Radiomic analysis will add differential diagnostic value of benign and malignant pulmonary nodules: a hybrid imaging study based on [18F]FDG and [18F]FLT PET/CT
Insights into Imaging volume 14, Article number: 197 (2023)
To investigate the clinical value of radiomic analysis on [18F]FDG and [18F]FLT PET on the differentiation of [18F]FDG-avid benign and malignant pulmonary nodules (PNs).
Data of 113 patients with inconclusive PNs based on preoperative [18F]FDG PET/CT who underwent additional [18F]FLT PET/CT scans within a week were retrospectively analyzed in the present study. Three methods of analysis including visual analysis, radiomic analysis based on [18F]FDG PET/CT images alone, and radiomic analysis based on dual-tracer PET/CT images were evaluated for differential diagnostic value of benign and malignant PNs.
A total of 678 radiomic features were extracted from volumes of interest (VOIs) of 123 PNs. Fourteen valuable features were thereafter selected. Based on a visual analysis of [18F]FDG PET/CT images, the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 61.6%, 90%, and 28.8%, respectively. For the test set, the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity of the radiomic models based on [18F]FDG PET/CT plus [18F]FLT signature were equal or better than radiomics based on [18F]FDG PET/CT only (0.838 vs 0.810, 0.778 vs 0.778, 0.750 vs 0.688, respectively).
Radiomic analysis based on dual-tracer PET/CT images is clinically promising and feasible for the differentiation between benign and malignant PNs.
Clinical relevance statement
Radiomic analysis will add differential diagnostic value of benign and malignant pulmonary nodules: a hybrid imaging study based on [18F]FDG and [18F]FLT PET/CT.
• Radiomics brings new insights into the differentiation of benign and malignant pulmonary nodules beyond the naked eyes.
• Dual-tracer imaging shows the biological behaviors of cancerous cells from different aspects.
• Radiomics helps us get to the histological view in a non-invasive approach.
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide with a generally low survival rate [1, 2]. The increasing number of pulmonary nodules (PNs), a precancerous entity of lung cancer, can be detected and screened by computed tomography (CT) . Malignant PNs detected at a late stage can increase mortality . Therefore, it is crucial to improve the accuracy of early differential diagnosis between benign and malignant PNs.
In this scenario, [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ([18F]FDG PET), as a non-invasively practical imaging standard, is a key tool to detect lung cancer and evaluate its staging and prognosis . The maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax), which is used clinically to assess tracer uptakes in lung cancer, provides information about the highest uptake point but not about tracer distribution within the tumor. Different features of the tumor such as cell proliferation, necrosis, microvessel density, blood flow, and hypoxia may be responsible for the heterogeneous distribution of FDG uptakes in different tumor types [6, 7]. Thus, [18F]FDG metabolic maps, showing the heterogeneous uptakes within the lesion, might be helpful in differentiating benign and malignant nodules . Under this context, radiomic analysis, revealing a variety of quantitative radiomic features [9,10,11], could express the heterogeneity of a mass in a sequence of algorithms. Previous research demonstrated the benefit of radiomic analysis on [18F]FDG PET/CT images in the detection and identification of solitary pulmonary nodules (SPN) by distinguishing between benign and malignant PNs [12,13,14].
[18F]fluoropyrimidine ([18F]FLT) phosphorylated by thymidine kinase-1 (TK-1) can accumulate in cells during S-phase and is therefore a well-established tracer for monitoring cell proliferation [15, 16]. In general, [18F]FLT concentrates less in tumor cells compared to [18F]FDG, as S-phase is the only time for its accumulation . In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), intratumoral [18F]FLT uptake is directly correlated to Ki-67 expression which stains proliferating cells on histopathological slides [18, 19]. Since malignant lesions have a greater proliferation rate than benign mass, [18F]FLT may serve as a potent biomarker to distinguish malignant lesions from benign PNs [19,20,21].
In this study, we aim to discern the malignancy of pulmonary nodules by radiomic analysis based on [18F]FDG and [18F]FLT signatures and further compare its value with radiomic analysis based on [18F]FDG PET alone and visual analysis.
Materials and methods
The evaluation of retrospective data was approved in accordance with the ethical standards of the Chinese PLA General Hospital Committee.
From January 2016 to April 2018, we retrospectively reviewed data of 113 patients with inconclusive PNs on [18F]FDG PET/CT, all of whom underwent additional preoperative [18F]FLT PET/CT scans within a week . An inconclusive PN was considered when the following criteria were met: (1) the lesions have apparently higher SUV than the rest of the lung; (2) there is no obvious evidence of nodal or distant metastasis, and (3) there are no definite indications of morphological malignancy, such as air bronchograms, spiculated or irregular margins, or lobulated shape.
The inclusion criteria of the study were (a) radiologically clear propensity to be diagnosed as a pulmonary nodule with a diameter of no more than 3 cm, (b) no definite diagnosis prior to [18F]FDG and [18F]FLT PET/CT examinations, (c) no treatments before PET/CT examination, (d) no indications of major organ dysfunctions or disorders, and (e) clear histopathologic identification or the endpoint of long-term follow-up.
[18F]FDG and [18F]FLT were produced, and both their radiochemical purities are higher than 95%. Every patient fasted for over 4 h with a blood glucose level of < 11.1 mmol/L and rested in a quiet room for about half an hour. Then, the [18F]FDG tracer was given intravenously in a standardized dose of 3.70–4.44 MBq/kg. An hour after the tracer administration, every patient underwent [18F]FDG PET/CT scan (Discovery ST; GE Healthcare), and at least 1 day after [18F]FDG PET scan, the [18F]FLT tracer was also injected at a dose of 3.70–4.44 MBq/kg, and an hour later, every patient underwent [18F]FLT PET/CT scan (Discovery ST; GE Healthcare).
For both tracers’ scans, we ran the following settings to get low-dose CT (LDCT) scans to prevent patients from excessive radiation: 120 kV, 100–250 mAs with automatic adjustment, 0.8 s rotation, 1.25 mm collimation, and a pitch varied according to the geometry of CT detector (4, 8, or 16 slices). Meanwhile, PET was scanned in 2 min/bed, 3- or 4-bed positions (axial field view 15.7 cm) in three-dimensional mode with three iterations, and 21 subsets. Then, images were acquired. All the PET/CT data were reconstructed with the Fourier rebinding iterative algorithm and a Gaussian filter of 4 mm full width at half maximum.
Three clinicians with more than 10 years of diagnostic experience in pulmonary diseases conducted the visual analysis of PET/CT images. All the PET/CT image interpreters were blind to the patients’ information. The interpretation of PN malignancy was listed in Additional file 1. Also, the final diagnosis was determined based on all listed characteristics. Discrepancies between interpreters were resolved in a consensus meeting.
All of the PET/CT data were analyzed by a semi-automated adaptive threshold method at the RadCloud platform (Huiying Medical Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). Volumes of interest (VOIs) of the PN were initially drawn with a threshold of 40% of the SUVmax according to PET images via a commercial software (PET VCAR, GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI, USA). After that, VOIs were checked visually on whether they have covered the whole components shown on the CT. If not, a lower threshold was then used . If the VOI contains surrounding physical tissues, such as the adjacent myocardial activity, we would adjust its boundary manually . All the segmentation was conducted by the same handler (a nuclear medicine physician with 4 years of experience in tumor drawing).
Both of the CT and PET images were analyzed, where radiomic feature calculations were performed within the same VOI in the settings of MATLAB (The MathWorks Inc.). When the respiratory motion leads to mismatches between CT and PET images, the extension of the VOI would be manually adapted to CT images. Before the computation of radiomic features, image voxel intensities were resampled into equally spaced bin widths of 0.1 . The radiomic features extracted from [18F]FDG PET/CT images include shape features, histogram-based features, and texture features. Furthermore, texture features covered gray level cooccurrence matrix (GLCM), run length matrix (GLRLM), size zone matrix (GLSZM), and neighborhood gray-tone difference matrix (NGTDM) features. For more information about the description of the texture feature, see Additional file 1.
