Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Original Article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Dual-energy CT virtual non-calcium: an accurate method for detection of knee osteoarthritis-related edema-like marrow signal intensity

Insights into Imaging volume 14, Article number: 74 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the performance of a dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) virtual non-calcium (VNCa) technique in the detection of edema-like marrow signal intensity (ELMSI) in patients with knee joint osteoarthritis (OA) compared to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Methods

The study received local ethics board approval, and written informed consent was obtained. DECT and MRI were used to examine 28 knees in 24 patients with OA. VNCa images were generated by dual-energy subtraction of calcium. The knee joint was divided into 15 regions for ELMSI grading, performed independently by two musculoskeletal radiologists, with MRI as the reference standard. We also analyzed CT numbers through receiver operating characteristics and calculated cut-off values.

Results

For the qualitative analysis, we obtained CT sensitivity (Readers 1, 2 = 83.7%, 89.8%), specificity (Readers 1, 2 = 99.5%, 99.5%), positive predictive value (Readers 1, 2 = 95.3%, 95.7%), and negative predictive value (Readers 1, 2 = 97.9%, 98.7%) for ELMSI. The interobserver agreement was excellent (κ = 0.92). The area under the curve for Reader 1 and Reader 2 was 0.961 (95% CI 0.93, 0.99) and 0.992 (95% CI 0.98, 1.00), respectively. CT numbers obtained from the VNCa images were significantly different between regions with and without ELMSI (p < .001).

Conclusions

VNCa images have good diagnostic performance for the qualitative and quantitative analysis of knee osteoarthritis-related ELMSI.

Key points

  • DECT-VNCa images had important clinical significance in diagnosing ELMSI.

  • DECT-VNCa images can improve the diagnosis of ELMSI by cut-off value.

  • The research of DECT-related post-processing technology in the diagnosis of OA-related pain needs further study.

Background

The most common type of arthritis worldwide is osteoarthritis (OA), and it is the main cause of dysfunction and disability in the elderly [1,2,3]. The knee joint is most commonly involved, and the estimated lifetime risk of knee OA is about 45% according to the Johnston County OA Project [1, 4]. Knee OA-related knee pain is common and is a frequent contributor to decreased quality of life in those affected. However, the underlying mechanism of knee pain in OA remains poorly understood [4,5,6].

Cartilage loss is a characteristic pathological feature of OA, although it is generally recognized that OA is a disease of the whole joint, involving the bone subchondral bone complex, and local soft tissues including synovium, meniscus, and ligament can also undergo pathological changes [1, 6, 7]. Recent studies suggest a strong association between ELMSI and pain in patients with knee OA, new or enlarging OA-ELMSI can be associated with accelerated cartilage loss on MRI when patients were followed up over time. Not surprisingly, given its association with new pain and/or pain intensity, multiple studies have shown that patients with OA-ELMSI are more likely to present for total knee arthroplasty, it can be found that in patients with knee osteoarthritis, the presence of ELMSI is important to guide the clinical evaluation of the cause of pain, and it can support in making the decision concerning appropriate treatment options [8,9,10,11]. The pain may be caused by osteoclasts under the subchondral bone reconstruction, especially the growth of nerve axons that dominate OA pain; and it is further suggested that early subchondral bone changes are involved [12,13,14].

The musculoskeletal system consists of two distinct areas of anatomy: bone and soft tissue. Two of the most valuable methods of analyzing these two major areas are CT and MRI. CT is cheaper and faster than MRI. Moreover, the radiation dose of DECT scan is not significantly higher than that of other CT scans. Subchondral ELMSI on MRI has been highly correlated with pain [13,14,15]. Clinically, although Dixon technique can quantitatively identify water and fat, some scholars believe that fluid-sensitive MRI sequences are a non-invasive technique for identifying ELMSI [16,17,18,19]. However, some patients cannot undergo MRI for various reasons, making it unsuitable for the evaluation of acute knee pain [20, 21]. DECT uses two X-ray tubes operating at different tube voltages at the same to deploy two different X-ray energy spectra and show different tissue characteristics. The VNCa technology uses bone mineral, yellow bone marrow and red bone marrow absorption curves on the two DECT X-ray spectra, which allows calcium reduction through image post-processing [22,23,24]. We hypothesized that DECT VNCa could achieve good consistency in detecting knee OA-related ELMSI compared with MRI. The purpose of our study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of VNCa post-processing technology to detect knee OA-related ELMSI.

