Cross-sectional imaging of acute gynaecologic disorders: CT and MRI findings with differential diagnosis—part II: uterine emergencies and pelvic inflammatory disease

Pietro Valerio Foti; Massimo Tonolini; Valeria Costanzo; Luca Mammino; Stefano Palmucci; Antonio Cianci; Giovanni Carlo Ettorre; Antonio Basile

doi:10.1186/s13244-019-0807-6

Educational Review
Open Access
Published: 20 December 2019

Cross-sectional imaging of acute gynaecologic disorders: CT and MRI findings with differential diagnosis—part II: uterine emergencies and pelvic inflammatory disease

Pietro Valerio Foti¹,
Massimo Tonolini ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9900-1801²,
Valeria Costanzo¹,
Luca Mammino¹,
Stefano Palmucci¹,
Antonio Cianci³,
Giovanni Carlo Ettorre¹ &
Antonio Basile¹

Insights into Imaging volume 10, Article number: 118 (2019) Cite this article

2455 Accesses
1 Altmetric
Metrics details

Abstract

Due to the growing use of cross-sectional imaging in emergency departments, acute gynaecologic disorders are increasingly diagnosed on urgent multidetector computed tomography (CT) studies, often requested under alternative presumptive diagnoses in reproductive-age women. If clinical conditions and state-of-the-art scanner availability permit, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is superior to CT due to its more in-depth characterisationof abnormal or inconclusive gynaecological findings, owing to excellent soft-tissue contrast, intrinsic multiplanar capabilities and lack of ionising radiation.

This pictorial review aims to provide radiologists with a thorough familiarity with gynaecologic emergencies by illustrating their CT and MRI appearances, in order to provide a timely and correct imaging diagnosis. Specifically, this second instalment reviews with examples and emphasis on differential diagnosis the main non-pregnancy-related uterine emergencies (including endometrial polyps, degenerated leiomyomas and uterine inversion) and the spectrum of pelvic inflammatory disease.

Key points

The main uterine emergencies include bleeding endometrial lesions, degenerated leiomyomas and uterine inversion
Identification of central fibrous core and intratumoural cysts suggest endometrial polyp over carcinoma
The rare uterine inversion appears at MRI as U-shaped uterus with a depressed fundus and “bulls-eye” transverse configuration.
The PID spectrum encompasses cervicitis, endometritis, salpingitis, pyosalpinx and tubo-ovarian abscess (TOA)
Identification of fallopian tube dilatation allows differentiation of TOA from complex adnexal tumour

Introduction

Although transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound (US) is the ideal technique for initial investigation of women with suspected genital disorders, in the emergency department (ED), the use of cross-sectional imaging is steadily growing. As a result, nowadays radiologists increasingly encounter unsuspected female genital diseases on urgent CT studies requested under alternative presumptive diagnoses. Therefore, familiarity with these conditions and their imaging appearances is required to avoid missing or misinterpreting clinically important abnormalities [1,2,3,4].

Compared to CT, on state-of-the-art scanners, MRI provides a superior characterisation of abnormal or inconclusive gynaecological findings. If scanner availability and patient’s conditions permit, the use of MRI is attractive for further investigation of acute female genital disorders without ionising radiation [5,6,7].

This pictorial essay aims to provide radiologists with an increased familiarity in recognition and characterisation of acute gynaecologic disorders on CT and MRI, in order to allow timely diagnosis and appropriate treatment. The previous first instalment reviewed the cross-sectional imaging appearances of corpus luteum and haemorrhagic ovarian cysts, gynaecologic haemoperitoneum from either ruptured corpus luteum and ectopic pregnancy and adnexal torsion. The present second instalment will discuss and present (with imaging examples) the main non-pregnancy-related uterine emergencies (including endometrial polyps, degenerated leiomyomas and uterine inversion) and the spectrum of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) [8, 9].

Uterine emergencies

Abnormal genital bleeding represents the characteristic and most common manifestation of acute uterine disorders and is one of the most common presentations in the emergency gynaecology unit as it accounts for approximately one-third of urgent gynaecologic visits. Causes encompass a wide spectrum of systemic and endocrine disorders, benign conditions (infection and focal abnormalities of the uterine cavity) and malignancies [10].

In reproductive-age women, when pregnancy is ruled out, clinical examination is required to search for vaginal and cervical abnormalities underlying acute bleeding. Additional imaging is required to detect or exclude abnormalities such as endometrial polyps or submucosal fibroids. Endometrial cancer is rarely encountered in pre-menopausal women, very exceptionally under 40 years of age. Dysfunctional uterine bleeding (idiopathic menorrhagia) represents a diagnosis of exclusion, in the absence of a recognizable pelvic pathology [11].

