy in osteosarcoma and in Ewing sarcoma.

DCE-MRI measures the properties of tissue microvasculature using contrast material. The first pass of the contrast bolus provides information about blood flow and volume, and this is calculated according to the signal variation over the first pass of the contrast. The accumulation of contrast agent in the tissues and its elimination is estimated over longer time frames [31, 32].

A qualitative analysis approach relies on time-signal intensity curves (TIC) or curve profile. The study of the TIC morphology provides information about the biological process of the tumor and allows the characterization of the tumor before and after treatment [33,34,35].

The use of TIC derived from DCE-MR has been widely reported in the literature in different clinical scenarios and parts of the body. According to Lavini et al. [36], there are 5 types of curve profile (Fig. 1). Type 1 curve shows no contrast uptake resulting in a horizontal type curve; type 2 shows progressive enhancement; type 3 shows a delayed plateau; type 4 shows a delayed washout; and type 5 shows fast initial contrast uptake followed by progressive late enhancement. Type 1 profile correlates with necrosis, type 2 with benign processes, such as peritumoral edema, types 3 and 4 with malignancy, and type 5 with granulation tissue or fibrosis [36,37,38]. Lavini et al. also describe two other curves. Type 6 or artery, which is characterized by a quick uptake and quick wash-out, and type 7, which includes all others curves not classified in the previous types.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Time intensity curves (TIC) in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Type I profile represents necrosis or cystic changes; type II is associated with benignity, such as peritumoral edema; types III and IV with malignant processes; and type V with granulation tissue or fibrosis

Dynamic MRI study may differentiate areas of necrosis, viable tumor, fibrosis and peritumoral edema, because they show specific types of TIC (Fig. 2). Although there may be overlap, DCE-MRI can help differentiate a malignant tumor from a benign tumor or at least narrow the differential diagnosis [39].

Fig. 2
figure 2figure 2

Osteosarcoma of the proximal right tibia in a 16-year-old boy. a Axial ADC map shows low signal intensity of the tumor confirming restricted diffusion (*). b Axial DCE-MR image (left) with corresponding time intensity curve (TIC) (right) shows peripheral enhancement of the tumor (short arrows on the left) which correlates with a type III curve (pink and orange arrows on the TIC). The blue curve in the TIC shows the typical morphology of any peripheral artery (long arrow on the left). c Axial fat-suppressed T2-weighted MR image shows hyperintensity of the bone marrow (arrows) surrounding the tumor (T), in keeping with edema. d Axial DCE-MR image (left) and corresponding TIC (right) show progressive enhancement of the bone marrow (arrows) which correlates with a type II curve (orange and pink curves), indicating edema. The blue curve in the TIC shows the typical morphology of the peripheral artery. e Axial fat-suppressed T2-weighted MR image after 2 cycles of chemotherapy shows an area of predominantly low signal intensity within the tumor (arrow) that may represent fibrosis and/or calcification. f Axial DCE-MR image (left) with corresponding TIC (right) shows progressive enhancement of the peripheral area of the tumor (short arrows) with a type II curve (red, green and pink curves), indicating overall good treatment response and presence of granulation tissue. Note the lack of enhancement of the central part of the tumor (long arrow) due to necrosis that correlates with a type I curve (orange curve) indicating non-viable tumor or necrosis. The blue curve correlates with the typical morphology of a peripheral artery

Areas of viable tumor are isointense on T2-weighted images, heterogeneously hyperintense following contrast administration and show low ADC values corresponding with high cellular areas. On DCE-MRI, viable tumor shows avid arterial contrast enhancement corresponding with higher slopes and type III and IV TIC.

Fibrosis and peritumoral edema usually share the same MRI features. On T2-weighted and contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed T1-weighted images, they show hyperintensity with high ADC values reflecting low or absent cellular areas. On DCE-MRI, the enhancement may be rapid, sustained and progressive or in contrast there may be progressive enhancement, but in any case they are associated with type II and V TIC.

Necrosis is usually hyperintense on T2-weighted images with no enhancement after contrast administration and shows high ADC values reflecting low cellularity. As there is no contrast uptake, DCE-MRI shows no curve slope correlating with type I TIC [39].

Osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma of bone usually show early arterial enhancement, which needs to be correlated and evaluated with DWI and conventional MRI.

