- Pictorial Review
- Open Access
A pictorial review of traumatic pericardial injuries
© The Author(s) 2012
- Received: 5 February 2012
- Accepted: 16 April 2012
- Published: 15 May 2012
Thoracic injuries are the third most common injuries in trauma patients with cardiac injuries amongst the most lethal. Imaging is essential in diagnosis and triage of patients with pericardial injuries, and this review aims to highlight the spectrum of imaging findings of pericardial trauma. Focussed assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) is the preferred initial examination, being rapid and accurate. Sensitivity of FAST for pericardial fluid detection is high with reported sensitivities of 97–100%. Plain chest radiography has low sensitivity for pericardial injuries but is useful in the evaluation of associated injuries. Computed tomography (CT) is the modality of choice for stable patients and can accurately diagnose traumatic pathology of the pericardium being especially useful in identification of cardiac herniation. The spectrum of CT findings includes pericardial fluid collections, focal pericardial defects and pneumopericardium.
A selection of cases of pericardial trauma encountered at a level one trauma centre is presented. Operative findings were correlated with the FAST scan, plain radiography and computed tomography imaging.
The imaging findings of pericardial trauma with various imaging modalities (ultrasound, plain radiography and computed tomography) are presented in order to aid interpretation during the acute trauma setting.
- Heart injuries
- Multidetector computed tomography
Injuries to the thorax are the third most common injuries in trauma patients  and have an overall fatality rate of approximately 10%. Cardiac injuries are among the most lethal in thoracic trauma patients, particularly in the setting of penetrating trauma . The majority of patients who sustain penetrating cardiac injuries die at the scene with a reported survival rate as low as 6% . The diagnosis of a pericardial injury relies on a high degree of clinical suspicion especially in patients with subtle imaging findings who may be haemodynamically stable on admission but subsequently deteriorate rapidly when a significant pericardial effusion develops. Dedicated imaging plays a cardinal role in the prompt management of these critically injured patients, and the aim of this pictorial review is to highlight the spectrum of imaging findings with a particular focus on cross-sectional imaging.
The pericardial sac is formed by the pleuropericardial folds that grow from the lateral body wall in a coronal plane. These septae appear at the beginning of the fifth week of embryonic development as broad folds of mesenchyme that grow medially towards each other and eventually fuse to separate the pleural and pericardial cavities . The pericardium contains the heart and juxtacardiac portions of the great vessels, and it is composed of an outer fibrous pericardium and an inner, double-layered sac, the serous pericardium . The pericardial space lies between the visceral and parietal layers of the serous pericardium and contains approximately 15–50 ml of serous fluid produced by the mesothelial cells that line the serosa. This fluid facilitates freedom of movement of the heart within the pericardium.
Inferiorly, the fibrous pericardium is attached to the diaphragm’s central tendon. Anteriorly, the pericardium is separated from the thoracic wall by lungs and pleurae, but in a small area at the level of the 4th and 5th costal cartilages, it is in direct contact with the posterior aspect of the sternum. Laterally, the fibrous pericardium is related to the pleura and the medial pulmonary surfaces with the phrenic nerve descending between them. Posterior relations of the fibrous pericardium include the principal bronchi, oesophagus, descending thoracic aorta and the posterior portions of the mediastinal surfaces of both lungs. Superiorly, the fibrous pericardium blends externally with the great vessels, and it is continuous with the pretracheal fascia. Through its various attachments, the pericardium is securely anchored and maintains its thoracic position. A number of pericardial sinuses and recesses between the pericardial reflections serve as a potential space to accommodate a limited amount of fluid.
Cardiac injuries are more common in penetrating trauma compared to blunt trauma and are fatal in a significant percentage of patients with many found dead at the scene . The anatomic position of the heart can account to some degree for the relative frequency of different injuries and, depending on the phase of respiration, penetrating abdominal injuries can also result in cardiac injury. The right and left ventricles are injured approximately 40% of the time, the right atrium approximately 24% of the time and the left atrium approximately 3% of the time .