Transvaginal US remains the initial modality of choice in the evaluation of endometrial diseases, but the use of MRI to clarify abnormal or suspicious US findings before hysteroscopy is increasing, as it provides superior detection and characterisation of abnormalities in the uterine cavity [12].

Endometrial polyps

Endometrial polyps (EP) represent a localised overgrowth of endometrial glands with a central stroma composed of fibrous tissue or smooth muscle. Sometimes asymptomatic, EP easily cause either menometrorrhagia in pre-menopausal women or post-menopausal bleeding. The prevalence ranges from 7.8% to 34.9% and increases with age; tamoxifen is a well-established risk factor [13, 14].

On T2-weighted MR images, EP appear as low signal intensity sessile or pedunculated masses projecting into the endometrial cavity, surrounded by high signal intensity fluid and endometrium. Furthermore, a fibrous core (low signal intensity stripe or centre) and intratumoural cysts (discrete, smooth-walled cystic structures of high signal intensity) may be identified within the mass. Cystic spaces correspond to dilated glands but are nonspecific as they may be present within EP, hyperplasia or cancer. On T1-weighted images, EP generally have isointense signal compared to the endometrium, and may become haemorrhagic after ulceration or infarction leading to the appearance of hyperintense region best appreciated using precontrast fat saturation. After gadolinium contrast, EP may show either early persistent or gradually increasing enhancement, equal to or greater than that of outer myometrium (Fig. 1) [10, 15, 16].

Regarding management, hysteroscopic polypectomy is the gold standard for both diagnosis and treatment. Conservative management is reasonable in the case of small polyps in asymptomatic patients [17].

The key differential diagnosis of post-menopausal bleeding is endometrial carcinoma, which usually shows intermediate signal intensity (hyperintense compared with the myometrium) on T2-weighted images [18]. Identification of the central fibrous core and of intratumoural cysts favour the diagnosis of EP. Conversely, myometrial invasion, necrosis, a lower enhancement compared to the adjacent myometrium and irregular internal “cystic” areas suggest carcinoma. Endometrial hyperplasia is a premalignant condition that does not have a characteristic imaging appearance (Fig. 2); therefore, any focal endometrial thickening warrants hysteroscopy and biopsy, especially in post-menopausal women [10, 15, 16].

In post-menopausal women, the normal endometrium measures a mean 4 mm (range 1–12 mm) thickness [19], and endometrial thickness should be regarded as abnormal if ≥ 5 mm or > 9 mm, respectively, in presence or absence or genital bleeding [10].

In reproductive age, the normal endometrial thickness varies according to the menstrual cycle phases. Shitano et al. prospectively investigated the MRI appearance of normal endometrium in 32 healthy pre-menopausal women in follicular phase (FP) and luteal phase (LP). The maximum thickness of the normal endometrium, measured on sagittal T2-weighted images, in FP (mean 6.5 mm, range 2.1–14 mm) was significantly lower than that in LP (mean 10.4 mm, range 3.9–20.4 mm). Furthermore, on T2-weighted sequences, the signal intensity of the normal endometrium in FP was significantly higher than that in LP [20].

Uterine fibroids

The most common gynaecological mass, fibroids (leiomyomas) are benign tumours composed of smooth muscle cells and fibrous connective tissues that develop in almost 20–30% of reproductive-age women. In non-complicated fibroids, CT findings include uterine enlargement with lobulated contours, deformity of the endometrial cavity, and presence of focal masses that vary from exophytic or subserosal to intramural to submucosal. When present, coarse calcification is quite specific. Contrast enhancement is variable, so that fibroids may appear isodense, hypodense or hyperdense relative to the myometrium. MRI is the most accurate modality to detect, localise and characterise leiomyomas, which are typically T2-hypointense compared to the surrounding myometrium and of intermediate signal intensity on T1-weighted images [21].

Acute pain develops in up to 30% of patients, secondary to either acute degeneration or torsion of an exophytic or submucosal pedunculated leiomyoma; in the latter case, vaginal bleeding coexists. Degeneration of leiomyomas results from the volumetric increase that outgrows vascular supply and may take different forms (hyaline, myxoid, cystic and haemorrhagic) according to the rapidity of development. The most common form is the hyaline one, with a deposit of collagen fibres. Among the different types of degeneration, the haemorrhagic one is most likely to cause acute pelvic pain. Haemorrhagic (“red”) degeneration often occurs during pregnancy or in association with the use of oral contraceptives and consists of haemorrhagic infarction of the leiomyoma secondary to venous thrombosis at the periphery of the lesion [21].