To build the radiomic models, we took the histologically confirmed malignant or benign PN as the ground. In detail, firstly, the dataset was randomly divided into a training set and a test set in a ratio of 7:3, of which the training set was used for feature selection and modeling while the test set was used to test the models’ performance (the distribution of the dataset is shown in Table 1). Secondly, an analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to univariate feature selection to clarify the value of image features in the dataset in the differentiation of benign PNs from malignant. To be more detailed, features were eliminated if the p value exceeded 0.05. Then, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method was applied to the high-dimensional data regression to screen out the most valuable discriminative features from the training set , to prevent machine learning models from overfitting. The minimum mean square error (MSE) was calculated through fivefold cross-validation. Based on MSE under different parameters, the best penalty parameters and fitting model of LASSO were obtained. Finally, the non-zero coefficient features were selected for model training.
Development of an individualized prediction model
Two radiomics-based models were established using logistic regression (LR) for the distinguished diagnosis of benign PNs from malignant. The radiomic features selected by ANOVA and LASSO on [18F]FDG PET/CT images were used for modeling. Meanwhile, we classified PNs’ uptakes indicated on [18F]FLT PET images into no uptake, slight uptakes (lower than half the value of thoracic vertebrae), and apparent uptakes. In the model of FDG-based radiomic analysis, the threshold of the predictive probability value is 0.699. In the model of radiomic analysis based on FDG and FLT, the threshold of predictive probability value is 0.594. That is, if the value is more than the threshold, then the PN was regarded as malignant and otherwise it was benign. The classification was regarded as a signature, which was then integrated with the selected features of [18F]FDG PET/CT images to build another model. By doing so, we tried to find out whether the modeling performances could be improved. At last, the performances of the two models were tested with the 5-fold cross-validation method and then quantitatively assessed through the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity based on the receiver operating characteristic (ROC). Besides, a separate test set was run for verification.
A total of 123 lesions were recorded from 113 patients (74 men, 39 women) aged between 27 and 83 years (mean age 56.4 years), of which 63 benign lesions were respectively diagnosed as inflammation (n = 12), tuberculosis (n = 29), or other diseases confirmed by follow-up (n = 22) while 60 malignant lesions included adenocarcinoma (n = 30), squamous cell carcinoma (n = 16), small cell carcinoma (n = 1), bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (n = 6), and others (n = 7) (Table 2).
Based on the visual analysis of [18F]FDG PET/CT images, the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 61.6%, 90%, and 28.8%, respectively. Representative images of the two cases are shown in Fig. 1.
In total, 678 radiomic features were extracted from VOIs (shown in Fig. 2). After ANOVA preprocessing, 294 features were selected for subsequent LASSO analysis. The entire process is shown in Fig. 3. Finally, 14 features with the closest relation to the differentiation of benign and malignant PNs were selected based on p value. CT-derived features and PET-based features were ranked by the coefficient value of the model, which indicates the correlation level, and are categorized in Fig. 4. Among these 14 features, 7 features were derived from PET images and 7 features were CT-based. More details of radiomic features are shown in Additional file 2.
We based the selected features and the features combined FLT signature to build two LR models, whose ROC are shown in Fig. 5. Based on [18F]FDG PET/CT plus [18F]FLT signature, the AUC, sensitivity, and specificity under the training set are 0.879, 0.810, and 0.750 in proper order while under the test set, they are 0.838, 0.778, and 0.750 successively. Based on [18F]FDG PET/CT images, the AUC, sensitivity, and specificity under the training set are 0.834, 0.786, and 0.778, respectively, while under the test set, they are 0.810, 0.778, and 0.688 in proper order. Table 3 reveals these results.
Early detection of lung cancer using LDCT, a clinically routine examination to discern the benign from malignant PNs, allows patients to receive timely treatment and better clinical outcomes, especially longer survival. Statistically, this could lead to a reduction of mortality in the long term. For accurate detection of lung cancer, the American College of Radiology (ACR) has developed the Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) to standardize CT images [22, 27], which, however, still has its own limitations because LDCT decreased the sensitivity of PNs’ detection and further delayed the early identification of PNs’ malignancy. Therefore, it is extremely important to explore new methods to promote early and precise detection of PNs.
