Skip to main content

Clinical and radiological features of lung disorders related to connective-tissue diseases: a pictorial essay


Connective tissue diseases (CTDs) include a spectrum of disorders that affect the connective tissue of the human body; they include autoimmune disorders characterized by immune-mediated chronic inflammation and the development of fibrosis. Lung involvement can be misdiagnosed, since pulmonary alterations preceded osteo-articular manifestations only in 20% of cases and they have no clear clinical findings in the early phases. All pulmonary structures may be interested: pulmonary interstitium, airways, pleura and respiratory muscles. Among these autoimmune disorders, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is characterized by usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP), pulmonary nodules and airway disease with air-trapping, whereas non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP), pulmonary hypertension and esophageal dilatation are frequently revealed in systemic sclerosis (SSc). NSIP and organizing pneumonia (OP) may be found in patients having polymyositis (PM) and dermatomyositis (DM); in some cases, perilobular consolidations and reverse halo-sign areas may be observed. Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is characterized by serositis, acute lupus pneumonitis and alveolar hemorrhage. In the Sjögren syndrome (SS), the most frequent pattern encountered on HRCT images is represented by NSIP; UIP and lymphocytic interstitial pneumonia (LIP) are reported with a lower frequency. Finally, fibrotic NSIP may be the interstitial disease observed in patients having mixed connective tissue diseases (MCTD). This pictorial review therefore aims to provide clinical features and imaging findings associated with autoimmune CTDs, in order to help radiologists, pneumologists and rheumatologists in their diagnoses and management.

Key points

  • Pulmonary involvement may be observed in Connective tissue diseases (CTDs).

  • On HRCT, pulmonary lesions may precede the onset of respiratory symptoms.

  • Usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP), non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP), and organizing pneumonia (OP) represent patterns of interstitial diseases in CTDs.

  • Airway diseases and pleural effusions may be found in RA.

  • Pulmonary hypertension is often depicted in scleroderma and systemic lupus erythematosus.


Connective tissue diseases (CTDs) include a spectrum of disorders that involve connective tissues of the human body; the target of these pathologies is represented by the extracellular matrix, which supports organs and is mainly composed of collagen and elastin. CTDs are “characterized by immune-mediated chronic inflammation often leading to tissue damage, collagen deposition and possible loss of function of the organ” [1]. They can be distinguished as heritable forms and autoimmune diseases. The latter have also been referred as systemic autoimmune diseases, which recognize genetic and environmental factors [2, 3]; they are mainly represented by rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic sclerosis (SSc), polymyositis (PM) and dermatomyositis (DM), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), Sjögren syndrome (SS) and mixed connective tissue diseases (MCTDs).

Pulmonary involvement can be observed in all these above-mentioned autoimmune diseases—often after the articular and skeletal symptoms and signs; however, an early identification of respiratory alterations is crucial for the prognosis, since lung involvement increases morbidity and mortality [4]. Multiple respiratory structures could be affected (pleura, parenchyma, airways, pulmonary vessels and thoracic muscles); more in detail, interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) may be encountered in almost all these autoimmune disorders, resembling different pulmonary patterns—such as usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP), non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP), organizing pneumonia (OP). Moreover, in patients with CTDs and interstitial patterns observed on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), survival is better than that observed with regard to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) [5].

Recently, within the spectrum of ILDs, a subset of patients has shown a progressive course of pulmonary fibrotic disease—despite treatment; this ILD progression, characterized by an increased extent of fibrosis on HRCT and/or reduction of pulmonary function test values, has been defined as “ILD progressive fibrotic phenotype” [6, 7].

Moreover, a recent trial has registered the effect of antifibrotic therapy in slowing the progression of fibrosing ILDs, and this efficacy has been validated also for those associated with autoimmune diseases [8]. In view of these considerations, early recognition of pulmonary involvement by clinicians and radiologists is more favorable, to evaluate the possibility of treatment. Therefore, the aim of this pictorial review is to describe the main clinical and radiological patterns of lung involvement in autoimmune CTDs (Table 1), in order to increase radiologists’ familiarity with their pattern of lung presentation on imaging.

Table 1 Main serum markers, clinical features and radiological patterns of autoimmune lung CTDs

Main text

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

RA is the most common connective tissue disease, with a prevalence of 1–2% in the general population; it commonly occurs in women, with a female to male ratio equal to 3:1 [7, 9]. This disease is characterized by erosive and symmetric inflammatory arthropathy, especially involving the distal joints. The evidence of early morning joint stiffness and pain—associated with positive rheumatoid factor (RF) and signs of arthritis—are considered typical clinical findings which may suggest the suspicion of disease. Highly specific for RA are the anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibodies, which are usually related to the severe stage of joint disease [10].

Extra-articular manifestations include subcutaneous nodules, skin ulceration, pericarditis, splenomegaly, pericarditis, atherosclerotic artery disease and a wide spectrum of pulmonary manifestations [11].

Lung involvement

Pulmonary manifestations, which occur in up to 80% of RA patients, contribute significantly to an increase in morbidity. It may result directly from RA involvement, or may be a consequence of medical treatment with immune-modulating molecules, which increase the risk of opportunistic infections and/or episodes of drug toxicity [11].

Pulmonary lesions may precede articular symptoms in a relatively low percentage of cases (up to 20%), and are often detected within the first 5 years of disease [12]. Among CTDs, RA is characterized by heterogeneous lung involvement; all pulmonary structures—such as airways, pleura, lung vessels and parenchyma—may be interested. Interstitial pneumonitis and fibrosis, rheumatoid nodules, OP, bronchiectasis, obliterative bronchiolitis, follicular bronchiolitis, and pleural effusion are the most common manifestations encountered [13].

ILD is the most common pulmonary manifestation of RA, occurring in 10–20% of cases; it is frequently found in men aged between 50 and 60 years [7, 13]. The estimated prevalence of RA-ILD is heterogeneous: HRCT is more sensitive than other methods—such as pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and chest radiographs [14]. In addition, some published studies have shown that patients who underwent screening procedures based on CT examinations, in absence of respiratory symptoms, often exhibit radiological abnormalities referred as interstitial lung abnormalities (ILA).

There are some risk factors to development of ILD-RA: older age, male sex, smoking, longer disease duration, high level of RF and anti-CCP antibodies have been strongly associated with increased risk of disease [7, 12]. Namely, RF and anti-CCP antibodies also predict development of RA in asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic patients. They have been reported as the most important clinical features of an underlying CTD—in patients having isolated ILD and a history of smoking [10].

Other relevant factors include the extent of fibrosis and the UIP pattern found on HRCT, and the severity of lung function impairment in terms of diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) and forced vital capacity (FVC) [11].

The most common symptoms of RA-ILD include exertional dyspnea and non-productive cough. Bibasilar inspiratory crackles may be commonly revealed on clinical auscultation [15, 16]. In the advanced phase of disease edema, cyanosis and signs of pulmonary hypertension (PH) may also be observed.

PFTs may show a restrictive pattern, with a reduction in FVC—with or without decreased values of DLCO. In a previous study by Gabbay et al. [17], DLCO reduction was reported as a highly sensitive factor for predicting the severity of ILD. Moreover, similarly to IPF, a decrease in FVC of ≥ 10% or a decrease in the DLCO values of ≥ 15% over 6–12 months, has been associated with increased mortality.

Radiological features

UIP represents the most common radiological and pathological pattern encountered in patients with RA (Fig. 1). It has important prognostic implications, being associated with worse survival than fibrotic NSIP appearance; the prognosis, however, is better than patients having UIP pattern due to IPF [11]. Recently published data suggest that a subgroup of RA-ILD patients with UIP may have stable disease for a long term, so that these patients need to be differentiated from those with IPF [7].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Axial (A, B) and sagittal (C) HRCT images of a UIP pattern in a 72-year-old patient with rheumatoid arthritis. The images show the typical UIP pattern, predominantly located on basal and subpleural regions, and represented by honeycombing areas (black arrows in AC), reticulations (white arrows in A, B) and traction bronchiectasis (white empty arrow in B)

NSIP, cellular or more commonly fibrotic, can also be observed on HRCT (Figs. 2, 3) [18]—followed by OP with/without interstitial lung fibrosis, lymphocytic interstitial pneumonia (LIP) pattern, and, infrequently, a desquamative interstitial pneumonia (DIP) pattern [18].

Fig. 2
figure 2

Axial HRCT images of a patient with rheumatoid arthritis. A, B clearly show ground-glass opacities (empty white arrows) and bronchiectasis (white arrows), resembling an NSIP pattern

Fig. 3
figure 3

Axial HRCT images of an NSIP pattern in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis. A, B Ground-glass opacities (empty white arrows) can be appreciated through the pulmonary parenchyma. The heterogeneous distribution of ground glass regions reflects areas of inflammation—alternated to normal lung regions

The histologic landmarks of RA-associated NSIP or UIP are identical to those observed in idiopathic NSIP and UIP, although interstitial lymphoid aggregates—either within alveolar septal walls or associated with small airways—appear more evident. In contrast, the frequency of fibroblast foci is lesser in RA-UIP than in idiopathic UIP [19].

The radiographic appearance consists of a fine reticular pattern, usually involving the lower lung zones and becomes more diffuse during the progression of disease, when also honeycombing and traction bronchiectasis can be depicted [13].

However, some typical HRCT findings may be observed in patients with CTDs-UIP: they include the "anterior upper lobe" sign (Fig. 4), the "exuberant honeycombing" sign (Fig. 5), and the “straight-edge” sign (Fig. 6) [20].

Fig. 4
figure 4

Anterior upper lobe sign in a patient with RA. It consists of a particular fibrosis distribution, most concentrated along the anterior side of the upper lobes; it can be appreciated on axial (black arrows in A, B) and sagittal MPR image (black arrow in C)

Fig. 5
figure 5

Axial (A, C), coronal (B) and sagittal (D) HRCT images demonstrate—in an RA patient—the presence of a florid honeycombing, involving more than 50% of the lung. This finding is typically due to macrocystic spaces (white arrows) and has been defined as “exuberant honeycombing sign”

Fig. 6
figure 6

Coronal multiplanar reformatted images. A, B demonstrate the presence of straight-edge sign in female RA patients showing interstitial lung fibrosis. This sign consists of a more pronounced fibrosis in the lung bases—with sharp demarcation in the cranio-caudal plane (white arrows in A, B)

The anterior upper lobe sign consists of a particular fibrosis distribution, most concentrated along the anterior side of the upper lobes; in some cases, it is associated with a concomitant lower lobe distribution. The so-called exuberant honeycomb-like cyst formation, represented by the presence of hypertrophic pulmonary honeycomb appearance—due to multiple cysts distributed in several layers—is different from the classic honeycomb, which contains cysts ranging from 3 up to 10 mm [21]. This exuberant appearance is reproduced by larger cysts, and very often is not associated with other fibrotic changes in the remaining lung regions. The straight-edge sign consists of an isolated fibrosis predominantly located in the lung bases—with sharp and clear demarcation in the cranio-caudal plane, easily appreciated on coronal reconstructed images (Fig. 6) [20].

Another HRCT feature of RA, considered as a secondary finding in a background of NSIP or UIP, is represented by airway disease, such as obliterative and follicular bronchiolitis [22]. This pulmonary alteration seems to be the earliest manifestation of RA in the lung. More in detail, obliterative bronchiolitis is due to the destruction and fibrotic replacement of the bronchioles, which leads to development of air trapping and reproduces a mosaic attenuation (Fig. 7); follicular bronchiolitis is characterized by the occlusion of bronchioles due to the presence of lymphoid aggregates in their walls, with a centrilobular nodules pattern. Rheumatoid nodules are an uncommon manifestation of RA: they are usually round, well-defined, peripherally located, and may cavitate (Fig. 8).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Airway disease in RA patient, clearly depicted in A, B. Lobular decreased attenuation areas (white empty arrows) are caused by follicular bronchiolitis and obliterative bronchiolitis. This finding represents an early manifestation of disease, due to airway involvement—typically found when no fibrosing alterations are observed

Fig. 8
figure 8

Cavitate nodular lesions (white empty arrows in A, B) in a male RA patient. Rheumatoid nodules represent a rare manifestation of disease; generally, they have bilateral and subpleural location, with rounded shape. The development of cavitation has been reported in literature related to vasculitis. Left pneumothorax (white asterisk) is also evident along the anterior part of the lung

PH commonly occurs in patients with RA, but is usually mild. Other complications of RA include lymphoma, and lung cancer [22].

Systemic sclerosis (SSc)

SSc—also known as scleroderma—is an autoimmune CTD characterized by fibroblast dysfunction and deposition of excessive extracellular matrix, leading to microvascular damage and progressive fibrosis of the skin and internal organs [23]. It is an uncommon disease, with an incidence of approximately 10 cases per million per year; it occurs more frequently in women between 30 and 70 years [13].

According to the extent of skin involvement, SSc has been divided into two forms [24, 25]: (1) limited SSc (skin thickening proximal to elbows and knees, but not involving the trunk), and (2) diffuse SSc (skin thickening of trunk, shoulder, pelvis and face), having also different involvement of internal organs and autoantibody subsets.

In addition to the skin thickening, disease is characterized by a wide spectrum of manifestations—which includes telangiectasias, fingertip ulcers, gastrointestinal diseases, myocardial diseases, and pulmonary involvement [26]. A joint ACR-EULAR (American College of Rheumatology-European League against Rheumatism) committee has developed new classification criteria for SSc diagnosis, based on the application of a point-system score ranging from 9 up to 19. In this classification, main clinical feature is considered the skin thickening of the fingers of both hands that extends proximal to the metacarpophalangeal joints. Other domains include skin thickening of the fingers, fingertip lesions, telangiectasia, abnormal nailfold capillaries, PH and/or ILD, Raynaud Phenomenon, Scleroderma related antibodies—mainly represented by anti-centromere antibodies (ACA) and anti-Scl-70 antibodies [27].

A score of 9 provides a definite diagnosis, and can be obtained with the presence of the main domain only (skin thickening extending proximal to metacarpophalangeal joints), or by the sum of the other clinical and serological domains [27].

Lung involvement

Most common pulmonary manifestations are represented by ILDs—often observed in the diffuse form of SSc [28], and pulmonary arterial hypertension—which may be found more commonly in the limited form of disease, as an isolated finding or in association with lung fibrosis [14, 22]. The prevalence of these manifestations ranges from over 22% (especially for PH) to up to 80% (ILD) [29].

Pulmonary involvement is frequently observed and is associated with high morbidity and mortality [30]. Among patients with collagen vascular disease, those with SSc show the highest mortality, due to the development of pulmonary hypertension—which has a prevalence ranging from 10% up to 16% [31]. ILD development, which shows the highest prevalence in SSc than in other CTDs, represents the main cause of mortality in SSc, being responsible for up to 40% of the causes of death [32, 33]. In other CTDs, the main cause of death is related to cardiovascular disease (RA and Sjogren’s syndrome) [34, 35], infection or malignancy (IIMs) [36].

In contrast with other CTDs, the pulmonary involvement in SSc tends to be limited to the interstitium, with or without vascular involvement; pleural and airways diseases are rarely observed.

As previously reported, a higher risk of ILD can be related to the diffuse form of SSc, and is associated with the presence of antibody profiles. More in detail, the presence of anticentromere antibodies often suggests limited skin involvement and absence of lung involvement, whereas anti-Scl-70 antibodies increase the risk for diffuse skin involvement and scleroderma lung disease [37].

The Th/To and PM-Scl antibodies have been related to the presence of limited skin disease [38]; they represent a marker for the development of hypertension [37]. Additional risk factors for ILD include esophageal dysmotility and gastroesophageal reflux disease. Specific patient features (old age, male gender, lower baseline FVC, and low baseline DLCO), imaging findings (extent of ILD on HRCT) and time of disease (shorter duration of scleroderma before the onset of respiratory symptoms)—seem to be predictive factors of progression and mortality in CTD-SSc [22, 39].

From the clinical point of view, symptoms of SSc-ILD include exertional dyspnea, non-productive cough and fatigue. Generally, the clinical examination reveals “velcro” crackles—which cannot be attributed to other causes. PFTs show a restrictive ventilatory impairment, with a low DLCO value [40].