At CT, haemorrhage and loss of contrast enhancement within a pedunculated, subserosal or intramural fibroid with a development of a cystic-like appearance may suggest the possibility of degeneration or infarction (Fig. 3). At MRI, haemorrhagic leiomyomas display diffuse or peripheral high signal intensity on T1-weighted images, reflecting the effect of methaemoglobin. On T2-weighted sequences, they show variable signal intensity with peripheral hypointensity secondary to haemosiderin formation. After gadolinium contrast agent administration, the lack of enhancement reflects interrupted blood supply (Figs. 4 and 5) [2, 9].

The most challenging differential diagnosis of benign degenerating leiomyomas is from uterine leiomyosarcomas that may exhibit different MR imaging patterns: (a) lobulated mass with high signal intensity on T2-weighted sequences, (b) well-marginated mass with low signal (similar to that of a leiomyoma), or (c) mass with extensive invasion and infiltrative margins. The suspicion of leiomyosarcoma may also be raised by the identification of haemorrhage and coagulative necrosis. The latter can present as areas of slightly high signal intensity on T1-weighted sequences and heterogeneous signal intensity on T2-weighted sequences [22]. In the differential diagnosis between leiomyomas and leiomyosarcomas, intravenous contrast agent administration is mandatory to identify solid components of leiomyosarcomas [23]. Lakhman et al. identified four qualitative MR features (nodular borders, haemorrhage, “T2 dark” areas and central unenhanced areas) strongly associated with leiomyosarcomas. In particular, the combination of at least three of these MR features may distinguish leiomyosarcomas from atypical leiomyomas with a specificity of > 95% [24].

As for the role of DWI, restricted diffusion may represent a pitfall since it is observable in benign cellular leiomyomas as well as in leiomyosarcomas, although some authors demonstrated significantly lower mean ADCs in leiomyosarcomas than in degenerated leiomyomas [25]. Although invasion, necrosis and above all rapid growth are suggestive of malignancy, the differentiation between benign degenerating leiomyomas and leiomyosarcomas still remains particularly challenging and the final diagnosis is often established histologically [22].

In patients with symptomatic uterine leiomyomas, embolisation is recognised as a minimally invasive uterine-sparing treatment option. Although embolisation is generally safe, post-procedural pain may occur: pain may range from mild to severe, is more frequent during the first week after embolisation and forms the “post-embolisation syndrome” along with fever, loss of appetite, nausea and malaise. Post-procedural readmission is needed in about 10% of cases [26, 27]. Severe pain is partly explained by myometrial ischaemia and is correlated with the percentage and volume of ischaemic tissue [28].

Contrast-enhanced MRI is the imaging method of choice to evaluate post-embolisation appearances of fibroids. At follow-up, treated leiomyomas may show increased signal intensity on T1-weighted images, due to the shortening effect of methaemoglobin, and variable signal intensity on T2-weighted images, a finding consistent with haemorrhagic infarction induced by the procedure (Fig. 6). On contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images, the lack of enhancement within fibroids is indicative of successful complete infarction without residual viable tissue [29, 30]. Since imaging appearances of treated leiomyomas can be very similar to that of leiomyomas with red degeneration and, to some extent, of leiomyosarcomas with coagulative necrosis, particular attention should be paid in the anamnesis of patients with pelvic pain, with thorough questioning regarding possible previous interventional procedures.

Uterine inversion

Uterine inversion (UI) refers to inside-out overturning and protrusion of the uterine fundus downwards up to or through the cervix that may occur either as an acute (within 24 h) life-threatening obstetric complication of mismanaged labour or in multiparous post-menopausal women from pulling effect of submucosal or pedunculated leiomyomas attached to the fundus; in the latter case, symptoms include pelvic tenderness or pain, vaginal discharge and irregular uterine bleeding. Physically, the vagina is occupied by the inverted uterus, but the clinical diagnosis is challenging without a high index of suspicion. Imaging is crucial to avoid misinterpretation as cervical tumour and to obviate biopsy which may cause profuse bleeding [31, 32].

Whereas the nature of the “mass” protruding into the vagina is difficult to identify at US, MRI generally clinches the diagnosis. The hallmark of UI on sagittal viewing is a U-shaped uterus with indentation and depression of the fundus, and a “bulls-eye” transverse configuration reflecting the zonal anatomy (Fig. 7d, f). Additionally, MRI may detect the possible presence of T2-hypointense submucosal fibroids or heterogeneously hyperintense mass-forming tumours. Albeit with limited contrast resolution, in acute settings, CT with adequate image reformation may also allow recognition of UI (Fig. 7a, c) [34].

Treatment of UI should consider the fertility and reproductive wishes of the patient, stage of inversion and underlying (benign or malignant) pathology. Whereas in puerperium manual repositioning is possible, post-menopausal UI requires abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy [35].

Pelvic inflammatory disease

Acute PID currently affects nearly one million reproductive-age women in the USA, represents the single most common (almost 25%) cause of ED gynaecological visits and is increasingly encountered due to changing sexual habits. Risk factors include multiple sexual partners, high coital frequency and the presence of intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUCD). PID results from untreated ascending microbial infection from the vagina by sexually transmitted microorganisms such as Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Mycoplasma genitalium and gram-negative bacteria; mixed aerobic and anaerobic infections represent 30–40% of cases. Causative agents spread from the vagina to the cervix and uterine cavity, followed by the fallopian tubes and ovaries and even to the peritoneal cavity. Therefore, PID represents a spectrum of abnormalities encompassing cervicitis, endometritis, salpingitis, pyosalpinx and tubo-ovarian abscess (TOA) [36].

PID is often diagnosed clinically on the basis of fever, dull aching pelvic pain and cervical tenderness, vaginal mucopurulent discharge, leukocytosis and elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. Most patients meeting these diagnostic criteria are treated empirically with broad-spectrum antibiotics. However, clinical manifestations are often unspecific. Therefore, cross-sectional imaging may be useful in patients with nonspecific presentation or inconclusive US, in those unresponsive to conventional therapy or with suspected complications such as abscesses requiring drainage. Furthermore, CT imaging is often requested in the ED to provide a differential diagnosis from other acute conditions such as urinary infection, appendicitis and diverticulitis [37, 38].

Tables 1 and 2 summarise the CT and MR imaging features of the PID spectrum, respectively. Additionally, a flow-chart describing an algorithm for MRI correct characterisation of PID forms and differential diagnosis is proposed in Fig. 8.

Table 1 CT findings of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID)

Full size table

Table 2 MR imaging findings of PID. DWI diffusion-weighted imaging, ADC apparent diffusion coefficient

Full size table

Cervicitis and endometritis

Cervicitis and endometritis represent early manifestations of PID and are often subclinical; when present, symptoms include pelvic pain, fever, vaginal discharge and menstrual abnormalities. In the former, MRI may demonstrate an enlarged uterine cervix with a prominent enhancement of the endocervical canal reflecting inflammation and hyperaemia (Fig. 9). Free pelvic effusion may be associated [39, 40].

On the other hand, endometritis may be encountered during pregnancy, during the postpartum period, following invasive gynaecologic procedures or in the setting of PID. CT (Fig. 10) and MRI (Fig. 11) may demonstrate the presence of fluid in the endometrial cavity and abnormal endometrial enhancement. Additionally, the lack of a clear separation of the uterus from adnexal and parametrial tissue, with “indistinct uterine border”, may be detected [37].

Pyosalpinx and differential diagnosis

Salpingitis corresponds to a swollen fallopian tube with mural inflammation and thickening (Fig. 12). Conversely, pyosalpinx reflects superimposed infection with luminal distension by pus. At CT, multiplanar reformations are helpful to recognise the dilated fallopian tubes as serpentine or tubular juxta-uterine fluid-containing structures with a diameter over 5 mm, peripherally enhancing a thick wall and complex internal fluid (Fig. 13). Surrounding pelvic oedema, thickening of uterosacral ligaments, periuterine and adnexal fat stranding may be detected [1,2,3,4].

The strength of MRI relies on its ability to identify the ovary, to demonstrate the tubular nature of a mass, and to differentiate pyosalpinx from haematosalpinx on the basis of signal intensity of the tubal fluid. Tukeva et al. found MRI (sensitivity 95%, specificity 89% and 93% overall accuracy) to be more accurate than transvaginal US in the diagnosis of PID (corresponding values were 81%, 78%, and 80%) and to be useful in decreasing the need for diagnostic laparoscopy [39]. Compared to CT, MRI better identifies tubal wall thickening, inflammation and enhancement (Figs. 14 and 15) and therefore allows differentiation of pyosalpinx from hydrosalpinx (Figs. 16 and 17), in which the fallopian tube is not infected, but dilated secondary to obstruction of the ampullary segment; causes include prior episodes of PID, endometriosis, adhesions and prior ectopic pregnancy in descending order of frequency. At cross-sectional imaging, hydrosalpinx appears as a thin-walled tubular C- or S-shaped structure separated from the uterus and ovary, with typical fluid signal intensity; sometimes, the pathognomonic “cogwheel” cross-section appearance corresponding to thickened longitudinal folds may be identified. Interpreted in conjunction with conventional MRI sequences, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) helps in the characterisation of adnexal lesions by discriminating the nature of the tubal content: a water-like appearance (hypointense on T1-weighted images and strongly hyperintense on T2-weighted images) and unrestricted diffusion are suggestive of hydrosalpinx; variable or heterogeneous signal intensity on conventional MR sequences and restricted diffusion on DWI is a characteristic of pyosalpinx and TOA [41].

Another differential diagnosis is haematosalpinx (Fig. 18), corresponding to dilatation of the fallopian tubes by blood products which may develop during EP, adnexal torsion, endometriosis, trauma and malignancy; the hallmark of haematosalpinx is hyperintense tubal content on fat-suppressed T1-weighted images, reflecting subacute blood [37, 38, 42, 43].

Posterior extension of the inflammatory process may cause thickening of the uterosacral ligaments, a common finding of PID, easily recognizable at both CT and MR [37]. Additionally, both CT and MRI may demonstrate reactive lymphadenopathy. Due to the course of drainage of the ovarian and salpingian lymphatic vessels along the gonadal veins, lymphadenopathy affects the paraaortic lymphatic chain at the level of the left renal hilum from the left side, and the paracaval and aortocaval chain from the right side [44].

Tubo-ovarian abscess

TOA develops in up to 15% of patients and represents the full-blown manifestation of untreated PID, in which further progression of infection leads to complete destruction of the normal adnexal structure and formation of an inflammatory mass that encompasses both the fallopian tube and ovary. Making the diagnosis of TOA is important since it requires hospitalisation and sometimes image-guided or surgical drainage.

Sometimes bilateral, TOA shows up at CT (Figs. 13 and 19) as a mixed solid-cystic adnexal mass with low-attenuation, complex internal fluid and thickened and irregularly enhancing walls and septa. The ipsilateral mesosalpinx is frequently thickened and displaced anteriorly. The identification of dilated, pus-filled fallopian tube helps to distinguish a TOA from a complex neoplastic mass. Free peritoneal fluid, surrounding inflammation in the pelvis with stranding of the presacral and periovarian pelvic fat are generally present (Fig. 19) [1, 3, 4, 8, 43].

At MRI, TOA (Fig. 20) is usually T1-hypointense, but signal features are variable and often mixed depending on its haemorrhagic and protein content. The presence of a hyperintense rim along the inner wall of the collection has been recently described and attributed to the presence of granulation tissue with haemorrhage [41]. T2-weighted images demonstrate a heterogeneous, predominantly hyperintense mass with multiple thick low-signal septa. The increased signal intensity of the surrounding peritoneal fat on T2-weighted sequences with fat saturation corresponds to associated oedema. Septa, capsules of fluid collections, and surrounding inflammatory stranding demonstrate intense enhancement after intravenous gadolinium; these structures, along with the purulent content of the mass, display restricted diffusion on DWI sequences. Enhancement of the peritoneum and uterine ligaments is also present [37, 38, 41, 45].

The differential diagnosis from an adnexal tumour may prove very challenging. The cross-sectional appearance of a TOA may closely resemble those of ovarian epithelial malignancies, but it should be remembered that ovarian cancer is generally not associated with tubal dilation [41]. The exceedingly rare primary fallopian tube carcinoma (PFTC) manifests with characteristic symptoms (colicky pelvic pain, adnexal mass and serosanguineous vaginal discharge, collectively referred to as “Laztko’s triad”) only in 15% of patients [46]. Ma et al. have described three characteristics, helpful MR findings of PFTC: (a) a tubular- or sausage-shaped mass with a solid component showing variable, generally homogenous, T1-hypointensity, T2-hyperintensity and moderate enhancement after intravenous contrast agent administration; (b) hydrosalpinx; and (c) intrauterine fluid [47]. Hydrosalpinx is caused by both the partial obstruction of the tubes and the fluid produced by the neoplasm. Due to the patency of the fallopian tubes, the tubal content may be discharged into the endometrial cavity or the peritoneum with consequent temporary shrinkage of the mass and relief of pelvic pain. Serial imaging examination may demonstrate this morphological variability of the mass. Intrauterine fluid is quite specific of PFTC, occurring in up to 30% of cases [46]. On DWI, the solid component of the mass demonstrates higher signal intensity and lower ADC values compared to the normal ovarian tissue [48].

Complicated and atypical PID forms

Occasionally, PID may spread even further in the pelvis forming peritoneal cavity abscesses (Fig. 21) or involve other adjacent organs such as the bowel, bladder and ureters. In these cases, recognition of anterior displacement of the broad ligament may be helpful to distinguish TOA from pelvic abscesses with a different origin. Furthermore, when faced with extensive pelvic infection, the diagnosis of actinomycosis should be suggested. Strongly associated with IUCD, Actinomyces israelii infection of the female genital tract characteristically spreads across soft-tissue planes, resulting in heterogeneous adnexal masses with small rim-enhancing hypoattenuating abscesses, complex masses in the peritoneal cul-de-sac and perirectal region, that commonly appear more solid, mass-like compared with usual TOA [49].