Materials and methods

This prospective study (Clinical Trial Registration No. ChiCTR1900024305) was approved by the local ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Study participants

Between August 2017 and November 2018, 30 patients (11 men and 19 women) underwent DECT of the knee(s) within 24 h after MRI. After, 6 patients were excluded (1 case of bone infarction, 1 case of rheumatoid arthritis, 2 cases of bone tumor-like lesions, and 2 cases of substandard image quality), 420 regions of 28 knee joints were included in the analysis (Fig. 1). The diagnostic criteria were recurrent episodes of knee arthralgia for one month [25]; X-ray, CT, and MRI examination showing asymmetric joint space narrowing, subchondral bone sclerosis and/or cystic degeneration, and osteophytes of the joints; clear and viscous synovial fluid (at least 2 times) with leukocyte counts less than 2000/-mL; a duration of morning stiffness less than 30 min; bony crepitus occurring with joint activity; normal or slightly elevated ESR or CRP levels [25,26,27,28,29]. The exclusion criteria included patient age < 40 years; diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, reactive arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, or any other type of chronic immune disease; systemic corticosteroid therapy; contraindications to MRI; and refusal of participation or to participate, recently [30,31,32,33,34].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow diagram of the study participant selection

Full size image

DECT scanning parameters (image reconstruction) and post-processing data

All the participants in this study underwent DECT scanning (Somatom Definition Flash, Siemens Healthineers). The scanner had two different kilovoltage X-ray tubes: low (A tube) and high (B tube). The tube voltage was set to 80 and 140 kVp, respectively. All scans were performed in the caudal-cranial direction with patients in a supine position. The acquisition parameters were employed (collimation, 40 × 0.6 mm; pitch, 0.7; rotation time, 1.0 s). We assumed a 2:1 ratio of the tube current–time product (A tube, 360 mAs; B tube, 180 mAs). The calculated mean volume CT dose index of each parameter based on our scan parameters was 12.9 ± 2.5 mGy (range, 11.3–16.3 mGy), and the mean dose length product was 287.8 ± 178.2 mGy·cm (range, 115.6–537.8 mGy·cm). In the default case of the CT scan, the DECT scan can obtain three different sets of images: 80 kVp, Sn140 kVp, and weighted average. We simulated the weighted average with a ratio of 0.3:0.7 to obtain a standard CT image with a contrast of 120 kVp. For post-processing data, our algorithm reconstructed axial slices of the 80- and Sn140 kVp datasets with a section thickness of 0.6 mm (0.5 mm increments).

We used commercial software (Syngo MMWPVE40B Siemens) to process the CT image post-processing data. Based on our previous experience, we set the relative contrast ratio to 1.56 at 80- and Sn140 kVp. The intensity of the smoothing filter range was set to 4, and the color-coded maps were used for further analysis.

MRI sequence parameters

MRI was performed with a 3.0-T scanner (Achieva, Philips Healthcare, Best) using a knee coil. The MRI parameters used by the investigators for examining patients with knee OA were: sagittal T1-weighted spin-echo MR sequence (repetition time msec/echo time msec, 633/20; ETL, 6; FOV, 160 mm × 160 mm × 80 mm; acquisition matrix, 384 × 312; section thickness, 2.5 mm; intersection gap, 0 mm), axial T2-weighted fat-saturated fast spin-echo MR sequence (5069/63; ETL, 15; FOV, 160 mm × 160 mm × 80 mm; acquisition matrix, 292 × 216; section thickness, 2.5 mm; intersection gap, 0 mm), sagittal and coronal T2-weighted fat-saturated fast spin-echo MR sequence (4835/65; ETL, 15; FOV, 150 mm × 150 mm × 84 mm/160 mm × 160 mm × 84 mm; acquisition matrix, 272 × 195/308 × 240; section thickness, 3 mm; intersection gap, 0 mm).

