Skip to main content

Fasciae of the musculoskeletal system: MRI findings in trauma, infection and neoplastic diseases


The fascial system is a continuum of connective tissues present everywhere throughout the body that can be locally involved in a large variety of disorders. These disorders include traumatic disorders (Morel-Lavallée lesion, myo-aponeurotic injuries, and muscle hernia), septic diseases (necrotizing and non-necrotizing cellulitis and fasciitis), and neoplastic diseases (superficial fibromatosis, desmoid tumors, and sarcomas). The current pictorial review aims to focus on these localized disorders involving the fasciae of the musculoskeletal system and their appearance at MRI.

Key points

  • The fascial system is a continuum of connective tissues that can be involved in traumatic, infectious, and neoplastic disorders

  • MRI is the best imaging technique to detect localized fascial involvement and assess its extent

  • MRI may be limited in the characterization of localized fascial disorders


Despite its presence everywhere throughout the body, the fascial system has received little attention in the imaging literature as it is regarded as a network of inert membranes barely involved by abnormal conditions [1]. In a previous article, we detailed how MRI patterns of involvement of the fasciae in systemic autoimmune diseases reflect the fascial anatomy [2]. Anyway, the fascial system may also be involved in localized disorders. Therefore, the current pictorial review aims to focus on traumatic disorders, infectious diseases, and neoplastic diseases involving the fasciae of the musculoskeletal system and their appearance at MRI.

Anatomy and terminology

The following terms will be used to describe the different components of the fascial system (Fig. 1) [2]:

  • “Fascia superficialis” to designate the complex formed by the layer of connective tissue located immediately deep to the dermis (stratum membranosum) and its attachments to the dermis (retinacula cutis superficialis) and to the deeper components of the fascial system (retinacula cutis profondis)

  • “Deep peripheral fascia” to designate the layer of connective tissue located at the interface between the hypodermis and the connective tissue surrounding the muscles (epimysium)

  • “Deep intermuscular fascia” to describe the deep intermuscular septa located deep to the deep peripheral fascia and separating muscles and muscle groups from each other.

Fig. 1

Schematic drawing of a transverse section of the thigh illustrating its fascial anatomy

Traumatic disorders

As bones or tendons, fasciae are injured when a mismatch exists between the forces placed on them and their ability to resist such forces [3]. This mismatch may originate from repeated microtraumas (overuse), acute injuries, or a combination of both. Traumatic lesions of the fasciae usually occur at the interfaces between the different components of the fascial system or at physiological defects of the fasciae which constitute weakness points from a mechanical point of view.

Morel-Lavallée lesion

Morel-Lavallée lesion (MLL) is a post-traumatic complication of the subcutaneous soft tissues after acute trauma [4]. MLL is secondary to the delamination along fascial planes after high-energy trauma with excessive shearing and subsequent separation of the subcutaneous soft tissues from the underlying deep fascia. This cleavage causes disruption of small vessels that cross the fascia and accumulation of lymph or blood into the perifascial plane with possible debris from fat necrosis and blood clots. MLL occurs most frequently at the lateral aspect of the thigh or around the knee in areas prone to shearing stress during accident [5]. Typical aspect of MLL is a fusiform or ovoid fluid collection located superficially to the deep peripheral fascia with low signal intensity on T1-weighted (T1w) images and high signal intensity on T2-weighted (T2w) images (Fig. 2) [6]. MLL is more frequently located at the interface between the hypodermic fat and the deep peripheral fascia, but it can also occur in the hypodermic fat along the fascia superficialis (stratum membranosum) (Fig. 3).

