Skip to main content

Imaging side effects and complications of chemotherapy and radiation therapy: a pictorial review from head to toe

Abstract

Newer biologic drugs and immunomodulatory agents, as well as more tolerated and effective radiation therapy schemes, have reduced treatment toxicity in oncology patients. However, although imaging assessment of tumor response is adapting to atypical responses like tumor flare, expected changes and complications of chemo/radiotherapy are still routinely encountered in post-treatment imaging examinations. Radiologists must be aware of old and newer therapeutic options and related side effects or complications to avoid a misinterpretation of imaging findings. Further, advancements in oncology research have increased life expectancy of patients as well as the frequency of long-term therapy-related side effects that once could not be observed. This pictorial will help radiologists tasked to detect therapy-related complications and to differentiate expected changes of normal tissues from tumor relapse.

Key points

  • Oncology treatments induce local and systemic expected changes on normal tissues.

  • Several complications may be observed in follow-up imaging examinations of oncology patients.

  • Radiologists are tasked to differentiate expected findings from residual/relapse of tumors.

Background

Daily practice and research in oncology are shifting toward precision medicine, with treatments targeted to specific patient and tumor profiles [1, 2]. This underlying concept of health care enables to personalize chemotherapy (ChT) and radiotherapy (RT) schemes improving safety and effectiveness [3]. Meanwhile, advancements in oncology imaging walk hand-in-hand with new treatment strategies. Fast and highly performing CT and MRI technologies have opened new frontiers in oncology imaging, allowing tissue characterization, early diagnosis, prognostic evaluation, and accurate response assessment; this innovative approach results in shifting the radiological assessment from the mere morphologic evaluation to obtaining qualitative and functional data that can be combined with patients clinical information [4,5,6,7].

Nevertheless, oncology treatment regimens may lead to local and systemic changes and complications depending on the type of treatment [8,9,10]. In this scenario, the correct interpretation of post-treatment imaging exams is crucial for an adequate and prompt management of cancer patients. Indeed, expected changes of normal tissues with specific imaging features are associated with several treatments. This review describes the main imaging changes induced by different treatment strategies in a comprehensive assessment “from head to toe.” The primary aim of this article is to guide radiologists tasked to face with old and new oncological therapies in the interpretation of post-treatment imaging exams for an adequate differentiation of expected post-treatment changes from pathological findings.

Imaging findings

Central nervous system (CNS)

CNS toxicity of anticancer treatments has received growing interest over the last years, as severe neurotoxicity may affect up to 33% of patients [11]. It may occur after partial or whole-brain RT and ChT, due to a direct or an indirect injury (e.g., coagulopathy). MRI is the modality of choice to differentiate therapy-related side effects from disease progression, infections, and paraneoplastic syndromes [12].

RT-induced neurotoxicity

RT-induced brain injury can be divided into acute, early delayed, and late-delayed (Table 1) [11, 13]. Acute brain injury is rare with conventional dose fractionation schemes and no changes are generally observed on MRI [11, 14]. In early delayed brain injury, T2-hyperintense areas and new abnormal enhancement patterns may be detected, a phenomenon known as pseudoprogression and classically described in high-grade gliomas after initiation of treatment with RT and ChT, most commonly temozolomide [13]. Advanced MRI techniques allow to differentiate true progression from these transient post-treatment changes, with the latter showing higher ADC signal and lower rCBV on perfusion compared with viable tumor, as well as a decrease in total tumor burden during follow-up (Figs. 1, 2) [14].

Table 1 Timeline, symptoms, and imaging findings of radiation-induced brain injury [11,12,13,14]
Fig. 1
figure1

Pseudoprogression. 71-year-old man with glioblastoma treated with ChT and RT. Axial FLAIR (upper row) and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (lower row) images before (a, d), during (b, e), and 3 months after treatment (c, f) showed initial occurrence of increasing size and enhancement of the lesion, followed by reduction of both signal changes and enhancement at the 3-month follow-up

Fig. 2
figure2

True progression. 53-year-old man with glioblastoma treated with surgery, ChT and RT. Axial FLAIR (upper row) and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (lower row) 1 month after surgery (a, d), and 1 (b, e) and 4 (c, f) months after ChT/RT showed continuous increasing in signal changes and enhancement of the lesion

According to the imaging pattern, late-delayed reactions can be classified as follows.

  • RT-induced vascular injury:

    Progressive cerebral arteriopathy with vessel narrowing and irregularity can be observed, sometimes associated with moyamoya disease [13]. Further, RT may induce capillary telangiectasias and cavernous malformations demonstrated as hypointensities on T2/T2*-weighted images (Fig. 3), and mineralizing microangiopathy that can be detected on nonenhanced CT as calcifications in the affected region [11, 13].

    Fig. 3
    figure3

    Radiation-induced vascular malformations (1). Axial CT image (a) of a 15-year-old male, treated for medulloblastoma 10 years before with surgery, whole-brain RT and ChT, shows multiple hyperdense brain lesions. Axial T2-weighted (b) and FLAIR (c) images show corresponding inhomogeneous lesions, and SWI minIP (d) confirms multiple “blooming” hypointense foci related to blood products. Sagittal T1-weighted images before (e) and after (f) contrast injection show spontaneous hyperintensity and patchy enhancement of the parieto-occipital lesion

  • RT-induced parenchymal injury:

    Leukoencephalopathy, also called “diffuse radiation injury”, demonstrates T2-hyperintensity in the periventricular white matter with sparing of the U-fibers, unlike with Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy [11, 13]. Metabolic imaging (such as PET or SPECT) and advanced MRI techniques are required to distinguish recurrent tumors from radionecrosis, in that the enhancing foci reveal decreased rCBV on perfusion, elevated lipid/lactate peaks on MR spectroscopy, and resolution of enhancement on follow-up (Fig. 4) [11].

    Fig. 4
    figure4

    Radionecrosis versus recurrent tumor. Axial FLAIR (a), contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (b) and DSC rCBV map (c) of a 72 year-old man with GBM treated with surgery and ChT/RT show brain swelling, high FLAIR signal, low”soap bubble” enhancement and reduced rCBV in the left temporal lobe, consistent with radionecrosis. Axial FLAIR (d), contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (e) and DSC rCBV map (f) of a 52-year-old woman with glioblastoma treated with surgery and ChT/RT show brain swelling, high FLAIR signal, intense enhancement and increased rCBV, indicative of tumor recurrence

    Transient focal enhancing lesions have been recently described with focal T2-hyperintense lesions and “snowflakes” or curvilinear enhancement in the pons, cerebellum, and posterior cerebral hemispheres [14]. Lastly, it must be pointed out that irradiated patients have sevenfold increased risk of developing secondary brain tumors, specifically meningioma, sarcoma and malignant glioma [11, 14].

  • Stroke-like migraine attacks after RT:

    It is an uncommon delayed complication [14]. MRI shows unilateral temporal, parietal, or occipital gyriform T2/FLAIR hyperintensities and enhancement that do not respect vascular territories, while DWI may reveal superimposed infarcts [14].

ChT-induced neurotoxicity

Although the ever-growing number of new ChT agents, most drugs tend to produce similar patterns of injury on MRI, or present pathognomonic findings (i.e., ipilimumab-induced hypophysitis). Acute or chronic leukoencephalopathy may occur after administration of methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil and fludarabine, and is demonstrated on MRI as bilateral involvement of subcortical and periventricular white matter with T2/FLAIR hyperintensities showing diffusion restriction but lack of contrast enhancement [12]. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome can be caused by several drugs (e.g., cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, bortezomib, sorafenib, rituximab, bevacizumab, Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs), and Chimeric antigen receptor T cell). MRI typically shows symmetric subcortical T2-hyperintensities involving occipital and parietal lobes without diffusion restriction (Fig. 5) [11, 13].

Fig. 5
figure5

Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome. Axial contrast-enhanced CT image (a) of a 40-year-old woman with metastatic cervical carcinoma treated with multiple ChT agents including Cisplatin and 5-Fluorouracil shows bilateral parieto-temporo-occipital, subcortical and cortical, hypodense and non-enhancing foci. Axial T2-weighted (b) and FLAIR (c) images reveal corresponding hyperintense areas. Axial GRE T2*-weighted (d) image shows cortical and focal hypointense foci (arrows) related to microhemorrhages with neither diffusion abnormality on DWI (e) nor pathologic contrast enhancement on axial post-contrast T1-weighted image (f)

Cerebrovascular disorders may be either ischemic or hemorrhagic (i.e., after antiangiogenic drugs, such as bevacizumab); L-asparaginase may lead to venous sinus thrombosis [12].

Cerebellar syndrome has been reported in patients undergoing cytosine arabinoside or, more rarely, 5-fluorouracil. In these patients, MRI can be initially unremarkable, followed by development of cerebellar atrophy within months after treatment [12]. Myelopathy is a rare complication of intrathecal ChT with methotrexate, cytosine arabinoside, and nelarabine [12].

Beyond classic chemotherapeutic drugs, ICIs, such as ipilimumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab, enhance immune antitumoral activity and may lead to complications including autoimmune hypophysitis, limbic encephalitis, meningoencephalitis, and cerebellitis, while rare manifestations include posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome and transverse myelitis [12]. On MRI, classic ipilimumab-induced hypophysitis appears as diffuse enlargement of the pituitary gland, with variable thickening of the infundibulum [15].

Head and neck

Several treatment regimens for head and neck (HN) cancers involve RT alone or in combination with ChT as either a radical or adjuvant postsurgical treatment [16, 17]. Concurrently with the expected curative results on the tumor, these treatments induce a variety of side effects on normal tissues neighboring the neoplasm, presenting as inflammatory/reactive changes or clinically relevant complications.

The tissue modification process generally starts alongside the radiation exposure; notwithstanding, the irradiated tissue may show clinically and radiologically evident abnormalities even months or years later [18]. Actively proliferating tissues show early modifications more often than tissues with a slow replication, which will be typically interested by delayed changes [19].

There are some expected RT-related changes that are related to a persistent inflammatory process:

  • thickening of the superficial soft tissues (skin and platysma muscle);

  • subcutaneous fat reticulation;

  • deep fat tissue reticulation and edema of the deep anatomical spaces;

  • swelling, edema, and enhancement of mucosa and muscles (especially laryngeal, pharyngeal and masticator muscles) (Fig. 6);

  • osseous sclerosis (Fig. 7);

  • increased enhancement of the major salivary glands and thyroid, followed by size reduction and alteration of their structure (Fig. 8).

Fig. 6
figure6

Chronic edema of the true vocal folds 14 years after ChT/RT in a 72-year-old man with lymph node metastasis from unknown primary. Axial T2-weighted (a) and T1-weighted (b) images acquired with surface-coil MRI of the larynx show diffuse T2-hyperintensity and slightly T1-hyperintensity of the true vocal folds. TC, thyroid cartilage; AC, arytenoid cartilage

Fig. 7
figure7

Osseous sclerosis of the right ramus of the mandible (arrow) in a 44-year-old man 5 years after right hemiglossopelvectomy followed by adjuvant ChT/RT for a carcinoma of the right border of the tongue. Pretreatment axial T1-weighted (a) MR image shows a lesion of the right border of the tongue (asterisk) and normal signal intensity of the right ramus of the mandible. Post-treatment axial T1-weighted (b) MR image shows the surgery outcome and diffuse hypointense signal of the spongiosa of the right ramus of the mandible (arrow). M, mandible; T, tongue

Fig. 8
figure8

Atrophy of the right parotid gland in a 73-year-old man 3 years after ChT/RT for a carcinoma of the right inferior alveolar crest. MR images show a right parotid gland smaller than the contralateral, with high signal on axial T2-weighted (a), high signal on T1-weighted (b), and low signal on post-contrast 3D GRE fat-sat T1-weighted (c) images, due to extensive fatty infiltration of the parenchyma. P, parotid gland; M, mandible; MM, masseter muscle; MPM, medial pterygoid muscle; DM, digastric muscle; internal carotid artery (arrow)

The swelling of the superficial soft tissues and muscles due to the acute inflammatory process may evolve in the long term to fibrosis with subsequent induration and functional impairment (Fig. 9) [20, 21].

Fig. 9
figure9

Fibrosis of the left true vocal fold (arrow) in a 60-year-old man 3 years after ChT/RT for laryngeal cancer. Coronal T2-weighted MR image acquired with surface-coil MRI of the larynx shows hypointense signal of the left true vocal fold. TC, thyroid cartilage; CC, cricoid cartilage; FVF, false vocal fold; TVF, true vocal fold

High radiation doses and large radiation fields, as well as persistent smoking habits and alcohol abuse, may facilitate the onset of uncommon post-RT complications [21].

  • Mucosal necrosis: most necroses occur within the first 2 years post-RT, with a peak between 6 and 12 months [21]. On cross-sectional imaging, mucosal necrosis should be suspected when mucosal enhancement is absent; superficial ulceration can also be associated. Gas pockets are frequently seen around the necrotic area [21, 22].

  • Osteoradionecrosis: it usually occurs 1–3 years post-RT, with a reported incidence between 0% and 37.5% [21]. The most affected site is the mandible, probably due to a relatively limited vascularization and superficial location. The most frequent bone abnormalities revealed by CT are interruptions of the cortical margins and loss of trabeculation of the spongiosa, commonly associated with pathological fractures. Soft tissue swelling and enhancement (sometimes with gas bubbles) can be seen both on CT and MRI surrounding the site of osteonecrosis. MRI shows also bone marrow signal changes with T1-hypointense, heterogeneous slightly T2-hyperintense areas, and strong and inhomogeneous contrast enhancement (Fig. 10) [20, 21, 23].

  • Chondronecrosis: it is usually consequent to post-treatment infectious perichondritis and may lead to cartilage fragmentation and intraluminal collapse. In laryngeal necrosis, cartilaginous abnormalities are visible on CT often with laryngeal soft tissues swelling and possible fluid and gas bubbles surrounding the cartilage itself. On MRI, it is revealed by T1 hypointensity and inhomogeneous gadolinium enhancement of the medullary space of ossified cartilage; the cortical rim shows irregular borders and focal fractures. Inflammatory changes of the surrounding soft tissues are common (Fig. 11) [20].

  • Vascular complications: accelerated atherosclerosis of the carotid arteries is a well-known effect of radiation which often complicates preexisting vascular disease. Pseudoaneurysm formation of the internal carotid artery is a life-threatening but rare complication. Thrombosis of the internal jugular vein may also occur [21].

  • Trismus: it is most likely related to pterygoid muscle and temporomandibular joint fibrosis, with a peak at 12–18 months post-RT. MRI shows T2 hyperintense downsized muscles with enhancement characterized by a linear edge corresponding to the radiation field [20].

  • Radiation-induced neoplasms: they arise within the radiation field at least 3 years after RT, with a different histology compared to the primary tumor [24]. Most frequent malignancies are squamous cell carcinomas, thyroid tumors, sarcomas, and lymphomas.

Fig. 10
figure10

Osteoradionecrosis of the right ramus of the mandible in a 70-year-old woman 4 years after ChT/RT for a right palatine tonsil cancer. Axial CT image (a) shows the loss of spongiosa trabeculation and several cortical breakings (black arrowheads) of the right ramus of the mandible. The corresponding MR slice of the same area (white arrowheads) shows heterogeneous and slightly hyperintense signal on axial T2-weighted (b), with low signal on axial T1-weighted (c), and subtle but diffuse enhancement in the bone and adjacent soft tissues, like the right masseter muscle (asterisk), in post-contrast axial T1-weighted image (d). M, mandible; T, tongue

Fig. 11
figure11

Laryngeal necrosis in an 88-year-old man five months after RT for a right glottic-supraglottic cancer. Surface-coil MRI of the larynx: pre-treatment axial T2-weighted (a), T1-weighted (b) and post-contrast 3D GRE fat-sat T1-weighted (c) MR images show a lesion of the right vocal fold (circle). Post-treatment axial T2-weighted (d), T1-weighted (e) and post-contrast 3D GRE fat-sat T1-weighted (f) show extensive necrosis of the right true vocal fold, anterior commissure and right lamina of the thyroid cartilage (asterisk); the right arytenoid cartilage is not recognizable. Cartilage fragmentation is pointed by the bold white arrow. TC, thyroid cartilage, AC, arytenoid cartilage

Lung

Radiation-induced lung injury (RILI) is a well-known event after RT for lung and breast cancer. In this setting, hypofractioned RT has shown to be effective and better tolerated treatment approach in lung cancer patients not suitable of concurrent RT/ChT [25, 26]. Several cellular and molecular changes occur in lung tissue after RT, with inflammatory cells infiltration and production of reactive nitrogen and oxygen species that determine oxidative damage of DNA and epithelial cell death leading to RILI [27, 28]. RILI is a significant cause of reduced quality of life in cancer survivors and presents with two distinct clinical phases: early (< 6 months) reversible adverse effects in the form of pneumonitis and late adverse fibrotic effects [29, 30]. Early CT changes include diffuse consolidation, patchy consolidation, diffuse ground-glass opacities (GGOs), patchy GGO, or no evidence of increasing density. Concerning late fibrotic changes, four categories of CT features may be observed: modified conventional pattern of fibrosis (consolidation, volume loss, bronchiectasis ± GGO), mass-like fibrosis (well-circumscribed focal consolidation limited to the tumor region but which is larger than the original tumor), scar-like fibrosis (a linear opacity in the tumor region with associated volume loss), or no evidence of increasing density [27]. A particular form of RILI is radiation-induced bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia, a clinico-pathological entity in the wide family of pulmonary fibrosis characterized by patchy and often migratory peripheral air space infiltrates of the lungs outside of the radiation field, unlike radiation pneumonitis [31].

ChT agents may induce lung injury by various mechanisms including direct toxic effect on the lung, immunologic response, and increase in capillary permeability. Timing of clinical manifestations is variable ranging from early onset to years after the beginning of ChT [32]. Further, there is no consensus on the duration of therapy-induced changes, which is extremely variable. Remission can be reached with dose reduction, drug withdrawal and associated administration of steroids, with evidence suggesting relapse if steroids are stopped early (within 3 months of onset) [32]. Notably, ChT-induced effects are not related with the duration of treatment, but these are frequently dose related. Patients with impaired renal function may experience increased drug accumulation and are at risk of increased lung toxicity. Conversely, hypersensitivity-type reactions are frequently dose independent. ChT-induced lung disease can present with interstitial pneumonitis/fibrosis and cryptogenic organizing pneumonia, hypersensitivity syndrome, hemorrhage, and capillary leak syndrome [33]; less common findings are pleural effusions, bronchospasm, hilar adenopathy, and veno-occlusive disease [34]. Capillary leak syndrome is characterized by an increase in vascular permeability, causing extravasation of fluids and proteins from capillary vessels into the soft tissues and resulting in interstitial edema. Capillary leak syndrome, and in general non-cardiogenic pulmonary edema due to lung toxiticy, is characterized by the presence of severe hypoxemia, bilateral alveolar infiltrates, GGOs, thickened septal lines, often with no pleural effusion and no evidence of left atrial hypertension/congestive heart failure [35].

Bevacizumab is among drugs that can induce lung hemorrhage, while gemcitabine and immune-mediated therapies such as interleukin 2 and interferon may lead to ARDS or noncardiogenic pulmonary edema [33]. Nevertheless, bleomycin must be mentioned among the most important ChT agents that induce lung disease; several radiologic patterns have been associated with this drug including cryptogenic organizing pneumonia, eosinophilic hypersensitivity, and interstitial pneumonitis [33]. Radiologists need to know imaging features of RILI and ChT-induced lung disease given that early detection of these conditions may be crucial to reduce the extent of lung damage. Figure 12 shows some examples of ChT/RT-related lung toxicity.

Fig. 12
figure12

Axial CT images of different cases of ChT/RT-related lung toxicity. a shows acute pneumonitis after the first administration of an anti-PD-1 target immunotherapic agent (Pembrolizumab) in a patient with right lung cancer. Also Nivolumab (another anti-PD-1 agent) can cause lung adverse disease with interstitial pneumonitis presenting with organizing pneumonia pattern, as shown in (b, c). An example of radiation-primed cryptogenic organizing pneumonia is reported in (d), which shows the so-called “reverse halo sign” or “atoll sign” in the left lower lobe after RT for breast cancer. e Shows acute and diffuse alveolar hemorrhage in a patient with NSCLC treated with Bevacizumab, with bilateral GGOs caused by blood filling alveolar spaces. Acute lung edema with bilateral smooth lobular septal thickening and GGOs in a patient treated with IL-2 is shown in (f)

Cardiac

Cardiotoxicity is one of the greatest challenges in the management of oncology patients, as it can compromise the success of treatment. Current RT techniques allow for focused radiation beams, sparing organs at risk thereby minimizing direct cardiac dose, with subsequent reduction of RT-related cardiac complications [36, 37]. Unfortunately, adverse events associated to ChT have been recorded not only with older ChT drugs (e.g., anthracyclines), but also with recently introduced immunotherapies and targeted therapies. In Table 2 the most frequent imaging scenarios of myocardial injury related to RT and ChT toxicity are summarized.

Table 2 Most common RT and ChT-induced myocardial damage

RT was found to induce endothelial dysfunction causing microvascular disease. Indeed, preclinical studies showed that RT-induced endothelial dysfunction determined microvascular damage with reduced capillary density and ischemia, which led to subsequent inflammation, cardiomyocyte loss, fibrosis, and ventricular dysfunction [36]. RT affects also the biological pathway of age-related atherosclerosis with an acceleration of atherosclerotic process. As a proof, Darby et al. [38] reported a close association between the mean heart dose and cardiac events with a significant increase of 7.4% in the rate of acute coronary events per 1 Gy. Further, older age at first RT resulted associated to higher risk of cardiac events and earlier onset [36].

Coronary-CT is the imaging of choice for coronary artery disease characterization and prognostication. In agreement with preclinical studies reporting an acceleration of atherosclerosis, the history of cancer and treatments has been markedly associated with increased coronary artery calcium scores compared to the general population in a 10-year follow-up study [39]. In line with this finding, elevated coronary artery calcium scores have been found after RT in Hodgkin’s lymphoma survivors, making coronary-CT and coronary artery calcium scores potential imaging tools to evaluate RT-related coronary artery disease [40]. As a matter of fact, mediastinal RT has shown to increase 6.8 times the risk of coronary artery abnormalities in Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients if compared to those not subjected to RT [41]. Moreover, high-dose chest RT was found to determine valve stenosis and constrictive pericarditis, which are late sequalae that become clinically evident 10–20 years after RT. Indeed, valve stenosis has been reported in 5–32% patients treated for Hodgkin lymphoma and can be noninvasively assessed also through imaging [42].

The spectrum of ChT-related cardiac complications is wide and differ depending on the drug, all of them leading to ventricular dysfunction. Pathological cardiac abnormalities due to cancer treatments include: (i) accelerated atherosclerosis related to hormone therapy; (ii) mitochondrial dysfunction with cell death and fibrosis due to anthracycline; (iii) coronary artery disease, ischemia, thrombosis and hypertension due to vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor, tyrosine kinase inhibitors and antimetabolites; and (iv) myocarditis with cardiogenic shock and life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias due to ICIs [43]. Given that the effect of ChT-induced myocardial injury mostly converge in ventricular dysfunction and heart failure, current guidelines for surveillance and detection of cardiotoxicity recommended monitoring cardiac function before, during and after treatment with the estimation of three-dimensional ejection fraction and global longitudinal strain [43]. Three-dimensional echocardiography is the first line imaging choice to assess ejection fraction and volumes with good accuracy and reliability, wide availability, cost-effectiveness and lack of radiation exposure. However, preserved ejection fraction does not exclude significant myocardial injury. For this reason, noninvasive imaging biomarkers to improve early detection of cardiotoxicity have been recently investigated [43,44,45]. Cardiac MRI is the non-invasive gold standard for morpho-functional myocardial characterization, being able to provide accurate volume and function estimation and information about tissue inflammation/edema and fibrosis, therefore improving the detection of cardiotoxicity over conventional functional assessment. Cardiac MRI can identify ChT-related microstructural changes including myocyte loss through the estimation of the intracellular and extracellular volume fraction. In particular, extracellular volume fraction resulted able to depict drug-induced extracellular matrix remodeling and edema. Indeed, extracellular volume fraction is sensitive to extracellular volume expansions related to edema in acute stages or diffuse fibrosis in later stages. These findings have the potential to improve clinical management of oncology patients, helping to detect cardiac damage in reversible stage. Nevertheless, the routine use of cardiac MRI is not currently recommended due to limited availability and high cost. The only exception is for patients receiving ICIs therapy in order to exclude treatment-related myocarditis (Fig. 13) [43], which is relatively uncommon (< 1%), but potentially life threatening (approximately 40% of death rate)[45].

Fig. 13
figure13

Myocarditis associated to immune checkpoint inhibitor in a patient with lung cancer. A 67-year-old man with advanced lung adenocarcinoma (stage IIIB) was initially treated with ChT/RT. Axial CT image (a) showing right lung RT-related changes around the primitive cancer (arrow). Due to an incomplete response, treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitor was administered. The patient attended was admitted four months later at the emergency department for acute dyspnea associated to increased high sensitive troponin T (113 ng/L; normal value < 14 ng/L). Cardiac MR showed a left ventricle with normal volume (83 mL/m2) but with a slight depression of the ejection fraction (47%) associated to a diffuse hyperintensity on STIR image and increased T2-ratio (b) suggestive for diffuse edema and a shadowed late gadolinium enhancement in the inferior wall with non-ischemic pattern. MR findings indicated active myocarditis which was confirmed at endomyocardial biopsy

Liver

ChT, RT, or their combination may cause liver injury related to both a direct hepatic toxicity and a non-hepatic toxicity due to an altered hepatic clearance.

ChT has been widely used for years in the management of primary or secondary liver tumors. The different mechanisms of action of ChT may result in a broad spectrum of clinical, pathological and radiological hepatic injuries, including diffuse and/or focal hepatopathy, such as acute or chronic hepatitis, steatosis, fibrosis, pseudocirrhosis, sinusoidal changes (i.e., sinusoidal obstruction syndrome [SOS], centrilobular sinusoidal dilatation or peliosis) and nodular hyperplasia (Fig. 14) (i.e., nodular regenerative hyperplasia or FNH-like lesions). The main ChT-induced hepatopathy with corresponding CT and MRI findings are presented in Table 3 [46]. Acute hepatocellular injury does not have specific imaging findings, and it is hypothesized that it may be detected during the hepatobiliary phase as impaired hepatocellular uptake of gadoxetate disodium. Chronic hepatocellular injury may lead to focal or diffuse morphological changes, such as confluent fibrosis and pseudocirrhosis, respectively. Imaging detection of pseudocirrhosis following ChT with severe portal hypertension may lead to interruption or change of the ChT drug to avoid major complications. ChT-induced steatosis and SOS (Fig. 15) are amongst the most common occurring in about 47% and 77.4% of patients, respectively [47, 48]. Steatosis may be easily depicted on cross-sectional imaging as low attenuation of liver parenchyma on CT (Fig. 16) (i.e. liver attenuation lower than 40 HU or liver attenuation lower than 10 HU as compared to the spleen) or signal loss in the opposed phase as compared to the in-phase images on MRI. The diagnosis of SOS includes indirect signs related to reduced liver outflow and portal hypertension (e.g. ascites, gallbladder wall thickening, splenomegaly) as well as a direct demonstration of patchy liver enhancement with a mosaic appearance mainly at the periphery of the right lobe on contrast-enhanced CT and MRI and reticular hypointensity on hepatobiliary phase at gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI [46]. Less frequently, SOS may be focal and thus its hypointensity on hepatobiliary phase may mimic a metastasis; however, focal SOS lacks diffusion restriction on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), which is helpful for the differential diagnosis with metastases [46]. Post-ChT occurrence of FNH-like lesions deserves also attention because the strong arterial phase hyperenhancement of these lesions and their appearance on CT/MRI performed during follow-up in oncology patients may induce to a false diagnosis of metastasis. However, the typical iso- to hyperintensity or doughnut-like appearance of FNH-like lesions in the MRI hepatobiliary phase allows a confident diagnosis [49]; more recently, MR elastography has proved to be even more accurate than DWI for differentiating benign and malignant focal liver lesions [50], and, therefore it may be considered to improve a non-invasive differential diagnosis. Finally, it is also known that ChT-induced liver steatosis may prevent the detection of liver metastases on CT [46].

Fig. 14
figure14

59-year-old woman with history of hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and segmental resection of distal left ureter for uterine leiomyosarcoma, and tumor relapse at first CT follow-up after 3 months from surgery and then treated with chemotherapy (doxurubicine-dacarbazine). Precontrast CT at 3 months after chemotherapy shows low attenuation of the liver parenchyma with an absolute value of 8 HU, consistent with post-ChT steatosis

Table 3 Most common ChT-induced parenchymal and vascular hepatic changes
Fig. 15
figure15

64-year-old man with history of left hemicolectomy for colon carcinoma and liver metastases treated with oxaliplatin. Contrast enhanced CT on precontrast (a), portal venous (b) and delayed (c) phases demonstrates a patchy liver enhancement with a mosaic appearance on portal venous phase, mainly in the periphery of the right lobe, with normal parenchymal enhancement on subsequent delayed phase. These findings are consistent with oxaliplatin-induced sinusoidal obstruction syndrome in its diffuse form

Fig. 16
figure16

44-year-old woman with breast cancer and liver metastasis treated with chemotherapy. Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI shows a 7 mm regenerative nodule (white arrow) that is not visible in the arterial phase (a), and shows contrast retention in the hepatobiliary phase (b). In the same patient a liver metastasis (black arrow) shows peripheral rim enhancement in the hepatic arterial phase (a) and a target appearance in the hepatobiliary phase (b) with central hyperintensity due to contrast retention and a peripheral hypointense rim

The adoption of RT for liver lesions has been limited for years as a result of normal tissue tolerance concerns. However, in the last decade, modern RT regimens, including stereotactic body RT and yttrium 90 transarterial radioembolization, have attracted increasing attention as therapeutic option for various liver malignancies [51,52,53]. However, in addition to the desired effect on tumors, RT exposes to a variable radiation dose and may lead to focal or diffuse changes on healthy liver parenchyma known as radiation-induced liver disease in case of external radiation or radioembolization-induced liver disease in patients treated with radioembolization [51, 52, 54]. Radiation-induced liver disease from external RT is characterized by symptomatic ascites and elevated liver enzymes but not bilirubin, while radioembolization-induced liver disease presents with ascites, non-elevated transaminases (except for ALP and GGPT), and significant bilirubin increase [55]. Liver changes due to RT-related injury may occur during, within a few weeks or after months or years from RT; it is mainly caused by a veno-occlusive damage due to obliteration of the central vein lumina by erythrocytes with subsequent vascular congestion. In addition, hepatic stellate cells are radiosensitive and their activation after RT may contribute to subsequent development of hepatic fibrosis. As such, common post-treatment imaging findings after RT are peritumoral edema, inflammation, ring enhancement, hepatic fibrosis, and capsular retraction [56]. Peritumoral edema and inflammation are usually the earliest encountered changes after RT and may lead to an apparent increase in tumor lesion size, which could be misinterpreted as progression. As such, in case of transarterial radioembolization, it is recommended to perform tumor response evaluation at least after 3 months from treatment [56]. In regard of the ring enhancement, it is described as a thin rim of enhancement surrounding the treated lesion and it may occur after either stereotactic body RT or yttrium 90 transarterial radioembolization; it is important to know its occurrence as a potential post-treatment change because it may occasionally simulate tumor progression (Fig. 17) [51, 55, 56]. RT may also lead to complications in the nearby organs and structures (e.e. cholecystitis, radiation pneumonitis, RT-induced enteritis) that can be also detected at cross-sectional imaging.

Fig. 17
figure17

65-year-old woman with viral cirrhosis and hepatocarcinoma previously treated with transarterial embolization with post-treatment persistence of viable tumor (LR-TR viable), then submitted to stereotactic body RT with radiation dose of 40 Gy in 5 fractions. a Contrast-enhanced MRI performed before stereotactic body RT shows the hypervascular HCC (arrow) on arterial phase. b Contrast-enhanced MRI performed two months after treatment showed a size increase of the lesion with reduced enhancement in the central area. c Contrast-enhanced MRI performed four months after stereotactic body RT shows an ill-defined peritumoral enhancement consistent with radiation induced liver disease, that prevents from adequate assessment of tumor margins; the lesion itself shows greater central hypointense area with peripheral enhancement. d Contrast-enhanced CT performed 6 months after stereotactic body RT shows a markedly reduced enhancement of the tumor, as well as reduction of peritumoral enhancement. Therefore, the tumor increase in size in the first follow-up at 2 months was not a true progressive disease and was likely related to RT-related changes. Case courtesy of Dr. Daniele Marin, Duke University Medical Center, Durham (NC), USA

Knowledge of the typical imaging appearance of imaging features of ChT/RT associated liver damage is therefore fundamental for adequate post-treatment CT/MRI interpretation and to guide hepatologists and oncologists towards the best patient management.

Pancreas

Clinical and radiological manifestations of pancreatic toxicity during systemic ChT and abdominal RT range from asymptomatic increase in blood pancreatic enzymes levels, to acute pancreatitis (AP) or parenchymal atrophy with exocrine insufficiency. In addition, ChT/RT for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) may induce changes in peri-pancreatic tissues, particularly at the interface between tumor mass and peri-pancreatic vessels. While asymptomatic increase in serum levels of pancreatic enzymes have been found in up to 30–56% of patients treated with sunitinib and sorafenib, ChT-related AP seems to be much less frequent, although its true incidence is unknown, as the causal relationship between the drug and AP may be difficult to determine [57]. Several drugs can induce AP: all-trans retinoic acids, cytarabine, and L-asparaginase used to treat leukemia, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors, ICIs and drugs like gemcitabine and capecitabine, which are commonly used in PDAC treatment [10, 57]. It has been postulated that capecitabine- and pazopanib-induced hypertriglyceridemia may lead to AP [57]; other factors that can contribute to AP can be a direct toxic effect, an allergic reaction or immune-related events. In general, imaging findings of ChT-associated AP do not differ from their non-drug-induced counterparts: enlargement of the pancreas, decreased parenchymal enhancement, peripancreatic fat stranding, fluid collections, and, in severe forms, intra- and peri-pancreatic necrosis.

Pancreatic atrophy is associated with long-term use of sunitinib and sorafenib [10, 57, 58]. Also ICIs can induce irreversible pancreatic atrophy that can lead to exocrine pancreatic insufficiency [59]. Imaging features are comparable to the fibrous-fatty involution commonly seen in elderly: parenchymal thinning with increased peripheral lobulations, change in the parenchymal appearance (hyperechoic at ultrasound, hypodense at CT, and hypointense on T1-weighted MRI), and delayed peak of parenchymal enhancement (Fig. 18).

Fig. 18
figure18

Pancreatic atrophy in a 50-year-old man with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Baseline axial CT scan show mild fatty infiltration of the pancreatic parenchyma (a). Axial CT scan performed after 2 years of sunitinib treatment (b) shows advanced pancreatic atrophy with the decrease in size of the pancreatic body/tail, fatty-fibrous replacement, increased lobular appearance of the gland and decreased attenuation

RT is a known potential cause of bowel damage and chronic pancreatitis. Stereotactic body RT has gained particular interest over recent years, as—compared to conventional RT—it maximizes the therapeutic window by delivering ablative doses to the tumor area, including the peripancreatic vessels, reducing the dose to neighboring organs, such as duodenum, stomach and intestine. Nevertheless, early and late bowel toxicities have been reported also after stereotactic body RT, including stricture, obstruction, ulceration, bleeding, and perforation [60].

One of the most important drawbacks of neoadjuvant ChT-RT for PDAC is that these treatments may induce the development of fibrosis as well as local and regional edema consequent to lymphatic congestion, that result in persistent thickening of the perivascular fat, which may be misinterpreted as persistent vascular invasion (Fig. 19). Indeed, previous studies showed that these “perivascular cuffs” are not correlated to the resection margin status, and that lead to underestimate the radiological evaluation of PDAC resectability after neoadjuvant therapy.

Fig. 19
figure19

Effects of neoadjuvant ChT/RT in a 63-year-old male with pancreatic body ductal adenocarcinoma. Baseline CT scan (a) shows a hypodense lesion consistent with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in the pancreatic body infiltrating the splenic artery (arrow); concurrent infiltration of the celiac trunk and the splenic vein was present. In the CT scan (b) performed after neoadjuvant ChT/RT (FOLFIRINOX + stereotactic body RT), the tumor mass was slightly reduced in size, but persistent soft-tissue attenuation was present around the splenic artery (“perivascular cuff”—arrow). The patient underwent surgical exploration with successful distal pancreatectomy and celiac artery resection (Appleby procedure); pathological examination of the resection specimen showed absence of residual disease, negative resection margins, and fibrosis around the splenic artery

Gastrointestinal

The gastrointestinal (GI) system is frequently affected by ChT/RT-induced toxicity because of the rapid turnover of enteric epithelium.

Acute esophageal toxicity may occur during or immediately after irradiation of the thorax and usually resolves within 4–6 weeks [61]. Clinically, the most common symptoms include dysphagia, odynophagia and chest pain [61, 62]. Late toxicity may also occur within months to years from thoracic irradiation, with paucisymptomatic course or onset of dysphagia due to fibrotic stenoses [63]. In acute phase, impaired esophageal peristalsis is commonly found at fluoroscopy usually 4–12 weeks after RT, while post-actinic fibrotic strictures with smooth and long stenotic segments with tapered margins usually occur with a median onset of 6 months from irradiation [62]. More rarely, chronic ulcerations, intermittent esophageal spasms, bleeding, perforation and/or fistulation may also occur [61, 63]. At CT, symmetric thickening of the esophageal walls can be appreciated in both early and late toxicity [62]. Along with the esophagus, even stomach and duodenum may be injured after RT. Gastric and duodenal ulcerations may be found, as well as impaired peristalsis of the antro-pyloric region, lumen abnormalities and narrowing [64]. Occasionally, nonspecific thickening of the gastric walls with stranding of the perivisceral fat may be evidenced on CT [64].

In the lower GI tract, the small bowel is more susceptible to RT-induced injuries due to its rapid cellular turnover, with the rectum being the least radio-sensitive part [9]. Acute intestinal toxicity presents with diarrhea, while malabsorption is the main clinical feature in chronic enteropathy [9]. In the first days/weeks after RT, small bowel dilation with submucosal edematous thickening and mucosal enhancement after contrast injection are observed at cross sectional imaging [9, 65]. In chronic phase, the bowel loops are tethered with altered motility. Fibrotic strictures may lead to small bowel obstruction and, sometimes, fistulae can be identified [9, 64, 66]. At fluoroscopy, the small bowel loops are thickened with altered peristalsis and straightening of the mucosal folds, while the large bowel shows a reduced distensibility with strictures and widening of the pre-sacral space. Mucosal ulceration, pseudo-polypoid protrusions, or contour irregularities can also be found [64]. The same findings may be detected by CT and MRI, which are essential to identify fistulae [64].

GI toxicity is frequently observed also after ChT [67]. Enteritis is often diffuse or prevailing in the distal ileum, while gastritis and duodenitis are less common (Fig. 20). Clinical picture includes abdominal pain, bloating and diarrhea [33]. CT shows the typical “target sign”, characterized by hyper-enhancement of mucosal and serosal layers of the bowel loops with regular thickening and edema of the submucosa. This sign is reliable in differentiating benign conditions from irregular neoplastic thickening of GI walls. Nevertheless, several benign disorders can present this sign and cannot be differentiated on the basis of this imaging feature, including ChT/RT-induced enteritis, ischemic bowel disease, crohn/ulcerative colitis, intramural bowel hemorrhage, and intestinal infections [68]. Bowel loops dilation with air-fluid levels are also common findings, with ileus as a potential complication particularly after treatment with vinca alkaloids [33]. Bleeding and bowel perforation are infrequent toxicities of some anti–VEGFR antagonists such as bevacizumab. In the setting of severe ChT-induced immunosuppression, neutropenic enterocolitis may occur with intramural bacterial invasion and manifestations ranging from mucosal inflammation to transmural wall necrosis. The cecum and the right colon are the most common sites involved in this condition [33]. Further, pneumatosis intestinalis may occur in patients treated with classic ChT agents as well as with Bevacizumab [33]. It is characterized by the presence of gas along the bowel wall with subserosal or submucosal location due to the disruption in mucosal integrity.

Fig. 20
figure20

Gastritis due to checkpoint inhibitor therapy (Nivolumab). CT scans in arterial (a) and venous (b) phase showing linear enhancement of the gastric mucosa and diffuse, marked edematous thickening of the submucosal layer, more evident in the prepiloric area with concentric stenosis of the antral lumen. Moderate perigastric fat stranding is appreciable. The stenotic visceral segment is confirmed at barium fluoroscopy (c, d), however the passage of the contrast medium at the level of duodenum and small intestine is allowed

Gynecologic

ChT is used as adjuvant treatment after surgery in advanced ovarian and endometrial cancers, whereas adjuvant RT is used for node positive cervical cancer and endometrial carcinoma extending beyond the myometrium. Primary ChT/RT is used for FIGO stage II-IV cervical cancer [69, 70]. In this scenario, paraphysiological imaging changes of normal gynecologic organs induced by treatment should be distinguished by complications and disease recurrence, with MRI being the most suitable diagnostic modality for this task [69, 71]. About 6 months after pelvic ChT/RT, the uterus reduces in volume and endometrium becomes thin with loss of the distinction between junctional zone and myometrium. Cervical stroma shows low signal intensity on T2-weighted MR images. Also the ovaries reduce in volume and signal with loss of follicular activity [72].

Response to treatment is assessed on the basis of reduction in tumor size and physiological reconstitution of uterine anatomical subdivision and homogeneous low signal intensity of cervical stroma; in addition, DWI may be helpful in distinguishing between residual disease and inflammatory tissue, since the latter does not demonstrate restricted pattern of diffusion [73].

Considering the most frequent complications of RT, cervical stenosis must be taken into account in the acute phase (3–6 months). The resulting obstruction can lead to fluid accumulation in the uterus, causing hematometra with subsequent infection and pyometrium. Fistulas are another fearsome late complication of RT, mostly occurring between bladder and vagina or rectum. Fistulous tracts are well identified on heavily T2-sequences, but contrast medium administration may help to highlight a recurrent disease (Fig. 21) [70].

Fig. 21
figure21

A 52-year-old woman with a FIGO IIa cervical cancer (arrow in a) treated with external beam RT and ChT, followed by high dose rate brachytherapy boost in July 2017. In December 2017 (b) sagittal T2-weighted image showed an almost normal reconstitution of hypointense cervical stroma. Axial T2-weighted MRI follow-up in April 2018 showed a fistulous tract (arrowhead in c) of the right-posterior vaginal wall at the level of fornix, that blinded-ended in correspondence of piriformis muscle. Axial post-contrast fat-suppressed T1-weighted images (d, e) showed better the fistulous tract (arrowhead in d) and irregular enhanced thickening of vaginal wall (arrows in d, e), extended to cervix, which raised a strong suspicion of disease recurrence. Axial CT image performed on September 2018 showed progressive disease since the pathologic tissue infiltrated pelvic side wall, rectum and bladder (respectively arrow, arrowhead and empty arrow in f)

Urinary and prostate

ChT/RT effects on urinary system and prostate are relatively common and the diagnosis is usually based on clinical and histological data. Imaging has a well-established role in the diagnostic work-up of tumors of the urinary system [74, 75], but it is not routinely used to reach the diagnosis of ChT/RT-related kidney injury. A common ChT-related damage is acute kidney injury (AKI), affecting around 20% of cancer patients in the first year of disease [76]. Traditional ChT and emerging target therapies can induce kidney microvascular, tubular and/or glomerular acute impairment that may result in interstitial fibrosis, chronic kidney disease (CKD) and dialysis. MRI has been proposed to early detect AKI [77, 78]. Dong et al. tested the ability of arterial spin labeling perfusion technique reporting significantly reduced perfusion in AKI patients both in cortex and medullary [77]. Li et al. [78] proposed blood oxygenation level-dependent functional MRI to identify tissue hypoxia, one of the leading causes of chronic disease development, reporting significant reduction of blood oxygen in renal cortex of CKD patients. However, the reference standard for interstitial fibrosis and CKD diagnosis is currently kidney biopsy, while US is used as initial Imaging method for cortex thickness assessment.

Pelvic RT could induce both acute and late adverse events on prostate and bladder [79, 80]. The main injury of bladder is hemorrhagic cystitis, which is diagnosed on the basis of clinical data and exclusion of other causes, with imaging being used to rule out other causes of hematuria and urinary symptoms [81]. Further, in chronic phase bladder becomes poorly distensible due to fibrosis. Ureters are less affected by pelvic RT, although their involvement may determine stricture and should be considered when dealing with hydronephrosis without obstructing calculi.

RT is a common therapeutic choice in prostate cancer, it can be performed by external beam RT or brachytherapy [82,83,84,85]. RT may induce physiological changes that must be correctly interpreted given that they can hinder tumor detection as well as mimic tumor recurrence. After RT, prostate demonstrates atrophy and diffuse low T2 signal, with loss of normal zonal anatomy (Fig. 22). Moreover, irregularity and stranding of periprostatic fat and atrophy of seminal vesicles can be detected. Therefore, DWI and dynamic contrast enhanced imaging are essential to detect recurrence, showing low ADC value and hypervascularity of recurrence, while high ADC value and slow enhancement in normal fibrotic tissue. After prostatic RT, urethral stricture is a common complication. In particular, until 9% of men after brachytherapy and 13% after external beam RT will develop stenosis [86]. Generally, urethral stricture affects the bulbomembranous urethra (> 90% of cases), while the intraprostatic urethra is less commonly involved even if it receives higher doses of ionizing radiations during RT. In this setting, retrograde cystourethrography and voiding cystourethrography are the most accurate techniques to detect urethral stricture (Fig. 23) [86].

Fig. 22
figure22

Follow-up MRI scan performed by a 67-year-old man with low-risk prostate cancer 12 months after external beam RT. Axial T2-weighted image shows the loss of zonal differentiation of the prostate

Fig. 23
figure23

Urinary disorders in a 72-year-old man after pelvic RT due to prostate cancer. Retrograde cystourethrogram, oblique view, shows dilatation of the membranous urethra (white arrow) due to a long stenosis of the bulbar segment (black arrow)

Spleen and lymph nodes

Systemic ChT and RT targeted to neighboring abdominal tumors may determine changes in splenic appearance that radiologists should take into account. These findings might be both expected effects without clinical impact and complications with non-negligible clinical relevance. Splenomegaly has been reported in association with some ChT protocols. In particular, splenic enlargement can be observed in 50%-87.9% colon cancer patients treated with oxaliplatin-based ChT with 31% median change of spleen size [87]. This finding seems to be a surrogate of oxaliplatin-induced SOS, above mentioned among ChT-induced liver injuries, that can be complicated by thrombocytopenia, which has been confirmed to be higher in colon cancer patients treated by oxaliplatinum and developing splenomegaly after ChT [87]. Thus, this imaging feature encountered in follow-up imaging examinations of oncology patients may be a warning sign in terms of developing SOS. Notably, a previous study has shown that bevacizumab administration in addition to oxaliplatin-based ChT may avoid splenic enlargement, leading the authors to consider the inhibition of splenomegaly as a potential indicator of the protective effect of bevacizumab against SOS induced by oxaliplatin in colon cancer patients [88]. Indeed, patients treated with oxaliplatin only and those treated with oxaliplatin + bevacizumab had 39.1% vs. 2.3% increase of splenic volume and 50% versus 16% incidence of moderate/severe SOS, respectively [88]. If on one hand splenic enlargement may be a side effect of ChT, on the other unintended irradiation of the spleen during RT performed for neighboring malignant tumors may lead to global or segmental splenic atrophy and calcific deposits in splenic parenchyma [64].

Concerning lymph nodes, these are common locations of metastases of solid tumors and lymphoproliferative disorders. Thus, increased size and morphology changes of lymph nodes are always considered as a wake-up call when encountered in follow-up imaging examinations performed on oncology patients. Nevertheless, the enlargement of benign lymph nodes may occur in oncology patients subjected to ChT. Hayashi et al. [89] reported the high incidence of early enlargement of benign lymph nodes after ChT/RT in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, accounting for more than 50% of all enlarged lymph nodes identified on follow-up CT examinations. In most patients (83%), benign lymph nodes enlargements showed no pathologic FDG uptake on PET/CT. Further, these lymph nodes presented decrease or no further changes in size at subsequent follow-up CT scans.

Regarding RT of normal or pathologic lymph nodes, a well-known complication is lymphedema related to scarring that interferes with lymphatics functions leading to lymphatic swelling [90, 91]. It starts 2–3 months after initiation of RT and can be highly disabling determining edema and fibrosis of skin/soft tissues and deep structures (e.g. pharyngeal and laryngeal mucosa in HN tumors)[90]. Another possible complication is infection with occurrence of lymph nodal abscess. The diagnostic task of radiologists is to differentiate necrotic neoplastic lymph nodes from abscesses. Indeed, both present fluid content and enhancing peripheral solid tissue on contrast-enhanced CT and MRI. However, DWI can be helpful allowing to distinguish the necrotic core of metastatic lymph nodes (with high ADC values) from the purulent content of suppurative lymphadenitis (with low ADC values) (Fig. 24) [92].

Fig. 24
figure24

A 62-year-old female patient with pain and swelling in the left side of the neck, fever, and history of larynx cancer treated with RT. Axial high b-value (b = 1000) DWI (a), ADC map (b), and post-contrast gradient-echo fat-suppressed T1-weighted (c) images show an enlarged left laterocervical lymph node (arrows), with very low ADC values (b) and no contrast enhancement (c) due to the purulent content of suppurative lymphadenitis

Bone and soft tissues

In the mature skeleton radiations primarily damage the osteoblasts leading to reduced bone matrix production, with unaffected osteoclasts resorption activity, and resulting in progressive osteopenia, coarse trabeculae formation and sclerotic focal areas, which may be radiographically detected after 1 year [93]. Radiations interfere with chondrogenesis in the immature skeleton, with epiphyseal chondrocytes being extremely radiosensitive. On imaging, changes may be seen as metaphyseal sclerosis, widening and fraying of growth plates, that may take up to 6 months to appear. Varus/valgus deformities are reported as pediatric irradiation sequelae, together with limb shortening; the younger is the subject, the greater is the growth impact [93]. Regardless the age, RT causes myeloid depletion due to the radiosensitivity of hematopoietic elements. This results (after 6–8 weeks) in the replacement of hematopoietic elements with adipocytes, with subsequent increase in T1 signal intensity due to fatty conversion (Fig. 25) [93, 94]. Indeed, bone signal depends on marrow cellularity, which is related to several factors including gender, inflammatory conditions, metabolic factors, and marrow activation that can be observed seen in some tumors [95]. Long-term effects of ChT include bone loss with the risk of developing osteoporosis related to traditional ChT agents (e.g. doxorubicin, carboplatin) and/or hormonal therapies. Reduced bone mass with subsequent increased risk of fracture may deserve bone mineral density assessment with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry [96, 97]. The ChT/RT-related weakening of bone segments may lead to insufficiency fractures, which are common sequelae of radiation osteitis, with sacrum and pelvic bones being the most involved sites (Fig. 26). The risk factors associated with insufficiency fractures are advanced age, post-menopausal state, osteoporosis and lower body mass index [70, 98, 99]. Sapienza and colleagues [100] analyzed 21 studies including 3929 patients treated by RT for gynecologic cancers and found that 14% developed insufficiency fractures. Interestingly, 40% of patients with fractures were asymptomatic; therefore post-treatment bone surveillance is warranted to prevent complications [100]. Another complication of both ChT and RT is osteonecrosis. The most common cause of osteonecrosis (10–30% of all cases) is the administration of high doses of corticosteroids, which are indeed included in several ChT regimens [101]. MRI is the imaging of choice for detecting osteonecrosis that presents as geographical areas bordered by a serpiginous T1-hypointense peripheral line, hyperintense on T2-weighted images with the typical “double line sign” consisting of inner bright line (granulation tissue) and outer dark line (sclerotic bone) observed on T2-weighted (Fig. 27) [102]. MRI is also essential to identify complications of osteonecrosis such as articular collapse, osteochondral fragmentations, fractures, and osteoarthritis. Of note, the risk of bone sarcoma secondary to RT is quite low (about 0.005%), with osteosarcoma being more than half of the cases [103]. According to most authors, secondary osteosarcomas have poorer prognosis than primary tumors due to high-grade of tumor, surgical difficulties, and reduced dose of RT that can be used in a previously irradiated field.

Fig. 25
figure25

A 46-year-old female patient with history of clear cell renal carcinoma. Sagittal T2-weighted (a), T1-weighted (b) and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (c) images of the lumbar spine at the level of L2 a bone metastasis previously treated by thermoablation and radiotherapy. Note the bone marrow signal intensity of the vertebral elements in D12-L4 within the irradiation field, due to medullary depletion and fatty replacement

Fig. 26
figure26

A 54-year-old woman, who underwent RT/ChT for cervical cancer, complained of low back pain 8 months after treatment completion. MRI exam with coronal oblique T1-weighted and fat suppressed T2-weighted images showed extensive bone marrow edema of the sacrum (arrows in a, b) due to insufficiency fractures clearly identified also by CT images (arrows in c, d)

Fig. 27
figure27

A 68-year-old man with Hodgkin Lymphoma treated with ChT (including high doses of corticosteroids) and atraumatic right hip pain. Coronal T1-weighted (a), coronal STIR (b), axial T1-weighted (c), axial T2-weighted (d), and axial proton density-weighted (e) images show geographical areas in both femurs with central fat signal, bordered by a serpiginous peripheral line, due to multifocal osteonecrosis (arrows). As a complication of osteonecrosis, a pathologic fracture of the neck of the right femur with bone marrow and perischeletric edema was identified (a, b). Also note the typical “double line sign” of the osteonecrotic area of the left femur head consisting of inner bright line (granulation tissue) and outer dark line (sclerotic bone) on axial T2-weighted image (d)

RT/ChT can have different effects on soft tissues, particularly on subcutaneous tissues, tendons, and muscles. Imaging findings of tissue changes are often non-specific and a significant overlap can be seen with degenerative and traumatic conditions. After RT, the typical finding is subcutaneous fibrosis of the treated area, with sclerosis and adhesions to underlying tissues. The effects of RT on tendons and ligaments are also characterized by progressive fibrosis with consequent loss of elasticity, shortening, and contracture [104].

Among the effects of drug therapies, it is well known the toxicity on tendons induced by quinolones antibiotics, especially involving the Achilles tendon [105]. Concerning drugs commonly included in ChT regimens, prolonged use of glucocorticoids is another recognized cause of drug-induced tendon degeneration and rupture. Among drug-induced myopathies, several ChT drugs may cause muscle weakness, myopathy, up to rhabdomyolysis in the most severe cases, including ifosfamide, gemcitabine/paclitaxel, cytarabine, doxorubicin, vincristine, mitoxantrone/cyclophosphamide, and cyclophosphamide [106]. Imaging findings are nonspecific, with MRI evidence of muscle edema, bilateral and symmetric muscles enlargement, particularly involving the buttocks and lower limbs.

Conclusions

ChT/RT-induced changes and complications may present with tricky imaging features that result in challenges in the interpretation of imaging follow-up exams. An accurate interpretation of these findings requires knowledge of therapeutic history, including ChT regimens and RT schemes. Indeed, newer biologic drugs and immunotherapies, as well as more effective and targeted RT, besides inducing tumor changes like pseudoprogression that are changing response criteria in clinical trials, have improved life expectancy of oncology patients thereby increasing the risk of long-term therapy-related side effects. Radiologists are tasked to distinguish expected findings from residual/relapse of tumors and to early identify therapy-related complications, which occasionally may be life-threatening conditions.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

AKI:

Acute kidney injury

AP:

Acute pancreatitis

ChT:

Chemotherapy

CKD:

Chronic kidney disease

GI:

Gastrointestinal

GGO:

Ground-glass opacity

HN:

Head and neck

ICIs:

Immune checkpoint inhibitors

PDAC:

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

RILI:

Radiation-induced lung injury

RT:

Radiotherapy

SOS:

Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome

VEGFR:

Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor

References

  1. 1.

    Le Tourneau C, Borcoman E, Kamal M (2019) Molecular profiling in precision medicine oncology. Nat Med 25:711–712. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-019-0442-2

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Badalamenti G, Messina C, De Luca I, Musso E, Casarin A, Incorvaia L (2019) Soft tissue sarcomas in the precision medicine era: new advances in clinical practice and future perspectives. Radiol Med 124:259–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-018-0883-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Kucha N, Soni TP, Jakhotia N et al (2020) A prospective, comparative analysis of acute toxicity profile between three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in locally advanced head and neck cancer patients. Cancer Treat Res Commun 25:100223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctarc.2020.100223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Albano D, Stecco A, Micci G et al (2021) Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) in oncology: an Italian survey. Radiol Med 126:299–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-020-01242-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Messina C, Bignone R, Bruno A et al (2020) Diffusion-weighted imaging in oncology: an update. Cancers (Basel) 12(6):1493 https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12061493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    García-Figueiras R, Baleato-González S, Padhani AR et al (2019) How clinical imaging can assess cancer biology. Insights Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-019-0703-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Sun NN, Ge XL, Liu XS, Xu LL (2020) Histogram analysis of DCE-MRI for chemoradiotherapy response evaluation in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Radiol Med 125:165–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-019-01081-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Cuccia F, Mortellaro G, Trapani G et al (2020) Acute and late toxicity and preliminary outcomes report of moderately hypofractionated helical tomotherapy for localized prostate cancer: a mono-institutional analysis. Radiol Med 125:220–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-019-01095-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Maturen KE, Feng MU, Wasnik AP et al (2013) Imaging effects of radiation therapy in the abdomen and pelvis: Evaluating “innocent bystander” tissues. Radiographics 33:599–619. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.332125119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Ngo D, Jia JB, Green CS, Gulati AT, Lall C (2015) Cancer therapy related complications in the liver, pancreas, and biliary system: an imaging perspective. Insights Imaging 6:665–677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-015-0436-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Soussain C, Ricard D, Fike JR, Mazeron J-J, Psimaras D, Delattre J-Y (2009) CNS complications of radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Lancet 374:1639–1651. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61299-X

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Godi C, Falini A (2019) Radiological findings of drug-induced neurotoxic disorders. In: Clin. neuroradiol. Springer International Publishing, pp 1403–1429

  13. 13.

    Cabaj A, Bekiesińska-Figatowska M, Duczkowska A, Duczkowski M (2016) Brain MRI findings in neurological complications of cancer treatment. Adv Clin Exp Med 25:789–797. https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/37716

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Castellano A, Anzalone N (2019) Radiation and chemotherapy induced injury. In: Clin. neuroradiol. Springer International Publishing, pp 1431–1458

  15. 15.

    Caranci F, Leone G, Ponsiglione A et al (2020) Imaging findings in hypophysitis: a review. Radiol Medica 125:319–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-019-01120-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    De Felice F, D’Angelo E, Ingargiola R et al (2020) A snapshot on radiotherapy for head and neck cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: a survey of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) head and neck working group. Radiol Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-020-01296-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    De Felice F, Musio D, Tombolini V (2020) Weekly hypofractionated radiation therapy in elderly non-resectable cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck region. Radiol Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-020-01260-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Magrini SM, Pasinetti N, Belgioia L et al (2019) Applying radiation protection and safety in radiotherapy. Radiol Medica 124:777–782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-019-01043-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Stone HB, Coleman CN, Anscher MS, McBride WH (2003) Effects of radiation on normal tissue: consequences and mechanisms. Lancet Oncol 4:529–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(03)01191-4

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Hermans R (2008) Posttreatment imaging in head and neck cancer. Eur J Radiol 66:501–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.01.021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Saito N, Nadgir RN, Nakahira M et al (2012) Posttreatment CT and MR imaging in head and neck cancer: what the radiologist needs to know. Radiographics 32:1261–1282. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.325115160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Debnam JM, Garden AS, Ginsberg LE (2008) Benign ulceration as a manifestation of soft tissue radiation necrosis: imaging findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 29:558–562. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A0886

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Raggio BS, Winters R (2018) Modern management of osteoradionecrosis. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 26:254–259. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOO.0000000000000459

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Giannini L, Incandela F, Fiore M et al (2018) Radiation-induced sarcoma of the head and neck: a review of the literature. Front Oncol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2018.00449

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Valeriani M, Marinelli L, Nicosia L et al (2019) Locally advanced inoperable primary or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer treated with 4-week hypofractionated radiation therapy (3 Gy/fraction). Radiol Medica 124:1324–1332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-019-01064-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Kim BH, Kim J-S, Kim KH, Moon HJ, Kim S (2020) Clinical significance of radiation dose–volume parameters and functional status on the patient-reported quality of life changes after thoracic radiotherapy for lung cancer: a prospective study. Radiol Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-020-01273-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Giuranno L, Ient J, De Ruysscher D, Vooijs MA (2019) Radiation-induced lung injury (RILI). Front Oncol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00877

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Borghetti P, Bonù ML, Giubbolini R et al (2019) Concomitant radiotherapy and TKI in metastatic EGFR- or ALK-mutated non-small cell lung cancer: a multicentric analysis on behalf of AIRO lung cancer study group. Radiol Med 124:662–670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-019-00999-w

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Giridhar P, Mallick S, Rath GK, Julka PK (2015) Radiation induced lung injury: Prediction, assessment and management. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev 16:2613–2617. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2015.16.7.2613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Parisi G, Mazzola R, Ciammella P et al (2019) Hypofractionated radiation therapy in the management of locally advanced NSCLC: a narrative review of the literature on behalf of the Italian Association of Radiation Oncology (AIRO)—Lung Working Group. Radiol Medica 124:136–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-018-0950-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Murofushi KN, Oguchi M, Gosho M, Kozuka T, Sakurai H (2015) Radiation-induced bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia (BOOP) syndrome in breast cancer patients is associated with age. Radiat Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0393-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Skeoch S, Weatherley N, Swift A et al (2018) Drug-induced interstitial lung disease: a systematic review. J Clin Med 7:356. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm7100356

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Torrisi JM, Schwartz LH, Gollub MJ, Ginsberg MS, Bosl GJ, Hricak H (2011) CT findings of chemotherapyinduced toxicity: what radiologists need to know about the clinical and radiologic manifestations of chemotherapy toxicity. Radiology 258:41–56. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.10092129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Limper AH (2004) Chemotherapy-induced lung disease. Clin Chest Med 25:53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-5231(03)00123-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Boiselle PM, Morrin MM, Huberman MS (2000) Gemcitabine pulmonary toxicity: CT features. J Comput Assist Tomogr 24:977–980. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004728-200011000-00027

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Taunk NK, Haffty BG, Kostis JB, Goyal S (2015) Radiation-induced heart disease: pathologic abnormalities and putative mechanisms. Front Oncol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2015.00039

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Arslan A, Aktas E, Sengul B, Tekin B (2020) Dosimetric evaluation of left ventricle and left anterior descending artery in left breast radiotherapy. Radiol Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-020-01201-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Darby SC, Ewertz M, McGale P et al (2013) Risk of ischemic heart disease in women after radiotherapy for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 368:987–998. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1209825

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Whitlock MC, Yeboah J, Burke GL, Chen H, Klepin HD, Hundley WG (2015) Cancer and its association with the development of coronary artery calcification: an assessment from the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. J Am Heart Assoc. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.115.002533

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Rademaker J, Schöder H, Ariaratnam NS et al (2008) Coronary artery disease after radiation therapy for Hodgkin’s lymphoma: coronary CT angiography findings and calcium scores in nine asymptomatic patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:32–37. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.3112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Küpeli S, Hazirolan T, Varan A et al (2010) Evaluation of coronary artery disease by computed tomography angiography in patients treated for childhood Hodgkin’s lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 28:1025–1030. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.2627

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Gujral DM, Lloyd G, Bhattacharyya S (2016) Radiation-induced valvular heart disease. Heart 102:269–276. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2015-308765

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Čelutkienė J, Pudil R, López-Fernández T et al (2020) Role of cardiovascular imaging in cancer patients receiving cardiotoxic therapies: a position statement on behalf of the Heart Failure Association (HFA), the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) and the Cardio-Oncology Council of the Eur. Eur J Heart Fail 22:1504–1524. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.1957

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Galán-Arriola C, Lobo M, Vílchez-Tschischke JP et al (2019) Serial magnetic resonance imaging to identify early stages of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity. J Am Coll Cardiol 73:779–791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Wang DY, Salem JE, Cohen JV et al (2018) Fatal toxic effects associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol 4:1721–1728. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.3923

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Vernuccio F, Dioguardi Burgio M, Barbiera F et al (2019) CT and MR imaging of chemotherapy-induced hepatopathy. Abdom Radiol (NY) 44:3312–3324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02193-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Peppercorn PD, Reznek RH, Wilson P, Slevin ML, Gupta RK (1998) Demonstration of hepatic steatosis by computerized tomography in patients receiving 5-fluorouracil-based therapy for advanced colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer 77:2008–2011. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1998.333

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Rubbia-Brandt L, Lauwers GY, Wang H et al (2010) Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome and nodular regenerative hyperplasia are frequent oxaliplatin-associated liver lesions and partially prevented by bevacizumab in patients with hepatic colorectal metastasis. Histopathology 56:430–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2559.2010.03511.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Gatti M, Calandri M, Bergamasco L et al (2020) Characterization of the arterial enhancement pattern of focal liver lesions by multiple arterial phase magnetic resonance imaging: comparison between hepatocellular carcinoma and focal nodular hyperplasia. Radiol Med 125:348–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-019-01127-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Hennedige TP, Hallinan JTPD, Leung FP et al (2016) Comparison of magnetic resonance elastography and diffusion-weighted imaging for differentiating benign and malignant liver lesions. Eur Radiol 26:398–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3835-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Vernuccio F, Godfrey D, Meyer M, et al (2019) Local tumor control and patient outcome using stereotactic body radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: IRECIST as a potential substitute for traditional criteria. AJR Am J Roentgenol 213(6):1232–1239

  52. 52.

    Vernaleone M, Bonomo P, Di Cataldo V et al (2019) Robotic stereotactic radiotherapy for liver oligometastases from colorectal cancer: a single-center experience. Radiol Medica 124:870–876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-019-01042-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Falcinelli L, Mendichi M, Chierchini S et al (2020) Pulmonary function in stereotactic body radiotherapy with helical tomotherapy for primary and metastatic lung lesions. Radiol Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-020-01223-w

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Yuan H, Liu F, Li X et al (2019) Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined with simultaneous DynaCT-guided radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of solitary large hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiol Medica. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-018-0932-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Sangro B, Gil-Alzugaray B, Rodriguez J et al (2008) Liver disease induced by radioembolization of liver tumors: description and possible risk factors. Cancer 112:1538–1546. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Spina JC, Hume I, Pelaez A, Peralta O, Quadrelli M, Monaco RG (2019) Expected and unexpected imaging findings after 90 Y transarterial radioembolization for liver tumors. Radiographics 39:578–595. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2019180095

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Badalov N, Baradarian R, Iswara K, Li J, Steinberg W, Tenner S (2007) Drug-induced acute pancreatitis: an evidence-based review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2006.11.023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Alessandrino F, Krajewski KM, Tirumani SH et al (2017) Biliary and pancreatic complications of molecular targeted therapies in cancer imaging. Abdom Radiol (NY) 42:1721–1733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1050-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Eshet Y, Baruch EN, Shapira-Frommer R et al (2018) Clinical significance of pancreatic atrophy induced by immune-checkpoint inhibitors: A case–control study. Cancer Immunol Res 6:1453–1458. https://doi.org/10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-17-0659

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Hajj C, Goodman KA (2015) Pancreatic cancer and SBRT: a new potential option? Reports Pract Oncol Radiother 20:377–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpor.2015.05.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Bradley J, Movsas B (2006) Radiation pneumonitis and esophagitis in thoracic irradiation. Cancer Treat Res 128:43–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-25354-8_4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Benveniste MF, Gomez D, Carter BW et al (2019) Recognizing radiation therapy–related complications in the chest. Radiographics 39:344–366. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2019180061

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Benveniste MF, Gomez D, Carter BW et al (2016) Radiation effects in the mediastinum and surroundings: imaging findings and complications. Semin Ultrasound CT MRI 37:268–280. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sult.2015.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Iyer R, Jhingran A (2006) Radiation injury: imaging findings in the chest, abdomen and pelvis after therapeutic radiation. Cancer Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1102/1470-7330.2006.9095

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Di Grezia G, Gatta G, Rella R et al (2019) MDCT in acute ischaemic left colitis: a pictorial essay. Radiol Med 124:103–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-018-0947-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Lambregts DMJ, Boellaard TN, Beets-Tan RGH (2019) Response evaluation after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer using modern MR imaging: a pictorial review. Insights Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-019-0706-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Spatola C, Privitera G, Milazzotto R et al (2019) Trends in combined radio-chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: a survey among radiation oncology centers of Sicily region on behalf of AIRO. Radiol Medica 124:671–681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-019-01007-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Ahualli J (2005) The target sign: Bowel wall. Radiology 234:549–550. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2342031015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Zhang A, Song J, Ma Z, Chen T (2020) Combined dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging to predict neoadjuvant chemotherapy effect in FIGO stage IB2–IIA2 cervical cancers. Radiol Medica 125:1233–1242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-020-01214-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Addley HC, Vargas HA, Moyle PL, Crawford R, Sala E (2010) Pelvic imaging following chemotherapy and radiation therapy for Gynecologic malignancies. Radiographics 30:1843–1856. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.307105063

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Ciolina M, Vinci V, Villani L et al (2019) Texture analysis versus conventional MRI prognostic factors in predicting tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced cancer of the uterine cervix. Radiol Medica 124:955–964. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-019-01055-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Arrive L, Chang YCF, Hricak H, Brescia RJ, Auffermann W, Quivey JM (1989) Radiation-induced uterine changes: MR imaging. Radiology 170:55–58. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.170.1.2909120

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Papadopoulou I, Stewart V, Barwick TD et al (2016) Post–radiation therapy imaging appearances in cervical carcinoma. Radiographics 36:538–553. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2016150117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Galia M, Albano D, Bruno A et al (2017) Imaging features of solid renal masses. Br J Radiol 90:20170077. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20170077

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Albano D, Agnello F, Midiri F et al (2019) Imaging features of adrenal masses. Insights Imaging 10:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-019-0688-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Christiansen CF, Johansen MB, Langeberg WJ, Fryzek JP, Sørensen HT (2011) Incidence of acute kidney injury in cancer patients: a Danish population-based cohort study. Eur J Intern Med 22:399–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2011.05.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Dong J, Yang L, Su T et al (2013) Quantitative assessment of acute kidney injury by noninvasive arterial spin labeling perfusion MRI: a pilot study. Sci China Life Sci 56:745–750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-013-4503-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Li C, Liu H, Li X, Zhou L, Wang R, Zhang Y (2019) Application of BOLD-MRI in the classification of renal function in chronic kidney disease. Abdom Radiol (NY) 44:604–611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1750-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Schieda N, Malone SC, Al Dandan O, Ramchandani P, Siegelman ES (2014) Multi-modality organ-based approach to expected imaging findings, complications and recurrent tumour in the genitourinary tract after radiotherapy. Insights Imaging 5:25–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-013-0295-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Mostafaei S, Abdollahi H, Kazempour Dehkordi S et al (2020) CT imaging markers to improve radiation toxicity prediction in prostate cancer radiotherapy by stacking regression algorithm. Radiol Med 125:87–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-019-01082-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Bertocchi E, Barugola G, Nicosia L et al (2020) A comparative analysis between radiation dose intensification and conventional fractionation in neoadjuvant locally advanced rectal cancer: a monocentric prospective observational study. Radiol Medica 125:990–998. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-020-01189-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Jereczek-Fossa BA, Surgo A, Maisonneuve P et al (2019) Late toxicity of image-guided hypofractionated radiotherapy for prostate: non-randomized comparison with conventional fractionation. Radiol Medica 124:65–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-018-0937-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    D’Angelillo RM, Fiore M, Trodella LE et al (2020) 18F-choline PET/CT driven salvage radiotherapy in prostate cancer patients: up-date analysis with 5-year median follow-up. Radiol Medica 125:668–673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-020-01167-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Detti B, Baki M, Becherini C et al (2019) High-dose intensity-modulated radiation therapy as primary treatment of prostate cancer: genitourinary/gastrointestinal toxicity and outcomes, a single-institution experience. Radiol Medica 124:422–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-018-0977-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Onal C, Bozca R, Dolek Y, Guler OC, Arslan G (2020) Incidental testicular doses during volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy in prostate cancer patients. Radiol Med 125:777–783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-020-01158-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Herschorn S, Elliott S, Coburn M, Wessells H, Zinman L (2014) SIU/ICUD consultation on urethral strictures: posterior urethral stenosis after treatment of prostate cancer. Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2013.08.036

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Eren T, Pasaoglu L (2020) Splenomegaly in colon cancer during adjuvant oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. Cureus. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7230

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Imai K, Emi Y, Iyama KI et al (2014) Splenic volume may be a useful indicator of the protective effect of bevacizumab against oxaliplatin-induced hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome. Eur J Surg Oncol 40:559–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2013.12.009

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Hayashi Y, Nishida T, Tsujii M et al (2014) Lymph node enlargement after definitive chemoradiotherapy for clinical stage I esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. BMC Cancer 14:706. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-706

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Brook I (2020) Late side effects of radiation treatment for head and neck cancer. Radiat Oncol J 38:84–92. https://doi.org/10.3857/roj.2020.00213

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Cellina M, Gibelli D, Floridi C, Oliva G (2020) Volumetric analysis of Non-contrast Magnetic Resonance Lymphangiography in patients affected by lower extremities primary lymphedema. Radiol Med 125:432–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-019-01122-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Albano D, La Grutta L, Grassedonio E et al (2016) Pitfalls in whole body MRI with diffusion weighted imaging performed on patients with lymphoma: What radiologists should know. Magn Reson Imaging 34:922–931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2016.04.023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Williams HJ, Davies AM (2006) The effect of X-rays on bone: a pictorial review. Eur Radiol 16:619–633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-0010-7

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Chiarilli MG, Delli Pizzi A, Mastrodicasa D et al (2020) Bone marrow magnetic resonance imaging: physiologic and pathologic findings that radiologist should know. Radiol Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-020-01239-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Pozzi G, Albano D, Messina C et al (2018) Solid bone tumors of the spine: Diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient measured using diffusion-weighted MRI using histology as a reference standard. J Magn Reson Imaging 47:1034-1042. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25826

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Messina C, Albano D, Gitto S et al (2020) Body composition with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: from basics to new tools. Quant Imaging Med Surg 10:1687–1698. https://doi.org/10.21037/QIMS.2020.03.02

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Messina C, Piodi LP, Rinaudo L et al (2020) Reproducibility of DXA-based bone strain index and the influence of body mass: an in vivo study. Radiol Med 125:313–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-019-01118-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Arpitha A, Rangarajan L (2020) Computational techniques to segment and classify lumbar compression fractures. Radiol Med 125:551–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-020-01145-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Foti G, Beltramello A, Catania M, Rigotti S, Serra G, Carbognin G (2019) Diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy CT and virtual non-calcium techniques to evaluate bone marrow edema in vertebral compression fractures. Radiol Med 124:487–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-019-00998-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Sapienza LG, Salcedo MP, Ning MS et al (2020) Pelvic insufficiency fractures after external beam radiation therapy for gynecologic cancers: a meta-analysis and meta-regression of 3929 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 106:475–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.09.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Albano D, Patti C, La Grutta L et al (2017) Osteonecrosis detected by whole body magnetic resonance in patients with Hodgkin Lymphoma treated by BEACOPP. Eur Radiol 27:2129–2136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4535-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Albano D, Patti C, Sconfienza LM, Galia M (2017) Whole-body MRI in the early detection of multifocal osteonecrosis. Br J Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20170280

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Virtanen A, Pukkala E, Auvinen A (2006) Incidence of bone and soft tissue sarcoma after radiotherapy: a cohort study of 295,712 Finnish cancer patients. Int J Cancer 118:1017–1021. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.21456

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Delanian S, Lefaix JL (2007) Current management for late normal tissue injury: radiation-induced fibrosis and necrosis. Semin Radiat Oncol 17:99–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semradonc.2006.11.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Kirchgesner T, Larbi A, Omoumi P et al (2014) Drug-induced tendinopathy: from physiology to clinical applications. Joint Bone Spine 81:485–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2014.03.022

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Sokolova A, Chan O, Ullah W, Hamdani AA, Anwer F (2017) Delayed rhabdomyolysis with paclitaxel, ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide regimen: a case report. J Med Case Rep 11:100. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-017-1272-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Domenico Albano, Massimo Benenati, Antonio Bruno, Federico Bruno, Marco Calandri, Damiano Caruso, Diletta Cozzi, Riccardo De Robertis, Francesco Gentili, Irene Grazzini, Giuseppe Micci, Anna Palmisano, Carlotta Pessina, Paola Scalise, Federica Vernuccio, and Carmelo Messina are members of the Young SIRM Working Group.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

Conceptualization of the study, DA and CM; literature search, all authors; writing—original draft preparation, all authors; writing—review and editing, DA and CM; All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Domenico Albano.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Albano, D., Benenati, M., Bruno, A. et al. Imaging side effects and complications of chemotherapy and radiation therapy: a pictorial review from head to toe. Insights Imaging 12, 76 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-021-01017-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Chemotherapy
  • Radiotherapy
  • Magnetic resonance imaging
  • Complications
  • Side effects