Radiological features

NSIP is the most common pattern of interstitial fibrosis found in SSc (Fig. 9), confirmed by several recent studies, including the largest one published by Bouros et al. – which recruited a total of 80 SSc-ILD patients [10, 41]. This uniform and diffuse fibrosis frequently involves lower lobes with a predominant posterior and peripheral distribution [31], often sparing the immediate subpleural area (Fig. 10). More in detail, in cases of NSIP pattern we observe a greater proportion of ground-glass opacities (GGOs) and a lower degree of coarse reticulation [42] (Fig. 11); fine reticulations could be appreciated, usually associated with traction bronchiectasis and bronchioloectasis (Fig. 11). Honeycombing, when present, is usually mild—even if when present it should be considered a sign of disease progression, with the replacement of ground-glass areas with honeycomb, and development of “end-stage lung disease” [19, 43]; the “straight-edge” sign is more common in SSc than RA. According to a study by Kim et al., the progression rate of honeycombing in patients with SSc is 0.07% of lung volume per month [44]. Moreover, a recent study found a correlation between PFTs and HRCT features (honeycombing and GGO) during follow-up examinations: in particular, the increase of honeycombing extension seems to be significantly correlated with DLCO decrease [31, 45].

Fig. 9
figure 9

Typical NSIP pattern in an SSc patient. A Ground-glass opacities and fine reticulations (white arrows), predominantly located in peripheral regions; in B, C traction bronchiectasis are also depicted (black arrows)

Fig. 10
figure 10

NSIP pattern with subpleural sparing in a female SSc patient. Axial (A) and sagittal (B) HRCT images demonstrate ground-glass opacities predominantly located in the basal pulmonary regions, with peripheral and subpleural distribution (white arrows). Pulmonary alterations may spare subpleural regions, as well demonstrated in A—namely in the left lower lobe

Fig. 11
figure 11

Axial (A, B) and coronal (C) HRCT images of an SSc patient demonstrate NSIP pattern with ground-glass opacities (black arrows), well depicted in the subpleural and basal regions of the lung; fine reticulations may be also observed. Coronal MPR image is useful to better delineate the presence of small bronchiectasis, which may be seen in the peripheral basal regions (white empty arrows)

Another useful CT finding is represented by the “Four Corners” sign (Fig. 12), defined by the presence of reticular opacities, ground-glass attenuations, and/or honeycombing distributed in the “4 corners regions of the thorax”: the anterolateral regions of mid-upper lobes (from the top of the aortic arch to the carina) and the posterosuperior regions of lower lobes (carina through the inferior pulmonary veins) [29]. In the retrospective HRCT analysis of 116 IPF and 115 SSc-ILD cases published by Walkoff et al. [29], a pattern of focal or disproportionate inflammation and/or fibrosis involving the bilateral anterolateral upper lobes and posterosuperior lower lobes (the four corners sign), was more commonly reported in SSc-ILD patients, with a specificity of 100% and a sensitivity of 16.4% [29].

Fig. 12
figure 12

The Four Corner Sign. This sign is defined by the presence of pulmonary fibrosis in the “4 corners regions of the thorax”—represented by anterolateral regions of mid-upper lobes and the posterosuperior regions of lower lobes. In this SSc patient, honeycomb areas are clearly recognizable in the upper lobes (white circles in A, B) and in the upper parts of lower lobes (white circles in B)

The four corners sign differs from the propeller sign: The latter is represented by a continuous gradient of peripheral fibrosis (honeycomb and/or reticulation) in UIP pattern—with a “propeller blade” distribution on axial images moving posterior to anterior from lung bases toward the apex [46]. Sagittal views may help radiologists in confirming or excluding the focal distribution of these signs, even if a clear differentiation between the four corners sign, anterior upper lobe sign and propeller sign may not be easily achieved. In addition, the low sensitivity reported in the study by Walkoff et al. [29], reduces the real utility of this sign in the differentiation between IPF and secondary fibrotic patterns.

A typical UIP pattern – with honeycombing, lung volume loss, and temporal and spatial heterogeneity of the lesion—may sometimes be seen, being depicted in up to 33% of cases [42]; however, as reported by Bouros et al., it has not been associated with a worse prognosis compared to NSIP [10, 41].

Interestingly, as reported by De Lauretis et al., “non-UIP/non-NSIP patterns”, such as follicular bronchiolitis, diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) and OP patterns, “are quite rare in the context of SSc” [10]; they may be occasionally found on HRCT images.

The PH prevalence is variable, depending on the method of detection; values ranging from 13% up to 35% have been reported using transthoracic Doppler echocardiography [42], and ranging from 8% up to 12% using right heart catheterization [43]. The histological hallmark of this vascular change is represented by concentric intimal thickening due to fibromyxoid tissue and mild medial hypertrophy—leading to thickened and stenotic pulmonary arterioles. The severity of vascular changes is not always proportionally associated with the degree of interstitial fibrosis [19].

Radiological features on chest radiograph or HRCT include enlargement of main and proximal pulmonary arteries (Fig. 13), although a normal-sized pulmonary artery does not exclude the diagnosis. The presence of pericardial thickening or effusion is also a strong predictor of echocardiographic pulmonary hypertension. In 80% of scleroderma cases, dilatation of distal two-thirds of the esophagus is observed [47] (Fig. 14).