The TIC shape analysis does not provide absolute measurements, and it is partly dependent on the protocol chosen. The final shape of the curve may be affected by several factors, such as the length of the dynamic MRI study, time resolution, and scan features [37, 38].

There are some limitations regarding the use of DCE-MRI. Type III TIC and type IV TIC are described in almost all patients with high-grade bone sarcomas and metastases. However, considering that the slope of the curve is partly affected by the vascularization of the tumor, poorly vascularized malignant tumors may exhibit benign slopes, whereas highly vascularized benign tumors, such as giant cell tumor and eosinophilic granuloma, may falsely show malignant slopes [33, 35].

Therefore, the rapid arterial uptake on DCE-MR is a better indicator of cellularity, cell turnover time, and vascularization, rather than the potential malignancy of bone tumors.

Osteosarcomas are usually highly perfused and permeable, while after chemotherapy, the tumors show substantial decrease in both perfusion and permeability [34, 39]. This corresponds to either development of tumor necrosis with fibrosis or to regions of relatively dormant tumor. Areas of persistent enhancement imply that some tumor has not responded effectively to therapy [32, 34]. The acquisition of delayed contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed T1-weighted images after completion of the dynamic study is useful because this improves visualization of the margins of the tumor and of the involvement of the neurovascular bundle and allows a more accurate estimation of tumor necrosis.


Clinical presentation

Osteosarcoma is the most common primary malignant bone tumor, often occurring in adolescents between 12 and 16 years of age, with a second peak incidence in patients older than 60 years [40]. Conventional type is the most common in childhood and adolescence and has been divided according to histologic appearance into osteoblastic, chondroblastic, and fibroblastic [41].

Children usually present with regional pain and occasionally in combination with a palpable mass or swelling [40]. Some patients relate the onset of symptoms to trauma occurring at the time that the symptoms began. Some bone tumors may present with neurologic symptoms depending on the site of origin [41, 42].

Conventional MRI findings

Osteosarcoma often affects the metaphysis and diaphysis of long bones [4]. It is iso- to hypointense to muscle on T1-weighted images, hyperintense on T2-weighted images, and shows heterogeneous enhancement after contrast agent administration [2]. As the tumor grows, MRI shows associated soft-tissue mass. Osteosarcoma not only metastasizes to the lungs, but also spreads within the affected bone resulting in skip lesions.

Multiparametric MRI findings

Osteosarcoma shows restricted diffusion due to its high cellularity, and this correlates with low ADC values [13,14,15, 18] (Fig. 3). Treatment response after chemotherapy with DWI should be analyzed with caution depending on the histological subtype of osteosarcoma. ADC values tend to be significantly different between viable tumor and necrosis in fibroblastic and osteoblastic osteosarcoma, whereas viable chondroblastic osteosarcoma cannot be completely distinguished from necrosis due to its high signal on T2-weighted images and higher ADC values as compared to the conventional type. [43,44,45]. Moreover, the imaging evaluation of chondroblastic osteosarcoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is challenging because cartilaginous tumor survival areas usually show high ADC values, indistinguishable from post-necrotic tissue or cystic/hemorrhagic necrosis [44]. The MRI evaluation of telangiectatic osteosarcoma can also be challenging as it usually has a cystic appearance with fluid levels due to hemorrhage and shows high ADC values.[45, 46].

Fig. 3
figure 3

Osteosarcoma involving the proximal metaphysis of the tibia in a 13-year-old boy. a Coronal fat-suppressed T2-weighted MR image shows a heterogeneous bone lesion (*) associated with a soft-tissue mass (arrow). b Axial ADC MR image shows diffusion restriction within the tumor (*). c, d Post-chemotherapy MRI. c Coronal fat-suppressed T2-weighted MR image shows a peripheral hypointense rim in the tumor suggestive of calcification (arrow). d Axial ADC MR image shows decrease of the areas of diffusion restriction (*) compared to the initial study, indicating good treatment response

DCE-MRI performed on areas of viable tumor shows types 3 and 4 curve profiles, whereas DCE-MRI performed on areas of non-viable tumor may show either type 1 curve in areas of necrosis or types 2 or 5 curves in areas of peritumoral edema [36,37,38] (Fig. 4). As with other neoplasms, residual tumor typically shows types 3 and 4 curve profiles, whereas fibrosis or granulation tissue may show type 5 curve profile [36] (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4figure 4