In this study, the performance of radiomic analysis supported by the combination of the dual tracers [18F]FLT and [18F]FDG PET/CT was shown to be better than [18F]FDG PET/CT, which convincingly demonstrated the added value of [18F]FLT PET/CT. Furthermore, the diagnostic efficacy of visual analysis tended to be lower than that of the radiomic analysis, which may be partly explained by the fact that the included subjects were difficult to diagnose on the basis of [18F]FDG PET/CT images. In particular, a large proportion of patients with tuberculosis toughened the problem because tuberculosis also presented high FDG uptakes on PET images, which makes it more difficult to differentiate from malignant PNs. However, machine learning-based radiomic analysis has the potential to distinguish solitary lung adenocarcinoma from tuberculosis . Thus, it can be demonstrated that radiomic analysis was a viable and non-invasive potential tool for these cases, especially when combined with [18F]FLT PET/CT modality.
Generally speaking, the accuracy of image-reading results is subject to the interpretation criteria and physicians’ accumulation of professional skills and clinical experience. So, the precise identification of various diseases calls for the highest possible objective and quantitative view . Although biopsy is thought of as the gold protocol for clear diagnosis of diseases, its limitations undoubtedly cannot be ignored, such as the invasivity, poor repeatability, higher incidence of secondary complications, and lack of whole body assessment or other spatial information other than puncture sites . In both scenarios, radiomics is growing and thriving as a key area of clinical interest as a result of continued efforts to determine independent imaging features.
Radiomics-based analyses have been successfully used in assessing spatial patterns of non-uniform distribution in a way to measure the intra-lesion heterogeneity morphologically and quantitatively [7, 31]. Moreover, it has been reported that functional biomarkers including the glucose metabolism indicated by SUV maps do better than morphological parameters visualized on CT in the differentiation of PNs with different properties . A previous study also indicated that integrating the morphological complexity and metabolic diversity of FDG improves the accuracy of lung cancer diagnosis, particularly by increasing the specificity . These studies have shown that [18F]FDG PET/CT-based radiomic analysis, as a combined manner of both morphological complexity and FDG uptake heterogeneity, is of vital importance in facilitating accurate diagnosis and clear differentiation of diseases.
Van Velden et al.  observed lower FDG uptakes within malignant PN (lung cancer), which was considered as a reflection of metabolic heterogeneity within cancer lesions. Under the same circumstance, a quantitative parameter indicating FDG metabolic heterogeneity within tumors was put forward to evaluate NSCLC patients’ feedback to the clinical management . To the same end, Tixier et al.  had clarified that heterogeneous distribution of FDG uptake within lesions could predict response to chemoradiation therapy in patients with esophageal cancer.
Currently, [18F]FLT has been recognized as a better-targeted tracer than [18F]FDG as it has a strong record of outstanding sensitivity in detecting primary carcinoma. However, clinical settings mainly focus on its potential to evaluate therapy response rather than other applications. Through the comparison between [18F]FDG and [18F]FLT uptakes in lung cancers, a conclusion was reached in a previous research that [18F]FLT uptakes achieved extraordinarily high specificity in correlation with malignant tumors. Comparatively, [18F]FDG uptakes occurred in half the benign lesions, resulting in a non-negligible false-positive rate . Also, Buck et al. detected [18F]FLT’s extreme insensitivity to lymph node staging (53%) . However, no physiological concentration of the tracer was found in the brain, making it suitable for the interference-free diagnosis of brain metastases . That was why he proposed [18F]FLT as a better tracer to assess the therapeutic feedback and clinical prognosis. Our findings with radiomic analysis based on [18F]FLT alone also indicated FLT performs better in the distinguish the benign PNs from malignant PNs. Similarly, a research enrolling 31 NSCLC patients demonstrated the sensitivity of [18F]FLT was much higher than that of [18F]FDG to primary lesions (74% vs 94%) (p = 0.003) . Furthermore, a study of 18 subjects with lung nodules who underwent [18F]FLT and [18F]FDG scans summed up as a more favorable performance of dual-tracer imaging than one of tracers alone . In this study, there was also a consistent conclusion that the [18F]FLT signature enhances the performance of radiomic analysis in distinguishing benign from malignant PNs.