Fig. 2

a Coronal SE T1-weighted (T1w) and (b) axial SE T2-weighted (T2w) images of the left hip and proximal part of the left thigh of a 22-year-old male with Morel-Lavallée lesion after a street fight. MRI demonstrates an extensive lenticular fluid collection (arrows) deep to the hypodermis and superficial to the fascia lata (arrowhead). Note the large fat lobule bulging into the collection (asterisk)

Fig. 3

Coronal (a) SE T1w and (b) fat-suppressed proton density-weighted (FSPD) images of the right knee of a 23-year-old male with Morel-Lavallée lesion after a motorcycle accident. MRI demonstrates a fluid collection (asterisks) extending from the interface between the hypodermis and deep peripheral fascia (arrow) along the fascia superficialis (arrowhead)

Myofascial and myotendinous injuries

In adults, muscle injuries tend to occur at muscle weak areas including the interface between the muscle and the epimysium (myofascial injuries) and the interface between the muscle and the tendon (myotendinous injuries) [7]. These injuries mostly involve shear stress with the contraction of different muscles or contraction of the muscle fibers of the same muscle in divergent directions causing excessive stress on the fasciae in between. MRI findings are similar in both cases with the loss of the normal architecture of the muscle and fasciae, abnormal heterogenous intermediate signal intensity on T1w and T2w sequences, and inconstant collections of fluid and/or blood. Myofascial and myotendinous injuries are secondary to acute trauma, but after recovery recurrences are common with minor trauma. The archetype of myofascial injuries is the myofascial tear of the medial head of gastrocnemius muscle and soleus muscle (Fig. 4) [8]. The archetype of myotendinous injuries is the tear of the myotendinous junction of the indirect head of the rectus femoris muscle (Fig. 5) [9].

Fig. 4

a Sagittal STIR, (b) axial SE T1w, and (c) axial SE T2w images of the left leg of a 41-year-old male with myofascial injury of the calf after a skiing accident. MRI demonstrates a fluid collection at the interface between the medial head of the gastrocnemius muscle and the soleus muscle (arrows) with a component of intermediate signal intensity on the T1w image corresponding to blood (asterisks). Note the infiltration of the connective tissue of the muscles adjacent to the collection (arrowheads)

Fig. 5

a Axial and (b) coronal FSPD images of the thighs of 19-year-old male with tear of the myotendinous junction of the right rectus femoris muscle after a soccer game. The aponeurosis of the right rectus femoris muscle is focally interrupted (arrow) with extensive fluid infiltration around the myotendinous junction and the tear (arrowheads)

Muscle hernia

Muscle hernias (MH) are rare focal protrusions of deep soft tissue through the deep peripheral fascia into the hypodermis. MH usually occur in the leg with the tibialis anterior muscle most frequently involved at the middle and lower thirds of the leg [10]. MH may preferentially occur in weak areas where vessels and nerves perforate the deep peripheral fascia [11, 12]. Dynamic imaging is useful with either ultrasonography or MRI to detect the protruding tissue [10]. MRI findings consist in the focal bulging of the muscle tissue out of the muscle compartment into the hypodermic fat, through the deep peripheral fascia, best seen when the muscle is contracted. Interruption of the deep peripheral fascia is inconstantly observed at MRI [10]. MH have been described in certain populations with great strain on the legs such as alpine soldiers and athletes [10], probably secondary to chronic hypertrophy of the muscles leading to hyperpression in the muscle compartments and excessive tension forces applied on the fasciae. It may also occur after direct trauma of the fascia such as open fracture or surgery (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6

Axial SE T1w image of the legs of a 23-year-old male with muscle hernia after open fracture and surgery of the left leg. Deep peripheral fascia of the antero-medial part of the left leg is interrupted (arrowhead) with herniation of the flexor digitorum longus muscle in the hypodermic fat (arrow)

Infectious diseases

As a continuum of connective tissues extending from the skin to the bone, soft-tissue infections, usually secondary to cutaneous portals of entry, can spread from the surface to the deepest parts of the fascial system. Infections involving the fascial system include cellulitis (or dermohypodermitis) when limited to the subcutaneous tissues and fasciitis when deep fasciae are involved [13]. Necrotizing soft-tissue infections are a particular form of soft-tissue infections characterized by an uncommon rapidly progression with tissue necrosis that can affect the subcutaneous tissues (necrotizing cellulitis) and/or the deep fasciae (necrotizing fasciitis) [14].

Non-necrotizing and necrotizing cellulitis

Cellulitis or dermohypodermitis refers to a bacterial infection involving the hypodermis without extension to the deep fasciae. Cellulitis is usually a clinical diagnosis. However, MRI can be performed to detect underlying deep tissue extension and possible localized collections [13]. MRI findings of cellulitis consist in an infiltration of the hypodermis with fluid-signal intensity (low signal intensity on T1w images and high signal on T2w images) and enhancement after contrast material injection. Cellulitis is generally asymmetrically distributed in the opposite to stasis edema which is usually bilateral and symmetrical without enhancement after contrast material injection (Fig. 7) [14]. Cellulitis may be associated with collections (Fig. 8) and lack of enhancement of the hypodermis due to poor vascularization and/or necrosis (necrotizing cellulitis) (Fig. 9). Like non-inflammatory stasis edema, inflammatory infiltration of cellulitis tends to collect in the deepest part of the hypodermis, deep to the stratum membranosum and superficial to the deep peripheral fascia, and should not be confused with the infiltration deep to the fascia or of the deep fascia itself as seen in fasciitis.

Fig. 7

Axial (a) STIR and (b) contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed SE T1w images of the legs of a 55-year-old male with non-complicated cellulitis of the left leg. MRI demonstrates diffuse thickening of the subcutaneous soft tissues with increased fluid content infiltration of the fascia superficialis enhancing after contrast material injection, more severe on the antero-medial part of the leg (arrow). Note the inflammatory infiltration along the interface between the hypodermis and the deep peripheral fascia which conserve normal thickness and signal (arrowheads)

Fig. 8

a Coronal contrast-enhanced and (b) axial contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed SE T1w images of the legs of a 25-year-old immunosuppressed male with rheumatoid arthritis and cellulitis of the left leg. Inflammatory infiltration of the fascia superficialis is centered around a large hypodermic fluid collection with irregular margins (arrow)

Fig. 9

Coronal (a) SE T1w, (b) FSPD, and (c) contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed T1w images of the left forefoot of an 81-year-old diabetic male with foot ulcer and necrotizing cellulitis. SE T1w and fluid-sensitive images demonstrate infiltrated hypodermic fat on the medial (white arrows) and to a lesser account dorsal aspect (black arrows) of the foot while the hypodermic fat on the plantar and lateral aspect is normal. After contrast material injection, necrotized skin and fat do not enhance (white arrowheads) and are surrounded by fat with enhanced inflammatory infiltration (black arrowheads)

Necrotizing fasciitis

Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is a particular form of soft-tissue infections that involves the deep fasciae. It is usually rapidly fatal, unless promptly recognized and surgically treated by extensive debridement [15, 16]. Distinguishing NF from non-NF based on clinical and biological results is difficult [17]. The definite diagnostic criterion is surgical exploration that demonstrates necrotic fat with brownish color and lack of resistance to manual debridement along the deep fascial plane [18,19,20]. The diagnosis of NF is difficult and often delayed because of variability in symptoms and signs [14, 21]. NF can be initially difficult to differentiate from cellulitis and other superficial infections of the skin. In fact, only 15 to 34% of patients with NF have an accurate diagnosis at admission [15]. The course is generally acute with a rapid progression of the clinical manifestations, but it can also be subacute, merely in elderly patients and diabetics, requiring careful clinical follow-up. Imaging tests play a questionable role in the diagnosis of NF and their performance should in no way delay operative management. At MRI, the main abnormality found in NF is thickening of the deep fasciae, with high signal intensity on fluid-sensitive sequences and heterogeneous enhancement after contrast material injection resulting from fluid accumulation and hyperhemia along the necrotic fasciae (Fig. 10). Muscle changes may also occur, generally in a superficial and limited manner probably due to endomysium infiltration (Fig. 11). Several authors attempted to provide a more detailed description of the MRI features observed in NF in comparison with those observed in non-necrotizing fasciitis (non-NF). In a nutshell, no single criterion was highly accurate. Kim et al. [22] showed that several features of the deep intermuscular fascia were found more frequently in NF than in non-NF including (a) abnormal high signal intensity measuring 3 mm or more in thickness, (b) extensive involvement at distance from the deep fascia, and (c) involvement of three or more compartments. Low signal intensity areas visible on all sequences and suggestive of gas were not found in non-NF and were present in 43% of case of NF. Anyway, MRI is less sensitive than CT scan which is the method of choice for the detection of gas in the soft tissues [23]. Focal or diffuse absence of post-contrast signal enhancement within the fascial abnormalities were seen in 26% of non-NF and in 86% of NF. There is considerable discrepancy in the MRI evaluation of NF. Several key points deserve emphasis: (a) the absence of MRI abnormalities of the deep intermuscular fascia and connective tissue of the muscles rules out NF, (b) presence of gas along the deep fasciae is highly specific but not sensitive, (c) extensive thickening of the intermuscular fasciae with an appearance suggesting incomplete vascularization supports the diagnosis of NF, (d) presence of alterations confined to the peripheral deep fascia and to limited portions of the adjacent intermuscular fasciae is of borderline significance [24].

Fig. 10

Axial (a) STIR and (b) contrast-enhanced SE T1w images of the thighs of a 34-year-old male with Staphylococcus aureus septicemia and necrotizing fasciitis of the left thigh. MRI demonstrates thickening of the deep intermuscular fasciae of the posteromedial compartment of the thigh with fluid-like signal on the STIR image (asterisks) and enhancement adjacent to the necrotic fasciae after contrast material injection (arrows)

Fig. 11

Axial SE T2w image of the legs of a 71-year-old male with necrotizing fasciitis of the right leg. MRI demonstrates thickening of the deep intermuscular fascia between gastrocnemius and soleus muscles with fluid-like signal (arrows) and extensive infiltration of the connective tissue of the adjacent muscles (arrowheads)

Neoplastic diseases

Neoplastic diseases arising from the fascial system include benign tumors, locally aggressive tumors without metastatic risk and malignant tumors. These tumors appear as masses in continuity with the fasciae and aponeurosis. Histologically, they consist of the proliferation of fibroblasts (with or without cytologic atypia) with collagen fibers and variable myxoid stroma.

Superficial fibromatosis

Benign tumors of the fasciae develop on superficial aponeurosis of the hand (palmar fibromatosis or Dupuytren’s contracture) and/or the foot (plantar fibromatosis or Ledderhose’s disease). Superficial fibromatosis mostly concerns patients aged over 50 years old with a predilection for male [25, 26].

Diagnosis of palmar fibromatosis is clinical with painless retraction and subcutaneous nodules of the palmar area, typically just in front of the flexor crease of the fourth and fifth fingers. Medical imaging is rarely useful in palmar fibromatosis and when performed it demonstrates fusiform nodules deep to the derma, in continuity with the palmar aponeurosis (Fig. 12). Multiple lesions and bilateral involvement are of strong value for the diagnosis of palmar fibromatosis.

Fig. 12

Axial SE T1w images of the hands of a 48-year-old male with palmar fibromatosis. a Palmar aponeuroses are normal in their proximal parts with thin regular margins (black arrowheads). b MRI demonstrates low signal intensity nodules (arrows) in continuity with the palmar aponeuroses (white arrowheads) located in front of the flexor crease of the fourth and fifth fingers corresponding to fibromatosis

Plantar fibromatosis is more difficult to assess clinically as it appears as non-specific masses of the plantar area without contracture. Medical imaging is frequently obtained in the work-up of these masses [27, 28]. As for palmar fibromatosis, imaging of plantar fibromatosis demonstrates nodules deep to the hypodermis, in continuity with the plantar aponeurosis, typically multiple. At MRI, enhancement after contrast material injection and signal intensity on T2w images vary according to their fibroblastic and collagenic content (Fig. 13) [29]. In case of non-typical appearance at MRI, multi-disciplinary discussion is recommended to decide the necessity to biopsy [27, 28].

Fig. 13

Sagittal (a) SE T1w and (b) fat-suppressed SE T2w images of the right foot of a 47-year-old male with plantar fibromatosis. MRI demonstrates fusiform thickening of the plantar fibromatosis with a nodule of low signal intensity on the T1w image and heterogeneous high signal intensity on the T2w image (arrow) in continuity with the normal aponeurosis (arrowheads)

Desmoid tumors (deep fibromatosis)

Desmoid tumors are rare locally aggressive (myo)fibroblastic neoplasms that affects most frequently young patients aged from 20 to 40 years old with a predilection for female [25, 26, 30]. Desmoid tumors of the trunk and extremities arise from fibroblasts of the connective tissue of the muscles and the deep peripheral fasciae [25, 26]. These tumors present local aggressiveness because of their tendency to infiltrate the adjacent structures and to recur after surgery but have no risk of metastasis.

MRI is the key exam to detect and assess desmoid tumors and their complications [30, 31]. Lesions are in continuity with the deep peripheral and/or intermuscular fasciae with a “fascia tail sign” often visible (Fig. 14). They appear as well-defined ovoid masses or ill-defined fibrotic infiltrations and may extend to the adjacent structures such as muscles, nerves, and vessels. Like superficial fibromatosis, enhancement after contrast material injection and signal intensity on fluid-sensitive images vary according to their histological content (Fig. 15). As these features are not specific of desmoid tumors and may be present in other benign or malignant tumors, multi-disciplinary discussion is recommended [30, 32].

Fig. 14

Coronal SE T1w image of the pelvis of a 52-year-old female with a desmoid tumor in the left hip area. MRI demonstrates low signal intensity masses (arrows) in continuity with the iliotibial tract and the deep peripheral fascia with typical aspect described as “fascia tail sign” (white arrowheads). The right iliotibial tract and deep peripheral fasciae are normal (black arrowhead)

Fig. 15

Axial (a) SE T1w image before contrast material injection, (b) SE T2w image, and (c) SE T1w image after contrast material injection of the left hip of the same patient as in Fig. 14. Masses have heterogenous signal reflecting their histological content: “mature” inactive fibrosis has low signal intensity and no enhancement (arrowheads) while “immature” active fibrosis has intermediate signal on T1w images and high signal intensity on T2w images with enhancement after contrast material injection (arrows)

MRI is also used to asses changes over time of desmoid tumors, whatever their treatment. Indeed, desmoid tumors may spontaneously regress when treated conservatively and may have recurrences when treated surgically [30].


Fibrosarcomas and myxofiborsarcomas are rare malignant tumors of the connective tissue which mostly affect patients older than 50 years old. Clinical presentation consists in a slowly growing and usually painless mass syndrome as any tumor of the soft tissues. Metastasis is more frequent in lungs, liver, and bone [33]. Imaging aspect is not specific with well-defined masses and/or poorly defined infiltrations of low signal intensity on T1w images, heterogeneous moderate to high signal intensity on T2w images depending on the cellularity and myxoid content and variable enhancement after contrast material injection [34]. Intratumoral necrosis or hemorrhage is possible. Biopsy is mandatory to allow histological diagnosis [33, 34].

Recommendations to image localized diseases involving the fascial system at MRI

MRI and ultrasonography are the best imaging techniques to assess localized diseases involving the fascial system. MRI is effective to detect the lesion and assess the fascial involvement from the skin to the bone, whereas ultrasonography is limited to the analysis of the superficial soft tissues. Both imaging modalities may be limited in the characterization of localized fascial diseases.

Standard MRI protocols usually include fat-sensitive sequences for the analysis of the neurovascular bundles and compartmental anatomy. Fat-suppressed fluid-sensitive sequences are mandatory for the detection of soft-tissue lesions with either fat-saturated T2w or proton density-weighted sequence, short tau inversion-recovery (STIR) sequences, or water-only T2w or proton density-weighted Dixon images [13, 35]. Intravenous contrast material injection can contribute to differentiate enhanced from non-enhanced lesion components.

Acquisition planes should include images along the short (i.e., perpendicular) and long (i.e., longitudinal) axes of the involved body segment and cover the entire lesions. The extent of the lesions is appreciated on the short axis images, usually axial images, and one of the two longitudinal axes images, coronal or sagittal images depending on the localization of the lesion. The short axis images better display the exact location of the lesion and its anatomical relationship with the other body structures. Long axis images are less accurate due to partial volumes (Fig. 16). Both axial and coronal acquisition planes allow comparative study of the limbs which is useful as the healthy limb can serve as a reference for the normal anatomy.

Fig. 16

Focused (a) axial, i.e., short axis, and (b) coronal, i.e., long axis, SE T1w contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed images of the left thigh of a 75-year-old male with high-grade myxofibrosarcoma. Axial images clearly demonstrate the localization of the lesion in the hypodermis and its anatomical relationship with the underlying deep peripheral fascia (arrows). The deep fascia is less conspicuous on the longitudinal images due to partial volumes (arrowheads)


The musculoskeletal fascial system can be affected by various localized disorders with variable time course and prognosis. MRI is the best imaging technique to detect the presence of fascial lesions and assess their localization and extent, but it is limited for lesion characterization (Table 1).

Table 1 Key MRI findings for the diagnosis of localized disorders of the fasciae


  1. 1.

    Stecco C, Macchi V, Porzionato A, Duparc F, De Caro R (2011) The fascia: the forgotten structure. Ital J Anat Embryol 116(3):127–138

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Kirchgesner T, Demondion X, Stoenoiu M et al (2018) Fasciae of the musculoskeletal system: normal anatomy and MR patterns of involvement in autoimmune diseases. Insights Imaging 9(5):761–771.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Pathria MN, Chung CB, Resnick DL (2016) Acute and stress-related injuries of bone and cartilage: pertinent anatomy, basic biomechanics, and imaging perspective. Radiology 280(1):21–38

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Dawre S, Lamba S, H S, Gupta S, Gupta AK (2012) The Morel-Lavallee lesion: a review and a proposed algorithmic approach. Eur J Plast Surg 35(7):489–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Parra JA, Fernandez MA, Encinas B, Rico M (1997) Morel-Lavallée effusions in the thigh. Skeletal Radiol 26(4):239–241

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Mellado JM, Bencardino JT (2005) Morel-Lavallée lesion: review with emphasis on MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 13(4):775–782

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Vidoni A, Gillett M, Botchu R, James S (2018) Lower limb muscle injuries: the good, the bad and the ugly. Eur J Radiol 104:101–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Delgado GJ, Chung CB, Lektrakul N et al (2002) Tennis leg: clinical US study of 141 patients and anatomic investigation of four cadavers with MR imaging and US. Radiology 224(1):112–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kassarjian A, Rodrigo RM, Santisteban JM (2012) Current concepts in MRI of rectus femoris musculotendinous (myotendinous) and myofascial injuries in elite athletes. Eur J Radiol 81(12):3763–3771

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Mellado JM, Pérez del Palomar L (1999) Muscle hernias of the lower leg: MRI findings. Skeletal Radiol 28(8):465–469

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Jarrett DY, Kramer DE, Callahan MJ, Kleinman PK (2013) US diagnosis of pediatric muscle hernias of the lower extremities. Pediatr Radiol 43(S1):2–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Braunstein JT, Crues JV 3rd (1995) Magnetic resonance imaging of hereditary hernias of the peroneus longus muscle. Skeletal Radiol 24(8):601–604.

  13. 13.

    Hayeri MR, Ziai P, Shehata ML, Teytelboym OM, Huang BK (2016) Soft-tissue infections and their imaging mimics: from cellulitis to necrotizing fasciitis. Radiographics 36(6):1888–1910

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Malghem J, Lecouvet FE, Omoumi P, Maldague BE, Vande Berg BC (2013) Necrotizing fasciitis: contribution and limitations of diagnostic imaging. Joint Bone Spine 80(2):146–154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Paz Maya S, Dualde Beltrán D, Lemercier P, Leiva-Salinas C (2014) Necrotizing fasciitis: an urgent diagnosis. Skeletal Radiol 43(5):577–589

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Roje Z, Roje Ž, Matić D, Librenjak D, Dokuzović S, Varvodić J (2011) Necrotizing fasciitis: literature review of contemporary strategies for diagnosing and management with three case reports: torso, abdominal wall, upper and lower limbs. World J Emerg Surg 6:46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Wall DB, Klein SR, Black S, de Virgilio C (2000) A simple model to help distinguish necrotizing fasciitis from nonnecrotizing soft tissue infection. J Am Coll Surg 191(3):227–231

