Skip to main content

Many faces of acute bowel ischemia: overview of radiologic staging


Acute bowel ischemia (ABI) can be life threatening with high mortality rate. In spite of the advances made in diagnosis and treatment of ABI, no significant change has occurred in the mortality over the past decade. ABI is potentially reversible with prompt diagnosis. The radiologist plays a central role in the initial diagnosis and preventing progression to irreversible intestinal ischemic injury or bowel necrosis. The most single imaging findings described in the literature are either non-specific or only present in the late stages of ABI, urging the use of a constellation of features to reach a more confident diagnosis. While ABI has been traditionally categorized based on the etiology with a wide spectrum of imaging findings overlapped with each other, the final decision for patient’s management is usually made on the stage of the ABI with respect to the underlying pathophysiology. In this review, we first discuss the pathologic stages of ischemia and then summarize the various imaging signs and causes of ABI. We also emphasize on the correlation of imaging findings and pathological staging of the disease. Finally, a management approach is proposed using combined clinical and radiological findings to determine whether the patient may benefit from surgery or not.

Key Points

  • There is a correlation between pathologic staging and radiologic findings of ABI.

  • Reversibility–irreversibility of ABI spans a temporal continuum with areas of overlap.

  • Understanding the pathophysiology of ABI can help for better management.

  • Management should be based on the latest stage identified.


Acute bowel ischemia (ABI) is defined as bowel injury associated with sudden interruption of blood supply to small or large intestine in an either segmental or diffuse pattern [1]. Despite low incidence (accounting for only 0.09–0.2% of emergency departments admissions [2]), this is a life-threatening condition with mortality rate reaching 60–80%, even with surgical intervention [3]. In spite of advances in detection and therapeutic options, no significant change has occurred in the mortality of ABI over the past decade [4]. Furthermore, with increasing mean life expectancy, bowel ischemia has turned into one of the most ominous disorders of elderly patients in the clinical practice [5].

Clinical presentation, physical examination and laboratory findings are generally non-specific and do not reliably differentiate bowel ischemia from other abdominal emergencies without imaging [6]. Patients with ABI may present with abdominal pain out of proportion to examination, rebound tenderness, epigastric bruit, vomiting and diarrhea, most of which happening in the late stages of the disease [7]. Elevation of serum lactate levels could be also a late finding in the course of disease. This is true for other laboratory findings including neutrophilic leukocytosis, high anion gap metabolic acidosis, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) [8].

Duration of insufficient blood flow is the most important prognostic factor which makes timely diagnosis and surgical intervention the cornerstones of improved outcome [9]. Although X-ray (abdominal or upright chest) and abdominal ultrasound play a vital role in the first-line diagnostic workup of acute abdomen, they usually yield non-diagnostic results in case of ABI [10]. Abdominal x-ray can show pneumoperitoneum, caused by bowel perforation in advanced stages of ABI, or even in some instances may show pneumatosis intestinalis in late in the disease course. Abdominal X-ray can also depict bowel distention as a non-specific finding caused by paralytic ileus in early stages of ABI. Abdominal ultrasound might be useful to assess intraperitoneal free fluid or portal venous gas in advanced ABI. Doppler study may also infrequently reveal arterial or venous occlusion in larger vessels.

With a 93% sensitivity and 96% specificity, multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) scan is widely utilized as the first-line imaging choice to confirm and localize ABI, determine its severity and exclude mimickers [11]. MRI is not a common choice for diagnosing ABI in acute clinical settings, and due to its better visualization of thrombosis, inflammatory processes and adhesion bands, it is more frequently used in evaluation of chronic bowel ischemia [10].

ABI tends to develop through different stages with distinctive diagnostic features at each stage [12]. CT scan plays an important role in appropriate triage of patients and early diagnosis of disease at the reversible stage. Thus, radiologists play a key role in the initial diagnosis by determining the location, extent of the disease and identifying the underlying cause, potentially preventing ABI progression to irreversible intestinal injury or bowel necrosis [13].

This review will address various causes and imaging signs of bowel ischemia with emphasizes on correlation of imaging findings and pathological staging of the disease. Finally, a management approach is proposed using combined clinical and radiological findings.


Intestinal ischemia develops when blood perfusion is disproportionate to the metabolic demands of the organ. Collateral circulation can protect the bowel from substantial damage when up to 75% of bowel perfusion is lost for 12 h [14]; however, complete perfusion loss of more than 4–6 h results in significant bowel injury [15]. Therefore, the initial hours are a golden time to achieve a favorable outcome with prompt intervention. ABI has diverse etiologies that could be divided into: arterial, venous, non-occlusive and mixed type [16]. Familiarity with each category will help radiologists take a proactive approach in early diagnosis of these emergent conditions (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1

Overview of the causes of acute bowel ischemia

Mesenteric circulation

A solid understanding of vascular anatomy and territories is crucial to identify the areas that are particularly susceptible to infarction from global ischemia. The abdominal aorta gives off three major branches responsible for the arterial blood supply of gastrointestinal tract, namely celiac artery (CA), superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and inferior mesenteric artery (IMA), which perfuse foregut (from the oral cavity to the proximal part of the duodenum, D1), midgut (from the mid-duodenum, D2, to the proximal two-thirds of the transverse colon) and hindgut (from the distal one-third of the transverse colon to the upper portion of the anus), respectively [17] (Fig. 2). This accounts for the conventional anatomic pattern with other anatomical variations exist [18].

Fig. 2

Bowel arterial territories supplied by celiac trunk (pink), SMA (red), IMA (orange) and internal iliac artery (yellow). [Photo was adapted and modified from "Blood supply to the intestines" by Anpol42 (; used under CC BY-SA 4.0]

The mesenteric venous drainage includes superior mesenteric vein (SMV) and inferior mesenteric vein (IMV), grossly mirroring the arterial system and running alongside the corresponding arteries. IMV drains blood from rectosigmoid and left colon; meanwhile, SMV drains right and transverse colon, ileum and jejunum. Subsequently, SMV and splenic vein (SV) join together to form the portal vein. IMV can drain into splenic vein (SV), SMV or their confluence [19]. In case of any arterial or venous occlusion, plenty of venous collateral pathways exist.

Absence or underdevelopment of vascular connections between two neighboring colonic vascular territories is regarded as “Watershed” areas. Junction of SMA and IMA at the colon’s splenic flexure is known as “Griffith’s point” [20]. There is an additional watershed area in the rectosigmoid junction between IMA branches and hypogastric arteries known as “point of Sudeck” [21]. These watershed areas are typically affected the most in hypoperfusion state [22].

Pathologic staging

Understanding the pathologic basis of ABI can help to estimate the probability of reversibility and choose the optimal treatment option. The gastrointestinal tract is made up of four layers, which include mucosa, submucosa, muscularis and serosa, from inner to outermost layer. ABI is categorized into 3 stages based on the involvement of each layer.

In stage I or the early stage, the damage is only confined to the mucosal layer [23]. The early stage of ischemia is typically followed by the release of certain mediators (cytokines, platelet-activating factor and tumor necrosis factor), which leads to an inflammatory response, resulting in further damage of the intestinal wall [24]. These changes are reversible and are not extended to the outer layers. This phase has the best prognosis and can heal completely with timely intervention.

Stage II or the intermediate stage is described as presence of specific pathologic changes (edema, erosion, hemorrhage and necrosis) in submucosa and muscularis propria [14]. There are two enteric nervous plexuses in these layers. Meissner’s plexus lies in submucosa and mainly controls secretion and local blood supply, whereas Myenteric or Auerbach’s plexus is located between the longitudinal and circular layers of the muscularis propria and is responsible for the peristaltic movement of the bowel. Injury to these neural plexuses leads to a reduced blood flow, impaired motor function and results in loss of peristalsis and muscles tone [25]. Fibrotic stricture of bowel eventually forms as the late outcome if perfusion restores (Figs. 3, 4).

Fig. 3

A 48 y/o male presented abdominal distention and diffuse pain. CT images demonstrate complete thrombotic occlusion of IMA (arrowhead) at its origin (a). Segmental thickening of sigmoid colon is noted in b with hypo enhancement, compatible with watershed ischemia (thin arrow). c 3 months later, patient returns with fibrotic stricture (thick arrow) of the distal sigmoid colon with upstream colonic dilatation and obstruction in d (asterisk)

Fig. 4

A 44 y/o male with chronic abdominal pain, recurrent episodes of partial small bowel obstruction and long history of portal vein thrombosis. MR enterography images show a fixed stricture (arrowheads) in jejunum on coronal T2-W FSE (a) and SSFP (b) sequences leading to upstream dilatation (asterisk). A partial filling defect (thin arrow) is also seen in SMV in axial T2-W SSFP sequence (c). On the post contrast coronal T1-W sequence (d), there are prominent mesenteric collateral structures (curved arrow) in the left hemi-abdomen adjacent to the stenotic jejunal segment. Chronic thrombosis of SMV is seen (thick arrow), with collateral formation (circle) in the porta hepatis due to chronic portal vein thrombosis

Stage III, the late stage, is manifested by transmural bowel necrosis and is developed if blood supply is not eventually restored [23]. Epithelial changes and alterations in cellular function in stage III lead to increased capillary permeability and therefore bacterial translocation [26]. Subsequently, efficient hepatic detoxification is impaired and toxins release into the systemic blood circulation. Consequently, progressive multiorgan failure develops [27]. It should be noted that bowel ischemia accompanied by reperfusion injury may lead to the disruption of mucosal barrier followed by bacterial invasion, septic shock and multiorgan failure, which may cause death without transmural necrosis [28]. This phase is clinically presented with fever, bloody diarrhea and shock. The permanent end-stage bowel damage in this stage accounts for the highest mortality rate and unfavorable prognosis. Therefore, surgical intervention is mandatory [29]. Schematic illustration of pathologic stages in ABI is shown in Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Three pathologic stages of bowel ischemia with corresponding histopathologic samples as early (a), intermediate (b) and late (c). [Top photo reproduced, with permission, from Kumar V, Abbas AK, Fausto N, Mitchell R (editors). Robbins basic pathology, 8th ed. Elsevier, 2007]

CT scan protocol

CT images are acquired in supine position from diaphragmatic dome to pubic symphysis covering the entire length of gastrointestinal tract. The protocol consists of unenhanced, arterial and portal venous phases for optimal visualization of hemorrhage, splanchnic vessels and bowel wall. Using unenhanced CT alone is inadequate and results in a delayed diagnosis as well as increased mortality [30]. Following the injection of 2 ml/kg bolus of 350 mg iodine/ml contrast material at the speed of 3–5 ml/s, the scans are obtained in arterial (30 s delay) and portal (65 s delay) phases. For multidetector CT scanners, collimation of 0.5–2.5 mm, detector pitch of 0.9–1.5 and slice thickness of 2.5 mm are used [31]. However, construction of thinner contiguous slices is recommended for multiplanar reformation and CT angiography.

Pre-contrast imaging is necessary as some important features of ischemia, like vascular wall calcification, hyperattenuating thrombosis and intramural hemorrhage, might be overlooked in post contrast images (Fig. 6). Oral contrast usage is not routinely recommended for patients suspicious for ABI because of potential delay and obscuration of intraluminal hemorrhage. Furthermore, adynamic ileus secondary to ABI prevents appropriate passage of oral contrast to distal bowel [32]. Biphasic CT scan has also been shown to be adequate for diagnosis of ABI with high sensitivity and specificity [33,34,35,36,37,38].

Fig. 6

A 32 y/o male presenting with acute SMV thrombosis due to protein C deficiency. CT images on first day of admission (a, b) display thrombosis (arrowhead) in SMV with segmental circumferential mural thickening in ileum (thin arrow), mesenteric fat stranding and free fluid. On day 3 (c, d), mural hyperdensity (thick arrow) is noted in non-contrast CT at the same segment without post contrast hyper-enhancement (curved arrow) suggestive of intramural hemorrhage. Mural thickening has relatively decreased. On day 9 (e, f), mural pneumatosis (asterisks) and thinning (paper thin) are depicted consistent with development of transmural necrosis which was confirmed in laparotomy

Radiologic staging

Early imaging diagnosis of ABI is often challenging since each individual CT finding is non-specific when observed separately. These include altered bowel wall thickness, attenuation or enhancement along with increased luminal diameter, mesenteric fat engorgement and mesenteric fluid [39]. The late findings suggestive of bowel necrosis include pneumatosis intestinalis, portal venous gas and pneumoperitoneum [40]. CT scan findings have been shown to correlate with pathologic staging and can help to predict the chance of reversibility [28]. Table 1 summarizes radiologic findings of ABI based on etiology and stage.

Table 1 Radiologic signs of ABI

Early stage: Bowel wall may be unchanged or thickened at stage I. Edema in submucosa and muscularis propria results in hypoattenuated thickened bowel wall, which is the most common imaging feature with a sensitivity of 38–86% and a specificity of 38–72% [41, 42]. Increased vascular permeability at this stage leads to contrast extravasation and mucosal hyperenhancement, especially in portal venous phase [28]. This mural stratification secondary to the enhancing mucosal and serosal layers with a hypoattenuating layer in between leads to the characteristic “Target” or “Halo” appearance [43]. On the other hand, disruption of arterial blood flow can cause mural hypoenhancement, known as “Pale ischemia,” which has a sensitivity of 62% and a specificity of 96% [39, 40]. Because there is no nerve injury at this stage, bowel lumen maintains normal diameter. Another common appearance is the hyperattenuating wall or “White” pattern. This could be due to intramural hemorrhage at pre-contrast images or increased mural enhancement during reperfusion on post-contrast scans [28]. Reduction of both arterial inflow and venous outflow also results in congestion and prolonged wall enhancement, “shock bowel” [44]. Differentiating a normal enhancing wall from a hyperattenuating wall caused by intramural hemorrhage is impossible without the pre-contrast images. Increased wall thickness, mesenteric fat stranding and ascites are other CT scan findings that are evident in reperfusion injuries, with a high sensitivity but low specificity [41, 45].

Intermediate stage Deeper extension of ischemia in stage 2 leads to paralytic ileus and luminal dilatation induced by nervous plexus involvement [46]. This finding has a sensitivity of 39–67% but is relatively non-specific, with a specificity ranging from 29 to 81% [34, 35, 41, 45]. Absence or minimal enhancement in the thickened bowel wall causes the “Grey” pattern at this stage; however, this pattern could also be seen with normal or even thin bowel wall segment [39, 40, 47]. The “Grey pattern” feature has a sensitivity of 40% and a specificity of 88% [41].The late sequel of this stage could be fibrotic stricturing following reparative changes [16].

Late stage In the late stage of arterial occlusion, transmural destruction of nerves and muscular layer leads to dilated, fluid or gas filled loops with extremely thinned wall, creating “Paper thin wall” appearance [48]. Transmural necrosis also causes fluid translocation from intraluminal space to the mesenteric folds, causing mesenteric fat stranding and interloop free fluid as consequences. An additional well-recognized feature for this stage is the “Gas” pattern. This pattern is created as a rim of air bubbles or multiple small separated gas bubbles with circumferential distribution dissect wall layers [49]. Transmural infarct and perforation can lead to translocation of intraluminal gas to the peritoneal cavity (pneumoperitoneum). Overview of enhancement patterns in each stage is shown in Fig. 7. It should be noted that different patterns of enhancement may occur simultaneously in a single patient (Fig. 8).

Fig. 7

Overview of the enhancement patterns in different stages of bowel ischemia

Fig. 8

A 68 y/o male with acute SMV thrombosis demonstrates varying degrees of bowel ischemia within the abdomen. a, b There is increased mucosal enhancement (target pattern) with mural thickening in ileal loops signaling early-stage mucosal ischemia. c, d Mural thickening and hypo-enhancement are depicted in another ileal segment proximally suggestive of intermediate stage ischemia. eg A short ileal segment shows mural thinning, perforation and pneumatosis due to late stage of transmural necrosis associated with pneumoperitoneum (thin arrows in b)


Arterial etiologies are the most prevalent causes of ABI, accounting for 60–70% cases [50]. Arterial embolus and thrombosis are the most important subtypes.


Mesenteric arterial emboli (MAE) account for approximately half of all ABI cases [51]. Arterial emboli typically originate from the heart, mainly caused by atrial fibrillation, structural abnormality or ischemic heart disease [52]. SMA is more frequently affected than CA and IMA due to the larger diameter and sharper branching angle (~ 45º) [53]. Considerable narrowing of the SMA immediately after the branching of the middle colic artery creates a vulnerable location for lodging embolus that leads to isolated ischemia of jejunum, ileum and proximal colon with the duodenum and transverse colon usually being spared [54]. The lodgment is also depending on the size of the embolus, with larger emboli tending to occlude proximal mesenteric arteries, resulting in greater extent of ischemia and poorer prognosis [46]. On the contrary, smaller emboli are usually trapped in distal branches causing a limited intestinal involvement with better prognosis [55]. Emboli may also cause end-organ infarctions including lower extremities, spleen, kidneys and brain [43] (Fig. 9).

Fig. 9

a A 52 y/o male with atrial fibrillation presenting with diffuse abdominal pain and guarding. There is a central filling defect (arrowhead) within the SMA approximately 5 cm from the SMA ostium, compatible with acute embolus associated with multifocal pneumatosis (thick arrow) and mesenteric venous gas (thin arrows) consistent with late-stage ischemia. bd A 55 y/o male presented with shock and abdominal pain. Incidental transmural left ventricular hypodensity (asterisk) is seen in RCA distribution, compatible with myocardial infarction. Small filling defect is also noted at LV apex, confirmed to represent a thrombus (curved arrow). Bowel wall thickening (dotted arrow) involves watershed region of sigmoid colon, with predominant mural hypoenhancement suggestive of intermediate stage ischemia


Mesenteric arterial thrombosis (MAT) is responsible for 20–35% of ABI cases [51]. Patients generally have long-standing atheroma, or previous stenosis, and have a more indolent course of clinical symptoms [43]. On the unenhanced phase, notable mural calcification of mesenteric arterial branches is usually evident, especially near the ostium and proximal parts of the vessel [56] (Fig. 10). Atherosclerotic changes are typically apparent in other organs including cerebral, renal, coronary and peripheral arteries [57]. The process of ischemia starts when the gradual narrowing reaches a critical level. Then, location and severity of obstruction and development of collaterals determine evolution to bowel necrosis.

Fig. 10

A 78 y/o male presented with severe abdominal pain to ER. Calcified plaques are evident in origin of SMA (arrowhead) and IMA (dotted arrow) leading to notable luminal stenosis associated with superimposed thrombus in SMA. Ischemic changes are depicted in descending colon as circumferential mural thickening and hypo enhancement (thick arrows) along with mural pneumatosis (thin arrows) consistent with late-stage ischemia

CT scan findings for both arterial embolus and thrombosis have great similarities. Low-attenuation filling defect on CT angiography or high attenuation intravascular substance on an unenhanced CT scan is a direct sign for arterial embolus or thrombosis, which can lead to “pale ischemia” and cause “paper-thin” bowel wall [39]. The signs of atherosclerotic changes in the affected artery help differentiate these two entities.

Although arterial bowel ischemia has a much higher incidence in the elderly men over 70 years old [58], in younger individuals, thrombotic microangiopathies, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, dissection and vasculitides may contribute to this type of ABI [16] (Figs. 11, 12). In such cases, unusual sites of the gastrointestinal tract including stomach, duodenum and rectum might be involved.

Fig. 11

A 33 y/o female with anti-phospholipid antibody syndrome with an extensive SMA thrombosis (arrowheads) and proximal jejunal necrosis (thick arrows) (a, b). She presented with recurrent abdominal pain 45 days after bowel resection surgery. c Marked thickening of small bowel near anastomosis is depicted with mucosal enhancement (thin arrow) suggestive of early ischemic changes. Follow-up CT on day 57 (d, e) showed dilation of small bowel (asterisk) with pneumatosis (curved arrows) upstream to a late outcome fibrotic stricture (dotted arrow) that was confirmed at surgery

Fig. 12

A 37 y/o female with known Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), presented with abdominal pain and diarrhea. a Axial T2-W sequence shows focal circumferential mural thickening (thick arrow) of the descending colon. Intense bowel wall diffusion restriction is noted on DWI (b) and ADC (c) sequences (arrowheads). On the post contrast axial T1-W image (d), there is lack of mural enhancement (thin arrow), favoring Lupus-induced ischemic colitis (intermediate stage). Accompanying mild serosal enhancement (dotted arrow) suggests underlying inflammation secondary to vasculitis. e Colonoscopic view of the same segment demonstrated fragile and edematous mucosa with loss of vascularity


Mesenteric venous thrombosis (MVT) accounts for 5–15% of ABI cases with the youngest peak age of onset and significantly better prognosis when compared to the arterial category (41.7% vs. 73.9% mortality rate) [59]. Although it can be primary on some occasions, the secondary type caused by underlying conditions and hypercoagulability state is much far more common, accounting for 80% of ABI cases [28, 60]. It is typically seen in young females taking hormonal contraceptives [61]. Thrombosis often affects SMV and appears as a filling defect in the portal phase of contrast enhanced CT scan. Sometimes thrombosis could also be depicted as hyper attenuating material in the lumen of mesenteric vein. Combination of vascular findings and bowel wall abnormalities in CT scan resulted in a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 90–94% for diagnosis of mesenteric venous ischemia by CT scan [62,63,64].

In the early stage, the bowel wall is frequently thickened [46]. This finding is more prominent than cases of isolated mesenteric arterial occlusion and is the result of reduced venous outflow and maintained high-pressure arterial inflow, which leads to high hydrostatic pressure and intramural edema [40]. “Target” appearance is more common compared to arterial ABI [28, 43]. Wall thickening also can fall out as a result of intramural hemorrhage or superimposed infection may also contribute to the wall thickening in MVT. In veno-occlusive ABI, exudative fluid also accumulates in the intraluminal space of ischemic bowel and results in “completely fluid filled, gasless, dilated loop” [65]. This rarely occurs in arterial form, thus helps in differentiating these entities. Extraluminal seepage of fluid causes mesenteric haziness and ascites [64]. It should be noticed that the degree of wall thickening and ascites is not always proportional to the intensity of bowel wall damage [48] (Fig. 13). Eventually, with persistence of venous outflow occlusion, arterial inflow diminishes leading to decreased or absent wall enhancement showing “Gray” pattern on CT [40]. The findings of the intermediate and late stages are similar to arterial cases (Figs. 14, 15).