Same patient as in Fig. 3a Axial DCE-MR image (left) with corresponding time intensity curve (TIC) (right) before treatment shows early peripheral enhancement of the tumor (long arrows), which correlates with types III and IV TIC (green curve) and no enhancement of the central part of the tumor (thick arrow), which correlates with a type I TIC (horizontal orange curve), suggestive of necrosis. Peritumoral edema (short arrow) correlates with a type II TIC (pink curve). The blue curve represents the arterial TIC. b Axial DCE-MR image (left) with corresponding TIC (right) after treatment shows enhancement of the residual tumor (short arrow), which correlates with a type III TIC (orange curve). There is no change of the tumor necrosis (green curve) or peritumoral edema (pink curve). c Volumetry and d histogram of ADC maps performed before and after treatment shows an increase of the ADC mean values from 1.22 mm2/s to 1.41 mm2/s. e) ADC image after treatment shows residual tumor (short arrows)

Ewing sarcoma of bone

Clinical presentation

Ewing sarcoma of bone is the second most common primary malignant bone tumor in children and adolescents, accounting for approximately 3% of all pediatric tumors, with an annual incidence of 1–3 cases per 1 million [36, 37]. The age of presentation is very broad, but the mean age of presentation is 14–15 years. There is equal gender distribution [12, 47]. According to the last WHO classification, Ewing sarcoma is included in the group of undifferentiated small round cell sarcomas of bone and soft tissue [48].

The clinical presentation varies depending on the location of the tumor. Symptoms such as pain and mass or swelling are often present for several months before diagnosis. Ewing sarcoma may also simulate an infectious process at presentation, often correlating with advanced disease and metastases [3]. Other manifestations depend on the site of involvement and may include neurologic symptoms, chest pain, and limb length discrepancy.

Conventional MRI findings

Ewing sarcoma usually affects the diaphysis of long bones and presents as a large bone tumor with ill-defined margins associated with a large soft-tissue mass [2] (Fig. 5). It has low to intermediate signal intensity on T1-weighted images and heterogeneous high signal intensity on T2-weighted images. It typically shows inhomogeneous contrast enhancement caused by the presence of internal necrosis or hemorrhage, which, depending on its time of evolution, may appear hyper-, iso-, or hypointense to muscle. Ewing sarcoma typically shows a microcystic appearance on T2-weighted images [2, 12, 48]. Locally, it can be very aggressive, invading surrounding structures.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Ewing sarcoma involving the proximal left humerus in a 12-year-old boy. a Sagittal contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed T1-weighted MR image shows a heterogeneous mass centered in the proximal humeral metaphysis (*) that extends to the epiphysis and proximal diaphysis and contains foci of internal necrosis (short arrow). Note severe varus angulation of the humerus due to previous fracture (long arrow). b Axial ADC MR image shows restricted diffusion of the cellular areas (*) with no restriction of the necrotic foci (arrow). c Sagittal contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed T1-weighted MR image after treatment shows decrease in volume of the mass with increase of necrotic areas (arrows). d Axial ADC MR image after treatment shows no restricted diffusion (*). e Volumetry of ADC maps performed before treatment shows a high and sharp ADC histogram of 0.7 mm2/s, while the histogram after treatment is short and wide and shifted to the right, with a value of 1.9 mm2/s. The conventional MRI sequences together with DWI indicate good treatment response