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Sarani B, Strong M, Pascual J, Schwab CW (2009) Necrotizing fasciitis: current concepts and review of the literature. J Am Coll Surg 208(2):279–288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Anaya DA, Dellinger EP (2007) Necrotizing soft-tissue infection: diagnosis and management. Clin Infect Dis 44(5):705–710

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Lancerotto L, Tocco I, Salmaso R, Vindigni V, Bassetto F (2012) Necrotizing fasciitis: classification, diagnosis, and management. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 72(3):560–566

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Wysoki MG, Santora TA, Shah RM, Friedman AC (1997) Necrotizing fasciitis: CT characteristics. Radiology 203(3):859–863

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Kim KT, Kim YJ, Won Lee J et al (2011) Can necrotizing infectious fasciitis be differentiated from nonnecrotizing infectious fasciitis with MR imaging? Radiology 259(3):816–824

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Chaudhry AA, Baker KS, Gould ES, Gupta R (2015) Necrotizing fasciitis and its mimics: what radiologists need to know. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204(1):128–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Yu JS, Habib P (2009) MR imaging of urgent inflammatory and infectious conditions affecting the soft tissues of the musculoskeletal system. Emerg Radiol 16(4):267–276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Walker EA, Petscavage JM, Brian PL, Logie CI, Montini KM, Murphey MD (2012) Imaging features of superficial and deep fibromatoses in the adult population. Sarcoma 2012:215810

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Murphey MD, Ruble CM, Tyszko SM, Zbojniewicz AM, Potter BK, Miettinen M (2009) From the archives of the AFIP: musculoskeletal fibromatoses: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 29(7):2143–2173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Toepfer A, Harrasser N, Dreyer F, Mogler C, Walther M, von Eisenhart-Rothe R (2017) Epithelioid sarcoma of the plantar fascia mimicking Morbus Ledderhose - a severe pitfall for clinical and histopathological misinterpretation. Foot Ankle Surg 23(4):e25–e30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Bousson V, Hamze B, Wybier M et al (2008) Soft tissue tumors and pseudotumors of the foot and ankle. J Radiol 89(1 Pt 1):21–34

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Yacoe ME, Bergman AG, Ladd AL, Hellman BH (1993) Dupuytren’s contracture: MR imaging findings and correlation between MR signal intensity and cellularity of lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 160(4):813–817

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Lee JC, Thomas JM, Phillips S, Fisher C, Moskovic E (2006) Aggressive fibromatosis: MRI features with pathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186(1):247–254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Braschi-Amirfarzan M, Keraliya AR, Krajewski KM et al (2016) Role of imaging in management of desmoid-type fibromatosis: a primer for radiologists. Radiographics 36(3):767–782

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Dinauer PA, Brixey CJ, Moncur JT, Fanburg-Smith JC, Murphey MD (2007) Pathologic and MR imaging features of benign fibrous soft-tissue tumors in adults. Radiographics 27(1):173–187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Augsburger D, Nelson PJ, Kalinski T et al (2017) Current diagnostics and treatment of fibrosarcoma -perspectives for future therapeutic targets and strategies. Oncotarget 8(61):104638–104653

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Wang H, Nie P, Dong C et al (2018) CT and MRI findings of soft tissue adult fibrosarcoma in extremities. Biomed Res Int 2018:6075705

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Guerini H, Omoumi P, Guichoux F et al (2015) Fat suppression with Dixon techniques in musculoskeletal magnetic resonance imaging: a pictorial review. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 19(4):335–347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information




All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Kirchgesner.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kirchgesner, T., Tamigneaux, C., Acid, S. et al. Fasciae of the musculoskeletal system: MRI findings in trauma, infection and neoplastic diseases. Insights Imaging 10, 47 (2019).

Download citation


  • Fascia
  • Musculoskeletal
  • Anatomy
  • Trauma
  • Infection
  • Neoplasm
  • Magnetic resonance imaging