From the statistical point of view, ANOVA and LASSO were used to screen the features in order to get rid of redundant features and avoid overfitting the models. Along the way of modeling, penalty was adopted as L2, which led to better learning of models and the two models constructed with satisfactory results. As pretreatment of feature selection, ANOVA ignored the correlation among features based on sparse assumption. So, the LASSO, a regression analysis method for variable selection and regularization, was adopted in order to further select features. Finally, we could assume that we have filtered out the most valuable features from a higher dimensional group of features.
This study has several limitations. There is some evidence suggesting that machine learning in FDG radiomic analysis is useful in distinguishing between subtypes with different levels of [18F]FDG uptake, such as squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma . However, designed as retrospective, the present study had a relatively small sample size, which to some extent led to the heterogeneity in the lesions and selection bias in the analysis. Just as such, we did not analyze imaging biomarkers according to different histological subtypes of benign and malignant PNs. Furthermore, we only chose LDCT in the PET/CT scanner so as to protect subjects from excessive radiation exposure, unavoidably causing the absence of multiplanar reconstruction, contrast enhancement, or other classical methods. Although the effectiveness of LDCT has been confirmed, it may not be plausible enough to fully acclaim the diagnostic value of CT . Additionally, the lack of motion correction on PET images could potentially lead to quantification errors and reduction of diagnostic confidence. At last, collective blind reading was conducted by professionals with various clinical backgrounds. That was how we tried to minimize the deviations from the right diagnosis. Yet, along with that, diverse window settings and perspectives may contribute to the discrepancy of judgment preferences. In other words, subjective factors cannot be completely excluded. Therefore, further research series with more homogeneous patients are needed to clarify the distinction between benign and malignant PN with a well-controlled and prospective design.
Despite the clinical recognition of visual inspection, radiometric analysis has become more prevalent in the accurate differentiation of PNs by providing quantitative and comprehensive biological features. In particular, the addition of the [18F]FLT modality enriches the visualization of the heterogeneity of PNs under different aspects of cellular activity characteristics. Therefore, radiomic analysis based on PET/CT images with two/more tracers may be a clinical potential and a viable solution for the detectable evaluation of benign and malignant PNs, which requires further detailed exploration.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.
- [18F]FDG PET/CT:
[18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography
Non-small cell lung cancer
Solitary pulmonary nodules
Maximum standard uptake value
Thymidine kinase-1 TK-1
Brabender J, Danenberg KD, Metzger R et al (2001) Epidermal growth factor receptor and HER2-neu mRNA expression in non-small cell lung cancer is correlated with survival. Clin Cancer Res 7:1850–1855
Siegel R, Desantis C, Jemal A (2014) Colorectal cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin 64:104–117
Godoy MCB, Odisio EGLC, Truong MT, de Groot PM, Shroff GS, Erasmus JJ (2018) Pulmonary nodule management in lung cancer screening: a pictorial review of Lung-RADS version 1.0. Radiol Clin North Am 56:353–363
Vansteenkiste J, Fischer BM, Dooms C, Mortensen J (2004) Positron-emission tomography in prognostic and therapeutic assessment of lung cancer: systematic review. Lancet Oncol 5:531–540
Kim SK, Allen-Auerbach M, Goldin J et al (2007) Accuracy of PET/CT in characterization of solitary pulmonary lesions. J Nucl Med 48:214–220