Multiparametric MRI findings

Ewing sarcoma is a highly cellular tumor and usually shows restricted diffusion, which correlates with low ADC values [2, 5]. The analysis of a combined whole-lesion ADC histogram together with a dynamic MRI assessment before and after treatment, provides a quantitative interpretation of tumor response (Figs. 5 and 6).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Ewing sarcoma involving the sphenoid bone in a 15-year-old boy. a Axial contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed T1-weighted MR image of the orbits shows a heterogeneously hyperintense mass (*) arising from the sphenoid bone with internal necrosis (arrow). b Axial ADC map shows restricted diffusion of the mass (*). c Axial contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed T1-weighted MR image performed after 2 cycles of chemotherapy shows decrease in volume of the mass with heterogeneous enhancement of the residual tumor (*). d Axial ADC maps shows no restriction of the residual mass (*). e Axial contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed T1-weighted MR image performed after 3 cycles of chemotherapy shows residual enhancing tissue (arrow). f Axial ADC map shows no restriction (arrow). g Volumetry of ADC maps performed before (yellow) during (white) and after (purple) treatment. Before chemotherapy, the tumor volume is 12 cc with corresponding high and sharp ADC (yellow) histogram of 0.49 mm2/s. During treatment, the volume does not significantly change (11 cc), but the corresponding volumetric ADC (white) histogram increases to 1.85 mm2/s, appearing short, wide and shifted to the right. After treatment, the volume decreases to 1.35 cc and the ADC (purple) histogram does not change (1.85 mm2/s). Overall, this indicates good treatment response

According to Parlak et al., absolute ADCmin values have been successfully used to differentiate Ewing sarcoma from osteosarcoma in difficult cases. ADCmin values in Ewing sarcoma have been reported to be significantly lower than in osteosarcoma, being 0.566 ± 0.07 in the former and 1.193 ± 0.33 × 10–3 mm2/s in the latter [49].

TICs are very helpful in the post-chemotherapy setting. Curves performed on areas of viable tumor correlate with types 3 and 4 TIC morphology on dynamic MRI evaluation, whereas TIC performed on areas of non-viable tumor may show type 1 curves indicating necrosis, or type 2 and 5 curves indicating fibrosis or granulation tissue [34,35,36]. Depending on the location, Ewing sarcoma may be unresectable and the use of dynamic MRI examination and TIC is very useful in order to detect residual disease.

Clinical applications

The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in bone sarcomas causes changes in the tumor that may be difficult to interpret by only relying on conventional MRI. For example, the treatment may produce changes of the intralesional signal intensity as well as increase in size due to necrosis and inflammatory events. The interpretation of this new appearance of the tumor on conventional MRI is challenging and difficult to differentiate from residual tumor [31, 32, 36] (Fig. 7). In these cases, the use of multiparametric MRI may be helpful to differentiate viable tumor from necrosis and granulation tissue [5, 34, 36, 37]. Multiparametric MRI should always be analyzed in conjunction with the anatomic sequences to avoid misinterpretations.

Fig. 7
figure 7figure 7

Ewing sarcoma of the distal femur in a 9-year-old boy. a-d) Pre-treatment. a Axial contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed T1-weighted MR image before treatment shows a large tumor heterogeneously enhancing (short arrows) with internal necrosis (*). b Automated volumetry of the mass is around 285 cc. c and d Axial DWI and ADC map images show restricted diffusion in the periphery of the lesion (arrows). Post-treatment. e Axial contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed T1-weighted MR image after treatment shows increase of the internal necrosis of the mass (*) with persisting peripheral enhancement (short arrows). Note soft tissue inflammation not present in the previous MRI (long arrow). f Automated volumetry of the mass is around 350 cc. g and h Axial DWI and ADC map images show mild linear restricted diffusion of the periphery (arrows). i Histogram of ADC maps performed before and after treatment shows an increase of the ADC mean values from 0.79 mm2/s to 1.41 mm2/s

Further improvement of the MRI techniques and sequences will allow radiologists a better interpretation of the studies and the potential role of DCE-MRI and DWI in determining the better timing to use neoadjuvant therapy [22, 31, 38]. Habre et al. demonstrated that ADC values are very helpful to evaluate response to therapy at mid-course of chemotherapy in bone sarcomas to differentiate good responders from bad responders. The change of absolute mean ADC values before and after chemotherapy is usually significantly higher among the good responders compared to the poor responders. For this reason, DWI is an excellent imaging technique to evaluate early treatment response as well as bad or no response, both of which could have clinical impact when monitoring young patients with bone sarcomas [50].

Machine learning applied to multiparametric MRI may provide in the near future an objective and reliable method to assess response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in bone sarcomas. Huang et al. proved that machine learning methods together with the information provided by anatomic (T2-weighted and post-contrast images) and functional (ADC) MRI might confidently discriminate between tumor necrosis from tumor survival [51].


The combination of conventional and multiparametric MRI is essential in the evaluation of osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma in children as it provides valuable data on the detection, characterization, staging, and follow-up after treatment. Quantification of tumor ADC heterogeneity has the potential to serve as a marker of treatment response and may be predictive of a tumor's potential response to therapy.

DWI characteristics and enhancement patterns are different for viable tumor, granulation tissue, peritumoral edema and necrosis. Bone sarcomas usually show restricted DWI and types 3 and 4 curve profiles. Necrosis usually shows a type 1 curve profile. Fibrosis, granulation tissue and peritumoral edema usually show types 2 or 5 curve profiles.

Availability of data and material

Not applicable.



Apparent diffusion coefficient


Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI


Diffusion-weighted imaging


European society for medical oncology-paediatric cancer-European reference on rare adult solid cancer


Intravoxel incoherent motion


Magnetic resonance imaging


Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors


Region of interest


Short tau inversion recovery


Time of echo


T1-weighted high-resolution isotropic volume excitation


Time-signal intensity curve


Time of repetition


Time-resolved angiography with keyhole


Time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics


  1. WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board (2020) Soft tissue and bone tumours. International Agency for Research on Cancer Press, Lyon, France

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kaste SC (2011) Imaging pediatric bone sarcomas. Radiol Clin North Am 49:749–765

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. McCarville MB, Chen JY, Coleman JL et al (2015) Distinguishing osteomyelitis from Ewing sarcoma on radiography and MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 205:640–650

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang CS, Yin QH, Liao JS et al (2012) Primary diaphyseal osteosarcoma in long bones: imaging features and tumor characteristics. Eur J Radiol 81:3397–3403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Alsharief AN, Martinez-Rios C, Hopyan S, Amirabadi A, Doria AS, Greer MLC (2019) Usefulness of diffusion-weighted MRI in the initial assessment of osseous sarcomas in children and adolescents. Pediatr Radiol 49:1201–1208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Thompson MJ, Shapton JC, Punt SE, Johnson CN, Conrad EU 3rd (2018) MRI identification of the osseous extent of pediatric bone sarcomas. Clin Orthop Relat Res 476:559–564

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Casali PG, Bielack S, Abecassis N et al (2018) Bone sarcomas: ESMO-PaedCan-EURACAN clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 29:iv79–iv95

  8. Guenther LM, Rowe RG, Acharya PT et al (2018) Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in osteosarcoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 65(4)

  9. McCarville MB, Federico SM, Bishop MW et al (2016) Assessment of chemotherapy response in ewing sarcoma. Radiology 281(2):647–649

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Saifuddin A, Sharif B, Gerrand C, Whelan J (2019) The current status of MRI in the pre-operative assessment of intramedullary conventional appendicular osteosarcoma. Skeletal Radiol 48(4):503–516

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Masrouha KZ, Musallam KM, Samra AB et al (2012) Correlation of non-mass-like abnormal MR signal intensity with pathological findings surrounding pediatric osteosarcoma and Ewing’s sarcoma. Skeletal Radiol 41:1453–1461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Murphey MD, Senchak LT, Mambalam PK, Logie CI, Klassen-Fischer MK, Kransdorf MJ (2013) From the radiologic pathology archives: Ewing sarcoma family of tumors: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 33:803–831

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Neubauer H, Evangelista L, Hassold N et al (2012) Diffusion-weighted MRI for detection and differentiation of musculoskeletal tumorous and tumor-like lesions in pediatric patients. World J Pediatr 8:342–349

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Subhawong TK, Wilky BA (2015) Value added: functional MR imaging in management of bone and soft tissue sarcomas. Curr Opin Oncol 27:323–331

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Degnan AJ, Chung CY, Shah AJ et al (2018) Quantitative diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging assessment of chemotherapy treatment response of pediatric osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma malignant bone tumors. Clin Imaging 47:9–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pullens P, Bladt P, Sijbers J et al (2017) Technical Note: A safe, cheap, and easy-to-use isotropic diffusion MRI phantom for clinical and multicenter studies. Med Phys 44(3):1063–1070