Pericardial tears range in size from a few millimetres to several centimetres with extension along the entire length of the pericardium. Small pericardial lacerations often tamponade and the fibrous pericardium can seal with blood and clot accumulating within the pericardial space resulting in a haemopericardium. This may have a protective effect in preventing exsanguination into the thoracic cavity and indeed pericardiocentesis may remove the “tamponade” effect of collected blood on traumatised cardiac chambers resulting in circulatory collapse . If the pericardial laceration is an isolated lesion, it is usually of no consequence , but when large enough, the heart may be dislocated and may result in torsion along an axis made by the inferior vena cava and the great vessels. Pericardial rupture is sometimes reported as an incidental finding at emergency thoracotomy/laporotomy but most are discovered post-mortem. The most common site of pericardial injury in blunt trauma is the left pleuropericardium parallel to the phrenic nerve . Other common sites of pericardial injury, in descending frequency, include the diaphragmatic surface of the pericardium, right pleuropericardial surface and the superior mediastinal surface .
A number of imaging modalities are available for imaging the heart and pericardium in the acute trauma setting including ultrasound [FAST (focussed assessment with sonography in trauma) or echocardiography], conventional radiography and computed tomography (CT). The FAST scan includes a transverse subxiphoid view of the heart and right and left longitudinal views of each hemithorax. The sensitivity of FAST for pericardial fluid detection is reported to be as high as 97–100% particularly in dedicated prospective studies specifically evaluating the role of ultrasonography in pericardial injuries [9–11]. Operator experience is a potential limitation of FAST scanning, and other limitations of ultrasound in the assessment of heart and pericardial injuries include the presence of air within the pericardial sac and extensive surgical emphysema. In cases of severe thoracic trauma, extensive surgical emphysema tracking along the superficial soft tissues of the anterior chest wall limits the ability of FAST to assess for pericardial effusion as there is significant attenuation of the sound waves. In our centre, FAST ultrasound is performed immediately after the primary advanced trauma life support (ATLS) survey. In a series of 36 cases of surgically confirmed cases of pericardial trauma, the sensitivity of FAST for pericardial fluid detection was very high at 88% (unpublished data).
Computed tomography (CT) imaging plays a crucial role in the assessment of stable patients with pericardial and cardiac injuries. Pneumopericardium can be difficult to differentiate from pneumomediastinum and medial pneumothorax on plain radiography alone. Axial or coronal CT images can aid differentiation if the plain radiography findings are difficult to interpret. If the pericardial tear is large enough, cardiac herniation can manifest on CT images through alteration of the normal cardiac axis (Fig. 1c), displacement of the heart (either within the left hemithorax or into the contralateral hemithorax), presence of air within an empty pericardium (“empty pericardial sac sign”) (Fig. 2b), and alteration of the normal cardiac contour (“collar sign”). The collar sign refers to a waist around the compressed portion of the heart herniating through a pericardial defect. Following injury to the diaphragmatic surface of the pericardium, there may also be herniation of bowel with bowel gas noted within the pericardial sac. Conversely, this may also result in cardiac herniation into the abdominal cavity . From the various case series, these abdominal-pericardial tears are difficult to diagnose, and they have varied presentations. Furthermore, there are reports of delayed presentation of pericardial phrenic hernias ranging from weeks to years . Other findings that may suggest cardiac herniation include an unusual cardiac silhouette contour. It is important to recognise that some of these features are seen in other conditions including ventricular aneurysms and ventricular chamber dilatation. Furthermore, partial or complete congenital absence of the pericardium can also result in cardiac axis deviation and pericardial discontinuity.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has a potential role in the assessment of pericardial injuries in patients who survive the initial acute admission and are haemodynamically stable. The normal parietal pericardium is best visualised during systole on T1-weighted imaging, where it appears thin (<2 mm) and returns low signal intensity. However, the normal parietal pericardium is often incompletely visualised. Cardiac MRI has been utilised to confirm the diagnosis of pericardial herniation and cardiac rupture following blunt trauma . In the case presented by Sohn et al. , cine MR images in a coronal plane (using a breathhold balanced fast field echo sequence) identified exaggerated up and down motion of the cardiac apex which was distinct from the left hemi-diaphragm. In addition, there was clockwise rotation of the cardiac axis, and the finding of a large pericardial tear with cardiac herniation was confirmed intra-operatively. Like CT, cardiac MRI can be used to assess the pericardium, but it has the advantage of being able to assess cardiac motion and to assess the functional significance of pericardial injuries and effusions.
Imaging plays a cardinal role in the diagnosis and triage of patients with pericardial injuries. FAST ultrasound with a pericardial window is the preferred initial examination, being rapid and highly accurate. Plain radiography has a very low sensitivity for cardiac and pericardial injuries, but it is useful in the evaluation of associated injuries (e.g. pneumothorax, haemothorax). CT is the modality of choice for stable patients and can accurately diagnose a range of the traumatic pathologies of the heart and pericardium being especially useful in the identification of cardiac herniation.