Qualitative analysis

We divided each knee into 15 regions according to anatomical characteristics (Fig. 2). The patella was divided into a lateral facet and a medial facet. The patellar ridge was considered to be part of the medial facet. The femoral articular surface was divided into medial and lateral condyles, and the trochlear groove was a part of the medial condyle. Both medial condyle and lateral condyle were divided into three regions: (1) anterior, from the anterior edge of the superior osteochondral junction to the anterior meniscus angle; (2) center, extending from the leading edge of the anterior horn of the meniscus to the attachment of the posterior capsule of the posterior horn of the meniscus; and (3) posterior, extending from the posterior capsule accessory of the posterior horn of the meniscus to the posterior superior and posterior junction of bone and cartilage. The medial tibial plateau and the lateral tibial plateau were divided into three equal subregions: anterior, middle, and posterior, and the tibial spines were considered a separate region [35, 36].

Fig. 2
figure 2

Regional subdivision of the articular surfaces. In the axial plane, the patella (left image) is divided into medial (M) and lateral (L) regions, with the ridge considered part of the M region. In the coronal plane, the femur and tibia are also divided into M and L regions, with the trochlear groove of the femur considered part of the M region. The spines (S) region represents the portion of the tibia beneath the tibial spines. In the sagittal plane, the femoral and tibial surfaces are further subdivided into anterior (A), central (C), and posterior (P) regions (middle image). Region A of the femur corresponding to the patellofemoral articulation; region C to the weight-bearing surface, and region P to the posterior convexity that articulates only in extreme flexion. Region C of the tibial surface corresponds to the uncovered portion between the anterior and posterior horns of the meniscus centrally and the portion covered by the body of the meniscus peripherally

Full size image

The data were analyzed independently by two radiologists (Reader 1 and Reader 2) with 15 and 6 years of experience in musculoskeletal radiology. Both were unaware of the patients’ other imaging data and clinical information. Each reader analyzed the reconstructed and post-processing DECT images. Scoring was based on the severity of the ELMSI in each region of the knee joint as follows: Grade 4, severe ELMSI (showing high density shadow); Grade 3, moderate ELMSI (showing relatively high density shadow); Grade 2, mild ELMSI (showing a slightly higher density shadow); and Grade 1, no ELMSI (showing high density without visible abnormalities). MRI was used as a reference standard to evaluate the severity of ELMSI (Fig. 3). The readers optimized the window settings and size adjustments for diagnosis. We only included ELMSI larger than 2 mm in the subchondral bone to reduce the number of false positive results due to artifacts.

Fig. 3
figure 3

a–c Axial MRI, DECT VNCa, and color-coded map images showing Grade 1 ELMSI in the patella. d–f Axial MRI, DECT VNCa, and color-coded map images showing Grade 2 ELMSI in the patella. g–i Coronal MRI, DECT VNCa, and color-coded map images showing Grade 3 ELMSI in the tibial plateau. j–l Coronal MRI, DECT VNCa, and color-coded map images showing Grade 4 ELMSI in the tibial plateau (arrow)

Full size image

MRI was used as a reference standard to evaluate the severity of ELMSI. A third radiologist (Reader 3) with 18 years of experience in musculoskeletal imaging, who did not know the DECT results, evaluated the MRI for ELMSI. Reader 3 changed the window settings and size adjustments of the MRI as needed.

Quantitative analysis of CT numbers

After qualitative identification and grading of ELMSI, the regions were quantitatively analyzed by Readers 1 and 2. The readers used MRI as the reference standard for the presence of ELMSI to measure the CT numbers, independently. In the ELMSI regions of the MRI, we found the corresponding regions in the VNCa image and used circular ROIs to obtain the CT numbers. For each study participant, two circular ROIs in the ELMSI regions of the VNCa image were placed to obtain the DECT VNCa mean CT numbers. Two ROIs at least of 50 mm2 were also randomly placed on bone marrow to obtain CT numbers (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Shows a schematic diagram of ELMSI with DECT VNCa. The blue ROI is in the normal bone marrow area, and the white ROI is in an area of ELMSI

Full size image

Statistical analysis

We used Cohen’s Kappa statistic to analyze the inter-reader agreement in the visual assessment of the DECT VNCa images. We used the McNemar test to analyze the visual differences between the two readers for different grades of ELMSI. Using visual analysis data for the DECT VNCa images, we calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV, defined as the presence of ELMSI on MRI and the absence of ELMSI on DECT), and negative predictive value (NPV, defined as the presence of ELMSI on DECT and the absence of ELMSI on MRI).

We used a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and its associated statistics to analyze the CT numbers of dual-energy VNCa images. Then, based on the ROC analysis, we compared the CT numbers with the ELMSI grades found in MRI to determine the most accurate cut-off CT numbers of ELMSI. Continuous variables are reported as mean ± standard deviation and were analyzed with the t test.

SPSS statistical software was used for analysis. p < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

A total of 24 participants were included in this study. For a total of 420 region of 28 knee joints for analysis. Study participant statistics are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Study participant statistics
Full size table

DECT was performed within 24 h after MRI. Of the 510 regions available for analysis, 420 regions (82.4%) were classified as compliant with standards.

Qualitative analysis of ELMSI identified on VNCa images

In our experiments, we found that the incidence of ELMSI in the medial tibia and femur was the highest, accounting for 4% and 5%, respectively, of which the medial central portions of the femur and tibia were both 2%. Inter-reader agreement for qualitative analysis of ELMSI was very good (κ = 0.92). Reader 1 found 49 areas of ELMSI found to be true positives on MRI, while 8 regions were classified as no ELMSI on the DECT VNCa images. Five false negative and two false positive ELMSI results were found by Reader 2. We identified the presence of ELMSI through DECT VNCa images and finally obtained the total sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV (Table 2). In this study, it was found that the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the patella were lower than those in other bones of the knee. This may be related to the small volume of the patella, and therefore, the ELMSI evaluation in this area is affected by the surrounding bone cortex.

Table 2 The diagnostic value of VNCa images in ELMSI
Full size table

Quantitative analysis

Table 3 shows the mean CT numbers for different grades of ELMSI on DECT VNCa images. Based on the findings of the two readers, we found that the higher the grade of ELMSI, the higher the CT numbers, and the participants with different grades of ELMSI also had significant differences in DECT VNCa images (p < 0.001 for both readers) (Table 3). According to the MRI results, Grade 1–2 ELMSI were defined as negative and Grade 3–4 ELMSI were defined as positive, and the mean CT numbers were measured (Table 4 and Fig. 5).

Table 3 CT numbers of different grades of ELMSI on VNCa images based on MRI
Full size table
Table 4 CT number analysis of positive and negative regions of ELMSI by MRI
Full size table
Fig. 5
figure 5

Mean CT numbers of positive and negative ELMSI, with Grade 3–4 ELMSI as a positive result and Grade 1–2 ELMSI as a negative result according to MRI; 1 and 2 in the figure represent Reader 1 and Reader 2

Full size image

We also analyzed different grades of ELMSI on the DECT VNCa image by ROC curve analysis. The area under the curve for Readers 1 and 2 was 0.961 (95% CI 0.93, 0.99) and 0.992 (95% CI 0.98, 1.00), respectively. The results are shown in Table 5 and Fig. 6. The cut-off values for Reader 1 and Reader 2 on the ROC were -41HU and -47HU, and the sensitivity and specificity were 87.8% and 99.5% and 98.0% and 99.5%, respectively (Table 5).