Watabe T, Tatsumi M, Watabe H et al (2012) Intratumoral heterogeneity of F-18 FDG uptake differentiates between gastrointestinal stromal tumors and abdominal malignant lymphomas on PET/CT. Ann Nucl Med 26:222–227
Chicklore S, Goh V, Siddique M, Roy A, Marsden PK, Cook GJ (2013) Quantifying tumour heterogeneity in [18F]FDGPET/CT imaging by texture analysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 40:133–140
Shields AF, Grierson JR, Dohmen BM et al (1998) Imaging proliferation in vivo with [F-18]FLT and positron emission tomography. Nat Med 4:1334–1336
O’Connor JP, Rose CJ, Waterton JC, Carano RA, Parker GJ, Jackson A (2015) Imaging intratumor heterogeneity: role in therapy response, resistance, and clinical outcome. Clin Cancer Res 21:249–257
Aerts HJ, Velazquez ER, Leijenaar RT et al (2014) Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach. Nat Commun 5:4006
Win T, Miles KA, Janes SM et al (2013) Tumor heterogeneity and permeability as measured on the CT component of PET/CT predict survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 19:3591–3599
Miwa K, Inubushi M, Wagatsuma K et al (2014) FDG uptake heterogeneity evaluated by fractal analysis improves the differential diagnosis of pulmonary nodules. Eur J Radiol 83:715–719
Dennie C, Thornhill R, Sethi-Virmani V et al (2016) Role of quantitative computed tomography texture analysis in the differentiation of primary lung cancer and granulomatous nodules. Quant Imaging Med Surg 6:6–15
Chen S, Harmon S, Perk T et al (2017) Diagnostic classification of solitary pulmonary nodules using dual time (18)F-FDG PET/CT image texture features in granuloma-endemic regions. Sci Rep 7:9370
Barthel H, Perumal M, Latigo J et al (2005) The uptake of 3’-deoxy-3’-[18F]fluorothymidine into L5178Y tumours in vivo is dependent on thymidine kinase 1 protein levels. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 32:257–263
Rasey JS, Grierson JR, Wiens LW, Kolb PD, Schwartz JL (2002) Validation of FLT uptake as a measure of thymidine kinase-1 activity in A549 carcinoma cells. J Nucl Med 43:1210–1217
Buck AK, Schirrmeister H, Hetzel M et al (2002) 3-Deoxy-3-[(18)F]fluorothymidine-positron emission tomography for noninvasive assessment of proliferation in pulmonary nodules. Cancer Res 62:3331–3334
Yue J, Chen L, Cabrera AR et al (2010) Measuring tumor cell proliferation with [18F]FLT PET during radiotherapy of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a pilot clinical study. J Nucl Med 51:528–534
Buck AK, Hetzel M, Schirrmeister H et al (2005) Clinical relevance of imaging proliferative activity in lung nodules. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 32:525–533
Vesselle H, Grierson J, Muzi M et al (2002) In vivo validation of 3’deoxy-3’-[(18)F]fluorothymidine ([(18)F]FLT) as a proliferation imaging tracer in humans: correlation of [(18)F]FLT uptake by positron emission tomography with Ki-67 immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry in human lung tumors. Clin Cancer Res 8:3315–3323
Biehl KJ, Kong FM, Dehdashti F et al (2006) [18F]FDGPET definition of gross tumor volume for radiotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer: is a single standardized uptake value threshold approach appropriate? J Nucl Med 47:1808–1812
Pinsky PF, Gierada DS, Black W et al (2015) Performance of Lung-RADS in the National Lung Screening Trial: a retrospective assessment. Ann Intern Med 162:485–491
Foster B, Bagci U, Mansoor A, Xu Z, Mollura DJ (2014) A review on segmentation of positron emission tomography images. Comput Biol Med 50:76–96
Leijenaar RT, Nalbantov G, Carvalho S et al (2015) The effect of SUV discretization in quantitative FDG-PET radiomics: the need for standardized methodology in tumor texture analysis. Sci Rep 5:11075
Huang YQ, Liang CH, He L et al (2016) Development and validation of a radiomics nomogram for preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 34:2157–2164
McKee BJ, Regis SM, McKee AB, Flacke S, Wald C (2015) Performance of ACR Lung-RADS in a clinical CT lung screening program. J Am Coll Radiol 12:273–276
MacMahon H, Naidich DP, Goo JM et al (2017) Guidelines for management of incidental pulmonary nodules detected on CT images: from the Fleischner Society 2017. Radiology 284:228–243