Fig. 13
figure 13

A patient with pulmonary hypertension (PH) assessed by chest CT. A Mediastinal window preset of visualization and (B) lung windowing preset of visualization clearly demonstrate the enlargement of the pulmonary trunk (white asterisk); commonly, the main pulmonary artery/ascending aortic/ratio is calculated. Generally, normal values are less than 1.0, whereas in cases of superior values, PH may be suspected

Fig. 14
figure 14

Axial (A, B) and coronal (C) images of an SSc patient. Dilatation of the esophagus is clearly recognizable, being depicted (white empty arrows) in the middle and distal parts of the mediastinum

Most of the patients have relatively limited disease, so they remain stable without treatment. To identify “a progressive pattern”, Goh et al. introduced a staging system based on the assessment of disease severity [48]. A semiquantitative HRCT analysis allows classifying patients in extensive or limited disease—depending on whether CT extent is deemed to be greater or less than 20%, respectively. Only if this division is uncertain, PFTs play a role in assessing the degree of disease severity, according to whether FVC is lower or higher than 70% of predicted [48].

Polymyositis (PM) and dermatomyositis (DM)

PM and DM are autoimmune inflammatory diseases, characterized by proximal muscle weakness, systemic involvement and specific cutaneous manifestations [49]; their incidence ranges from 1.2 to 66 new cases per 1,000,000 person-years, with female predilection [50].

According to a variable degree of muscle inflammation and systemic involvement, the appropriate term to define these conditions is idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs)—a group of CTDs which may also include the antisynthetase syndrome (ASSD) [51].

Diagnostic criteria for IIMs, firstly proposed by Bohan and Peter, include: (1) symmetric proximal muscle weakness, (2) serum elevation of the skeletal muscle enzymes such as creatine kinase (CK), (3) characteristic electromyography alterations, (4) muscle biopsy with evidence of necrosis and (5) typical skin manifestations for DM, such as heliotrope rash and Gottron papule [52, 53].

Lung involvement

Pulmonary involvement, and namely ILDs, are the most common non-musculoskeletal manifestations of IIMs [51]. Lung involvement occurs in 30–66% of patients with myositis, and represents the major cause of morbidity and mortality [10]; as reported by Vacchi et al., “ILD results often in decreased quality of life and increased utilization of healthcare services” [54]. In these CTDs, it may manifest in one or more of three forms:

  1. 1.

    Hypoventilation and respiratory failure due to the involvement of the respiratory muscles;

  2. 2.

    Interstitial pneumonitis, usually showing NSIP pattern or OP pattern;

  3. 3.

    Aspiration pneumonia—secondary to pharyngeal muscle weakness (the most common pulmonary complication) [13, 55].

Other pulmonary complications, such as hypertension and pneumomediastinum, have been less frequently described in patients with myositis [56].

The prevalence of IIM-ILDs ranges from 20 to 78%—depending on methods of ascertainment and patient selection [14]. The ILD development usually may precede the onset of clinical myositis, and is associated with increased mortality [56]. Therefore, risk factors for ILD development should be early identified: older age, presence of arthritis/arthralgia, “mechanic’s hands”, ulceration and elevated levels of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein, are all associated with increased risk of ILD [57, 58]. Furthermore, autoantibodies against aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (anti-synthetases) have been strongly linked to ILD; namely, anti-histidyl-tRNA synthetase (Anti-Jo1) antibodies is the most common anti-synthetases, depicted in 25–40% of patients with PM/DM, and in 30–75% of the ILD subgroup. Also, serum levels of KL-6, a marker of epithelial cell damage/regeneration used to monitor disease activity, have also been considered a predictive factor for ILD development [56]. Respiratory symptoms may develop after, concomitantly, or before the onset of muscle and skin manifestations, occurring at any time during the course of the diseases [59].

The overall clinical course in patients with IIMs-ILD can be quite variable, ranging from subclinical to rapidly progressive forms [14]; progression is more likely observed in patients with lower FVC and symptomatic disease [56].

In symptomatic ILDs, two main clinical scenarios may be encountered: (a) pulmonary infiltrates with rapidly progressive dyspnea and frequent evolution into respiratory failure; (b) insidious onset of dyspnea with radiological abnormalities that represent the most common pattern.

When ILD is the only pulmonary manifestation, PFTs may show a moderate restrictive pattern, with decreased values of DLCO and FVC. The concomitant presence of respiratory muscle inflammation, especially diaphragmatic weakness, can also result in changes in PFTs [56]; however, when the muscle strength is less than 50%, a reduced lung volume may be found [10].

Radiological features

Most frequent ILD patterns—associated with PM or DM are represented by NSIP (Figs. 15, 16), OP (Fig. 17) and DAD [55]. However, patients with antiJo-1 antibodies may exhibit UIP pattern: in these cases, a differential diagnosis with IPF can be challenging—namely if myositis is clinically absent. To provide a correct diagnosis, an accurate serological assessment is required [51]. Histologic appearance is helpful in determining the prognosis: patients with DAD or UIP have a poor prognosis, with only a 33% survival rate at 5 years; patients with OP and/or NSIP patterns have, respectively, excellent and good prognosis [13].

Fig. 15
figure 15

NSIP pattern in a patient with PM. Subpleural reticulations are located in the subpleural regions, namely located in the right lung (white curved arrows in A. Ground-glass opacifications and reticulations are demonstrated through the lung, predominantly located in the basal right lung and in the middle lobe (white arrows in B), with small bronchiectasis included

Fig. 16
figure 16

NSIP pattern in a patient with PM. HRCT features include reticulations superimposed on ground-glass opacifications, as clearly depicted in the middle lobe (white arrows); traction bronchiectasis (empty white arrow) can also be appreciated in the same area. Subpleural reticulations are also evident in B, in the basal part of the right lung (empty white arrows)

Fig. 17
figure 17

Axial (A, B) and coronal (C) HRCT of a PM-DM patient, showing OP pattern. AC Peripheral and bronchocentric consolidations (black arrows); the “air bronchogram sign” is clearly recognizable. Follow-up HRCT images (DF) demonstrate the typical evolution of organizing form, with tendency to migration and location changing (empty white arrows)

At chest radiographs, parenchymal abnormalities include the presence of a reticular pattern, with basal and symmetric distributions [60]; bilateral areas of consolidations may develop in some patients, suggesting superimposed DAD and/or OP patterns [13].

ILDs associated with PM/DM or ASSD syndrome are often characterized by a typical HRCT appearance, which consists of confluent GGO areas and consolidations located in the lower lobes, and superimposed on a reticular pattern with traction bronchiectasis; honeycombing is a rare manifestation, being identified in up to 16% of patients who have abnormal chest radiographic findings or pulmonary function [13]. This appearance reflects the histologic combination of OP and fibrotic NSIP [61] (Fig. 18).

Fig. 18
figure 18

OP and NSIP pattern in a clinical case of antisynthetase syndrome. Bronchiectasis are clearly seen in the dorsal region of the right lung (white empty arrows in A); small linear opacities and lines (white arrows) are also appreciable in A. Subtle consolidations resembling a perilobular distribution are well depicted in B (white arrows)

OP pattern can also be revealed as an isolated manifestation: it is defined by the presence of focal granulation tissue in the alveoli and their ducts, which progressively leads to the obstruction of the smaller airways. On HRCT images, it is characterized by patchy areas of ground glass opacities or consolidations, generally showing more alveolar and less bronchocentric distribution—in comparison to OP not associated with IIMs [62].

In some cases, the "reverse halo" sign is reproduced, with central ground-glass opacities surrounded by parenchymal consolidations (Fig. 19) [22].

Fig. 19
figure 19

Reverse halo sign or “atoll sign” in a patient with OP. HCRT images show circular consolidations surrounding normal parenchyma (white arrows in AC)

DAD is characterized on HRCT by diffuse ground-glass opacities and extensive consolidations (Fig. 20); it is associated with a very poor prognosis [10]. Other rare manifestations of ILD associated with PM-DM include pleuritis, airway involvement, and vasculitis [19].

Fig. 20
figure 20

A 62-year-old man with acute respiratory failure. He referred Gottron papules and acral cutaneous ulcerations one month previously; laboratory exams revealed increased Creatine-Phosphokinase levels (800 u/l) and presence of Anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (MDA5) antibodies. Diffuse ground-glass opacifications (white asterisks in AC) and small consolidations (white arrows in A, C) are depicted, suggesting HRCT features of diffuse alveolar damage

Lung biopsy is not usually performed in patients with PM/DM-ILD, in view of its limited usefulness in the diagnosis and management of the disease [56]. Bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) can be helpful in patients undergoing immunosuppressive treatment in order to exclude infection [10].

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

SLE is a chronic autoimmune multisystem disorder of unknown etiology that may affect almost any organ—joints, skin, kidneys, serosa, vessels and the central nervous system; it shows an incidence of 2–3 cases per year per 100,000 persons [63, 64]. Most commonly depicted in young women [13], SLE is characterized by the production of antinuclear antibodies (ANA). Other common serological abnormalities include anti-dsDNA antibodies (76%), hypocomplementemia (71%), and anti-Ro and/or anti-SS-A antibodies (35%) [65].

This disease may have a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations: rheumatological, dermatological, and renal abnormalities are commonly observed as well as pulmonary involvement. The latter may occur with a wide range, being found in 20–90% of patients with SLE [66].

Lung involvement

All pulmonary compartments may be affected: pleura (pleural effusion), lung parenchyma (acute pneumonitis, respiratory infections and ILD), respiratory muscles and pulmonary vessel (acute pulmonary hemorrhage). While acute pulmonary lesions (pulmonary hemorrhage and acute lupus pneumonitis) are usually associated with high levels of systemic lupus activity, chronic pulmonary forms of disease—such as interstitial pneumonitis and fibrosis—can progress independently of other organ involvement [65]. Even if pulmonary disease is not included among the diagnostic criteria, lung involvement, namely in the chronic form, has an important negative effect on prognosis. Furthermore, an increased risk of respiratory infections has been related to some SLE therapies [66].

In contrast with the high prevalence of pleuritis and acute pulmonary manifestations (50–60%), fibrotic ILD is less commonly found in SLE than in the other collagen tissue diseases, occurring only in a range of 1–15% of patients [22]. It is considered an unusual finding, and also clinical progression is usually slow, remaining often a stable disease [65]. Risk factors for ILDs include: older age at the initial presentation (> 50 years old), longstanding disease (> 10 years), and the presence of overlapping clinical features with scleroderma—such as Raynaud’s phenomenon, sclerodactyly, abnormal nailfold capillaries and anti-ribonucleoprotein (RNP) antibodies [66]. Hypocomplementemia, high levels of C-reactive protein, and the presence of cryoglobulins or lupus erythematosus cells in the serum have been also associated with increased risk of ILD development. Finally, the interstitial disease may represent a sequel of acute lupus pneumonitis/DAD pattern [10].

A minority of patients with SLE (3–8%) have a clinically significant ILD, with symptoms such as dyspnea and cough that are similar in most types of ILD [22]. In the absence of respiratory symptoms, the diagnosis is usually incidental, achieved through the recognition of radiological findings on chest imaging examination, or through the identification of abnormal lung function tests [66]. PFTs may show a restrictive pattern of disease and, most commonly, a DLCO reduction is observed [65].

Radiological features

Pleural involvement could be observed with radiological signs of pleuritis and/or effusion; parenchymal manifestations may be radiologically revealed as pulmonary infections, chronic interstitial lung disease, acute lupus pneumonitis (ALP), and diffuse alveolar hemorrhage (DAH) [67]. In a previous study by Kinder et al., the etiology of pulmonary infections has been related to bacterial pathogens in 75% of cases, mycobacteria in 12%, fungi in 7%, and virus in 5% [67, 68].

Considering the chronic interstitial disease—as with other CTDs—NSIP represents the most frequent radiological and pathological pattern encountered, followed by LIP and OP; the UIP pattern is very uncommonly reported [51]. Bronchiolitis obliterans has been also reported as the initial manifestation of SLE [69].

Some studies have described the presence of mononuclear or lymphocytic interstitial and peribronchiolar infiltrates, which are associated—with variable intensity—in a cellular NSIP pattern having lesser degrees of fibrosis [19].

Radiographic evidence of interstitial fibrosis—characterized by a reticular pattern, predominantly in the lower lobes—is seen in only about 3% of LES patients. Instead, HRCT interstitial abnormalities are seen in 30% of patients; they are often relatively mild and non-specific, with thickening of interlobular and intralobular septa and parenchymal bands being the most frequently observed [22]. Honeycombing is uncommonly seen in SLE. Other findings include GGO and consolidations, reflecting not only the presence of a wide spectrum of patterns such as interstitial fibrosis, but also the presence of ALP, DAH, or OP [13].

ALP is a rare and fatal form that can be the initial presenting form of SLE; it may be seen concurrently in the context of an active lupus nephritis [66]. It is characterized by a variable degree of respiratory impairment with fever, cough, dyspnea, pleuritic and chest pain; on HRCT, it can be revealed by the presence of focal or diffuse pulmonary consolidations (Fig. 21), often indistinguishable from severe infection and acute respiratory distress syndrome [22]. It is likely that the majority of cases represent DAD and/or DAH [10]. Unfortunately, about 50–100% of patients who survive the acute episode, will progress to chronic interstitial pneumonitis [65].

Fig. 21
figure 21

A 37-year-old patient with ALP, characterized by dyspnea, fever and pleuritic pain; on HRCT images (A, B), bilateral pleural effusions (black arrows) and right lower lobe consolidation (black asterisk) are clearly recognizable

DAH is a relatively rare but severe lung manifestation (1.5% of SLE patients) (Fig. 22) [10]. Similar to ALP, it is characterized by an abrupt onset of dyspnea, fever and cough, hemoptysis at presentation, with a specific sudden decrease of hemoglobin. HRCT features are comparable to ALP, showing bilateral consolidations and/or ground-glass opacities. BAL is diagnostic, identifying high neutrophil count, serosanguinous fluid, and hemosiderin-laden macrophages within the lavage [70].

Fig. 22
figure 22

DAH in a patient with LSD. Images (A, B) show diffuse bilateral consolidations and ground-glass opacities

Other complications of SLE may include diaphragmatic dysfunction, PH and pulmonary thromboembolism.

Diaphragmatic dysfunction, an uncommon manifestation of SLE, could be related to a reduction of diaphragmatic strength, diaphragm fibrosis, and phrenic nerve palsy. It is manifested by reduced lung volume, reproducing what is known as “the shrinking lung syndrome” [71]. As reported by Mathai et al., risk factors include longer disease duration, presence of anti-RNP antibodies, and history of pleuritis [14]. Patients with shrinking lung syndrome often present dyspnea and chest pain; in these cases, PFTs show a restrictive pattern. Radiographic findings may be aspecific, with elevation of diaphragm and basal atelectasis—but no evidence of ILD or pleural disease [66].

PH occurs in SLE female patients—typically under the age of 40 years; risk factors include the presence of serositis, interstitial disease, Raynaud’s phenomenon, anticardiolipin and anti-U1 RNP antibodies [72]. Dyspnea during exercise is often the first symptom and PFTs may show reduced values; however, the gold standard for diagnosis is right heart catheterization [65]. HRCT is useful to exclude other diseases such as ILD, often showing enlarged pulmonary vessels and compromised pulmonary/aorta ratio.

Pulmonary thromboembolism may be found in those patients with SLE: there is a direct correlation between antiphospholipid (APL) antibodies levels to lupus anticoagulant activity and inhibition of activated protein C, thereby producing a prothrombotic effect and increasing the risk of a thromboembolic event [73]. Clinically, patients may present with sudden onset pleuritic chest pain, dyspnea or hypoxemia. Computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) may reveal filling defects of the main arterial pulmonary branches, or segmental and subsegmental pulmonary vessels.

Sjögren syndrome (SS)

SS, also known as “sicca syndrome”, is a chronic inflammatory autoimmune disease of the exocrine glands, caused by parenchymal lymphocytic infiltration; the disease is characterized by xerostomia and xerophthalmia [74].

This disease is relatively common, and has been found in 0.1% of the population; it has been distinguished in primary or secondary SS, depending on whether it is associated or not with other CTDs—most commonly RA, SLE and SSc [13]. In a retrospective study from the United States, the annual incidence reported for primary SS was 3.9 per 100,000 [75, 76].

A diagnosis of SS is based on the weighted sum of 5 items, which include: (1) labial salivary glands with focal lymphocytic sialadenitis (weight 3 points); (2) identification of anti-nuclear antibodies against ribonucleoproteins Ro/SSA (weight 3 points); (3) ocular staining score ≥ 5 in at least 1 eye (weight 1 point); (4) Schirmer’s test ≤ 5 mm/5 min in at least 1 eye (weight 1 point); (5) unstimulated saliva flow rate ≤ 0.1 ml/min (weight 1 point). According to this ACR-EULAR 2016 Classification Criteria, diagnosis of Sjögren Syndrome is achieved in patients having a score ≥ 4 [77].