Table 5 The diagnostic performance of VNCa images in ELMSI based on MRI
Full size table
Fig. 6
figure 6

Shows ROC curves calculated from CT numbers derived from DECT VNCa images for two independent readers for the differentiation of knee joint osteoarthritis with and without ELMSI. The area under the curve was 0.961 for Reader 1 and 0.992 for Reader 2 (Blue represents Reader 1 and green represents Reader 2)

Full size image

Discussion

The results of this study showed that DECT VNCa imaging has an encouragingly high agreement with MRI for the detection of ELMSI in knee joint OA. ELMSI can be qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed by ROI-based CT numbers measurements. We also found that the CT numbers of bone marrow are closely related to the grade of ELMSI. There were statistically significant differences in CT number of the bone marrow between the four grades of ELMSI.

The results of our qualitative analysis showed that VNCa images have excellent performance for the detection of ELMSI changes in OA. Stated simply, calcium is subtracted from the DECT during post-processing to obtain the VNCa images, allowing the identification of increased non-specific CT numbers. Current ELMSI research mostly involves trauma-related ELMSI, and less information exists about arthritis-related ELMSI in chronic diseases such as OA. This may be because MRI is not the preferred method for evaluating trauma-related acute pain.

We have previously reported that DECT VNCa has good diagnostic performance in the detection of carpal joint contusion and is a potential alternative scanning method for patients with contraindications to MRI [37]. Currently, most investigators use VNCa images to detect trauma-associated ELMSI, and qualitative and quantitative analysis of DECT VNCa images has had high diagnostic performance for these lesions [38,39,40]. Some investigators have reported good diagnostic performance of VNCa in detecting the infiltration pattern of multiple myeloma-associated ELMSI. Notably, VNCa technology has been applied for the detection of ELMSI in the sacroiliac joint and good correlation was obtained [41]. Our data show that quantitative analysis of DECT VNCa images is effective for the diagnosis of ELMSI in patients with knee OA. The difference in CT numbers between ELMSI-positive and ELMSI-negative regions is important for determining the quantitative and qualitative diagnostic results of DECT VNCa imaging [39, 41].

In our study, this significant difference enabled us to detect ELMSI on VNCa images. We measured the attenuation of bone marrow on VNCa images reconstructed from DECT and found a significantly higher attenuation in regions that were positive for ELMSI than in those that were negative for ELMSI on MRI. However, in several cases, MRI-positive ELMSI were not detected on qualitative analysis of the VNCa images. When we suspect ELMSI in DECT VNCa images, the diagnostic efficiency can be increased by measuring CT numbers [42, 43]. We also used a ROC curve cut-off value to analyze suspected ELMSI. The cut-off value greatly improved the sensitivity and specificity of ELMSI detection. The value of Rel.CM plays an important role in post-processing VNCa images and influences the qualitative and quantitative evaluation of ELMSI. We used the multi-plane reconstruction image to measure the CT numbers of the bone marrow. Besides the bone marrow, knee OA also involves ligaments, menisci, and other structures. Various DECT post-processing technologies can be used to better display ligaments, menisci, bursae, and other structures, which greatly improves its diagnostic performance for the disease [44]. Our data show that VNCa technology may be an alternative method for detecting ELMSI in patients with contraindications to MRI. DECT scanning speed is fast and related to the convenience of image post-processing. Therefore, VNCa post-processing is of great significance for our diagnosis of OA-related ELMSI.