Hu Y, Zhao X, Zhang J, Han J, Dai M (2021) Value of [18F]FDGPET/CT radiomic features to distinguish solitary lung adenocarcinoma from tuberculosis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 48:231–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-04924-6. Epub 2020 Jun 25
Sollini M, Cozzi L, Antunovic L, Chiti A, Kirienko M (2017) PET radiomics in NSCLC: state of the art and a proposal for harmonization of methodology. Sci Rep 7:358
Lopes R, Betrouni N (2009) Fractal and multifractal analysis: a review. Med Image Anal 13:634–649
Mayerhoefer ME, Materka A, Langs G et al (2020) Introduction to radiomics. J Nucl Med 61:488–495
Zukotynski KA, Hasan OK, Lubanovic M, Gerbaudo VH (2021) Update on molecular imaging and precision medicine in lung cancer. Radiol Clin North Am 59:693–703
Kubota K, Murakami K, Inoue T, Saga T, Shiomi S (2011) Additional effects of FDG-PET to thin-section CT for the differential diagnosis of lung nodules: a Japanese multicenter clinical study. Ann Nucl Med 25:787–795
van Velden FH, Cheebsumon P, Yaqub M et al (2011) Evaluation of a cumulative SUV-volume histogram method for parameterizing heterogeneous intratumoural FDG uptake in non-small cell lung cancer PET studies. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 38:1636–1647
Tixier F, Le Rest CC, Hatt M et al (2011) Intratumor heterogeneity characterized by textural features on baseline [18F]FDGPET images predicts response to concomitant radiochemotherapy in esophageal cancer. J Nucl Med 52:369–378
Yang W, Zhang Y, Fu Z et al (2010) Imaging of proliferation with [18F]FLT PET/CT versus [18F]FDGPET/CT in non-small-cell lung cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 37:1291–1299
Buck AK, Halter G, Schirrmeister H et al (2003) Imaging proliferation in lung tumors with PET: [18F]FLT versus [18F]FDG. J Nucl Med 44:1426–1431
Tian J, Yang X, Yu L et al (2008) A multicenter clinical trial on the diagnostic value of dual-tracer PET/CT in pulmonary lesions using 3’-deoxy-3’-[18F]fluorothymidine and [18F]FDG. J Nucl Med 49:186–194
Ren C, Zhang J, Qi M, et al. (2021) Machine learning based on clinico-biological features integrated [18F]FDGPET/CT radiomics for distinguishing squamous cell carcinoma from adenocarcinoma of lung. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 48:1538–1549
Schoder H, Yeung HW, Larson SM (2005) CT in PET/CT: essential features of interpretation. J Nucl Med 46:1249–1251
We would like to thank the Chinese Scholarship Council for the financial support. The financial support from the Austrian Federal Ministry for Digital and Economic Affairs, the National Foundation for Research, Technology and Development and the Christian Doppler Research Association are gratefully acknowledged. We thank Siemens Healthineers for the financial and scientific support. We thank Clemens Spielvogel for their insightful comments, suggestions, and constructive criticism. We thank Prof. Alexander Haug for his suggestions to this study.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The evaluation of retrospective data was approved in accordance with the ethical standards of Chinese PLA General Hospital Committee. Informed consent was obtained from all the subjects involved in the study.
Consent for publication
The corresponding authors (Prof. Baixuan Xu and Prof. Lukas Kenner) and other authors all approve for the publication.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The three categories of radiomic features on PET modality and CT modality. Notes: In the Column Feature Name, x_y_z represents a direction in 3D; d represents a cross-section and f represents the position in the histogram.
The interpretation criteria of visual analysis.
About this article
Cite this article
Ning, J., Li, C., Yu, P. et al. Radiomic analysis will add differential diagnostic value of benign and malignant pulmonary nodules: a hybrid imaging study based on [18F]FDG and [18F]FLT PET/CT. Insights Imaging 14, 197 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01530-6