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hori M, Kamiya K, Murata K (2021) Technical basics of diffusion-weighted imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 29(2):129–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Asmar K, Saade C, Salman R et al (2020) The value of diffusion weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient in primary osteogenic and Ewing sarcomas for the monitoring of response to treatment: initial experience. Eur J Radiol 28(124):108855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Subhawong TK, Jacobs MA, Fayad LM (2014) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging for characterizing musculoskeletal lesions. Radiographics 34:1163–1177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Surov A, Nagata S, Razek AA, Tirumani SH, Wienke A, Kahn T (2015) Comparison of ADC values in different malignancies of the skeletal musculature: a multicentric analysis. Skeletal Radiol 44:995–1000

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hayashida Y, Yakushiji T, Awai K et al (2006) Monitoring therapeutic responses of primary bone tumors by diffusion-weighted image: initial results. Eur Radiol 16:2637–2643

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Saleh MM, Abdelrahman TM, Madney Y, Mohamed G, Shokry AM, Moustafa AF (2020) Multiparametric MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging in predicting response to chemotherapy in cases of osteosarcoma and Ewing’s sarcoma. Br J Radiol 93(1115):20200257

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Oka K, Yakushiji T, Sato H, Hirai T, Yamashita Y, Mizuta H (2010) The value of diffusion-weighted imaging for monitoring the chemotherapeutic response of osteosarcoma: a comparison between average apparent diffusion coefficient and minimum apparent diffusion coefficient. Skeletal Radiol 39:141–146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nakajo M, Fukukura Y, Hakamada H et al (2018) Whole-tumor apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram analysis to differentiate benign peripheral neurogenic tumors from soft tissue sarcomas. Magn Reson Imaging 48:680–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Singer AD, Pattany PM, Fayad LM, Tresley J, Subhawong TK (2016) Volumetric segmentation of ADC maps and utility of standard deviation as measure of tumor heterogeneity in soft tissue tumors. Clin Imaging 40:386–391

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kubo T, Furuta T, Johan MP, Ochi M, Adachi N (2017) Value of diffusion-weighted imaging for evaluating chemotherapy response in osteosarcoma: a meta-analysis. Mol Clin Oncol 7:88–92

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee SK, Jee WH, Jung CK, Im SA, Chung NG, Chung YG (2020) Prediction of poor responders to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with osteosarcoma: additive value of diffusion-weighted MRI including volumetric analysis to standard MRI at 3T. PLoS One 10;15(3):e0229983.

  28. Baidya Kayal E, Kandasamy D, Khare K, Bakhshi S, Sharma R, Mehndiratta A (2019) Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) for response assessment in patients with osteosarcoma undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eur J Radiol 119:108635

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fayad LM, Mugera C, Soldatos T, Flammang A, del Grande F (2013) Technical innovation in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of musculoskeletal tumors: an MR angiographic sequence using a sparse k-space sampling strategy. Skeletal Radiol 42:993–1000

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Costa FM, Martins PH, Canella C, Lopes FPPL (2018) Multiparametric MR imaging of soft tissue tumors and pseudotumors. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 26:543–558

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kubo T, Furuta T, Johan MP et al (2016) Percent slope analysis of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of chemotherapy response of osteosarcoma or Ewing sarcoma: systematic review and meta-analysis. Skeletal Radiol 45(9):1235–1242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Dyke JP, Panicek DM, Healey JH et al (2003) Osteogenic and Ewing sarcomas: estimation of necrotic fraction during induction chemotherapy with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 228(1):271–278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Fayad LM, Jacobs MA, Wang X, Carrino JA, Bluemke DA (2012) Musculoskeletal tumors: how to use anatomic, functional, and metabolic MR techniques. Radiology 265:340–356

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Guo J, Reddick WE, Glass JO et al (2012) Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging as a prognostic factor in predicting event-free and overall survival in pediatric patients with osteosarcoma. Cancer 118:3776–3785

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Van Rijswijk CS, Geirnaerdt MJ, Hogendoorn PC (2004) Soft-tissue tumors: value of static and dynamic gadopentetatedimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging in prediction of malignancy. Radiology 233:493–502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lavini C, de Jonge MC, van de Sande MGH et al (2007) Pixel-by-pixel analysis of DCE MRI curve patterns and an illustration of its application to the imaging of the musculoskeletal system. Magn Reson Imaging 25(5):604–612

