Skip to main content

Letter to the editor: “Utilization of CT and MRI scanning in Taiwan, 2000–2017”

An Opinion to this article was published on 21 August 2023

The Original Article was published on 03 February 2023

Dear Editor in Chief,

We read with interest the article entitled “Utilization of CT and MRI scanning in Taiwan, 2000–2017” by Huang et al. [1] recently published in Insights into Imaging. The authors conducted comprehensive analyses of the advanced imaging utilization in Taiwan across subgroups, using national data from National Health Insurance (NHI) claims and Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) health statistics. We congratulate the authors for their contributions to provide an overview of overall advanced imaging examinations performed in Taiwan. However, our examination of the study has revealed several limitations in the authors' approach to subgroup analysis.

First, using the entire population as the denominator of utilization rates in subgroups would cause an underestimation of the true rates. For instance, in the emergency department (ED) setting, the reported rates of CT use in Taiwan ranged from 116 to 177 per 1000 ED visits during 2005–2013 [2,3,4], compared to rates reported in other countries ranging from 34 to 245 per 1000 ED visits (as summarized in Table 1) [5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. However, the rate reported by the authors was 16 per 1000 persons per year, calculated by using the whole population of Taiwan (approximately 24 million) as the denominator. This could lead to confusion that Taiwan had a low CT utilization rate in ED setting compared to other countries. The appropriate denominator should be the yearly users of ED services (approximately 3–4 million). The same issue applies to rates reported in other subgroups (as shown in Table 4 of the authors’ article) [1].

Table 1 Worldwide trends of CT use in the ED patients

Second, the underestimation of CT scans due to under-coding and self-pay should not be ignored. Previous studies have shown the underreporting of CT and MRI in US inpatient claims data [12], which may also occur in Taiwan. The NHI Bureau limits the reimbursement of multiple CT scans for a patient at the same day and imposes penalties for outliers in service volumes, leading to changes in provider behavior such as discretionary billing [13]. To observe this phenomenon, we compared the number of CT scans in claim records with total CT scans, including uncoded and self-pay scans, in our hospital during 2010–2017. The underestimation of CT scans in claim records was up to 10.2% in emergency patients and 8.8% in outpatients in 2017 (as shown in Table 2). We also found increasing trends of uncoded CT scans in emergency patients and self-pay CT scans in outpatients. These findings suggest that the actual rates of CT utilization may be higher than those derived from NHI claims data, and the difference may continue to increase in the future.

Table 2 Trends of all CTs, uncoded and self-paid CT during 2010–2017, stratified by patient settings

Finally, the use of OECD health statistics data to compare advanced imaging utilization across countries is limited. Although the data showed in the hospital and ambulatory subgroups primarily refer to inpatient and outpatient settings, exceptions are described in the Definitions, Sources and Methods of OECD health statistics [14]. As the countries selected in eTable 4 of the authors’ article [1], the data of “in-hospital” CT examinations in Korea and the USA include outpatients, while the data of “ambulatory” CT examinations in France, Korea and the USA include inpatients. In addition to the mixed data between inpatient and outpatient settings, the methodology and coverage of data source vary widely across countries in OECD health statistics. Given these limitations, using data from NHI claims and OECD health statistics may not be suitable for the subgroup analyses of the imaging utilization.

In conclusion, our review of the article by Huang et al. on the utilization of CT and MRI scanning in Taiwan highlights several limitations in the subgroup analyses. Using the entire population as the denominator in calculating utilization rates has led to underestimation of the actual rates. Additionally, the underreporting of CT and MRI scans due to under-coding and self-pay is not negligible and may have resulted in further underestimation. The limitations of using data from NHI claims and OECD health statistics for subgroup analyses of advanced imaging utilization also warrant attention. It is recommended that future studies on advanced imaging utilization in Taiwan consider data from multiple hospitals to mitigate the impact of under-coding and self-pay, and to accurately reflect the utilization rates in both inpatient and outpatient settings.

Availability of data and material

All data and material are included in this Letter to the Editor.



Computed tomography


Emergency Department


Magnetic resonance imaging


National Health Insurance


Organisation for Economics Co-operation and Development


  1. Huang C-C, Effendi FF, Kosik RO et al (2023) Utilization of CT and MRI scanning in Taiwan, 2000–2017. Insights Imaging 14:23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Chang JC-Y, Lin Y-Y, Hsu T-F et al (2016) Trends in computed tomography utilisation in the emergency department: a 5 year experience in an urban medical centre in northern Taiwan. Emerg Med Australas 28:153–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hu S-Y, Hsieh M-S, Lin M-Y et al (2016) Trends of CT utilisation in an emergency department in Taiwan: a 5-year retrospective study. BMJ Open 6:e010973.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Peng Y-C, Lee W-J, Chang Y-C et al (2022) Radiologist burnout: trends in medical imaging utilization under the national health insurance system with the universal code bundling strategy in an academic tertiary medical centre. Eur J Radiol 157:110596.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kocher KE, Meurer WJ, Fazel R et al (2011) National trends in use of computed tomography in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 58:452–462.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bellolio MF, Heien HC, Sangaralingham LR et al (2017) Increased computed tomography utilization in the emergency department and its association with hospital admission. West J Emerg Med 18:835

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Berdahl CT, Vermeulen MJ, Larson DB, Schull MJ (2013) Emergency department computed tomography utilization in the United States and Canada. Ann Emerg Med 62:486–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bhayana R, Vermeulen MJ, Li Q et al (2014) Socioeconomic status and the use of computed tomography in the emergency department. Can J Emerg Med 16:288–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Maxwell S, Ha NT, Bulsara MK et al (2021) Increasing use of CT requested by emergency department physicians in tertiary hospitals in Western Australia 2003–2015: an analysis of linked administrative data. BMJ Open 11:e043315.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ahn S, Kim WY, Lim KS et al (2014) Advanced radiology utilization in a tertiary care emergency department from 2001 to 2010. PLoS One 9:e112650.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Juliusson G, Thorvaldsdottir B, Kristjansson JM, Hannesson P (2019) Diagnostic imaging trends in the emergency department: an extensive single-center experience. Acta Radiologica Open 8:2058460119860404.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Dismuke CE (2005) Underreporting of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging procedures in inpatient claims data. Med Care 43:713–717.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chang C-K, Xirasagar S, Chen B et al (2015) Provider behavior under global budgeting and policy responses: an observational study on eye care services in Taiwan. Inquiry 52:0046958015601826

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. OECD Health Statistics (2022) definitions, sources and methods. Accessed 12 Feb 2023

Download references


This opinion article has not received any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



HML and SZL contributed to literature research and manuscript preparation. All the authors contributed to data acquisition. HML, SZL and LYW analyzed the data. All authors have read and approved the opinion article. All authors contributed equally to this Letter to the Editor.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hao-Ming Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors consent to the publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare no completing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, HM., Liu, SZ., Yeh, LR. et al. Letter to the editor: “Utilization of CT and MRI scanning in Taiwan, 2000–2017”. Insights Imaging 14, 83 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: