Skip to main content

Advertisement

Insights into Imaging
Insights into Imaging Cover Image

CT imaging features of atrioventricular shunts: what the radiologist must know

Insights into Imaging volume 7, pages119–129(2016)Cite this article

Article metrics

Abstract

In the last decade, cardiac computed tomography (CT) has gained mainstream acceptance for the noninvasive exclusion of significant coronary disease in a selected population. Improvements in electrocardiogram (ECG)-triggered imaging techniques also allow, by extension, a proper evaluation of the complete heart anatomy. Given the increasing worldwide clinical implementation of cardiac CT for coronary artery evaluation, radiologists can, incidentally, be confronted with unfamiliar and previously unsuspected non-coronary cardiac pathologies, including congenital morphological defects. This presence of congenital heart disease (CHD) should not be overlooked, being the most common form of birth defect, with a total birth prevalence of 9.1 per 1000 live births worldwide [1]. The prevalence of adult patients with CHD is estimated to be 3000 per million adults [2]. Ventricular septal defects (VSDs) are the most frequent subtypes of CHD, accounting together with atrial septal defects (ASDs) for nearly half of all CHD cases [1]. While some small defects are rarely symptomatic and can go undetected for life, others are clinically significant and require adequate and timely medical intervention. In this article, we present the CT imaging features of atrioventricular (AV) shunts, highlighting both their embryological origins and associated relevant clinical features.

Teaching points

• Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most common birth defect.

• Ventricular and atrial septal defects account for nearly half of CHD cases.

• Atrioventricular defects can frequently be detected on a cardiac CT.

• Radiologists must be able to identify clinically significant atrioventricular defects.

Introduction

In the last decade, cardiac computed tomography (CT) has gained mainstream acceptance for the noninvasive exclusion of significant coronary disease in a selected population. Improvements in electrocardiogram (ECG)-triggered imaging techniques also allow, by extension, a proper evaluation of the complete heart anatomy. Given the increasing worldwide clinical implementation of cardiac CT for coronary artery evaluation, radiologists can, incidentally, be confronted with unfamiliar and previously unsuspected non-coronary cardiac pathologies, including congenital morphological defects. This presence of congenital heart disease (CHD) should not be overlooked, being the most common form of birth defect, with a total birth prevalence of 9.1 per 1000 live births worldwide [1]. The prevalence of adult patients with CHD is estimated to be 3000 per million adults [2]. Ventricular septal defects (VSDs) are the most frequent subtypes of CHD, accounting together with atrial septal defects (ASDs) for nearly half of all CHD cases [1]. While some small defects are rarely symptomatic and can go undetected for life, others are clinically significant and require adequate and timely medical intervention. In this article, we present the CT imaging features of atrioventricular (AV) shunts, highlighting both their embryological origins and associated relevant clinical features.

Concise overview of relevant embryology and anatomy

The development of atrial septation initiates 28–30 days after gestation, with key elements of this development shown in Figs. 1 and 2 [3–5]. In short, the AV canal develops together with atrial septation. Cells from the primitive endocardium migrate and form the endocardial cushions, which are swellings of connective tissue surrounding the AV canal (Figs. 3 and 4) [4, 5]. Septation of the primitive ventricle occurs simultaneously with atrial septation in the fifth to seventh week. Furthermore, it is closely related to the septation of the truncus and conus cordis, which leads to the formation of the future ventricular outflow tracts. The complete separation of both ventricles is the final result of these two processes (Figs. 5, 6, and 7) [4, 5].

Fig. 1
figure1

Primitive atrium and ventricle before the age of 30 days in a frontal view (a) and lateral view (b) and around 30 days in a frontal view (c) and lateral view (d). Before the age of 30 days, the embryonic heart is composed of a primitive atrium (A) and ventricle (V) without a dividing septum. Around 30 days of gestation the primary atrial septum or septum primum (SP, drawn in red), begins to grow as a crescent-shaped structure downwards from the roof of the primitive atrium toward the atrioventricular (AV) canal

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure2

Evolution of atrial septation in afrontal view (a) and lateral view (b). The fifth drawing of panel b is also a frontal view. The septum primum (SP, drawn in red) grows towards the developing endocardial cushions (asterisk) at the level of the atrioventricular (AV) canal, dividing the primitive atrium into what will become the left atrium (LA) and right atrium (RA). An opening, called the ostium primum (OP), is left between the edge of the SP and the endocardial cushions at the AV canal. The OP allows oxygenated blood from the placenta to bypass the lungs and flow between the developing atria. During further development, the SP will gradually fuse with the endocardial cushions. However, before closure, a second opening in the SP will appear. This opening, known as the ostium secundum (OS) allows continuing interatrial communication. At the age of 36 days, a second septum, the septum secundum (SS, drawn in blue) appears from the atrial roof immediately to the right of the SP. In its course, it overlaps the OS and eventually fuses with the endocardial cushions. This septum, too, leaves an opening called the foramen ovale (FO). The superior edge of the SP partially regresses. The inferior part acts as a valve, allowing only right-to-left flow through the FO, as prenatal blood passes from the right atrium to the left atrium (dotted arrow) since right atrial pressure exceeds left atrial pressure. After birth, increased pulmonary return will raise the left atrial pressure, which will cause the valve to functionally close, as shown in the fifth drawing of Figure b, and eventually fuse with the septum secundum at the age of 6 months

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure3

Development of the AV canal at the embryological stages of 4, 6, 9 and 12 mm. The endocardial cushions proliferate in different planes, not only dividing the AV canal in a left mitral and right tricuspid canal but also forming part of the membranous ventricular septum and closing the atrial OP

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure4

Normal anatomy of the AV canal. It is divided into a right canal with a tricuspid AV valve (circle) separating the right atrium and the right ventricle and a left canal with a bicuspid (mitral) AV valve (star) separating the left atrium and the left ventricle. The aortic valve (triangle) and the pulmonary valve (square) are located anterior of the AV valves

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure5

At the end of the fourth week the unseptated primitive ventricle (V) is connected on one side with the primitive atrium (which is not shown and lying directly behind of the primitive ventricle on this drawing), through the atrioventricular (AV) canals. On the other side it is connected with the bulbus cordis (B). The bulbus cordis consists of the conus cordis and the truncus cordis and will give rise to the future aorta and truncus pulmonalis. In the fifth week the left and right part of the primitive ventricle start to grow, creating a median muscular ridge (interventricular septum, IVS). Initially, this ridge mainly results from the joining of the growing ventricles on each side. In a second stage, cell growth from the ventricular septum itself contributes to the size. The primitive interventricular septum grows up to the endocardial cushions, creating two chambers. However, it will stop growing before it reaches the endocardial cushions, leaving an opening that allows interventricular communication, called the interventricular foramen

Full size image
Fig. 6
figure6

In the fifth embryological week, two ridges (drawn in orange and in green) develop in the wall of bulbus cordis. These ridges will converge in the midline and grow and extend toward the muscular interventricular septum (IVS), in a helical way. This leads to the formation of the aortopulmonary septum, which divides the bulbus cordis into two arterial channels, the aorta and the truncus pulmonalis, the former continuous with the left ventricle and the latter with the right ventricle. At the end of the seventh week, the ridges fuse with the atrioventricular (AV) endocardial cushions and with the muscular septum, forming the membranous septum and closing the interventricular foramen

Full size image
Fig. 7
figure7

Normal anatomy of the interventricular septum. It consists of a thick muscular portion (m) and a thin oval-shaped membranous portion (asterisk). The latter lies immediately inferior to the aortic valve cusps (arrowhead) and the pulmonary valve cusps (arrow). RV right ventricle, LV left ventricle

Full size image

Multimodality imaging of intracardiac shunts

The most used technique for intracardiac shunt evaluation is transthoracic and especially transoesophageal echocardiography, which is by many still considered the reference standard [6]. However, both CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can also be used to visualize intracardiac shunts [7, 8]. The choice between these imaging modalities often depends on the local expertise and available equipment. When further comparing CT versus MRI, MRI is a more complex technique but may provide functional cardiac information and may be able to quantify the degree of an AV shunt by volumetric measurements of the ventricles and flow quantification over the cardiac valves.

Furthermore, MRI has the advantage of not using radiation and can also be performed without the use of intravenous contrast administration. Conversely, CT has been proven to deliver exquisite anatomic visualization of cardiac anatomy in a short examination time with little physician input. While it is not customary to use CT for the visualization of intracardiac shunts, the use of ECG gating techniques during routine examinations targeted at the coronary arteries allows excellent simultaneous visualization of these congenital defects, as such, enhancing the value of the radiology report [8, 9]. When large, they can also be detected on non-ECG-gated CT examinations.

Atrial shunts

An ASD is defined as a persistent opening in the interatrial septum after birth, allowing communication between the left and the right atrium [5, 6]. When present, oxygenated blood shunts from the left atrium to the right atrium, the shunted volume depending on the size of the defect.

The reported birth prevalence of ASDs is 1.64 per 1000 live births, accounting for 13 % of all CHDs [1]. They account for 25–30 % of CHD cases diagnosed in adulthood [10]. Remarkably, most ASDs, even those with a large left-to-right shunt, go undiagnosed through most of one’s childhood and may only become symptomatic in the fifth decade or later. The exact age at which symptoms begin is highly variable and not exclusively related to the size of the shunt. With advancing age, the risk of developing exercise intolerance, atrial fibrillation or even decompensated right heart failure and pulmonary hypertension increases [11].

ASDs are detectable on both contrast-enhanced CT and MR examinations. While they can be appreciated on standard axial images, their presence and further characterization is often better appreciated on oblique, reformatted images perpendicular to the atrial septal plane.

Patent foramen ovale

During fetal life, a normal interatrial communication through the oval foramen exists, providing oxygenated blood from the inferior vena cava into the left atrium. As such, this communication is not a true ASD but a necessary passage tunnelled during embryologic development. It is commonly encountered in newborn babies. With advancing age, left atrial pressure increases, functionally closing the foramen ovale by pushing the septum primum flap against the septum secundum. In a vast majority of cases, normal development evolves to complete septal fusion. However, a failed fusion with persistent interatrial communication is called a patent foramen ovale (PFO), a common finding found in up to 25 % of adults [12].

Reflecting the embryologic purpose of arteriovenous communication, a PFO has a vertical cranio-caudal orientation in the direction of the inferior vena cava, best seen on axial images or oblique images perpendicular to the atrial septum. Both the OP and secundum flap can then be identified, surrounded by dense intravenous contrast, as demonstrated in Fig. 8. A variable amount of dense contrast can often be seen flowing into the right atrium. Incomplete fusion does not necessary imply that an interatrial shunt exists, as the septum can be functionally closed with still identifiable septum flaps. This anatomic variation is called a probe PFO (Fig. 9).

Fig. 8
figure8

Four-chamber contrast-enhanced CT image a illustrating a small patent foramen ovale (arrow). Oblique coronal contrast-enhanced CT images b show the interatrial septum at the level of the fossa ovalis. A patent foramen ovale (asterisk) is the result of a failed fusion between the septum primum (arrows) and the interatrial groove (IAG), which consists of a superior (S) and inferior (I) part. There virtually never is a volume overload in these patients because the transatrial flow is limited and oblique to the interatrial septum, due to the orientation of the septum primum flap. This feature distinguishes a PFO from other atrial septal defects where the flow direction is perpendicular to the axis of the interatrial septum. LA left atrium, RA right atrium

Full size image
Fig. 9
figure9

Oblique sagittal post-contrast CT image in a patient with an incidentally found probe PFO at the level of the superior part (S) of the interatrial groove (IAG). Similar to a PFO a septum primum flap (arrow) is present. However, in this entity functional closure of the foramen ovale has occurred and hence, no interatrial communication exists, in contrast to a real PFO. I inferior part of the interatrial groove, LA left atrium, RA right atrium

Full size image

PFO’s are mostly clinically silent, frequently seen during cardiac CT examination performed for unrelated reasons [8]. When large, they can also be detected on non-ECG gated CT examinations [13]. In asymptomatic patients with an incidental PFO, no medical or interventional therapy is advised. Furthermore, a potential benefit of having a PFO is facilitation of transseptal catheter passage in radiofrequency ablation procedures. The criteria for PFO closure are not standardized. Whether transcatheter PFO closure is considered superior to medical therapy in reducing the risk of recurrent stroke is currently the subject of intense debate and research [14, 15].

Ostium primum defect

An OP defect is a less common type of ASD, accounting for 15 % of ASDs. They occur in the lower portion of the atrial septum near the AV valves. The embryological basis of this defect is shown in Fig. 10. In the presence of an OP defect, one should therefore always look for an associated valve defect, most frequently a cleft in the anterior leaflet of the mitral valve.