Finally, in Western countries, genitourinary tuberculosis is increasingly encountered because of the spread of HIV infection and increasing immigration; the fallopian tubes are the commonest site of tuberculous involvement, which appears as bilateral pyosalpinx or TOA. Calcifications are uncommon, particularly in the acute phase. Coexistent endometritis appears as distended pus-filled uterine cavity and prominent endometrial enhancement (Fig. 22). Peritoneal and omental thickening, ascites and associated nodal or parenchymal involvement may help to suggest the diagnosis of tuberculosis, which may closely mimic peritoneal carcinomatosis [43].

Vaginal infections

Vaginal abscesses appear as hypodense, thick-walled rim-enhancing lesions, which may arise from Chlamydia, N. gonorrheae or polymicrobial infection of the Bartholin gland (located at the posterolateral vagina) and may require surgical incision (Fig. 23). Alternatively, the infected Gartner cyst should be suggested when located in the anterolateral wall at the proximal third of the vagina, and differentiated from a urethral diverticulum [49].

Conclusion

Although discouraged in childbearing-age women, CT often provides the first diagnosis of an unsuspected acute gynaecological disorder; therefore, familiarity with their imaging appearances is crucial to avoid missing or misinterpreting clinically important entities which may require surgical treatment. If clinical conditions and scanner availability permit, MRI is superior to CT for further characterisation of uterine abnormalities causing acute pain and genital bleeding. Additionally, cross-sectional imaging is helpful to elucidate the varied imaging appearances of PID and atypical genital infections.

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analysed in this study.

Abbreviations

ADC:: Apparent diffusion coefficient
CRP:: C-reactive protein
CT:: Computed tomography
DWI:: Diffusion-weighted imaging
ED:: Emergency department
EP:: Endometrial polyp
FP:: Follicular phase
HIV:: Human immunodeficiency virus
IUCD:: Intrauterine contraceptive device
LP:: Luteal phase
MRI:: Magnetic resonance imaging
PFTC:: Primary fallopian tube carcinoma
PID:: Pelvic inflammatory disease
TOA:: Tubo-ovarian abscess
UI:: Uterine inversion
US:: Ultrasound