Fig. 13

A 54 y/o male with chronic kidney disease undergoing hemodialysis presented with recent abdominal pain and constipation. a There is complete SMV thrombosis (arrowhead) leading to extensive ischemic changes in small bowel loops. b Hyperdense circumferential mural thickening (thick arrow) secondary to intramural hemorrhage is seen. c Mesenteric engorgement is evident (white box). d There are also mural pneumatosis, thinning and hypodensity (thin arrow) consistent with late-stage ischemia. Free fluid in abdomen and pelvis (asterisks) and mesenteric edema (dotted arrow) are also depicted. Intra operative images display prominent mesenteric veins (black box) due to engorgement (e) associated with small bowel necrosis (f)

Fig. 14

Progression of venous ischemia from early to late stage in a 58 y/o male presenting with abdominal pain. On day 1 (a, b), baseline Imaging demonstrates extensive SMV thrombosis (arrowhead) with associated small bowel wall (curved arrow) and mesenteric edema (thick arrow), compatible with early stage of ischemia. On day 3 (c), follow-up scan demonstrates bowel wall thinning with extraluminal oral contrast (thin arrows) as mesenteric venous contrast intravasation, suggestive of Intermediate stage ischemia. On day 7 (d), subsequent CT shows extensive pneumatosis (asterisks) and pneumoperitoneum (dotted arrow), in keeping with late-stage ischemia. Please notice that oral contrast intravasation can precede transmural bowel necrosis

Fig. 15

A 66 y/o cirrhotic male patient presenting with acute SMV thrombosis. a, b CT images reveal complete filling defect in SMV (arrow head) and mesenteric fluid (dotted arrow) associated with mural pneumatosis (thin arrow) and thinning (thick arrow) in a dilated ileal segment. c Intra operative image shows necrosis of ileal segments along with some adjacent borderline segments

Salim et al. demonstrated that small bowel wall edema was the independent risk factor associated with bowel resection in a prospective study on 102 patients with mesenteric venous thrombosis [66]. In a study by Vietti Violi et al. on follow-up of 20 patients with acute mesenteric venous thrombosis, most cases (80%) evolved toward the chronic form with vein stenosis or occlusion and development of collateral veins. It has been reported that patients with short, isolated central mesenteric venous thrombosis in a larger vein might present higher probability of complete radiologic recovery [67]. Higher rate of recanalization in patients with portal or mesenteric vein thrombosis was also observed by Condat et al. compared to patients with more extensive and distal thrombosis [68].


Non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia (NOMI) is responsible for almost 20% of ABI cases [69] and is caused by nonocclusive reduction of arterial blood flow. Hemodynamic instability followed by mesenteric arterial vasoconstriction is the main cause [70], usually seen as a part of systemic hypotensive state associated with impaired sympathetic response in elderly or critically ill patients with concomitant multiorgan damage [71]. CT scan findings have significant overlap with other ABI entities or bowel disorders including infectious and inflammatory diseases of bowel, making the diagnosis even more challenging [72]. The difficulty of early assessment, advanced age, comorbidities and generalized poor physical state are the reasons for the less than 50% survival rate in this subtype [73].

Generalized vasospasm may be obvious as narrowing of IVC, aorta and mesenteric vessels resulting in decreased enhancement of affected bowel segments and occasionally other organs (liver, spleen and pancreas) [74]. Bowel wall thickness ranges from unchanged in earliest stages to markedly thinned in an advanced stage [40, 74]. Radiologic and pathologic findings indicating ischemic staging are the same as other entities (Figs. 16, 17). Four radiological signs had been suggested by Siegelman et al. in 1974 for description of mesenteric vasospasm based on conventional angiography [75]: (1) narrowing in the origins of multiple branches of the SMA, (2) irregularities in intestinal branches as alternate dilatation and narrowing, “the string of sausages sign” [76], (3) spasm of the mesenteric arcades, (4) impaired filling of intramural vessels. Another suggested sign of NOMI has been contrast reflux into the abdominal aorta at angiography [70]. Nakamura et al. reported that diameters of SMA and SMV have been significantly smaller in 11 NOMI cases than 44 controls on CT scan and SMV diameter was a more significant parameter than SMA diameter. Whether these results could be considered as diagnostic criteria remain to be investigated because the so-called smaller SMV sign has also been reported in other etiologies like acute SMA occlusion [77].

Fig. 16

Non-occlusive Mesenteric Ischemia (NOMI) in three different patients. a, b A 61 y/o male with hypovolemic shock, images show wall thickening, submucosal hypo-enhancement (target wall pattern), and mucosal hyper-enhancement (thick arrows) involving small and large bowel suggesting early-stage bowel ischemia associated with hepatic ischemia as peripheral hepatic hypo-enhancement (asterisk). c, d A 77 y/o female in shock with bloody diarrhea and renal failure. Colonic distention (thick arrow) with paper-thin wall and subtle pneumatosis (thin arrow). Note collapsed IVC (arrowhead). Renal Ischemia is also seen as heterogeneous delayed nephrogram compatible with acute tubular necrosis (dotted arrows). e, f A 62 y/o male presented with abdominal distention, pain and sepsis 5 days after CABG. Extensive cecal pneumatosis (asterisks) is noted with hypo-enhancement of medial wall (arrowhead) and hyper-enhancement of lateral wall (thin arrow). There is a rim-enhancing pericecal collection (curved arrow) and extraluminal air (dotted arrow) compatible with perforation and abscess. Patchy areas of necrosis were found at surgery

Fig. 17

Uncommon manifestations of NOMI in two different patients. a, b A 35 y/o male with history of cardiac transplantation and multiorgan failure. Diffuse bowel distention is seen, with pneumatosis of the colon (thin arrows) and paper-thin colonic wall, suggesting advanced stage of bowel necrosis. Coronal CT image demonstrates dystrophic subtle myocardial calcification in the transplant heart (asterisk) suggestive of rejection. The patient expired from bowel ischemia as a result of cardiac transplant rejection. c, d A 51 y/o female with alcoholic cirrhosis found to have high anion gap lactic acidosis. Marked diffuse colonic wall thickening is depicted with mucosal enhancement (thick arrow) and “target” wall pattern suggestive of early ischemic injury. Additional involvement of the small bowel (dotted arrow) and stomach (curved arrow). Cirrhotic liver (arrowhead) is also noted

During the hypoperfusion state, colon is more vulnerable to ischemia than the small intestine [78]. The anatomic and physiologic characteristics of the mesenteric circulation contribute to particular vulnerability of right colon in classical NOMI. Compared to the left colon, the right colon frequently lacks a well-developed and consistent marginal collateral network. The vasa recta of right colon are usually longer and originating further away from the bowel. Dominant involvement of right colon in NOMI could also be explained by the possibility of "mesenteric steal" from more proximal branches of SMA circulation when perfusion is compromised [79, 80]. Progression of damages occurs in almost a similar manner to small bowel ischemia from mucosa to serosa [81].

Mixed (strangulation) and other miscellaneous causes

Strangulated bowel is usually emanating from closed-loop obstruction and is responsible for 10% of ABI cases [28]. It is described as a twisted C or U-shaped segment of small intestine with both proximal and distal parts obstructed and blood flow compromised, in which the affected segment is dilated, thin walled and fluid filled [82]. Adhesion, hernia and volvulus can also be associated with closed-loop obstruction (Fig. 18, 19) [83]. At earlier stages, arterial input is preserved due to its higher pressure but with taking time both arterial inflow and venous drainage usually get diminished [84]. Signs and staging of ischemia in strangulated bowel are the same as other entities. Some specific features of closed-loop obstruction include radial distribution of intestinal loops and the “beak” sign or triangular loops, caused by fusiform tapering of fluid-filled bowel loops [39, 82]. The closed-loop mechanism in combination with reduced bowel wall enhancement and diffuse mesenteric haziness has been shown to predict strangulation accurately in adhesive small bowel obstruction [85]. Higher risk of ischemia is seen in matted or multiple adhesive bands than single adhesive bands. Zinc et al. have suggested that the beak sign and fat notch sign are associated with the presence of a single adhesive band which can help to personalize patient’s treatment, for example by choosing the laparoscopic approach when non-operative treatment fails [86]. The positive predictive values for a single adhesive band were 92% and 100% for the beak sign and the fat notch sign, respectively [87] (Figs. 20, 21).