Our study has several limitations. First, the number of participants was small; further study with a larger sample size is needed. VNCa algorithm is unable to show mild ELMSI directly adjacent to cortical bone; this is due to incomplete masking of the cortex and spatial averaging. Third, because the DECT post-processing image settings required multiple parameters and the selection of parameters greatly impacted the ELMSI image display, we used MRI as the reference standard to detect ELMSI, so small ELMSI may not be detected on VNCa images. Future studies should include a comparison of multiple selected parameters. Fourth, MRI was used as the reference standard because of the limited pathological reference standards available.

In summary, DECT VNCa images have good diagnostic performance for qualitative and quantitative analysis of knee OA-related ELMSI. DECT VNCa images may play an important role in the diagnosis of acute pain related to OA-ELMSI.

Availability of data and materials

Due to the nature of this research, participants of this study did not agree for their data to be shared publicly, so supporting data are not available.

Abbreviations

BML:

Bone marrow lesion

CT:

Computed tomography

DECT:

Dual-energy computed tomography

ELMSI:

Edema like marrow signal intensity

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

NPV:

Negative predictive value

OA:

Osteoarthritis

PPV:

Positive predictive value

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

ROI:

Region of interest

VNCa:

Virtual non-calcium

References

  1. O’Neill TW, McCabe PS, McBeth J (2018) Update on the epidemiology, risk factors and disease outcomes of osteoarthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 32:312–326

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hunter DJ, Zhang Y, Niu J et al (2006) Increase in bone marrow lesions associated with cartilage loss: a longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging study of knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 54:1529–1535

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pan F, Tian J, Aitken D, Cicuttini F, Winzenberg T, Jones G (2017) The association of knee structural pathology with pain at the knee is modified by pain at other sites in those with knee osteoarthritis. Clin Rheumatol 36:2549–2555

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Qin J, Barbour KE, Murphy LB et al (2017) Lifetime risk of symptomatic hand osteoarthritis: the Johnston County osteoarthritis project. Arthritis Rheumatol 69:1204–1212

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Fukaya T, Mutsuzaki H, Mori K (2019) Influence of pain on knee joint movement and moment during the stance phase in patients with severe bilateral knee osteoarthritis: a pilot study. Medicina (Kaunas) 55:756

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhu S, Zhu J, Zhen G et al (2019) Subchondral bone osteoclasts induce sensory innervation and osteoarthritis pain. J Clin Invest 129:1076–1093

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Manara M, Varenna M (2014) A clinical overview of bone marrow edema. Reumatismo 66:184–196

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Perry TA, Parkes MJ, Hodgson RJ, Felson DT, Arden NK, O’Neill TW (2020) Association between bone marrow lesions & synovitis and symptoms in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 28:316–323

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang X, Chen T, Liang W et al (2022) Synovitis mediates the association between bone marrow lesions and knee pain in osteoarthritis: data from the Foundation for the National Institute of Health (FNIH) Osteoarthritis Biomarkers Consortium. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 30:1270–1277

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Maraghelli D, Brandi ML, Matucci Cerinic M, Peired AJ, Colagrande S (2021) Edema-like marrow signal intensity: a narrative review with a pictorial essay. Skeletal Radiol 50:645–663

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nielsen FK, Egund N, Jorgensen A, Jurik AG (2017) Risk factors for joint replacement in knee osteoarthritis; a 15-year follow-up study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 18:510

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Saltzman BM, Riboh JC (2018) Subchondral bone and the osteochondral unit: basic science and clinical implications in sports medicine. Sports Health 10:412–418

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Sherwood J (2019) Osteoarthritis year in review 2018: biology. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 27:365–370

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Atukorala I, Kwoh CK, Guermazi A et al (2016) Synovitis in knee osteoarthritis: a precursor of disease? Ann Rheum Dis 75:390–395

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Geurts J, Patel A, Hirschmann MT et al (2016) Elevated marrow inflammatory cells and osteoclasts in subchondral osteosclerosis in human knee osteoarthritis. J Orthop Res 34:262–269

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hunter DJ, Gerstenfeld L, Bishop G et al (2009) Bone marrow lesions from osteoarthritis knees are characterized by sclerotic bone that is less well mineralized. Arthritis Res Ther 11:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. McQueen FM (2012) Bone marrow edema and osteitis in rheumatoid arthritis: the imaging perspective. Arthritis Res Ther 14:224

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Hugle T, Geurts J (2017) What drives osteoarthritis?-synovial versus subchondral bone pathology. Rheumatology (Oxford) 56:1461–1471

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. van Vucht N, Santiago R, Lottmann B et al (2019) The Dixon technique for MRI of the bone marrow. Skeletal Radiol 48:1861–1874

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mattap SM, Aitken D, Wills K et al (2018) How do MRI-detected subchondral bone marrow lesions (BMLs) on two different MRI sequences correlate with clinically important outcomes? Calcif Tissue Int 103:131–143

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Singh V, Oliashirazi A, Tan T, Fayyad A, Shahi A (2019) Clinical and pathophysiologic significance of MRI identified bone marrow lesions associated with knee osteoarthritis. Arch Bone Jt Surg 7:211–219

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Bjorkman AS, Koskinen SK, Lindblom M, Persson A (2020) Diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy CT for detection of bone marrow lesions in the subacutely injured knee with MRI as reference method. Acta Radiol 61:749–759

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang MY, Zhang XY, Xu L et al (2019) Detection of bone marrow oedema in knee joints using a dual-energy CT virtual non-calcium technique. Clin Radiol 74:815 e811-815 e817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Booz C, Noske J, Lenga L et al (2020) Color-coded virtual non-calcium dual-energy CT for the depiction of bone marrow edema in patients with acute knee trauma: a multireader diagnostic accuracy study. Eur Radiol 30:141–150

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Alizai H, Virayavanich W, Joseph GB et al (2014) Cartilage lesion score: comparison of a quantitative assessment score with established semiquantitative MR scoring systems. Radiology 271:479–487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hayashi D, Roemer FW, Guermazi A (2016) Imaging for osteoarthritis. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 59:161–169

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hayashi D, Roemer FW, Jarraya M, Guermazi A (2017) Imaging in osteoarthritis. Radiol Clin N Am 55:1085–1102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang Y, Wluka AE, Pelletier JP et al (2010) Meniscal extrusion predicts increases in subchondral bone marrow lesions and bone cysts and expansion of subchondral bone in osteoarthritic knees. Rheumatology (Oxford) 49:997–1004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Pouders C, De Maeseneer M, Van Roy P, Gielen J, Goossens A, Shahabpour M (2008) Prevalence and MRI-anatomic correlation of bone cysts in osteoarthritic knees. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:17–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Dumovich J, Singh P (2020) Physiology, trauma. StatPearls, Treasure Island

    Google Scholar 

  31. Dong B, Kong Y, Zhang L, Qiang Y (2017) Severity and distribution of cartilage damage and bone marrow edema in the patellofemoral and tibiofemoral joints in knee osteoarthritis determined by MRI. Exp Ther Med 13:2079–2084

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Cronstrom A, Creaby MW, Nae J, Ageberg E (2016) Modifiable factors associated with knee abduction during weight-bearing activities: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med 46:1647–1662

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Roi GS, Monticone M, Salvoni M, Sassi R, Alberti G (2015) Self-reported knee symptoms assessed by KOOS questionnaire in downhill runners (skyrunners). PLoS One 10:e0126382

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Carek SM (2020) Hip and knee injuries. Prim Care 47:115–131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Amano K, Li AK, Pedoia V et al (2017) Effects of surgical factors on cartilage can be detected using quantitative magnetic resonance imaging after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 45:1075–1084

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Peterfy CG, Guermazi A, Zaim S et al (2004) Whole-organ magnetic resonance imaging score (WORMS) of the knee in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 12:177–190

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ren QP, Tang DQ, Zhao H et al (2018) Diagnostic performance of dual-energy CT for the detection of bone bruise in the wrist. Chin Clin Med imaging 29:56–60

    Google Scholar 

  38. Guggenberger R, Gnannt R, Hodler J et al (2012) Diagnostic performance of dual-energy CT for the detection of traumatic bone marrow lesions in the ankle: comparison with MR imaging. Radiology 264:164–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Cao JX, Wang YM, Kong XQ, Yang C, Wang P (2015) Good interrater reliability of a new grading system in detecting traumatic bone marrow lesions in the knee by dual energy CT virtual non-calcium images. Eur J Radiol 84:1109–1115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Wu H, Zhang G, Shi L et al (2019) Axial spondyloarthritis: dual-energy virtual noncalcium CT in the detection of bone marrow edema in the sacroiliac joints. Radiology 290:157–164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Petritsch B, Kosmala A, Weng AM et al (2017) Vertebral compression fractures: third-generation dual-energy CT for detection of bone marrow edema at visual and quantitative analyses. Radiology 284:161–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Victor N, Simon L, Nuran A et al (2018) Bone marrow edema in traumatic vertebral compression fractures: diagnostic accuracy of dual-layer detector CT using calcium suppressed images. Eur J Radiol 105:216–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Foti G, Catania M, Caia S et al (2019) Identification of bone marrow edema of the ankle: diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy CT in comparison with MRI. Radiol Med 124:1028–1036

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Rajiah P, Sundaram M, Subhas N (2019) Dual-energy CT in musculoskeletal imaging: what is the role beyond gout? AJR Am J Roentgenol 213:493–505

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (SP: Grant No. 81271538), 345 Talent Project and Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province (SP: Grant No. 2019-ZD-0794), Scientific Research Project of Hunan Provincial Department of Education, Key project (HZ: Grant No. 20A437), Scientific Research Project of Hunan Provincial Health Department of China (DT: Grant No. B2004-097), Hunan Provincial Science and Technology Innovation Program of China (DT: Grant No. 2021JJ30621). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Heng Zhao and Hui Li have contributed equally to this work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The First Affiliated Hospital, Department of Radiology, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, 421001, Hunan, China

    Heng Zhao, Hui Li, Xia Xie, Hai-yan Tang, Xiao-xin Liu, Yi Wen, Xin Xiao, Lu Ye, You-wei Tang, Gao-yue Dai, Jia-ni He, Li Chen, Qian Wang & De-qiu Tang

  2. Department of Radiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Sanhao Street No. 36, Heping District, Shenyang, 110004, Liaoning, China

    Heng Zhao & Shi-nong Pan

  3. Department of Radiology, The First People’s Hospital of Zhaoqing City, Zhaoqing, China

    Hui Li

Authors
  1. Heng Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hui Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xia Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hai-yan Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xiao-xin Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yi Wen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Xin Xiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Lu Ye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. You-wei Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Gao-yue Dai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Jia-ni He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Li Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Qian Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. De-qiu Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Shi-nong Pan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

HZ and HL contributed equally to this work. HZ and HL mainly conceived and wrote the article. XX, YW, XX, LY, YWT, LC and QW mainly contributed to collection and statistics of patients. HYT, XXL, GYD and JNH mainly contributed to the operation and experimental design of the equipment. DQT and SNP mainly contributed to the review and polishing of the framework of the article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to De-qiu Tang or Shi-nong Pan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by Medical Ethic Committee of University of South China. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Meanwhile, this study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR) (www.chictr.org.cn), the registration number was ChiCTR1900024305. We declare that we had full access to all of the data in this study and complete responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, H., Li, H., Xie, X. et al. Dual-energy CT virtual non-calcium: an accurate method for detection of knee osteoarthritis-related edema-like marrow signal intensity. Insights Imaging 14, 74 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01407-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01407-8

Keywords