References

1.
Bennett GL, Slywotzky CM, Giovanniello G (2002) Gynecologic causes of acute pelvic pain: spectrum of CT findings. Radiographics 22:785–801
Google Scholar
2.
Potter AW, Chandrasekhar CA (2008) US and CT evaluation of acute pelvic pain of gynecologic origin in nonpregnant premenopausal patients. Radiographics 28:1645–1659
Article Google Scholar
3.
Swart JE, Fishman EK (2008) Gynecologic pathology on multidetector CT: a pictorial review. Emerg Radiol 15:383–389
Article Google Scholar
4.
Cano Alonso R, Borruel Nacenta S, Díez Martínez P, María NI, Ibáñez Sanz L, Zabía Galíndez E (2009) Role of multidetector CT in the management of acute female pelvic disease. Emerg Radiol 16:453–472
Article Google Scholar
5.
Ditkofsky NG, Singh A, Avery L, Novelline RA (2014) The role of emergency MRI in the setting of acute abdominal pain. Emerg Radiol 21:615–624
Google Scholar
6.
Ayyala RS, Khwaja A, Anupindi SA (2017) Pelvic pain in the middle of the night: use of MRI for evaluation of pediatric female pathology in the emergent setting. Emerg Radiol 24:681–688
PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
7.
Pedrosa I, Zeikus EA, Levine D et al (2007) MR imaging of acute right lower quadrant pain in pregnant and nonpregnant patients. Radiographics 27:721–743 discussion 743-753
PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
8.
Roche O, Chavan N, Aquilina J et al (2012) Radiological appearances of gynaecological emergencies. Insights Imaging 3:265–275
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
9.
Iraha Y, Okada M, Iraha R et al (2017) CT and MR imaging of gynecologic emergencies. Radiographics 37:1569–1586
Google Scholar
10.
Sadro CT (2016) Imaging the endometrium: a pictorial essay. Can Assoc Radiol J 67:254–262
PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
11.
Bignardi T, Van den Bosch T, Condous G (2009) Abnormal uterine and post-menopausal bleeding in the acute gynaecology unit. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 23:595–607
PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
12.
Dueholm M, Lundorf E, Hansen ES et al (2001) Evaluation of the uterine cavity with magnetic resonance imaging, transvaginal sonography, hysterosonographic examination, and diagnostic hysteroscopy. Fertil Steril 76:350–357
CAS PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
13.
Hileeto D, Fadare O, Martel M et al (2005) Age dependent association of endometrial polyps with increased risk of cancer involvement. World J Surg Oncol 3:8
PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
14.
Dreisler E, Stampe Sorensen S, Ibsen PH et al (2009) Prevalence of endometrial polyps and abnormal uterine bleeding in a Danish population aged 20-74 years. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 33:102–108
CAS PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
15.
Nalaboff KM, Pellerito JS, Ben-Levi E (2001) Imaging the endometrium: disease and normal variants. Radiographics 21:1409–1424
CAS PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
16.
Grasel RP, Outwater EK, Siegelman ES et al (2000) Endometrial polyps: MR imaging features and distinction from endometrial carcinoma. Radiology 214:47–52
CAS PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
17.
American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists (AAGL): Advancing Minimally Invasive Gynecology Worldwide (2012) AAGL practice report: practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of submucous leiomyomas. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 19:152–171
Article Google Scholar
18.
Nougaret S, Horta M, Sala E et al (2019) Endometrial cancer MRI staging: updated guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology. Eur Radiol 29:792–805
PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
19.
Hauth E, Libera H, Kimmig R et al (2006) MR imaging of the pelvis in the diagnosis of the endometrium in breast cancer patients in tamoxifen therapy. ROFO 178:316–323
CAS PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
20.
Shitano F, Kido A, Kataoka M et al (2016) MR appearance of normal uterine endometrium considering menstrual cycle: differentiation with benign and malignant endometrial lesions. Acta Radiol 57:1540–1548
PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
21.
Murase E, Siegelman ES, Outwater EK et al (1999) Uterine leiomyomas: histopathologic features, MR imaging findings, differential diagnosis, and treatment. Radiographics 19:1179–1197
CAS PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
22.
Kido A, Togashi K, Koyama T et al (2003) Diffusely enlarged uterus: evaluation with MR imaging. Radiographics 23:1423–1439
PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
23.
Kubik-Huch RA, Weston M, Nougaret S et al (2018) European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) guidelines: MR imaging of leiomyomas. Eur Radiol 28:3125–3137
PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
24.
Lakhman Y, Veeraraghavan H, Chaim J et al (2017) Differentiation of uterine leiomyosarcoma from atypical leiomyoma: diagnostic accuracy of qualitative MR imaging features and feasibility of texture analysis. Eur Radiol 27:2903–2915
PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
25.
Tasaki A, Asatani MO, Umezu H et al (2015) Differential diagnosis of uterine smooth muscle tumors using diffusion-weighted imaging: correlations with the apparent diffusion coefficient and cell density. Abdom Imaging 40:1742–1752
PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
26.
Bulman JC, Ascher SM, Spies JB (2012) Current concepts in uterine fibroid embolisation. Radiographics 32:1735–1750
PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
27.
Bruno J, Sterbis K, Flick P et al (2004) Recovery after uterine artery embolisation for leiomyomas: a detailed analysis of its duration and severity. J Vasc Interv Radiol 15:801–807
PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
28.
Ruuskanen A, Sipola P, Hippelainen M et al (2009) Pain after uterine fibroid embolisation is associated with the severity of myometrial ischaemia on magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 19:2977–2985
PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
29.
Verma SK, Gonsalves CF, Baltarowich OH et al (2010) Spectrum of imaging findings on MRI and CT after uterine artery embolisation. Abdom Imaging 35:118–128
PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
30.
Deshmukh SP, Gonsalves CF, Guglielmo FF et al (2012) Role of MR imaging of uterine leiomyomas before and after embolisation. Radiographics 32:E251–E281
PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
31.
Tibrewal R, Goswami S, Chakravorty PS (2012) Non puerperal uterine inversion. J Obstet Gynaecol India 62:452–453
PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
32.
Darji P, Banker H, Gandhi V et al (2012) Postmenopausal woman with vaginal mass: do not forget to see for uterine inversion. BMJ Case Rep 2012:bcr0220125841
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
33.
Tonolini M (2018) Case 15871. Non-puerperal uterine inversion without underlying tumour. EuroRAD URL: http://www.eurorad.org/case/15871
34.
Mihmanli V, Kilic F, Pul S et al (2015) Magnetic resonance imaging of non-puerperal complete uterine inversion. Iran J Radiol 12:e9878
PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
35.
Saxena R, Shah T, Thirumalappa S et al (2011) Technique of abdominal hysterectomy for non-puerperal uterine inversion. BMJ Case Rep 2011:bcr0120113729
PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
36.
Samraj GP, Curry RW Jr (2004) Acute pelvic pain: evaluation and management. Compr Ther 30:173–184
PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
37.
Revzin MV, Mathur M, Dave HB et al (2016) Pelvic inflammatory disease: multimodality imaging approach with clinical-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 36:1579–1596
PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
38.
Czeyda-Pommersheim F, Kalb B, Costello J et al (2017) MRI in pelvic inflammatory disease: a pictorial review. Abdom Radiol (NY) 42:935–950
Article Google Scholar
39.
Tukeva TA, Aronen HJ, Karjalainen PT et al (1999) MR imaging in pelvic inflammatory disease: comparison with laparoscopy and US. Radiology 210:209–216
CAS PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
40.
Mutter GL, Prat J (2014) Pathology of the Female Reproductive Tract, 3rd edn. London Churchill Livingstone Elsevier, London
41.
Foti PV, Ognibene N, Spadola S et al (2016) Non-neoplastic diseases of the fallopian tube: MR imaging with emphasis on diffusion-weighted imaging. Insights Imaging 7:311–327
PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
42.
Moyle PL, Kataoka MY, Nakai A et al (2010) Nonovarian cystic lesions of the pelvis. Radiographics 30:921–938
PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
43.
Rezvani M, Shaaban AM (2011) Fallopian tube disease in the nonpregnant patient. Radiographics 31:527–548
PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
44.
Harisinghani M (2013) Atlas of lymph node anatomy. Springer, New York
Google Scholar
45.
Foti PV, Attina G, Spadola S et al (2016) MR imaging of ovarian masses: classification and differential diagnosis. Insights Imaging 7:21–41
Article Google Scholar
46.
Veloso Gomes F, Dias JL, Lucas R et al (2015) Primary fallopian tube carcinoma: review of MR imaging findings. Insights Imaging 6:431–439
PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
47.
Ma FH, Cai SQ, Qiang JW et al (2015) MRI for differentiating primary fallopian tube carcinoma from epithelial ovarian cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 42:42–47
PubMed Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
48.
Grabowska-Derlatka L, Szeszkowski W, Sienko J et al (2018) Magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging in diagnostics of primary fallopian tube carcinoma - is it useful? Pol J Radiol 83:e161–e165
PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
49.
Orlowski HL, Mellnick VM, Dahiya N et al (2016) The imaging findings of typical and atypical genital and gynecologic infections. Abdom Radiol (NY) 41:2294–2309
Article Google Scholar
50.
Tonolini M, Bonzini M (2016) Case 14163. Female genital tuberculosis. EuroRAD. Available at: URL: https://www.eurorad.org/case/14163

Download references

Acknowledgements

APC costs are covered by the ESR since the corresponding author is an active ESR member.

Funding

This research received no external funding. There has been no financial support for this work that could have influenced the design, execution, interpretation or writing of the study.

Author information

Affiliations

Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies, Radiology I Unit, University Hospital “Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele”, Via Santa Sofia 78, 95123, Catania, Italy
Pietro Valerio Foti, Valeria Costanzo, Luca Mammino, Stefano Palmucci, Giovanni Carlo Ettorre & Antonio Basile
Department of Radiology, “Luigi Sacco” University Hospital, Via G.B. Grassi 74, 20157, Milan, Italy
Massimo Tonolini
Department of General Surgery and Medical-Surgical Specialties, Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
Antonio Cianci

Authors

Pietro Valerio Foti
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Massimo Tonolini
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Valeria Costanzo
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Luca Mammino
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Stefano Palmucci
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Antonio Cianci
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Giovanni Carlo Ettorre
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Antonio Basile
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors collaborated in conceiving, writing and checking the paper, and are fully aware of its content. MT, PVF, VC, LM, SP, AC, GCE and AB contributed to the conceptualization; data analysis; writing, reviewing and editing; and supervision of the manuscript. MT, PVF, VC and LM contributed to the original draft preparation and image preparation. All authors read and approved the final submitted version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Massimo Tonolini.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Foti, P.V., Tonolini, M., Costanzo, V. et al. Cross-sectional imaging of acute gynaecologic disorders: CT and MRI findings with differential diagnosis—part II: uterine emergencies and pelvic inflammatory disease. Insights Imaging 10, 118 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-019-0807-6

Download citation

Received: 24 May 2019
Accepted: 18 October 2019
Published: 20 December 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-019-0807-6

Keywords

Gynaecologic emergencies
Uterus
Pelvic inflammatory disease
Computed tomography (CT)
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)