Fig. 18

An 84 y/o female with notable abdominal pain and distension for 1 week and obstipation for 2 days. She underwent CT scan with oral and without IV contrast due to elevated serum creatinine level. ac Right obturator hernia is seen containing a loop of ileum (thick arrow), causing proximal small bowel obstruction (asterisks). No pneumatosis or pneumoperitoneum was found, so the surgeon decided to make a local inguinal incision to reduce the incarcerated ileal loop; however, this was found to be necrotic (arrow head) (d). A subsequent midline incision for laparotomy revealed a long necrotic ileal segment (dotted arrow), that was resected (e). Retrospectively, the herniated loop showed high mural density (thick arrow) on non-contrast CT examination suggestive of hemorrhagic infarct

Fig. 19

A 59 y/o male status post recent bowel resection for malignancy found to have leukocytosis and abdominal pain. a Postoperative left diaphragmatic hernia with pneumatosis (thin arrows) found during postop leak check fluoroscopic exam. b Follow-up CT confirmed a diaphragmatic defect (thick arrows) with herniation of bowel loops into the lower chest. Necrotic bowel was found at surgery

Fig. 20

A 45 y/o female with remote prior bowel resection for malignancy presenting with abdominal pain and distension. ad Intermediate to late imaging findings of ischemia with dilated small bowel loops with lack of wall enhancement (thick arrows), small bowel-feces sign and minimal pneumatosis (thin arrow), adjacent mesenteric fat stranding and mild interloop fluid. Additionally, the bowel wall is paper-thin (dotted arrow) in the likely necrotic segment with narrowing at two transition points (arrowheads) due to adhesion bands, compatible with closed-loop obstruction. Normal enhancing jejunum (curved arrow) is seen. e Corresponding necrotic closed loop of bowel was evident on laparotomy

Fig. 21

A 17 y/o female with abdominal pain, distension, nausea and vomiting for 3 days. a, b Marked gastric dilatation is seen with mural pneumatosis (thin arrows) and hypo-enhancement (arrowheads). Portal vein pneumatosis is also depicted (dotted arrow). Patient’s annular pancreas (thick arrows) was causing duodenal luminal narrowing. c, d Emphysematous gastritis and annular pancreas were confirmed in surgery; total gastrectomy and esophagojejunostomy were performed

Mixed arterial and venous ischemia are also infrequently seen in association with other conditions including trauma, chemotherapy, irradiation, drug induced, corrosive injury, lead poisoning, iatrogenic, etc. [74] (Figs. 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28).

Fig. 22

A 68 y/o male with unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma with severe abdominal pain and bloody diarrhea 4 days after starting a new chemotherapy regimen with paclitaxel and gemcitabine. ae Extensive air is seen in portal vein branches (dotted arrow) and SMV (arrowhead), along with notable intestinal pneumatosis in duodenum (asterisk), small bowel (thin arrows), ascending and sigmoid colon (curved arrow); without a specific mesenteric vascular territorial distribution. Primary tumor is noted in pancreatic head (thick arrow). f Bowel necrosis was found in laparotomy from the duodenum to distal colon. No resection was performed due to extensive GI tract involvement, and the patient died

Fig. 23

A 64 y/o male with remote history of abdominal liposarcoma, status post whole abdominal external beam radiation therapy. Diffuse marked small bowel wall thickening (thick arrows) is evident involving bowel loops within the radiation field associated with transmural enhancement suggestive of early ischemia. However, there is small volume pneumoperitoneum (arrowheads), due to CT-occult micro-perforation, suggestive of focal bowel necrosis

Fig. 24

A 68 y/o male with warfarin toxicity was admitted to the ER with left-sided abdominal pain and tenderness for 2 days. ae Circumferential mural thickening (thick arrows) with intramural hyperdensity (dotted arrows) is noted in jejunum suggestive of intramural hemorrhage. Additionally, there is an area of hypoenchancing mural thickening (thin arrows) adjacent to the same segment, favoring intermediate to late-stage bowel ischemia. f This was confirmed intraoperatively

Fig. 25

A 27 y/o female ingested ratsbane (rodenticide) in a suicide attempt presenting with abdominal pain and hematochezia. ac Segmental circumferential mural thickening (thick arrows) is seen involving the proximal ileum, with adjacent mesenteric fat stranding and mild free fluid. Superimposed focal area of mural hypo-enhancement (thin arrow) (grey pattern) is depicted, suggesting intermediate stage ischemia. There is also transmural mild hyperdensity (dotted arrows) suggesting intramural hemorrhage. Histopathologic results of resected ileal segments revealed mixed transmural necrosis and intramural hemorrhage, presumably due to the warfarin-like effect of ratsbane

Fig. 26

A 56 y/o male with abdominal pain, distension and obstipation for 3 days found to have high serum lead level (> 100 mcg/dl) due to oral intake of lead-contaminated opium. ac Non-IV contrast CT revealed intraluminal dense particles (thick arrows) in bowel along with pneumoperitoneum (asterisks), free fluid (curved arrow) and multifocal segmental mural thickening (thin arrows). Additionally, there is a perforation (arrowhead) with adjacent free air, confirmed on laparotomy. Histopathology revealed transmural necrosis in the resected perforated segment

Fig. 27

A 42 y/o female with severe epigastric pain 3 days following intragastric balloon insertion for obesity, which was subsequently removed. CT scan was performed 5 days later due to persistent pain and leukocytosis. Pre (a) and post (b) IV contrast CT scan display focal adhesion of gastric body to anterior abdominal wall with mild mural thickening (thick arrows), demonstrating no enhancement on post contrast images compared to the rest of enhancing gastric wall (thin arrows) (grey pattern). c Laparotomy demonstrated anterior gastric wall thinning with pale creamy appearance along with focal perforation due to pressure necrosis from prior balloon placement. The anterior gastric wall was locally resected and repaired

Fig. 28

A 56 y/o male with known cardiac amyloidosis, abdominal pain and nausea. a CT of abdomen showed thickening of the left ventricle myocardium related to amyloid deposition (dotted arrow). Additionally, there are gastric distension (asterisk) and pneumatosis (thin arrows). Endoscopic biopsy of the bowel wall revealed amyloid deposition as the underlying cause. b Prior gastric emptying study showed markedly delayed emptying. Gastric emphysema and ischemia were found at surgery

Management algorithm

The main goal of management is to achieve a prompt diagnosis, specify the best treatment option and reduce mortality in these patients. ABI is a cardiovascular emergency which entails strict management rules identical to those created for acute myocardial or cerebrovascular ischemia [88]. With immediate management, mortality rate is less than 10%, but this figure increases to 50–60% with moderate delay (6–12 h) and reaches 80–100% with a delay more than 24 h [89]. These results clearly emphasize the close correlation between evolution of necrosis and increasing mortality. Therefore, restoration of the blood flow to the ischemic parts or revascularization is the fundamental principle for surgical and endovascular treatments in all stages. It is worth noting that the morphology of an ischemic bowel can be deceiving and even a severely ischemic bowel can be viable after revascularization [6]. Nevertheless, surgical resection of the necrotic segments is usually inevitable in irreversible stage [90].

The management of ABI is summarized as “3Rs,” Resuscitation, Rapid diagnosis and Revascularization [91]. Invasive hemodynamic monitoring, supportive care, serial assessment of electrolyte level and acid–base status and follow-up imaging are the best approaches in stage I and stage II in which there is no sign of necrosis [3, 6]. Patients should be kept “nil by mouth” which can protect them against ischemic exacerbation and reduce probability of emergency surgery. Systemic anticoagulation therapy with continuous infusion of unfractionated or low molecular weight heparin should be administered as part of early medical therapy especially in cases of veno-occlusive disease, unless there is a contraindication [51, 92]. Broad spectrum antibiotics are also part of initial therapy, especially in critically ill patients [93]. In patients with NOMI, correction of precipitating cause in addition to administration of vasodilators is fundamental [94]. Surgery is established as the best approach in patients with late stage bowel ischemia as revascularization, assessment of organs’ viability and resecting necrotic segments are achievable with surgery [80].

It is noteworthy that reversibility–irreversibility of the bowel spans a temporal continuum with areas of overlap (Fig. 29). In the co-occurrence of stages, management should be based on the latest stage identified. Nuzzo et al. in a prospective cohort of 67 patients with ABI identified three predictive factors of irreversible ischemic injury requiring resection as: (a) organ failure, (b) serum lactate levels > 2 mmol/l and (c) bowel dilation > 2.5 cm at the time of diagnosis. Having 1, 2 and 3 of these factors increased rate of irreversible necrosis to 38, 89 and 100%, respectively. They have suggested that these predictive factors could be useful in emergency setting to decide whether a surgical treatment is mandatory [95]. According to the radiologic, clinical and laboratory findings, a proposed algorithm for management of ABI regardless of etiology is shown in Fig. 30 to determine whether the patient may benefit from surgery. Needless to say, that the goal of surgery is re-establishment of blood supply, resection of non-viable bowel and preservation of viable bowel. According to this algorithm, patients in early stage should be monitored or reimaged, while intermediate stage depends on the clinical and laboratory factors to decide whether the patient needs to be monitored or referred to surgical or vascular intervention. The late stage necessitates rapid laparotomy and/or revascularization.

Fig. 29

Phases of bowel ischemia from reversible to irreversible with concomitant imaging findings and late outcomes. Note that reversibility–irreversibility spans a temporal continuum with areas of overlap

Fig. 30

Flowchart depicting management proposal according to radiologic, clinical and laboratory findings


Some non-ischemic conditions may have overlapping imaging features. Most notably, pneumatosis intestinalis may be found in any mechanical mucosal injury, increased mucosal permeability, infections, corticosteroid usage, organ transplantation, inflammation, certain pulmonary conditions with alveolar rupture and pneumatosis cystoides coli [96, 97]. Differentiation of this benign type of pneumatosis from its ominous counterpart as a sign of bowel necrosis might be challenging (Figs. 31, 32).

Fig. 31

Pneumatosis cystoides intestinalis in two different patients. a A 40 y/o male with Crohn’s disease status post ileocecectomy, on corticosteroids. CT imaging demonstrates benign long-segment colonic pneumatosis cystoides (thick arrows) which resolved on 3 months follow-up examination (not shown). b A 68 y/o male with abdominal pain. CT shows incidental benign pneumatosis of small bowel (thick arrows), but no other findings suggestive of ischemia. Clinical examinatin was benign, and findings proved to be self-limited on follow-up CT

Fig. 32

A 23 y/o male presented following hydrogen peroxide ingestion in suicide attempt, found to have transient gastro-esophageal pneumatosis and portal venous gas secondary to esophagogastritis. a, b Initial contrast-enhanced CT demonstrates intramural air within the distal esophagus (thick arrow) and stomach (arrowhead). There is associated extensive portal venous gas (thin arrows). c, d Follow-up CT demonstrates interval resolution of portal venous gas, esophageal and gastric pneumatosis. Patient was treated conservatively as there was no evidence of perforation on upper endoscopy


Bowel wall ischemia is sub-classified into three pathologic stages depending on the degree of mural involvement (mucosal, submucosal and trans-mural). There are imaging clues that indicate the severity of bowel wall involvement and suggest the pathologic stage. Bowel ischemia may be classified by etiology into the following categories: arterial, venous, non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia (NOMI), mixed arterial/venous and miscellaneous (rare). Imaging provides valuable information regarding the inciting cause. Both the reversibility and imaging stages of ischemia have considerable overlap; however, the management should be based on the latest stage identified. The imaging findings should be interpreted in the context of the clinical picture (serum lactate level, peritoneal signs, multiorgan failure, etc.) and management decisions should ultimately be guided clinically. Decision regarding whether the patient needs surgery or not is the most important question from clinician, which is usually unrelated to the etiology of the ABI since any cause of bowel ischemia may eventually results in a single outcome that is bowel necrosis. Therefore, focusing on the predictive factors of bowel necrosis rather than etiology can better help on the management of ABI cases.

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.



Acute bowel ischemia


Celiac artery


Inferior mesenteric artery


Inferior mesenteric vein


Mesenteric arterial emboli


Mesenteric arterial thrombosis


Multidetector computed tomography


Mesenteric venous thrombosis


Non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia


Superior mesenteric artery


Superior mesenteric vein


Splenic vein


  1. 1.

    Patel A, Kaleya RN, Sammartano RJ (1992) Pathophysiology of mesenteric ischemia. Surg Clin N Am 72(1):31–41

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Acosta S, Björck M (2003) Acute thrombo-embolic occlusion of the superior mesenteric artery: a prospective study in a well defined population. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 26(2):179–183

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Bala M, Kashuk J, Moore EE et al (2017) Acute mesenteric ischemia: Guidelines of the World Society of Emergency Surgery. World J Emerg Surg 12(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Kassahun WT, Schulz T, Richter O, Hauss J (2008) Unchanged high mortality rates from acute occlusive intestinal ischemia: six year review. Langenbecks Arch Surg 393(2):163–171

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Yasuhara H (2005) Acute mesenteric ischemia: the challenge of gastroenterology. Surg Today 35(3):185–195

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Wyers MC (2010) Acute mesenteric ischemia: diagnostic approach and surgical treatment. Semin Vasc Surg 23(1):9–20

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Björck M, Koelemay M, Acosta S et al (2017) Editor’s choice-management of the diseases of mesenteric arteries and veins: clinical practice guidelines of the European Society of Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 53(4):460–510

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    van den Heijkant TC (2013) Challenges in diagnosing mesenteric ischemia. World J Gastroenterol 19(9):1338

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Luther B, Mamopoulos A, Lehmann C, Klar E (2018) The ongoing challenge of acute mesenteric ischemia. Visc Med 34(3):217–223

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Gangadhar K, Kielar A, Dighe MK et al (2016) Multimodality approach for imaging of non-traumatic acute abdominal emergencies. Abdom Radiol (NY) 41(1):136–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Menke J (2010) Diagnostic accuracy of multidetector CT in acute mesenteric ischemia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology 256(1):93–101

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Kühn F, Klar E (2014) Vaskuläre Komplikationen im Darmtrakt. Gastroenterol up2date 10(03):159–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Copin P, Zins M, Nuzzo A et al (2018) Acute mesenteric ischemia: a critical role for the radiologist. Diagn Interv Imaging 99(3):123–134

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Longo WE, Ballantyne GH, Gusberg RJ (1992) Ischemic colitis. Dis Colon Rectum 35(8):726–733

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Guan Y, Worrell RT, Pritts TA, Montrose MH (2009) Intestinal ischemia-reperfusion injury: reversible and irreversible damage imaged in vivo. Am J Physiol Liver Physiol 297(1):G187–G196

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Clair DG, Beach JM (2016) Mesenteric ischemia. N Engl J Med 374(10):959–968

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Rosenblum JD, Boyle CM, Schwartz LB (1997) The mesenteric circulation. Surg Clin N Am 77(2):289–306

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Walker T (2009) Mesenteric vasculature and collateral pathways. Semin Interv Radiol 26(03):167–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Kumar S, Sarr MG, Kamath PS (2001) Mesenteric venous thrombosis. N Engl J Med 345(23):1683–1688

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Meyers MA (1976) Griffiths’ point: critical anastomosis at the splenic flexure. Significance in ischemia of the colon. AJR Am J Roentgenol 126(1):77–94

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Van Tonder JJ, Boon JM, Becker JH, van Schoor AN (2007) Anatomical considerations on Sudeck’s critical point and its relevance to colorectal surgery. Clin Anat 20(4):424–427

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Berland T, Andrew OW (2008) Acute mesenteric ischemia. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol 11(1):3–10

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Haglund U, Bergqvist D (1999) Intestinal ischemia-the basics. Langenbecks Arch Surg 384(3):233–238

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Matsumoto S, Sekine K, Funaoka H et al (2014) Diagnostic performance of plasma biomarkers in patients with acute intestinal ischaemia. Br J Surg 101(3):232–238

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Thacker M, Rivera LR, Cho H-J, Furness JB (2011) The relationship between glial distortion and neuronal changes following intestinal ischemia and reperfusion. Neurogastroenterol Motil 23(11):e500–e509

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Stoney RJ, Cunningham CG (1993) Acute mesenteric ischemia. Surgery 114(3):489–490

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Guillaume A, Pili-Floury S, Chocron S et al (2017) Acute mesenteric ischemia among postcardiac surgery patients presenting with multiple organ failure. Shock 47(3):296–302

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Kanasaki S, Furukawa A, Fumoto K et al (2018) Acute mesenteric ischemia: multidetector CT findings and endovascular management. Radiographics 38(3):945–961

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Ritz J-P, Germer C-T, Buhr HJ (2005) Prognostic factors for mesenteric infarction: multivariate analysis of 187 patients with regard to patient age. Ann Vasc Surg 19(3):328–334

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Wadman M, Block T, Ekberg O, Syk I, Elmståhl S, Acosta S (2010) Impact of MDCT with intravenous contrast on the survival in patients with acute superior mesenteric artery occlusion. Emerg Radiol 17(3):171–178

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Garzelli L, Nuzzo A, Copin P et al (2020) Contrast-enhanced CT for the diagnosis of acute mesenteric ischemia. AJR Am J Roentgenol 215(1):29–38

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Mazzei MA, Volterrani L (2015) Nonocclusive mesenteric ischaemia: think about it. Radiol Med 120(1):85–95

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Akyildiz H, Akcan A, Oztürk A, Sozuer E, Kucuk C, Karahan I (2009) The correlation of the D-dimer test and biphasic computed tomography with mesenteric computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis of acute mesenteric ischemia. Am J Surg 197(4):429–433

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Barmase M, Kang M, Wig J, Kochhar R, Gupta R, Khandelwal N (2011) Role of multidetector CT angiography in the evaluation of suspected mesenteric ischemia. Eur J Radiol 80(3):e582–e587

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Aschoff AJ, Stuber G, Becker BW et al (2009) Evaluation of acute mesenteric ischemia: accuracy of biphasic mesenteric multi-detector CT angiography. Abdom Imaging 34(3):345–357

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Kirkpatrick IDC, Kroeker MA, Greenberg HM (2003) Biphasic CT with mesenteric CT angiography in the evaluation of acute mesenteric ischemia: initial experience. Radiology 229(1):91–98

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Ofer A, Abadi S, Nitecki S et al (2009) Multidetector CT angiography in the evaluation of acute mesenteric ischemia. Eur Radiol 19(1):24–30

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Yikilmaz A, Karahan OI, Senol S, Tuna IS, Akyildiz HY (2011) Value of multislice computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute mesenteric ischemia. Eur J Radiol 80(2):297–302

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Olson MC, Fletcher JG, Nagpal P, Froemming AT, Khandelwal A (2019) Mesenteric ischemia: what the radiologist needs to know. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 9(Suppl 1):S74-87

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Dhatt HS, Behr SC, Miracle A, Wang ZJ, Yeh BM (2015) Radiological evaluation of bowel ischemia. Radiol Clin North Am 53(6):1241–1254

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Barrett T, Upponi S, Benaglia T, Tasker AD (2013) Multidetector CT findings in patients with mesenteric ischaemia following cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. Br J Radiol 86(1030):20130277

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Taourel PG, Deneuville M, Pradel JA, Régent D, Bruel JM (1996) Acute mesenteric ischemia: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced CT. Radiology 199(3):632–636

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Costa AF, Chidambaram V, Lee JJ, Asquith J, Skaff ER, Thipphavong S (2014) Multidetector computed tomography of mesenteric ischaemia. Insights Imaging 5(6):657–666

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Mirvis SE, Shanmuganathan K, Erb R (1994) Diffuse small-bowel ischemia in hypotensive adults after blunt trauma (shock bowel): CT findings and clinical significance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 163(6):1375–1379

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Schieda N, Fasih N, Shabana W (2013) Triphasic CT in the diagnosis of acute mesenteric ischaemia. Eur Radiol 23(7):1891–1900

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Horton KM, Fishman EK (2007) Multidetector CT angiography in the diagnosis of mesenteric ischemia. Radiol Clin North Am 45(2):275–288

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Sheedy SP, Earnest F, Fletcher JG, Fidler JL, Hoskin TL (2006) CT of small-bowel ischemia associated with obstruction in emergency department patients: diagnostic performance evaluation. Radiology 241(3):729–736

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Chou CK, Mak CW, Tzeng WS, Chang JM (2004) CT of small bowel ischemia. Abdom Imaging 29(1):18–22

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Wiesner W, Mortelé KJ, Glickman JN, Ji H, Ros PR (2001) Pneumatosis intestinalis and portomesenteric venous gas in intestinal ischemia: correlation of CT findings with severity of ischemia and clinical outcome. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177(6):1319–1323

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Acosta S (2015) Mesenteric ischemia. Curr Opin Crit Care 21(2):171–178

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Oldenburg WA, Lau LL, Rodenberg TJ, Edmonds HJ, Burger CD (2004) Acute mesenteric ischemia: a clinical review. Arch Intern Med 164(10):1054–1062

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Kärkkäinen JM, Acosta S (2017) Acute mesenteric ischemia (part I)—Incidence, etiologies, and how to improve early diagnosis. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 31(1):15–25

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Bhagirath Desai A, Sandeep Shah D, Jagat Bhatt C, Umesh Vaishnav K, Salvi B (2015) Measurement of the distance and angle between the aorta and superior mesenteric artery on CT scan: values in Indian population in different BMI categories. Indian J Surg 77(Suppl 2):614–617

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Liao G, Chen S, Cao H, Wang W, Gao Q (2019) Review: Acute superior mesenteric artery embolism: a vascular emergency cannot be ignored by physicians. Medicine (Baltimore) 98(6):e14446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Florim S, Almeida A, Rocha D, Portugal P (2018) Acute mesenteric ischaemia: a pictorial review. Insights Imaging 9(5):673–682

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Wasnik A, Kaza RK, Al-Hawary MM, Liu PS, Platt JF (2011) Multidetector CT imaging in mesenteric ischemia–pearls and pitfalls. Emerg Radiol 18(2):145–156

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Chiu Y-W, Wu C-S, Chen P-C, Wei Y-C, Hsu L-Y, Wang S-H (2020) Risk of acute mesenteric ischemia in patients with diabetes: a population-based cohort study in Taiwan. Atherosclerosis 296:18–24

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Lawson RM (2018) Mesenteric ischemia. Crit Care Nurs Clin N Am 30(1):29–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Adaba F, Askari A, Dastur J et al (2015) Mortality after acute primary mesenteric infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Color Dis Off J Assoc Coloproctol Gt Br Irel 17(7):566–577

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Cohn DM, Roshani S, Middeldorp S (2007) Thrombophilia and venous thromboembolism: implications for testing. Semin Thromb Hemost 33(6):573–581

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Alvi AR, Khan S, Niazi SK, Ghulam M, Bibi S (2009) Acute mesenteric venous thrombosis: improved outcome with early diagnosis and prompt anticoagulation therapy. Int J Surg 7(3):210–213

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Oliva IB, Davarpanah AH, Rybicki FJ et al (2013) ACR appropriateness criteria® imaging of mesenteric ischemia. Abdom Imaging 38(4):714–719

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Rajesh S, Mukund A, Arora A (2015) Imaging diagnosis of splanchnic venous thrombosis. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2015:1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Acosta S, Alhadad A, Ekberg O (2009) Findings in multi-detector row CT with portal phase enhancement in patients with mesenteric venous thrombosis. Emerg Radiol 16(6):477–482

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Kim JY, Ha HK, Byun JY et al (1993) Intestinal infarction secondary to mesenteric venous thrombosis: CT-pathologic correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 17(3):382–385

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Gnanapandithan K, Feuerstadt P (2020) Review article: Mesenteric ischemia. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 22(4):17

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Vietti Violi N, Fournier N, Duran R et al (2014) Acute mesenteric vein thrombosis: factors associated with evolution to chronic mesenteric vein thrombosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 203(1):54–61

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Condat B, Pessione F, Helene Denninger M, Hillaire S, Valla D (2000) Recent portal or mesenteric venous thrombosis: increased recognition and frequent recanalization on anticoagulant therapy. Hepatology 32(3):466–470

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Howard TJ, Plaskon LA, Wiebke EA, Wilcox MG, Madura JA (1996) Nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia remains a diagnostic dilemma. Am J Surg 171(4):405–408

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Trompeter M, Brazda T, Remy CT, Vestring T, Reimer P (2002) Non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia: etiology, diagnosis, and interventional therapy. Eur Radiol 12(5):1179–1187

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Al-Diery H, Phillips A, Evennett N, Pandanaboyana S, Gilham M, Windsor JA (2019) The pathogenesis of nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia: implications for research and clinical practice. J Intensive Care Med 34(10):771–781

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Furukawa A, Kanasaki S, Kono N et al (2009) CT diagnosis of acute mesenteric ischemia from various causes. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192(2):408–416

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Leone M, Bechis C, Baumstarck K et al (2015) Outcome of acute mesenteric ischemia in the intensive care unit: a retrospective, multicenter study of 780 cases. Intensive Care Med 41(4):667–676

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Sugi MD, Menias CO, Lubner MG et al (2018) CT Findings of acute small-bowel entities. Radiographics 38(5):1352–1369

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Siegelman SS, Sprayregen S, Boley SJ (1974) Angiographic diagnosis of mesenteric arterial vasoconstriction. Radiology 112(3):533–542

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Boley SJ, Brandt LJ, Veith FJ (1978) Ischemic disorders of the intestines. Curr Probl Surg 15(4):1–85

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Nakano T, Ito T, Takei T, Takemoto M (2018) Accuracy of the smaller superior mesenteric vein sign for the detection of acute superior mesenteric artery occlusion. Acute Med Surg 5(2):129–132

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Bobadilla JL (2013) Mesenteric ischemia. Surg Clin N Am 93(4):925–940

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Landreneau RJ (1990) The right colon as a target organ of nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia. Arch Surg 125(5):591

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Björck M, Koelemay M, Acosta S et al (2017) Management of the diseases of mesenteric arteries and veins. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 53(4):460–510

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Taourel P, Aufort S, Merigeaud S, Doyon FC, Hoquet MD, Delabrousse E (2008) Imaging of ischemic colitis. Radiol Clin North Am 46(5):909–924

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Balthazar EJ, Birnbaum BA, Megibow AJ, Gordon RB, Whelan CA, Hulnick DH (1992) Closed-loop and strangulating intestinal obstruction: CT signs. Radiology 185(3):769–775

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Geffroy Y, Boulay-Coletta I, Jullès M-C, Nakache S, Taourel P, Zins M (2014) Increased unenhanced bowel-wall attenuation at multidetector CT is highly specific of ischemia complicating small-bowel obstruction. Radiology 270(1):159–167

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Wiesner W, Khurana B, Ji H, Ros PR (2003) CT of acute bowel ischemia. Radiology 226(3):635–650

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Millet I, Boutot D, Faget C et al (2017) Assessment of strangulation in adhesive small bowel obstruction on the basis of combined CT findings: implications for clinical care. Radiology 285(3):798–808

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Zins M, Millet I, Taourel P (2020) Adhesive small bowel obstruction: predictive radiology to improve patient management. Radiology 296(3):480–492

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Delabrousse E, Lubrano J, Jehl J et al (2009) Small-bowel obstruction from adhesive bands and matted adhesions: CT differentiation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192(3):693–697

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Nuzzo A, Corcos O (2017) Management of mesenteric ischemia in the era of intestinal stroke centers: the gut and lifesaving strategy. Rev Med Interne 38(9):592–602

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Klar E, Rahmanian PB, Bücker A, Hauenstein K, Jauch K-W, Luther B (2012) Acute mesenteric ischemia: a vascular emergency. Dtsch Arztebl Int 109(14):249–256

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Kougias P, Lau D, El Sayed HF, Zhou W, Huynh TT, Lin PH (2007) Determinants of mortality and treatment outcome following surgical interventions for acute mesenteric ischemia. J Vasc Surg 46(3):467–474

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Tilsed JVT, Casamassima A, Kurihara H et al (2016) ESTES guidelines: acute mesenteric ischaemia. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 42(2):253–270

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Acosta S (2014) Surgical management of peritonitis secondary to acute superior mesenteric artery occlusion. World J Gastroenterol 20(29):9936–9941

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Silvestri L, van Saene HKF, Zandstra DF, Marshall JC, Gregori D, Gullo A (2010) Impact of selective decontamination of the digestive tract on multiple organ dysfunction syndrome: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Crit Care Med 38(5):1370–1376

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Klotz S, Vestring T, Rötker J, Schmidt C, Scheld HH, Schmid C (2001) Diagnosis and treatment of nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia after open heart surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 72(5):1583–1586

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Nuzzo A, Maggiori L, Ronot M et al (2017) Predictive factors of intestinal necrosis in acute mesenteric ischemia: prospective study from an intestinal stroke center. Am J Gastroenterol 112(4):597–605

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Feczko PJ, Mezwa DG, Farah MC, White BD (1992) Clinical significance of pneumatosis of the bowel wall. Radiographics 12(6):1069–1078

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Sarwani N, Tappouni R, Tice J (2011) Pathophysiology of acute small bowel disease with CT correlation. Clin Radiol 66(1):73–82

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors state that this work has not received any funding.

Author information




ARR is the guarantor of integrity of the entire study. ARR and AHD contributed to study concepts and design. ARR, AHD, AM and HS contributed to data acquisition. AGK, BK and ARR contributed to literature research. AGK and BK prepared the manuscript. ARR and AHD edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amir Reza Radmard.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from all patients whose data have been used in this study.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Davarpanah, A.H., Ghamari Khameneh, A., Khosravi, B. et al. Many faces of acute bowel ischemia: overview of radiologic staging. Insights Imaging 12, 56 (2021).

Download citation


  • Acute bowel ischemia
  • Radiologic staging
  • Pathologic correlation
  • Management