Fig. 10
figure10

In normal embryological development, the OP closes and fuses with the endocardial cushions. The ostium secundum appears simultaneously, as illustrated in Fig. 2. An OP defect occurs when the OP fails to close and fuse with the endocardial cushions (asterisk), shown in frontal (F) and lateral (L) view. LA left atrium, RA right atrium, SP septum primum, OS ostium secundum

Full size image

Since OP defects are often large they can easily be depicted on CT, revealing a large shunt flow, typically perpendicular to the interatrial septum. Oblique CT images allow detailed evaluation of the anatomy, such as the relationship with the AV valves and the absence of a flap, as illustrated in Fig. 11. As in all types of ASDs, surgical closure of the defect is indicated in those patients with a hemodynamically significant shunt that causes enlargement of the right heart structures. Suspicion of paradoxal embolism in the absence of other causes is also a valid indication for defect closure [16, 17].

Fig. 11
figure11

Four-chamber view (a) and short-axis (b) contrast-enhanced CT images showing a large OP defect (asterisk) allowing a communication between the left atrium (LA) and right atrium (RA). These defects are located in the part of the interatrial septum adjacent to the AV valves. Because OP defects are often large and lack a septal flap as in a patent foramen ovale, a shunt-induced volume overload with subsequent enlargement of the RA and ventricle can be seen

Full size image

Ostium secundum defect

Ostium secundum defects are the most frequent type of ASD, accounting for 75 % of all cases. They are found in the region of the fossa ovalis. The embryological basis of this ASD is illustrated in Fig. 12. Contrary to a PFO, an overlapping septal flap is lacking. As in OP defects, a shunt flow perpendicular to the axis of the interatrial septum is seen, in contrast to the more oblique cranio-caudal flow of a PFO, as demonstrated in Fig. 13.

Fig. 12
figure12

In normal embryological development, resorption of the septum primum at the ostium primum and formation of the foramen ovale in the septum secundum occur simultaneously, as illustrated in Fig. 2. In some cases, excessive resorption of the septum primum (drawn in red) or inadequate development of the septum secundum (drawn in blue) or a combination of both occurs. This leads to a larger than normal defect centrally in the interatrial septum at the future fossa ovalis, called an ostium secundum defect (asterisk). F frontal view, L lateral view

Full size image
Fig. 13
figure13

Axial (a) and coronal (b) contrast-enhanced CT images clearly depict an ostium secundum defect (asterisk) at the fossa ovalis with shunting of contrast-enhanced blood from the left atrium (LA) to the right atrium (RA). Contrary to a patent foramen ovale, the flow is perpendicular to the axis of the interatrial septum because of the absence of an overlapping septal flap. In large defects like in this case, this can lead to volume overload and dilatation of the right atrium and ventricle

Full size image

Small defects are often asymptomatic and usually do not require treatment. Large defects, however, can initially cause volume overload of the right heart, eventually leading to pressure overload with dilatation of the right atrium and ventricle. As a consequence, right heart failure, pulmonary hypertension and right-to-left shunting may render this type of ASD to become symptomatic, usually in the fifth decade. This can be prevented by shunt closure, either surgically or endovasculary depending on the characteristics of the defect. Large defects and defects close to the edge of the interatrial wall are less suited for the endovascular approach since most closing devices cannot be anchored properly [16, 17].

Sinus venosus defect

Sinus venosus defects represent 4–11 % of atrial septum defects [18]. The name is derived from an abnormal absorption of the embryologic sinus venosus into the right atrium. In this defect, communication exists between one or more of the right pulmonary veins and the junction of the superior vena cava and the right atrium, called the superior vena cava type, as demonstrated in Fig. 14. Sometimes, only the superior vena cava is involved (Fig. 15). In fewer cases, this occurs just above the junction of the inferior vena cava and the right atrium (inferior sinus venosus defect) [19]. The presence of a sinus venosus defect may lead to volume and pressure overload of the right heart. Multiplanar CT reconstructions are very useful in the assessment of the complex anatomy of this type of ASD. Sinus venosus defects with significant hemodynamic impact need surgical correction to prevent further right heart failure and pulmonary hypertension [16, 17].