We would like to thank Anita West for the preparation of this manuscript. No grants were received.
Guarantor of integrity of the entire study: N. Fotiadis; literature search: A. Adams, J.Y. Chin; clinical studies: W.W. Sapsford, K. Brohi; manuscript preparation: A. Adams, N. Fotiadis, J.Y. Chin, W. Sapsford, K. Brohi; manuscript editing: A. Adams, N. Fotiadis, J.Y. Chin.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
- Clarke DE, Fantus RJ (eds) (2007) National Trauma Data Bank annual report. American College of Surgeons, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Korner M et al (2008) Current role of emergency US in patients with major trauma. Radiographics 28:225–244PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Demetriades D, ven der Veen BW (1983) Penetrating injuries of the heart: experience over two years in South Africa. J Trauma 23:1034–1041PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Larsen WJ (2001) Human embryology, 3rd ed. Churchill Livingstone, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- Gray H (1999) Gray’s anatomy, 38th ed. Churchill Livingstone, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- Korner M et al (2008) Current role of emergency US in patients with major trauma. RadioGraphics 28:225–244PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Clarke DE, Wiles CS, Lim MK et al (1983) Traumatic rupture of the pericardium. Surgery 93:495–503Google Scholar
- Parmley LF, Manion WC, Mattingly TW (1958) Nonpenetrating traumatic injury of the heart. Circulation 18(3):371–396PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fulda G, Brathwaite CEM, Rodriquez A, Turney SZ, Dunham CM, Cowley RA (1991) Blunt traumatic rupture of the heart and pericardium: a ten year experience [1979–1989]. J Trauma 31:167–173PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mattox K, Von Koch B et al (1975) Logistic and technical considerations in the treatment of the wounded heart. Circulation 51/52:210–214Google Scholar
- Rozycki GS, Feliciano DV, Ochsner MG et al (1999) The role of ultrasound in patients with possible penetrating cardiac wounds: a prospective mulitcentre study. J Trauma 46:543–551, discussion 551–552PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rozycki GS, Feliciano DV, Schmidt JA et al (1996) The role of surgeon-performed ultrasound in patients with possible cardiac wounds. Ann Surg 223:737–744, discussion 744–746PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tayal VS, Beatty MA, Marx JA, Tomaszewski CA, Thomason MH (2004) FAST (focused assessment with sonography in trauma) accurate for cardiac and intraperitoneal injury in penetrating anterior chest trauma. J Ultrasound Med 23:467–472PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schiavone WA, Ghumrawi BK, Catalano DR et al (1991) The use of echocardiography in the emergency management of non-penetrating traumatic cardiac rupture. Ann Emerg Med 20:1248–1250PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Niezen RA, a Lieng JT, Bode PJ (2001) Acute tamponade after blunt chest trauma. Emerg Radiol 8:144–146View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wall M, Mattox K, Wolf D (2005) The cardiac pendulum: blunt rupture of the pericardium with strangulation of the heart. J Trauma 59:136–142PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schir F et al (2001) Blunt traumatic rupture of the pericardium with cardiac herniation: two cases diagnosed using computed tomography. Eur Radiol 11:995–999PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sherren P, Galloway R, Healy M (2009) Blunt traumatic pericardial rupture and cardiac herniation with a penetrating twist: two case reports. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 17:64.Google Scholar
- Glass JD, McQuillen EN, Hardin NJ (1984) Iatrogenic cardiac herniation: post mortem case. J Trauma 24:632–633PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nassiri N, Yu A, Statkus N, Gosselin M (2009) Imaging of cardiac herniation in traumatic pericardial rupture. J Thoracic Imaging 24(1):69–72PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cobb RT, Stanley TV (1987) Peritoneo-pericardial hernia. A review and case report. J Tenn Med Assoc 80(11):677–679PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hernandez-Luyando L et al (1996) Tension pericardial collections: sign of ‘flattened heart’ in CT. Eur J Radiol 23(3):250–252PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Goldstein JA (2004) Cardiac tamponade, constrictive pericarditis, and restrictive cardiomyopathy. Curr Probl Cardiol 29:503–567PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sohn JH et al (2005) Pericardial rupture and cardiac herniation after blunt trauma: a case diagnosed using cardiac MRI. Br J Radiol 78:447–449PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.