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Vilanova JC, Baleato-Gonzalez S, Romero M, Carrascoso-Arranz J, Luna A (2016) Assessment of musculoskeletal malignancies with functional MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 24:239–259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Choyke PL, Dwyer AJ, Knopp MV (2003) Functional tumor imaging with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 17:509–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Uhl M, Saueressig U, van Buiren M et al (2006) Osteosarcoma: preliminary results of in vivo assessment of tumor necrosis after chemotherapy with diffusion- and perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 41(8):618–623

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Longhi A, Errani C, Paolis De, Mercuri M, Bacci G (2006) Primary bone osteosarcoma in the pediatric age: state of the art. Cancer Treat Rev 32:423–436

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Lindsey BA, Markel JE, Kleinerman ES (2017) Osteosarcoma overview. Rheumatol Ther 4:25–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Vijayakumar V, Lowery R, Zhang X et al (2014) Pediatric osteosarcoma: a single institution’s experience. South Med J 107:671–675

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Wang CS, Du LJ, Si MJ et al (2013) Noninvasive assessment of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in osteosarcoma of long bones with diffusion-weighted i. PLoS One 8:e72679

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Zeitoun R, Shokry AM, Ahmed Khaleel S, Mogahed SM (2018) Osteosarcoma subtypes: magnetic resonance and quantitative diffusion weighted imaging criteria. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst 30:39–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Wang J, Sun M, Liu D et al (2017) Correlation between apparent diffusion coefficient and histopathology subtypes of osteosarcoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Acta Radiol 58:971–976

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Zishan US, Pressney I, Khoo M, Saifuddin A (2020) The differentiation between aneurysmal bone cyst and telangiectaticosteosarcoma: a clinical, radiographic and MRI study. Skeletal Radiol 49(9):1375–1386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Lahl M, Fisher VL, Laschinger K (2008) Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors: an overview from diagnosis to survivorship. Clin J Oncol Nurs 12:89–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Murphey MD, Kransdorf MJ (2021) Staging and classification of primary musculoskeletal bone and soft-tissue tumors according to the 2020 WHO update, from the AJR Special Series on Cancer Staging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 217(5):1038–1052

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Parlak S, Ergen FB, Yüksel GY et al (2021) Diffusion-weighted imaging for the differentiation of Ewing sarcoma from osteosarcoma. Skeletal Radiol 50(10):2023–2030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Habre C, Dabadie A, Loundou AD et al (2021) Diffusion-weighted imaging in differentiating mid-course responders to chemotherapy for long-bone osteosarcoma compared to the histologic response: an update. Pediatr Radiol 51(9):1714–1723

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Huang B, Wang J, Sun M et al (2020) Feasibility of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging combined with machine learning in the assessment of necrosis of osteosarcoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a preliminary study. BMC Cancer 20(1):322

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


No grant funding or other financial support has been received by any author during the creation of the work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



EJIN contributed to the study conception and design, selection and compilation of image sample, drafting of manuscript, subsequent manuscript revisions and final approval of the version to be submitted. MN contributed to the drafting of manuscript and figures, subsequent manuscript revisions and final approval of the version to be submitted. ON contributed to the drafting of manuscript and figures, subsequent manuscript revisions and final approval of the version to be submitted. EL contributed to the drafting of manuscript and figures, subsequent manuscript revisions and final approval of the version to be submitted. FT contributed to the drafting of manuscript and figures, subsequent manuscript revisions and final approval of the version to be submitted. MS contributed to the drafting of manuscript and figures, subsequent manuscript revisions and final approval of the version to be submitted. MG contributed to the drafting of manuscript and figures, subsequent manuscript revisions and final approval of the version to be submitted. IB contributed to the drafting of manuscript and figures, subsequent manuscript revisions and final approval of the version to be submitted. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emilio J. Inarejos Clemente.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Ethics Committee for Research with Medicines of the Sant Joan de Déu Foundation revised the article with the title “Multiparametric MRI Evaluation of Bone Sarcomas in Children”, presented by Emilio Inarejos (REC code: ART-06–21). This REC evaluated the article and did not observe ethical inconveniences for its publication.

Consent for publication

Images are entirely unidentifiable, and there are no details on individuals reported within the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Inarejos Clemente, E.J., Navarro, O.M., Navallas, M. et al. Multiparametric MRI evaluation of bone sarcomas in children. Insights Imaging 13, 33 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: