Skip to main content
  • Educational Review
  • Open access
  • Published:

Liver imaging and pregnancy: what to expect when your patient is expecting

Abstract

Liver diseases in pregnancy can be specific to gestation or only coincidental. In the latter case, the diagnosis can be difficult. Rapid diagnosis of maternal-fetal emergencies and situations requiring specialized interventions are crucial to preserve the maternal liver and guarantee materno-fetal survival. While detailed questioning of the patient and a clinical examination are highly important, imaging is often essential to reach a diagnosis of these liver diseases and lesions. Three groups of liver diseases may be observed during pregnancy: (1) diseases related to pregnancy: intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelets (HELLP) syndrome, and acute fatty liver of pregnancy; (2) liver diseases that are more frequent during or exacerbated by pregnancy: acute herpes simplex hepatitis, Budd-Chiari syndrome, hemorrhagic hereditary telangiectasia, hepatocellular adenoma, portal vein thrombosis, and cholelithiasis; (3) coincidental conditions, including acute hepatitis, incidental focal liver lesions, metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease, cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, liver abscesses and parasitosis, and liver transplantation. Specific knowledge of the main imaging findings is required to reach an early diagnosis, for adequate follow-up, and to avoid adverse consequences in both the mother and the fetus.

Critical relevance statement Pregnancy-related liver diseases are the most important cause of liver dysfunction in pregnant patients and, in pregnancy, even common liver conditions can have an unexpected turn. Fear of radiations should never delay necessary imaging studies in pregnancy.

Key points

• Pregnancy-related liver diseases are the most frequent cause of liver dysfunction during gestation.

• Fear of radiation should never delay necessary imaging studies.

• Liver imaging is important to assess liver emergencies and for the diagnosis and follow-up of any other liver diseases.

• Common liver conditions and lesions may take an unexpected turn during pregnancy.

• Pregnancy-specific diseases such as pre-eclampsia and HELLP syndrome must be rapidly identified. However, imaging should never delay delivery when it is considered to be urgent for maternal-fetal survival.

Graphical Abstract

Introduction

The increased production of estrogens and progesterone in pregnancy affects the metabolic and excretory functions of the liver [1]. Global liver function is primarily modified by hemodynamic and biochemical changes to adapt to the increased metabolic demand. Primary systemic vasodilatation may occur as early as the first trimester, inducing an increase in plasma volume and hyperdynamic circulatory status, with a 30 to 50% increase in cardiac output [2]. All these changes affect liver function. On color Doppler ultrasonography (CDUS), portal blood flow increases while hepatic arterial resistance decreases in the 3rd trimester [3]. There is impaired clearance of substances with extensive hepatic metabolism, and pharmacokinetic changes in the liver [4]. Hemostatic changes lead to a procoagulant state, especially in the second half of pregnancy with increasing clotting factor values and fibrinogen, and a decrease in anticoagulant factors and fibrinolysis [5]. During pregnancy, serum phosphatase alkaline activity increases in the 3rd trimester. Serum aminotransferase, gammaglutyltransferase, and bile acids remain unchanged but serum albumin concentration decreases by hemodilution [6,7,8].

The overall prevalence of pregnancy-related liver diseases (LD) is higher in low- and middle-income countries, ranging from 3 to 11.3% worldwide [6, 7, 9]. Pregnancy-related LD are the most frequent cause of liver dysfunction during gestation and may have a high risk of mortality for both the mother and fetus, especially in the absence of an early diagnosis and rapid treatment [3, 6,7,8]. Liver imaging is important to for the diagnosis and follow-up of liver conditions, as well as to determine the specific often urgent treatment.

This review presents an overview of the key imaging findings associated with LD in pregnancy. The following conditions will be discussed: (1) those specifically related to pregnancy, in particular, intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, pre-eclampsia/eclampsia, hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelets (HELLP) syndrome, and acute fatty liver of pregnancy; (2) conditions that are more frequent during, or exacerbated by, pregnancy: acute herpes simplex hepatitis, Budd-Chiari syndrome, hemorrhagic hereditary telangiectasia, hepatocellular adenoma, portal vein thrombosis, and cholelithiasis; and (3) coincidental conditions including acute hepatitis, incidental focal liver lesions, metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, liver abscesses and parasitosis, and liver transplantation (Table 1). Finally, diagnostic imaging algorithms will be presented to help recognize hepatic complications and guide the diagnostic pathway of pregnant patients.

Table 1 Classifications of hepatobiliary disorders according to their relationship with pregnancy

Liver imaging perspective

Liver imaging during pregnancy helps guiding the differential diagnoses and identifies parenchymal or vascular complications and emergencies. Ultrasonography (US) is usually the first-line test. It is accessible, reliable, and safe even during the first trimester, as long as the use of Doppler is limited [10]. Recent studies have confirmed that contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) is safe and can therefore be used to evaluate the vascularity of single lesions [11]. Standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (e.g., ≤ 3-T MRI) may be safely used in all trimesters [10,11,12,13] as an alternative. This technique provides greater spatial and soft tissue resolution, multiplanar images, and larger fields of view [14, 15]. Gadolinium-based contrast administration is still controversial. Although this agent crosses the placenta, no direct toxic effects have been identified. However, the number of studies in humans is limited [16], thus it should only be used when strictly necessary [10, 13, 14, 17], and it should not be used in patients with renal impairment [17]. Macrocyclic contrast agents (e.g., gadobutrol, gadoterate meglumine) are recommended because they are associated with the lowest risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis [17]. Hepatobiliary contrast agents have an intermediate risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. In particular, high doses have been shown to be teratogenic and toxic in animal studies; thus, these agents must only be administered when there is no alternative and the potential benefits justify the potential risks [10, 18].

Radiation exposure

Ionizing radiation exposure is a common concern during pregnancy. However, if standard dose-reducing precautions are taken, the absolute risk of anomalies or abortion is negligible at doses < 50 mGy, even if the fetus is included in the field of view [10, 19]. Doses < 50 mGy may only have an “all‐or‐none” effect before implantation, in the first 2 weeks of gestation [20].

Between 50 and 100 mGy, the theoretical risks are uncertain [9]. There is a risk of teratogenicity between weeks 2 and 8 [20] and a possibility of embryonic demise within the first 2 weeks alone [19]. At doses > 100 mGy, spontaneous abortion, malformations, and neurological anomalies may occur, especially between 8 and 17 weeks of gestation, during organogenesis and the development of the nervous system [13, 19]. One computed tomography (CT) scan of the abdomen and pelvis represents a dose of 5.76 ± 3.22 mGy [16, 21], depending on the machine and dose-reducing protocols. Therefore, in a single study, the fetus will probably be exposed to < 50 mGy, even if multiple phases are acquired [10, 16]. Thus, fear of radiation should never delay imaging, especially in emergencies. The main precaution is to keep doses as low as reasonably achievable [10, 13, 16, 19]. At present, there is very little information in the literature on the use of techniques such as dual energy, spectral CT, or ultralow doses, which would further reduce doses.

Iodine-based intravenous contrast agents are safe [16,17,18,19]. Although there have been concerns about possible damage to the fetal thyroid, studies with lower-osmolality/non-ionic contrast media have not shown any teratogenic effects or induction of hypothyroidism [16,17,18,19].

A summary list of imaging indications is presented in Table 2.

Table 2 Classification of hepatobiliary disorders according to clinical and imaging classifications

Pregnancy-related liver disorders

Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy

Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) is a symptomatic cholestasis that affects 0.1–4% of pregnancies and usually develops during the third trimester [9, 22, 23], although it may occur earlier, such as at the end of the first trimester [9]. ICP is diagnosed by excluding other cholestatic diseases and is characterized by worsening pruritus, increased serum aminotransferase activities, and elevated serum bile acids. When the latter exceeds 40 μmol/L (severe ICP), the risk of preterm labor, fetal asphyxia, or stillbirth increases, with a significant increase above 100 μmol/L [23]. Gallstones are observed in 13–20% of cases, usually associated with a low phospholipid–associated cholelithiasis syndrome [24]. US and MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) may be performed to demonstrate intra- and/or extrahepatic cholelithiasis (Fig. 1) [22]. Ursodeoxycholic acid is prescribed because it may delay a premature delivery [22, 23]. Clinical and biochemical resolution occurs within 6 weeks after delivery [7,8,9, 22, 23]. ICP recurs in genetic forms that may be associated with bile acid transporter mutations [22].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy in a 36-year-old woman. a Transverse abdominal US scan shows multiple gallstones (short arrow) into the gallbladder. Contextual transverse scan of the pancreas (b) reveals the presence of a blurred hypoechoic lesion on the pancreas that (arrow), together with laboratory evidence of raised amylase and lipase, led to the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis

Pre-eclampsia

Pre-eclampsia (PE) is a progressive systemic disorder that affects 3–10% of all pregnancies [25] and is defined by the association of new-onset arterial hypertension and proteinuria, although one of these elements is absent in 10–20% of cases [25,26,27]. PE is a normal placentation disorder characterized by placental ischemia, widespread endothelial dysfunction, and systemic vasospasm. Most cases are diagnosed > 20 weeks of gestation (early PE), and in 20–30% of cases post-partum (late PE) [26]. The termination of pregnancy is the only confirmed treatment [9]. In a population-based retrospective study in more than one million singleton deliveries, nulliparity, and maternal age ≥ 35 were the major risk factors for PE [28]. Other known factors are obesity, chronic arterial hypertension, pregestational diabetes type 2, and prior PE [29, 30]. The decision and type of delivery should follow the usual obstetric rules; however, expedited delivery is recommended [9].

In non-complicated PE, any sudden deterioration must be promptly detected. Bedside abdominal US plays an important role, because it can identify new liver alterations, presence of peritoneal fluid, or portal vein thrombosis. When the liver is involved, portal thrombosis may be the first imaging sign and suggests severe disease requiring immediate delivery [8, 25]. Other signs of liver involvement are seen if PE progresses to eclampsia and HELLP syndrome. Imaging plays an important role when severe complications are suspected, but delivery should never be delayed when a clinical diagnosis is clearly established.

Eclampsia and HELLP syndrome

The worsening of PE involves multiple organ damage and is usually associated with eclampsia (defined as new onset of grand mal seizure activity and/or unexplained coma) and HELLP syndrome. The latter is characterized by the triad of hemolysis (H), elevated liver enzymes (EL), and low platelet (LP) count. HELLP occurs in 10–25% of the cases of PE, or 0.8–1% of all pregnancies [12, 25,26,27]. It develops during the third trimester or early post-partum (up to 4 weeks; 25% of cases) [9]. Symptoms range from epigastric, right upper quadrant, or scapular pain to sudden hypovolemic shock [15]. The mortality rate is >5% [8], and a rapid termination of pregnancy is required.

It is important to note that Doppler US results show decreased total hepatic blood flow before [31] and at the onset of [32] symptomatic HELLP syndrome. This is probably due to sinusoidal fibrin depositions and obstruction, and disease progression induces liver ischemia, infarction (frequently with fever), periportal necrosis, microthrombi, and/or intrahepatic hemorrhage/hematoma, then capsular lesions including bleeding, and ultimately liver rupture [33, 34]. Although US is the first-line imaging test, CT with or without intravenous contrast administration is the gold standard to detect and follow-up complications [12, 35, 36] (Fig. 2). Studies have reported a marked increase in liver stiffness on US [37], especially during eclampsia [38]; thus, this measurement could be recommended in the future.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Hepatic rupture in a 27-year-old woman around childbirth. The patient complained of severe right upper quadrant and scapular pain. Alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase were augmented, prothrombin time was 30%. Transverse abdominal US scan (a) shows the presence of hypoechoic areas (*), free fluid around the liver (stars), and striated thickening of the gallbladder walls (arrow), raising suspicion for pre-eclampsia. Axial (b) and coronal (c) CT scan on portal venous phase (b) demonstrate hepatic lacerations (arrowhead) with surrounding hemoperitoneum and a large peritoneal hematoma (*). Patient underwent emergency cesarean section and liver transplant

The imaging findings of HELLP include liver hypertrophy, hyperechoic thickening of the periportal space (portal halo sign), thickening of the Glisson capsule and gallbladder wall, ascites, and pleural effusion. On US, probe compression may increase abdominal pain [3, 5, 7, 8]. Infarction is seen as peripheral hypoechoic bands on US, hypo-attenuating, non-enhancing on CT, and ill-defined with a slightly high T2 signal on MRI [15, 33,34,35,36] (Fig. 3). Liver hematomas, usually located in the right liver [15], present as heterogeneous, subcapsular lesions, often with hemoperitoneum [15]. Intrahepatic hematoma and hepatic rupture are the main life-threatening complications. The latter is seen as a focal irregularity with an adjacent sentinel clot. Foci of active bleeding mirror the attenuation/intensity of the aortic lumen [33] (Fig. 4).

Fig. 3
figure 3

MRI evidence of necrosis due to HELLP in a 32-year-old patient. Necrosis appears as multiple slightly hypointense bands on T1w sequences (a), corresponding to areas of T2 hyperintensity (b). Ascites is also seen (*)

Fig. 4
figure 4

HELLP Syndrome natural history in a 31-year-old woman. Three subsequent scans, all in coronal plane reconstruction, portal venous phase. The first one (a) was held at the end of third trimester, when symptoms first appeared. Liver infarctions (*), ascites (star), and a little subcapsular hematoma (arrow) are seen, typical signs of HELLP syndrome. Immediate delivery was promptly performed after the radiologist’s diagnosis. Control CT scans held after 10 (b) and 40 days (c) show progressive disappearance of subcapsular hematoma and ascites, with calcifications all along the infarcted areas

Hemodynamic stabilization is the first step in the management of hepatic rupture and hemoperitoneum, including fluids and blood transfusions, with an emergency delivery. In selected cases, a conservative approach including careful surveillance may be chosen in hemodynamically stable patients [39]. In the remaining patients, an urgent laparotomy with liver packing and blood evacuation, hepatic artery ligation, or hepatic arterial embolization is recommended. Partial hepatectomy should be avoided because it worsens the maternal prognosis [40]. When bleeding is uncontrolled or in the presence of rapid deterioration of liver function [27], emergency transfer to a liver transplantation (LT) center is recommended although LT is rarely performed [41].

Acute fatty liver of pregnancy

Acute fatty liver of pregnancy (AFLP) is due to centrilobular microvesicular steatosis, which mainly occurs in the 2nd or 3rd trimester at an incidence of 5/100,000 [42]. AFLP is an obstetric emergency because immediate delivery is required for maternal-fetal survival. Any delay, including non-essential imaging, significantly increases the risk of in-utero or maternal death and is associated with rapid deterioration of liver and kidney functions, disseminated intravascular coagulation and more rarely hemoperitoneum, encephalopathy, multiorgan failure, uterine atony, and death [8, 42,43,44,45]. The origin of AFLP may be enzyme deficiencies of intramitochondrial fatty acid oxidation in the fetal liver [42]. Symptoms include nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain [42,43,44,45], polyuro-polydypsia [45], and rarely, hypertension [9]. Imaging alone is non-specific and may underestimate the diagnosis, especially at the onset of the disease. Thus, the Swansea criteria have been proposed combining 5 clinical symptoms, 5 liver and renal dysfunction laboratory findings, hyperuricemia, bright liver or ascites on US, and microvesicular steatosis on biopsy. Scores ≥ 6/14 confirm the diagnosis [45]. However, the sensitivity for early disease and the specificity in advanced cases are not satisfactory [9]. Imaging findings include a sudden increase in parenchymal US echogenicity (Fig. 5), and liver attenuation ≤ 40 HU on CT [33, 42, 43]. MRI is the most sensitive technique. It provides a qualitative assessment with dual echo T1-weighted sequences [44]—the signal dropout on opposed-phased T1-weighted images can be significant in patients with AFLP [33]—and fat quantification with proton density fat fraction (PDFF) provides precise information on the percentage of fat deposition [46, 47].

Fig. 5
figure 5

Acute fatty liver of pregnancy (AFLP) in a 32-year-old primiparous woman. US performed in the first month of the pregnancy showed no signs of hepatic steatosis (a), while US scan performed at the beginning of third trimester (b) demonstrates a markedly increased hepatic echogenicity that, combined with clinical examination, is consistent with acute fatty liver

Liver diseases exacerbated by or more frequent during pregnancy

Acute Herpes Simplex Virus Hepatitis

Both subtypes of herpes simplex virus (HSV) are uncommon causes of symptomatic anicteric acute liver injury. Due to the immunosuppression during the second half of pregnancy, acute hepatitis (AH) due to herpes simplex virus (AHSV) is significantly more frequent in pregnant than in non-pregnant women of the same age [48]. Persistent fever is the main symptom, alone or associated with lesions on the skin or genitals. Serum aminotransferase values vary between 5 to more than 50 times the upper limit of normal. Leukopenia and thrombocytopenia are also highly suggestive of AHSV but are not found in half of the cases at the onset. These features can mimic pre-eclampsia or AFLP and delay these diagnoses [20]. Empirical antiviral treatment with acyclovir should be prescribed as early as possible to avoid progression to acute liver failure (ALF) [49]. Blood RT-PCR of the virus and HSV serologic tests confirm the diagnosis [8, 49, 50]. Mortality reaches 20% [48]. Although imaging can help make the diagnosis it is non-specific (refer to the paragraph “acute hepatitis”).

Budd-Chiari syndrome

Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) is a hepatic venous outflow obstruction disorder [33, 51, 52]. Pooled prevalence of pregnancy-related BCS is 13.1% in females with BCS [51]. This suggests that BSC can be triggered by, manifest for the first time, or be aggravated by pregnancy [52, 53] due to the hormonal changes and thrombophilic status during this period [51]. BCS should be suspected in any pregnant woman with persistent abdominal pain, isolated, or associated with the development of ascites and/or hepatomegaly [33, 51, 52, 54]. The risk of decompensation in pregnancy is high and usually manifests by the development of ascites [54]. Doppler US is the first-line diagnostic and screening technique (Fig. 6). When US is inconclusive, contrast-enhanced MRI should be performed [33, 55, 56].

Fig. 6
figure 6

Ultrasound (US) surveillance during pregnancy in a 29-year-old woman with chronic Budd-Chiari syndrome. Pre-pregnancy gadobenate dimeglumine contrast-enhanced MR images (a, b) obtained during portal venous phase (a) and hepatobiliary phase (b) show the occlusion of the hepatic veins (a—arrows) and multiple benign regenerative nodules with peripheral hyperintensity on hepatobiliary phase (b—arrows). Note the presence of a trans-jugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) connecting the superior vena cava and the portal system. US examination performed during pregnancy (c, d) allowed to evaluate the patency of the TIPS (c), to monitoring the lesion size (d) and to eliminate the presence of ascites

Imaging features include hepatic venous occlusion and an enlarged, heterogenously enhancing liver. In acute cases, a recent thrombus in the inferior vena cava and/or the hepatic veins [12], or a “flip-flopping” enhancement pattern can be seen (early subtle increased enhancement of the periphery, and subsequent prominent central enhancement). Patients with chronic or acute-on-chronic BCS may have a nodular, dysmorphic liver, hepatic venous collaterals, and signs of portal hypertension. Benign (regenerative or FNH-like) nodules are also common. These range from 1 to 4 cm, are homogenously hyperenhancing on hepatic arterial phase, with variable attenuation/intensity on portal venous phase [55, 56], and can increase in size during pregnancy [52]. Anticoagulation is indicated as the first-line therapy for acute disease to improve blood flow, while interventions such hepatic venous angioplasty and TIPS are a second-line treatment. Management should be discussed in expert multidisciplinary centers [54, 57].

Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia

Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT), or Osler-Weber-Rendu disease, is a rare autosomal dominant vascular dysplasia, characterized by multiorgan telangiectasias and arteriovenous malformations, mainly in the lung and liver [12, 58, 59]. HHT is often diagnosed during pregnancy, mainly in the 3rd trimester or after delivery. Most pregnancies are uneventful, but there is a significant maternal risk of arteriovenous malformation rupture [60]. The Curaçao Diagnostic Criteria are usually used for diagnosis, including the family and personal clinical history associated with findings of diffuse telangiectasias and shunts, heterogeneous liver enhancement, and a common hepatic artery > 6 mm in diameter to confirm the diagnosis [33, 59, 60] (Fig. 7). MRI or contrast-enhanced CT (when bleeding is suspected) are the first-line techniques for suspected HHT in pregnancy. When HHT is known, imaging should be performed to follow the arteriovenous malformations during pregnancy [12, 61]. US or MRI may be the first-line screening technique depending on the location of the aneurysms because the growth of hepatic shunts due to the cardiovascular changes increase the risk of biliary ischemia, bleeding, hemoperitoneum, liver failure, and biliary necrosis [58, 59].

Fig. 7
figure 7

Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia discovered in a 33-year-old pregnant woman. The patient had an episode of hemoptysis that led to a contrast-enhanced CT. Liver is slightly heterogeneous on unenhanced image (a). Enhanced CT shows the presence of a heterogeneously enhancing liver on hepatic arterial phase (b) with portal phase homogenization (c). Coronal plane MIP reconstruction on arterial phase (d) shows the presence of enlarged intra- and extrahepatic artery (> 6 mm—thick arrow) and early enhancement of left hepatic vein (thin arrow)

Hepatocellular adenoma

Because of the trophic effect of estrogens, hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) increases in size in 25% of pregnancies [62]. The risk in HCAs < 5 cm are minimal while in HCAs > 5 cm the risk of intratumoral bleeding, spontaneous rupture, and hemoperitoneum is high (Fig. 8) [62]. Monitoring is recommended with ultrasound examinations each trimester [63]. Teamwork is essential in the evidence of growth or bleeding, the latter requiring trans-arterial embolization or surgery in some patients. It is hypothesized that during pregnancy, the subtypes more prone to bleeding are the inflammatory or Sonic Hedgehog subtypes, as seen in the general population [64]. Imaging will mirror that of the general population. The Sonic Hedgehog subtype does not have any specific imaging characteristics but is more frequent in obese patients. The inflammatory subtype can present with strong arterial enhancement, persisting in the portal and late venous phase for both CT and MRI. On MRI, the presence of the “atoll sign,” with a ring of T2 hyperintensity surrounding an isointense lesion, increases the specificity [64]. The lesion-to-liver contrast enhancement ratio on hepatobiliary phase may help differentiate these subtypes from the beta-catenin activated subtype [65].

Fig. 8
figure 8

Hepatocellular adenoma evolution during pregnancy in a 29-year-old woman, 39th week of pregnancy, presenting with sudden and strong acute pain in right upper abdomen, associated drop of hemoglobin levels (Hb = 10 g/dL). Axial CT scan on delayed phase (a) shows a tumor (*) measuring more than 5 cm, with active bleeding (arrow) and hemoperitoneum (arrowhead). Due to patient instability, arterial embolization combining gelatin sponge injection and selective distal coiling was performed (b) followed by fetal extraction. Six years after the event, axial scan, T1w MRI (c) shows shrinkage of the lesion

Portal vein thrombosis

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) not associated with well-known hepatic risk factors is rare during pregnancy or puerperium [66]. In a minority of cases PVT is acute with sudden abdominal pain and often, fever [66]. Acute PVT is characterized on US by hyperechoic appearance and on CT by a spontaneous hyperattenuating appearance with post-contrast filling defects. There is a risk of bowel ischemia in the presence of extension into the mesenteric veins. Anticoagulant therapy (with low molecular weight heparin) is required. Short-term Doppler US follow-up must be performed to evaluate disease progression or response to treatment. Chronic PVT is identified as a complication of portal hypertension, HELLP syndrome, PE, eclampsia, or by chance [66]. Prothrombotic factors must be searched for in all cases of PVT. The outcome of pregnancy is good after 20 weeks of gestation, with 58% of births after 36 weeks. Complications include miscarriage (20%) and preterm births [53, 66] (Fig. 9).

Fig. 9
figure 9

Pre-eclampsia (PE) outcomes in a 24-year-old primiparous woman. This patient did not perform imaging studies during pregnancy, but presented with persistent right upper quadrant pain around delivery, increased AST/ALT and arterial blood hypertension; hence, PE was suspected. Axial, portal venous phase CT scan performed after childbirth demonstrates portal vein thrombosis (arrow) and parenchymal infarction (dotted lines)

Cholelithiasis

Hyperestrogenemia, hypercholesterolemia, and decreased gallbladder mobility result in supersaturated bile during pregnancy [8, 33] and 10% of pregnant women develop gallstones or sludge [7]. Imaging findings and complications are similar to those in the non-pregnant population, including cholecystitis, choledocholithiasis, and pancreatitis. While US is the first-line imaging technique for suspected gallstone disease, MRCP is safe [20, 33]. Supportive care is the initial management strategy, but endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has a well establish therapeutic role, and may be performed especially in the second trimester [20]. Conservative management can result in more frequent recurrent biliary symptoms, acute episodes of pancreatitis, hospitalizations, and cesarean sections. Each case should be discussed with the obstetrician, especially in the first trimester. Studies on ERCP have shown that radiation exposure is usually < 6 mGy and should therefore be considered safe [67].

Coincidental liver diseases

Acute hepatitis

AH should be considered in the presence of sudden jaundice and acute liver injury or failure in pregnancy [50, 68,69,70]. Although viral hepatitis (virus A to E) is the most common cause of jaundice in pregnancy worldwide [50], hepatotoxicity due to drug reactions, herbal or dietary supplements should be ruled out [63,64,65,66,67,68,69]. In India, the hepatitis E virus is a common cause of AH in pregnancy with a 25% mortality rate [8, 50], while acetaminophen overdose is responsible for 30% of the cases of ALF in pregnancy in the USA [68].

Autoimmune hepatitis may also be seen in pregnancy, requiring rapid diagnosis and therapy. Imaging can help in the diagnosis of AH with a combination of hepatomegaly, gallbladder wall thickening, and periportal edema [33]. AHSV should be suspected in the presence of multiple small (< 1 cm) nodular lesions, between 1 and 3 mm, that are hypoechoic on US, hypo-attenuating on CT, and represent necrotic foci [70].

Incidental focal liver lesions

Like in the general population, an incidental liver lesion without no underlying liver disease is benign in 96% of the cases [71]. If the pre-test probability and unenhanced imaging support a benign diagnosis, further characterization with contrast administration should be performed after childbirth (Fig. 10). However, CEUS is safe for single lesions during pregnancy [11].

Fig. 10
figure 10

Focal liver lesion management in a 27-year-old pregnant woman. During routine US, a liver mass is seen (first picture, upper row), showing vascularization and arterial flow on Doppler US (first picture, lower row). MR study was requested and demonstrates a T1 hypointense lesion, slightly hyperintense on T2. This lesion was not deemed malignant therefore contrast-enhanced MRI was withheld until childbirth and showed avid enhancement on hepatic arterial phase (HAP) with homogenization on delayed phase (DP) and a central scar (arrow), typical of focal nodular hyperplasia

During or after pregnancy, hemangiomas can grow (Fig. 11) [72, 73] but they are indolent. Spontaneous hepatic rupture is exceptional [73]. Focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) is asymptomatic, does not grow, and does not require follow-up [73, 74].

Fig. 11
figure 11

During a routine US (a), hyperechoic hepatic lesions (arrows) were seen in a 37-year-old pregnant woman. These lesions showed no vascularization on Doppler US nor stiffness, and the liver had no signs of chronic liver disease, so they were classified as hemangiomas. Months later, one lesion slightly grew, and an unenhanced MR was performed (b), showing high T2 signal with low T1 signal (upper row) and no diffusion restriction (lower row), thus confirming the diagnosis of hemangiomas

If an unknown lesion presents fat, HCA is suggested. HCAs have non-specific imaging characteristics on US and CT; therefore, MRI should be performed. If malignancy is suspected, breast cancer should be suspected as it is the most common primary cancer in pregnancy [75], and is characterized by hypoenhancing liver metastases. Cystic components may suggest a mucinous gastrointestinal or ovarian primary, while hyperenhancing lesions suggest a metastatic choriocarcinoma [76], sarcoma, and renal or neuroendocrine tumor. US surveillance is recommended each trimester in pregnant patients with a history of extrahepatic cancers known to metastasize to the liver [63]. Biopsy may also be considered whenever needed in incidental focal lesions, severe liver dysfunction in transplanted patients, or in cases of severe liver disease. Liver biopsy appears to be safe and well tolerated in the first trimester. It is difficult to draw firm conclusions in other cases, which should be judged based on the risk and benefit of this procedure [77].

Metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease

Metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) (previously known as non-alcoholic steatohepatitis; NAFLD) is currently the most frequent chronic liver disease worldwide [78] and includes a spectrum from simple steatosis to hepatocellular injury and fibrosis. The prevalence of MASLD in pregnancy has nearly tripled in the last decade and is independently associated with a higher incidence of hypertensive complications, post-partum hemorrhage, pre-eclampsia HELLP syndrome, and preterm birth [79,80,81]. Treatment in pregnancy mainly involves nutritional measures and physical activity [78].

Imaging can determine the presence of liver steatosis. PDFF-MRI is the most accurate biomarker, and the fibrosis can be estimated on transient elastography, US-, or MR-elastography [82, 83]. A differential diagnosis is made with AFLP using clinical-laboratory data and the absence of other findings connected with AFLP. Although the mechanisms by which MASLD favor adverse maternal and perinatal events are not well defined, the presence of MASLD warrants preconception counselling and management by specialized obstetricians [81].

Cirrhosis

Chronic viral hepatitis (B and C), metabolic dysfunction–associated steatohepatitis (previously known as non-alcoholic steatohepatitis), autoimmune diseases, and alcohol are the main causes of cirrhosis in pregnancy [79, 80]. Pre-conceptional cirrhosis compensation is the mainstay of successful pregnancies [84]. During pregnancy, hepatic decompensation, ascites, and variceal hemorrhage can occur. The risk of decompensation can be predicted by scores such as the MELD (model for end-stage liver disease), the preconception Albumin-Bilirubin score (ALBI), or preconception aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI) [85]. Variceal bleeding remains the most frequent result of cirrhotic decompensation and death in pregnancy [86] and preventive endoscopic band ligation is recommended [87, 88]. Close monitoring is required in all trimesters (Fig. 12) to assess ascites, portal vein thrombosis, and new or growing focal lesions. Spontaneous rupture of a splenic artery aneurysm is a rare event found in 0.00001–0.003% of cases [89]. Maternal and fetal survival is 26% in the mother and 50% in the fetus and depends on a rapid diagnosis and effective treatment. It mainly occurs in the second half of pregnancy or during labor [89, 90]. Pregnancy, hyperdynamic circulation, and hormone-induced alterations of the arterial walls are contributing factors. Abdominal imaging with CT or MRI helps the diagnosis, showing the size and location of the aneurysm and its rupture. Urgent embolization of the splenic artery or laparotomy (with delivery) must be performed for uncontrolled bleeding [89,90,91].

Fig. 12
figure 12

Cirrhotic decompensation during an unplanned pregnancy in a 31-year-old patient with hepatitis B virus-related cirrhosis. Surveillance abdominal US scan during the second trimester shows the presence of pleural effusion (*) and mild ascites (*). The therapy of the patient was therefore changed accordingly, and the gestation was otherwise uneventful

Hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is very rare in pregnancy, but the prognosis is worse than in the non-pregnant population, with a 1-year survival rate < 30%. Rapid and aggressive tumor growth is described, with a higher chance of rupture, probably due to estrogens and neovascularization [92,93,94]. Surveillance with US or MRI is recommended during each trimester in women at risk of HCC, [63]. When HCC is suspected, characterization by either contrast-enhanced MRI or CT should not be delayed [92]. Surgery is usually recommended, but loco-regional treatments such as percutaneous tumor ablation have been found to be safe [92,93,94,95].

Fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma is an uncommon variant of HCC that mainly occurs in young adults and is rarely observed in pregnancy. Imaging is crucial for a differential diagnosis with focal nodular hyperplasia. While both these events share hyperenhancement and a central scar, only HCC shows portal or delayed phase wash-out or presents with a mosaic architecture. Other typical findings suggesting fibrolamellar HCC are the presence of a central calcification, in which is rare in an FNH, and lesion heterogeneity [96].

Liver abscesses and parasitosis

Pregnant patients with sepsis and fever who undergo abdominal US should always be checked for liver abscess [97]. The most common causes in pregnancy include E. Coli, Bacterioides spp., and Entamoeba histolytica [97, 98]. Maternal and fetal mortality is high for liver abscesses in these cases since pregnancy and immunodepression are risk factors for invasive infections, septic shock, and/or liver rupture [97,98,99]. Imaging is important for both diagnosis and surveillance. US shows a thick-walled hypoechoic lesion, with peripheral and progressive ring-like enhancement on CEUS. Unenhanced MRI shows a T2-hyperintense solid-fluid lesion with central diffusion restriction [98]. Further characterization can be obtained by US-guided aspiration [100]. The symptoms and complications of hepatic echinococcosis may be severe during pregnancy and may therefore require urgent treatment [101].

Liver transplantation considerations

In women with prior liver transplantation (LT) pregnancies that are carefully planned and monitored are successful in 80% of cases [102]. Drugs linked to fetal toxicity should be stopped at least 6 months before conception in any partner [7]. During pregnancy, radiologists should consider that LT women are at an increased risk of infections, pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, HELLP syndrome, and preterm delivery [102]. Acute graft rejection and liver failure can occur even during pregnancy and must be carefully and promptly detected. Liver Doppler US is the first imaging technique to monitor the transplant and pregnancy-related complications. When inconclusive, non-contrast MRI is preferred to CT. The literature also suggests that LT may be safely performed during pregnancy [103, 104].

Diagnostic algorithms

Asymptomatic patients with unknown focal liver lesions

If an unknown focal liver lesion is incidentally seen on US, the clinical setting and characteristics of the lesion should be considered first. In particular:

  1. (1)

    Cystic lesions: anechoic lesions, no walls, inner components, or septa suggesting simple hepatic cysts. If multiple and small, consider biliary hamartomas. If the walls are thick or with calcifications, abscesses, echinococcosis, or, rarely, cystic metastases are differential diagnoses. When in doubt, perform MRI.

  2. (2)

    Solid lesions:

    1. (a)

      Hyperechoic: the most common entities are hemangiomas and focal steatosis, followed by FNHs, HCAs, and metastases. With no previous images or if uncertain, consider MRI or CEUS. If unenhanced MRI suggests a benign lesion, definitive characterization could be postponed. Focal steatosis follows a typical distribution pattern around the gallbladder and close to the hilum.

    2. (b)

      Hypoechoic: US is not specific; consider CEUS (if single), or MRI. Contrast administration only if suspected malignancy. Regular US follow-up is needed for HCAs (> 5 cm risk of bleeding). Multiple, small hypoechoic spots suggest metastases, infections, or sarcoidosis. With periportal edema and gallbladder wall thickening, consider hepatitis.

    3. (c)

      Isoechoic: FNH. Color Doppler might show the central artery and CEUS the typical spoke-wheel pattern. FNH can only be suspected on unenhanced MRI.

If necrotic/liquid components are present, consider metastases and abscess.

In the presence of fat, consider HCA or atypical FNH. In the presence of cirrhosis, siderotic content is a sign of regenerative or dysplastic nodules. Hematic nodules include hematomas or bleeding HCAs. Contrast-enhanced MRI or CT should be performed when active bleeding is suspected. Figure 13 contains a diagnostic chart for characterization of focal liver lesions in pregnancy.

Fig. 13
figure 13

Diagnostic algorithm presenting the management and differential diagnoses to consider in an asymptomatic pregnant woman with focal liver lesions. abbreviations: US = Ultrasonography; MRI = Magnetic Resonance Imaging; CEUS = Contrast Enhanced US; FNH = Focal Nodular Hyperplasia; HCA = Hepatocellular Adenoma

Urgent or emergency management

In stable patients with right upper quadrant pain, bedside US is usually the first-line examination. If abdominal pain, fever, and ALT or AST >10 times the upper normal value are present, HSV hepatitis should be suspected and acyclovir therapy should start empirically as soon as possible. If leukopenia is seen too, the diagnosis is almost certain. Differential diagnosis include hepatic bleeding and hematoma. Hyperleukocytosis will raise concern for liver abscess.

If hepatic infarction, rupture, hemorrhage, or hematoma are suspected, CT or MRI should be performed with contrast agents, if necessary, without delay. HELLP syndrome, liver tumors, trauma, or AFLP may be complicated by hepatic infarction, bleeding, hematoma, or liver capsule rupture, with a risk of maternal death > 5%. After the diagnosis, a decision of immediate or delayed delivery depends on both the cause of hemoperitoneum and the term of pregnancy and should be made by an expert multidisciplinary team.

In the presence of persistent signs of hemodynamic instability, immediate blood transfusions and delivery are required prior to trans-arterial embolization or surgery. Coordination with an LT center is recommended. Figure 14 provides a diagnostic chart for urgent and emergency situations.

Fig. 14
figure 14

Diagnostic Algorithm for liver urgencies and emergencies in pregnancy. abbreviations: RUQ = Right Upper Quadrant; ICP = Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy; AFLP = Acute Fatty Liver of Pregnancy; HELLP = Elevated Liver Enzymes, Low Platelet; US = Ultrasonography; MRI = Magnetic Resonance Imaging; MRCP= Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography; CT = Computed Tomography; MRI = Magnetic Resonance Imaging; AST = Aspartate transaminase; ALT = alanine aminotransferase (ALT); NAFLD = Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Conclusion

The global incidence of LD in pregnancy is rising. Acute LD in pregnancy may require urgent care. It is highly important to detect clinical syndromes and hepatic lesions that require urgent care or delivery as rapidly as possible. In pregnant women, abdominal imaging is crucial especially for the diagnosis of emergencies, like bleeding, hematomas, and liver rupture in pre-eclampsia/HELLP, or the rupture of splenic artery aneurysm in cirrhotic women. Liver diseases will be best managed when there is a close cooperation between the obstetrician, the radiologist and the hepatologist, to avoid adverse consequences on both mother and child.

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Abbreviations

AFLP:

Acute fatty liver of pregnancy

AH:

Acute hepatitis

AHSVH:

Acute herpes simplex virus hepatitis

ALF:

Acute liver failure

BCS:

Budd-Chiari syndrome

CDUS:

Color Doppler ultrasonography

CEUS:

Contrast-enhanced ultrasounds

CT:

Computed tomography

FNH:

Focal nodular hyperplasia

HCA:

Hepatocellular adenoma

HCC:

Hepatocellular carcinoma

HELLP:

Hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelets syndrome

HEV:

Hepatitis E virus

HHT:

Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia

HSV:

Herpes simplex virus

ICP:

Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy

MASLD:

Metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease

MRCP:

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

NAFLD:

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

PDFF:

Proton density fat fraction

PE:

Pre-eclampsia

PVT:

Portal vein thrombosis

US:

Ultrasounds

References

  1. Feldt-Rasmussen U, Mathiesen ER (2011) Endocrine disorders in pregnancy: physiological and hormonal aspects of pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 25:875–884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beem.2011.07.004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tkachenko O, Shchekochikhin D, Schrier RW (2014) Hormones and hemodynamics in pregnancy. Int J Endocrinol Metab 12(2):e14098

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Mandic-Markovic VD, Mikovic ZM, Djukic MK et al (2014) Doppler parameters of the maternal hepatic artery blood flow in normal pregnancy: maternal hepatic artery blood flow in normal pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 181:275–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.08.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Costantine MM (2014) Physiologic and pharmacokinetic changes in pregnancy. Front Pharmacol 5:65. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2014.00065

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Bissonnette J, Durand F, De Raucourt E et al (2015) Pregnancy and vascular liver disease. J Clin Exp Hepatol 5:41–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jceh.2014.12.007

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Ch’ng CL, (2002) Prospective study of liver dysfunction in pregnancy in Southwest Wales. Gut 51:876–880. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.51.6.876

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Westbrook RH, Dusheiko G, Williamson C (2016) Pregnancy and liver disease. J Hepatol 64:933–945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2015.11.030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Joshi D, James A, Quaglia A et al (2010) Liver disease in pregnancy. Lancet 375:594–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61495-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Terrault NA, Williamson C (2022) Pregnancy-associated liver diseases. Gastroenterology 163:97-117.e1. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2022.01.060

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. RSNA and ACR statement on Safety of the Developing Fetus in Medical Imaging During Pregnancy, updated: 2/25/2021 (https://www.radiologyinfo.org/en/info/safety-mri-pregnancy#top) Accessed on 26/08/2023

  11. Schwarze V, Marschner C, Negrão De Figueiredo G et al (2020) Single-center study: evaluating the diagnostic performance and safety of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in pregnant women to assess hepatic lesions. Ultraschall Med 41:29–35. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0973-8517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Plowman RS, Javidan-Nejad C, Raptis CA et al (2017) Imaging of pregnancy-related vascular complications. Radiographics 37:1270–1289. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2017160128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. ACR–SPR Practice Parameter for Imaging Pregnant or Potentially Pregnant Adolescents and Women with Ionizing Radiation. Available at https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Radiology-Safety/Radiation-Safety. Accessed on 26/08/2023.

  14. Gatta G, Di Grezia G, Cuccurullo V et al (2021) MRI in pregnancy and precision medicine: a review from literature. J Pers Med 12:9. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12010009

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Beranger-Gibert S, Lagadec M, Boulay-Coletta I et al (2015) Hepatic and perihepatic involvement of female genital diseases and pregnancy: a review. Abdom Imaging 40:1331–1349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0263-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wieseler KM, Bhargava P, Kanal KM et al (2010) Imaging in pregnant patients: examination appropriateness. Radiographics 30:1215–1229. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.305105034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) – 10th version, available on: https://www.esur.org/esur-guidelines-on-contrast-agents/. Accessed on 26/08/2023.

  18. FDA position on Multihance during pregnancy. Available at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2010/021357s009lbl.pdf. Accessed on 26/08/2023.

  19. Tirada N, Dreizin D, Khati NJ et al (2015) Imaging pregnant and lactating patients. Radiographics 35:1751–1765. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2015150031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sarkar M, Brady CW, Fleckenstein J et al (2021) Reproductive health and liver disease: practice guidance by the American association for the study of liver diseases. Hepatology 73:318–365. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.31559

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Shubayr N, Alashban Y (2023) Estimation of radiation doses and lifetime attributable risk of radiation-induced cancer in the uterus and prostate from abdomen pelvis CT examinations. Front Public Health 10:1094328. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1094328

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Geenes V, Chappell LC, Seed PT et al (2014) Association of severe intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy with adverse pregnancy outcomes: a prospective population-based case-control study. Hepatology 59:1482–1491. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.26617

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ovadia C, Seed PT, Sklavounos A et al (2019) Association of adverse perinatal outcomes of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy with biochemical markers: results of aggregate and individual patient data meta-analyses. Lancet 393:899–909. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31877-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dong C, Condat B, Picon-Coste M et al (2021) Low-phospholipid-associated cholelithiasis syndrome: prevalence, clinical features, and comorbidities. JHEP Rep 3:100201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhepr.2020.100201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Alese MO, Moodley J, Naicker T (2021) Preeclampsia and HELLP syndrome, the role of the liver. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 34:117–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2019.1572737

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sibai BM, Ramadan MK, Usta I et al (1993) Maternal morbidity and mortality in 442 pregnancies with hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets (HELLP syndrome). Am J Obstet Gynecol 169:1000–1006. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(93)90043-I

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hammoud GM, Ibdah JA (2014) Preeclampsia-induced Liver Dysfunction, HELLP syndrome, and acute fatty liver of pregnancy. Clin Liver Dis 4:69–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/cld.409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lisonkova S, Bone JN, Muraca GM et al (2021) Incidence and risk factors for severe preeclampsia, hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count syndrome, and eclampsia at preterm and term gestation: a population-based study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 225:538.e1-538.e19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2021.04.261

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Elawad T, Scott G, Bone JN et al (2022) Risk factors for pre-eclampsia in clinical practice guidelines: comparison with the evidence. BJOG 1471–0528:17320. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Siddiqui A, Deneux-Tharaux C, Luton D et al (2020) Maternal obesity and severe pre-eclampsia among immigrant women: a mediation analysis. Sci Rep 10(1):5215. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62032-9. (Published 2020 Mar 23)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Kawabata I, Nakai A, Takeshita T (2006) Prediction of HELLP syndrome with assessment of maternal dual hepatic blood supply by using Doppler ultrasound. Arch Gynecol Obstet 274:303–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-006-0175-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Nasr A, Nafeh H (2009) Decreased hepatic perfusion in patients with HELLP syndrome. J Obstet Gynaecol 29:624–627. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443610903061728

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Heller MT, Tublin ME, Hosseinzadeh K, Fargiano A (2011) Imaging of hepatobiliary disorders complicating pregnancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:W528–W536. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.5128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Perronne L, Dohan A, Bazeries P et al (2015) Hepatic involvement in HELLP syndrome: an update with emphasis on imaging features. Abdom Imaging 40:2839–2849. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0481-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. El Allani L, Benlamkaddem S, Berdai MA, Harandou M (2020) A case of massive hepatic infarction in severe preeclampsia as part of the HELLP syndrome. Pan Afr Med J 36:78. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2020.36.78.23302

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Guo Q, Yang Z, Guo J et al (2018) Hepatic infarction induced by HELLP syndrome: a case report and review of the literature. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 18:191. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1799-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Frank Wolf M, Peleg D, Kariv Silberstein N et al (2016) Correlation between changes in liver stiffness and preeclampsia as shown by transient elastography. Hypertens Pregnancy 35:536–541. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641955.2016.1197934

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Carmiel Haggai M, Sgayer I, Bornstein J et al (2022) Liver stiffness and steatosis in preeclampsia as shown by transient elastography–a prospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 227:515.e1-515.e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2022.04.048

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Brito M, Gamito M, Neves AR et al (2021) Conservative management of a pregnancy complicated by preeclampsia and postpartum spontaneous hepatic rupture: a case report and review of the literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 267:79–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.10.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. GrandʼMaison S, Sauvé N, Weber F et al (2012) Hepatic rupture in hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelets syndrome. Obstet Gynecol 119:617–625. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e318245c283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Mazzola A, Magro B, Perdigao F et al (2021) Acute liver failure and HELLP syndrome: a clinical case and literature review. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 45:101498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinre.2020.07.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Liu J, Ghaziani TT, Wolf JL (2017) Acute fatty liver disease of pregnancy: updates in pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Am J Gastroenterol 112:838–846. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2017.54

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Wei Q, Zhang L, Liu X (2010) Clinical diagnosis and treatment of acute fatty liver of pregnancy: a literature review and 11 new cases: acute fatty liver of pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 36:751–756. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0756.2010.01242.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhong Y, Zhu F, Ding Y (2020) Early diagnostic test for acute fatty liver of pregnancy: a retrospective case control study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 20:162. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-2787-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Knight M, Nelson-Piercy C, Kurinczuk JJ et al (2008) A prospective national study of acute fatty liver of pregnancy in the UK. Gut 57:951–956. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2008.148676

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Tang A, Tan J, Sun M et al (2013) Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: MR imaging of liver proton density fat fraction to assess hepatic steatosis. Radiology 267:422–431. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.12120896

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Châtel P, Ronot M, Roux O et al (2016) Transient excess of liver fat detected by magnetic resonance imaging in women with acute fatty liver of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 214:127–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.09.067

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Norvell JP, Blei AT, Jovanovic BD, Levitsky J (2007) Herpes simplex virus hepatitis: an analysis of the published literature and institutional cases. Liver Transpl 13:1428–1434. https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.21250

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Allen RH, Tuomala RE (2005) Herpes simplex virus hepatitis causing acute liver dysfunction and thrombocytopenia in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 106:1187–1189. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000160481.11517.a0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Terrault NA, Levy MT, Cheung KW, Jourdain G (2021) Viral hepatitis and pregnancy. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 18:117–130. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41575-020-00361-w

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Ren W, Li X, Jia J et al (2015) Prevalence of budd-chiari syndrome during pregnancy or puerperium: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2015:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/839875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Rautou P-E, Plessier A, Bernuau J et al (2009) Pregnancy: a risk factor for Budd-Chiari syndrome? Gut 58:606–608. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2008.167577

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Wiegers H, Hamulyák E, Damhuis S et al (2022) Pregnancy outcomes in women with Budd-Chiari syndrome or portal vein thrombosis – a multicentre retrospective cohort study. BJOG 129:608–617. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Merz WM, Rüland AM, Hippe V et al (2016) Pregnancy in budd-chiari syndrome: case report and proposed risk score. Medicine (Baltimore) 95:e3817. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000003817

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Brancatelli G, Federle MP, Grazioli L et al (2002) Benign regenerative nodules in budd-chiari syndrome and other vascular disorders of the liver: radiologic-pathologic and clinical correlation. Radiographics 22:847–862. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.22.4.g02jl17847

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Porrello G, Mamone G, Miraglia R (2023) Budd-chiari syndrome imaging diagnosis: state of the art and future perspectives. Diagnostics 13:2256. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13132256

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Payancé A, Plessier A, Valla D, Rautou P-E (2019) Angioplasty with stenting for Budd-Chiari syndrome. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 4:657–659. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30224-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Mac Sweeney C, Connolly P, Brady AB, Cafferkey Á (2020) Anaesthetic management of a parturient with hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) and pulmonary haemorrhage requiring urgent caesarean section. BMJ Case Rep 13:e231120. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2019-231120

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Torabi M, Hosseinzadeh K, Federle MP (2008) CT of nonneoplastic hepatic vascular and perfusion disorders. Radiographics 28:1967–1982. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.287085067

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Delagrange L, Dupuis O, Fargeton A et al (2023) Obstetrical and neonatal complications in hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia: a retrospective study. BJOG 130:303–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Raiya S, Athavale A, Nair J, Deshmukh H (2017) Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia with hemothorax in pregnancy. Lung India 34:206. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-2113.201301

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Gaspersz MP, Klompenhouwer AJ, Broker MEE et al (2020) Growth of hepatocellular adenoma during pregnancy: A prospective study. J Hepatol 72:119–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2019.09.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Williamson C, Nana M, Poon L et al (2023) EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of liver diseases in pregnancy. J Hepatol 79:768–828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2023.03.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Nault J-C, Couchy G, Balabaud C et al (2017) Molecular classification of hepatocellular adenoma associates with risk factors, bleeding, and malignant transformation. Gastroenterology 152:880-894.e6. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2016.11.042

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Klompenhouwer AJ, Man RA, Dioguardi Burgio M et al (2020) New insights in the management of Hepatocellular Adenoma. Liver Int 40:1529–1537. https://doi.org/10.1111/liv.14547

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Hoekstra J, Seijo S, Rautou PE et al (2012) Pregnancy in women with portal vein thrombosis: results of a multicentric European study on maternal and fetal management and outcome. J Hepatol 57:1214–1219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2012.07.034

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Magno-Pereira V, Moutinho-Ribeiro P, Macedo G (2017) Demystifying endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) during pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 219:35–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.10.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Casey LC, Fontana RJ, Aday A et al (2020) acute liver failure (ALF) in pregnancy: how much is pregnancy related? Hepatology 72:1366–1377. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.31144

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Navarro VJ, Khan I, Björnsson E et al (2017) Liver injury from herbal and dietary supplements. Hepatology 65:363–373. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.28813

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Tripuraneni V, Patel K, Brennan TV, Ho LM (2014) Fulminant herpes simplex viral hepatitis: ultrasound and CT imaging appearance and a review of the imaging literature. Clin Imaging 38:191–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2013.11.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Hansen N, Weadock W, Morani A, Carlos R (2012) Liver lesions discovered incidentally on ultrasound. Acad Radiol 19:1087–1093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2012.06.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Falcão D, Pedroto I, Moreira T (2022) Silent growth of a “Super-Giant” Hemangioma. GE Port J Gastroenterol 29:75–76. https://doi.org/10.1159/000514659

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Cobey FC, Salem RR (2004) A review of liver masses in pregnancy and a proposed algorithm for their diagnosis and management. Am J Surg 187:181–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.11.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Rifai K, Mix H, Krusche S et al (2013) No evidence of substantial growth progression or complications of large focal nodular hyperplasia during pregnancy. Scand J Gastroenterol 48:88–92. https://doi.org/10.3109/00365521.2012.737361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Aktoz F, Yalcin AC, Yüzdemir HS et al (2020) Treatment of massive liver metastasis of breast cancer during pregnancy: first report of a complete remission with trastuzumab and review of literature. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 33:1266–1271. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2018.1517308

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Kang YJ, Oh JH, Yoon Y et al (2002) Hepatic metastasis from choriocarcinoma: angiographic findings in two cases. Korean J Radiol 3:260. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2002.3.4.260

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Heneghan MA, Cannon MD (2018) Hepatic diagnostics in pregnancy: biopsy, biomarkers, and beyond. Hepatology 68:401–403. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.29859

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Fouda S, Vennikandam MM, Pappachan JM, Fernandez CJ (2022) Pregnancy and metabolic-associated fatty liver disease: a clinical update. J Clin Transl Hepatol 10:947–954. https://doi.org/10.14218/JCTH.2022.00052

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Huang AC, Grab J, Flemming JA et al (2022) Pregnancies with cirrhosis are rising and associated with adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. Am J Gastroenterol 117:445–452. https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000001590

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Hagström H, Höijer J, Ludvigsson JF et al (2016) Adverse outcomes of pregnancy in women with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Liver Int 36:268–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/liv.12902

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Sarkar M, Grab J, Dodge JL et al (2020) Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in pregnancy is associated with adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. J Hepatol 73:516–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2020.03.049

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Lee SS (2014) Radiologic evaluation of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. World J Gastroenterol 20:7392. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i23.7392

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Dulai PS, Sirlin CB, Loomba R (2016) MRI and MRE for non-invasive quantitative assessment of hepatic steatosis and fibrosis in NAFLD and NASH: Clinical trials to clinical practice. J Hepatol 65:1006–1016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2016.06.005

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Mullin M, Djerboua M, Sarkar M et al (2022) Pregnancy is not associated with an increased risk of decompensation, transplant, or death in compensated cirrhosis. Int J Hepatol 2022:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9985226

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Gonsalkorala ES, Cannon MD, Lim TY et al (2019) Non-Invasive Markers (ALBI and APRI) predict pregnancy outcomes in women with chronic liver disease. Am J Gastroenterol 114:267–275. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41395-018-0181-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Flemming JA, Mullin M, Lu J et al (2020) Outcomes of pregnant women with cirrhosis and their infants in a population-based study. Gastroenterology 159:1752-1762.e10. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2020.07.052

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Ginès P, Krag A, Abraldes JG et al (2021) Liver cirrhosis. Lancet 398:1359–1376. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01374-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Gao X, Zhu Y, Liu H et al (2021) Maternal and fetal outcomes of patients with liver cirrhosis: a case-control study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 21:280. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03756-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Ornaghi S, Crippa I, Di Nicola S et al (2022) Splenic artery aneurysm in obstetrical patients: a series of four cases with different clinical presentation and outcome. Int J Gynecol Obstet 159:474–479. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.14133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Ha JF, Phillips M, Faulkner K (2009) Splenic artery aneurysm rupture in pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 146:133–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.05.034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Lee SH, Yang S, Park I et al (2022) Ruptured splenic artery aneurysms in pregnancy and usefulness of endovascular treatment in selective patients: a case report and review of literature. World J Clin Cases 10:9057–9063. https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i25.9057

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Maeda T, Imai D, Wang H et al (2020) Hepatic resection for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma during pregnancy: a case report. Surg Case Rep 6:229. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40792-020-00985-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. Matsuo M, Furukawa K, Shimizu H et al (2018) Novel treatment strategy with radiofrequency ablation and surgery for pregnant patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a case report. Surg Case Rep 4:43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40792-018-0434-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. Russell P, Sanjay P, Dirkzwager I, Chau K, Johnston P (2012) Hepatocellular carcinoma during pregnancy: case report and review of the literature. N Z Med J 125(1353):141–145 (Published 2012 Apr 20)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Nault J-C, Sutter O, Nahon P et al (2018) Percutaneous treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: State of the art and innovations. J Hepatol 68:783–797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2017.10.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Pawlik T, Lafaro K (2015) Fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma: current clinical perspectives. J Hepatocell Carcinoma 2:151–7. https://doi.org/10.2147/JHC.S75153

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. Yüksel B, Seven A, Kucur S et al (2013) presentation and management of pyogenic liver abscess in a 23-week pregnant woman. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol 2013:1–3. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/845215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Kaiser RWJ, Allgeier J, Philipp AB et al (2020) Development of amoebic liver abscess in early pregnancy years after initial amoebic exposure: a case report. BMC Gastroenterol 20:424. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-020-01567-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. Agarwal A, Joy D, Das P et al (2021) Hemorrhage and rupture of an unusual benign liver lesion in pregnancy: a case report. J Clin Exp Hepatol 11:260–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jceh.2020.07.004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Schmiedecke SS, Napolitano PG, Estrada SM (2019) Perinatal pyogenic liver abscess: a rare entity and first reported case of klebsiella pneumoniae. Am J Perinatol Rep 09:e251–e255. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1692713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Noori IF (2021) Liver hydatid diseases of the pregnancy: management approaches and outcomes. Int J Surg Open 31:100324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijso.2021.100324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Valentin N, Guerrido I, Rozenshteyn F et al (2021) Pregnancy outcomes after liver transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 116:491–504. https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000001105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Toti L, Manzia TM, Romano P et al (2010) Successful management of a same-day emergency delivery and liver transplant in a 27 weeks pregnant woman with fulminant hepatic failure. Transpl Int 23:114–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-2277.2009.00908.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Maddukuri VC, Stephenson CD, Eskind L et al (2012) Liver transplantation for acute liver failure at 11-week gestation with successful maternal and fetal outcome. Case Rep Transplant 2012:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/484080

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors declare that no external funds, grants, or other financial support was received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Manuscript draft writing: GP, JB, and VV. Writing—review and final editing: GP, RC, JB, AA, GB, MDB, and VV. The scientific guarantors of the content of the manuscript are JB, MDB, and VV. Data collection: GP, RC, JB, MDB, and VV. Overall design of the manuscript: GP, RC, JB, AA, GB, MDB, and VV. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giorgia Porrello.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was conducted in accordance to the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent to the imaging procedures was obtained after a full explanation of the purpose and nature of the procedure. This study does not involve animals.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

GP, JB, A.A., G.B., MDB, and VV declare that they have nothing to disclose. RC is a member of the Insights into Imaging Editorial Board and is the Insights into Imaging Social Media Editor. He has not taken part in the review or selection process of this article.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Porrello, G., Cannella, R., Bernuau, J. et al. Liver imaging and pregnancy: what to expect when your patient is expecting. Insights Imaging 15, 66 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-024-01622-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-024-01622-x

Keywords