Fig. 14
figure14

Axial (a) and coronal (b) contrast-enhanced CT images illustrate a sinus venosus defect (asterisk), located eccentrically in the interatrial septum near the entry of the super vena cava (SVC) into the right atrium (RA). Instead of draining into the left atrium (LA) the right pulmonary veins (RPVs) conjoin with the superior vena cava into the RA. There is also interatrial communication through a short vein segment (asterisk in c). The anomalous pulmonary venous return leads to a volume overload and secondary dilatation of the RA and ventricle. IVC inferior vena cava

Full size image
Fig. 15
figure15

Axial (a) and oblique sagittal (b) post-contrast CT images of a patient with anomalous return of the right upper pulmonary vein (asterisk) in the superior vena cava (SVC)

Full size image

Ventricular shunts

A ventricular septum defect (VSD) is an abnormal opening in the VS [5], allowing communication between the ventricular cavities. In children, VSDs are the second most common CHD (34 %) with a birth incidence of 2.62 per 1000 live births [1]. Most of these are small and spontaneously resolve in childhood, the majority within the 1 year after birth [20]. VSDs may also be acquired after acute myocardial infarction, chest trauma, cardiac interventions, or endocarditis.

In the adult population, the prevalence is estimated to be 0.3 per 1000 [21], making it the second most common form of CHD after the bicuspid aortic valve.

Membranous VSD

Membranous VSDs are the most common type of VSD, accounting for 70–80 % of all cases. It is located in the upper part of the VS directly below the aortic valve and behind the septal leaflet of the tricuspid valve (Fig. 16). Because of their proximity to the defect regurgitation of these valves may occur.

Fig. 16
figure16

This axial contrast-enhanced CT nicely illustrates a defect in the membranous portion of the IVS (arrow). This defect permits a communication between the ventricular cavities, and causes blood shunting from the high pressure left systemic circulation to the low-pressure pulmonary circulation. The magnitude of the shunt is influenced by the size of the defect, the pressure in right ventricle (RV) and left ventricle (LV) and the pulmonary and systemic vascular resistance. RA right atrium, LA left atrium

Full size image

There are two main subtypes, a true defect that is confined to the membranous septum alone and defects that extend into the muscular septum. Untreated VSDs in adults are almost always small defects with little hemodynamic load on the heart, and no risk of pulmonary vascular disease. Their only risk is infective endocarditis or arrhythmias. The proportion of VSDs that are large and hemodynamically significant is assumed to form 20 % of all VSDs [22]. In large defects, there is usually a volume overload of the right ventricle, the pulmonary circulation and eventually the left atrium and left ventricle. If untreated, this leads to a left ventricular dilatation, systolic dysfunction and heart failure. Eventually, even pulmonary vascular disease and right-to-left shunting (Eisenmenger syndrome) will develop [5]. Most patients with these large defects born before 1960 would not have had effective surgical treatment and very few of them would be alive today. Therefore, those adults seen today are virtually all postoperative [5, 23].

Muscular VSD

These defects are confined to the muscular septum and account for 20 % of VSDs. The apical two thirds of the muscular septum is most frequently involved (Fig. 17). Multiple small defects (“Swiss cheese” septum) can occur and have the same hemodynamic effects as a single large defect [5]. Small and moderate VSDs in children frequently close entirely or sufficiently within the first 2 years making intervention unnecessary. They are often asymptomatic and have an excellent prognosis. When symptoms of heart failure or pulmonary vascular disease occur in neonates, often in case of large VSDs, surgical correction is recommended. Patients with an unclosed VSD are at risk for endocarditis and need a life-long prophylaxis. Adults with irreversible pulmonary damage and Eisenmenger syndrome are not eligible for closure of the defect, because right heart failure can be induced. Large defects with normal pulmonary vascular resistance, on the other hand, can still be treated with repair of the defect [24].

Fig. 17
figure17

Four-chamber view (a) and two-chamber view (b) of contrast-enhanced CT in a patient with a muscular VSD. The defect (arrow) is confined to only the muscular part of the IVS. Like in membranous VSD, a large defect can lead to congestive heart failure or pulmonary vascular disease. RV right ventricle, LV left ventricle

Full size image

Ventricle septum diverticulum

Ventricle septum diverticulum is not a true VSD but it can be a mimicker, so it is worth mentioning. This is a rare congenital malformation that is defined as an out pouching of one of the ventricles into the interventricular septum, as shown in Fig. 18 [25].

Fig. 18
figure18

Coronal oblique (a) and axial (b) contrast-enhanced CT nicely show a ventricular septum diverticulum (arrow). There is a defect originating from the left ventricle (LV) extending in the muscular interventricular septum without reaching the right ventricle (RV). This entity has no hemodynamic importance but can increase the risk of endocarditis

Full size image

Rare VSDs

A supracristal VSD is a rare type (5–8 %) and is located beneath the aortic and pulmonic valves and connects the aorta with the right ventricular outflow tract. It is often associated with aortic valve prolapse. A second uncommon VSD (8–10 %) is situated posterior to the septal leaflet of the tricuspid valve. It is usually associated with an AV septal defect or anomalous insertion of the chordae tendinae of the AV valves.

Imaging after intervention

Different devices are available today for closure of clinically significant intracardiac shunts. They not only differ in architecture but also in imaging compatibility, such as artefact production on CT. This is nicely illustrated in three different ASD closure devices in Fig. 19. Devices used for VSD closure are comparable with those used in ASD closure (Fig. 20). The choice of device and access route depends largely on the location and morphology of the shunt to be treated. Transoesophageal echocardiography remains the golden standard in this pre-procedural assessment, but CT is found to give equal information [8, 9]. Transoesophageal and transthoracic echocardiography, however, remain the reference standard for detection and follow-up of residual shunts [26, 27]. In post-procedural follow-up too, CT can still play an important role, i.e. in detecting complications at the site of intervention but also along the access route, e.g. pseudoaneurysm formation at the puncture site.

Fig. 19
figure19

Different atrial septal occluder devices are shown: the Biostar© device (Organogenesis, Canton, MA, USA) in figures a–b, the Premere© device (St Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN, USA) indicated by arrows in Figures c–d and the Amplatzer© device (AGA Medical, Plymouth, MN, USA) indicated by arrows in Figures e–f. Difference in architecture between the devices can clearly be appreciated as well as a difference in artifact production, most pronounced in the Premere device. RA right atrium, LA left atrium

Full size image
Fig. 20
figure20

Two-chamber view of contrast-enhanced CT (a), maximum intensity projection (MIP) (b) and volume-rendered (c) images of a VSD closure device. RV right ventricle, LV left ventricle

Full size image

Conclusion

Noninvasive cardiac CT imaging is becoming increasingly common in daily practice. But there is more to see than just the coronary arteries. Clinically important structural heart defects can be detected as well. Knowledge of this kind of pathology is the key to detection, which eventually increases the value of the radiological report. In this article, we give an overview of common types of congenital disease, the AV shunts. We try to emphasize which defects are clinically important and which are insignificant.

References

  1. 1.

    van der Linde D, Konings EE, Slager MA et al (2011) Birth prevalence of congenital heart disease worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 58(21):2241–2247

  2. 2.

    van der Bom T, Bouma BJ, Meijboom FJ, Zwinderman AH, Mulder BJ (2012) The prevalence of adult congenital heart disease, results from a systematic review and evidence based calculation. Am Heart J 164(4):568–575

  3. 3.

    Anderson RH, Brown NA, Webb S (2002) Development and structure of the atrial septum. Heart 88(1):104–110

  4. 4.

    Sadler TW (2015) Langman’s medical embryology, 13th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore

  5. 5.

    Lilly LS (2011) Pathophysiology of heart disease : a collaborative project of medical students and faculty, 5th edn. Wolters Kluwer, Philadelphia

  6. 6.

    Geva T, Martins JD, Wald RM (2014) Atrial septal defects. Lancet 383(9932):1921–1932

  7. 7.

    White HD, Halpern EJ, Savage MP (2013) Imaging of adult atrial septal defects with CT angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 6(12):1342–1345

  8. 8.

    Saremi F, Channual S, Raney A et al (2008) Imaging of patent foramen ovale with 64-section multidetector CT. Radiology 249(2):483–492

  9. 9.

    Johri AM, Rojas CA, El-Sherief A et al (2011) Imaging of atrial septal defects: echocardiography and CT correlation. Heart 97(17):1441–1453

  10. 10.

    Lindsey JB, Hillis LD (2007) Clinical update: atrial septal defect in adults. Lancet 369(9569):1244–1246

  11. 11.

    Webb G, Gatzoulis MA (2006) Atrial septal defects in the adult: recent progress and overview. Circulation 114(15):1645–1653

  12. 12.

    Hara H, Virmani R, Ladich E et al (2005) Patent foramen ovale: current pathology, pathophysiology, and clinical status. J Am Coll Cardiol 46(9):1768–1776

  13. 13.

    Revel MP, Faivre JB, Letourneau T et al (2008) Patent foramen ovale: detection with nongated multidetector CT. Radiology 249(1):338–345

  14. 14.

    Carroll JD, Saver JL, Thaler DE et al (2013) Closure of patent foramen ovale versus medical therapy after cryptogenic stroke. N Engl J Med 368(12):1092–1100

  15. 15.

    Katsanos AH, Spence JD, Bogiatzi C et al (2014) Recurrent stroke and patent foramen ovale: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke 45(11):3352–3359

  16. 16.

    Baumgartner H, Bonhoeffer P, De Groot NM et al (2010) ESC Guidelines for the management of grown-up congenital heart disease (new version 2010). Eur Heart J 31(23):2915–2957

  17. 17.

    Warnes CA, Williams RG, Bashore TM et al (2008) ACC/AHA 2008 guidelines for the management of adults with congenital heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines on the Management of Adults With Congenital Heart Disease). Developed in Collaboration With the American Society of Echocardiography, Heart Rhythm Society, International Society for Adult Congenital Heart Disease, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol 52(23):143–263

  18. 18.

    Attenhofer Jost CH, Connolly HM, Danielson GK et al (2005) Sinus venosus atrial septal defect: long-term postoperative outcome for 115 patients. Circulation 112(13):1953–1958

  19. 19.

    Van Praagh S, Carrera ME, Sanders SP, Mayer JE, Van Praagh R (1994) Sinus venosus defects: unroofing of the right pulmonary veins--anatomic and echocardiographic findings and surgical treatment. Am Heart J 128(2):365–379

  20. 20.

    Turner SW, Hunter S, Wyllie JP (1999) The natural history of ventricular septal defects. Arch Dis Child 81(5):413–416

  21. 21.

    Warnes CA, Liberthson R, Danielson GK et al (2001) Task force 1: the changing profile of congenital heart disease in adult life. J Am Coll Cardiol 37(5):1170–1175

  22. 22.

    Wren C, Richmond S, Donaldson L (2000) Temporal variability in birth prevalence of cardiovascular malformations. Heart 83(4):414–419

  23. 23.

    Hoffman JI, Kaplan S, Liberthson RR (2004) Prevalence of congenital heart disease. Am Heart J 147(3):425–439

  24. 24.

    Penny DJ, Vick GW (2011) Ventricular septal defect. Lancet 377(9771):1103–1112

  25. 25.

    Pitsis AA, Visouli AN, Kelpis TG et al (2008) Diverticulum of the left ventricle: etiology and surgical treatment. Heart Surg Forum 11(2):75–77

  26. 26.

    von Bardeleben RS, Richter C, Otto J et al (2009) Long term follow up after percutaneous closure of PFO in 357 patients with paradoxical embolism: Difference in occlusion systems and influence of atrial septum aneurysm. Int J Cardiol 134(1):33–41

  27. 27.

    Shafi NA, McKay RG, Kiernan FJ, Silverman IE, Ahlquist M, Silverman DI (2009) Determinants and clinical significance of persistent residual shunting in patients with percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure devices. Int J Cardiol 137(3):314–316

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Antwerp University Hospital, Wilrijkstraat 10, 2650, Edegem, Antwerp, Belgium

    • Simon Nicolay
    • , Rodrigo A. Salgado
    •  & Paul M. Parizel

  2. Department of Cardiology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium

    • Bharati Shivalkar
    • , Paul L. Van Herck
    •  & Christiaan Vrints

Authors

  1. Search for Simon Nicolay in:

  2. Search for Rodrigo A. Salgado in:

  3. Search for Bharati Shivalkar in:

  4. Search for Paul L. Van Herck in:

  5. Search for Christiaan Vrints in:

  6. Search for Paul M. Parizel in:

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon Nicolay.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nicolay, S., Salgado, R.A., Shivalkar, B. et al. CT imaging features of atrioventricular shunts: what the radiologist must know. Insights Imaging 7, 119–129 (2016) doi:10.1007/s13244-015-0452-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Congenital heart disease
  • Atrial septal defects
  • Ventricular septal defects
  • Cardiac CT
  • CT angiography