Extra-glandular and systemic manifestations involve kidney, central nervous system and lung; the presence of the latter is associated with a fourfold increased risk of mortality after 10 years of the disease [14, 74].

Lung involvement

The prevalence of pulmonary involvement in SS ranges from 9 to 75%, depending on inclusion criteria and on the detection method employed [74]. More in detail, the prevalence of clinically significant lung involvement ranges from 9 to 24%, according to the different studies reported in the paper by Mathai et al. [14]; however, about 75% of asymptomatic patients show abnormalities on pulmonary function tests, BAL, and HRCT [78,79,80]. Pulmonary manifestations in SS are rarely the presenting feature and usually develop late in the course of the disease, similar to RA and SLE [14].

Lung involvement includes a wide spectrum of airways (as follicular bronchiolitis, common findings) and interstitial abnormalities [79, 80], and lymphoproliferative disorders [10, 81].

SS-related ILD is a common manifestation; it is associated with an increase in mortality, which seems to be related to the baseline arterial partial pressure of oxygen, and to the presence of honeycombing on HRCT [74]. According to some studies, smoking, male sex, long disease evolution, systemic manifestations, and the presence of anti-Sjogren’s syndrome-related antigen A (SSA) antibodies (also called anti-Ro or anti-SSA/Ro antibodies) have been identified as main risk factors for lung disease [74].

Radiological features

NSIP is the most frequent subtype of ILD in SS, with a prevalence of 28–61% [14]. In the past, early studies have reported LIP as the main form of ILD. However, in a case series published in literature, only 17% of patients with Sjögren have shown a pattern of LIP histologically. This recent change—regarding the most frequent pattern, could be related to the revisions of diagnostic criteria for LIP, with a reclassification as LIP of some cases of cellular NSIP; in addition, others previously classified as LIP, would now be considered as low-grade lymphoma [10, 14].

Histologically, LIP is characterized by a diffuse interstitial and peribronchiolar infiltration of lymphoplasma cells that significantly expands the alveolar septa [81].

After the NSIP and LIP pattern, SS-ILD may reproduce an appearance of OP; UIP, in a minority of cases, may also be observed.

Parenchymal abnormalities are evident at chest radiography in 10–30% of patients, with a reticulonodular pattern that involves mainly the lower lung zones [13].

HRCT abnormalities findings have been described in a range of 34–50% of cases; main radiological patterns include ground-glass attenuation areas, reticular opacities and consolidations—while honeycombing occurs infrequently [82]. An HRCT pattern consistent with NSIP has been found to be highly correlated with a histological NSIP pattern, so that a surgical biopsy is not required. In other cases, a typical HRCT pattern of LIP may be observed; it includes GGO—reflecting the lymphocytic infiltration, thin-walled peribronchovascular cysts and centrilobular and subpleural nodules (Fig. 23). The pulmonary nodules (Fig. 24) may be explained by the presence of lymphocytic bronchiolitis; thickening of the bronchovascular bundles is also observed, related to the expansion of the interstitial tissue by lymphoplasma cell infiltration [81]; these nodules, due to the peribronchovascular locations, may determinate inhomogeneous lung attenuation, due to air-trapping mechanisms. (Fig. 25). Cysts may have a typical peribronchovascular or peripheral location, being detected along peribronchovascular bundles (Fig. 26) or subpleural mediastinal regions (Fig. 27). Unfortunately, an LIP pattern is not clearly distinguishable from malignant lymphoma, which occurs approximately in 20% of patients with SS. To achieve a differential diagnosis, radiologists should consider other radiological features—such as consolidations, large nodules (11–30 mm) or pleural effusions; all these signs have been associated with lymphoma (Fig. 28) [83].

Fig. 23
figure 23

LIP pattern in a 77-year-old female patient. A, B Ground-glass opacifications superimposed on a reticular pattern (white arrows in A)—reflecting the lymphocytic infiltration; there are also thin-walled peribronchovascular cysts (white curved arrow in A) and centrilobular and subpleural nodules (black arrows in B)

Fig. 24
figure 24

Pulmonary nodules and reticulations in a pattern LIP. Nodules (white empty arrows in A, B) may be reproduced in LIP patients, due to the presence of lymphocytic bronchiolitis, with thickening of the bronchovascular bundles

Fig. 25
figure 25

LIP pattern with inhomogeneous attenuation of pulmonary parenchyma. Nodules, due to the peribronchovascular locations, may reproduce inhomogeneous lung attenuation, due to air-trapping mechanisms (white empty arrows in A, C)

Fig. 26
figure 26

Typical peribronchovascular locations of cysts in a female patient with SS. Cysts—sharply demarcated and thin-walled—are distributed along peribronchovascular structures (white empty arrows in AC); they may be not associated with other pulmonary findings

Fig. 27
figure 27

A 77-year-old man with diagnosis of Sjöegren, achieved from histological samples of parotid glands. Cystic spaces are clearly depicted through the lung regions, with anterior and subpleural mediastinal location (black arrows in A, B). Peripheral cystic areas have been associated with perilymphatic distribution of disease

Fig. 28
figure 28

A 77-old-year female patient affected by SS. After a chest radiograph—which showed pulmonary consolidations—she underwent a CT examination. A, B Right and left pulmonary consolidations are depicted (black arrows in the middle and left lower lobes); B a ground-glass attenuation area, with small nodules, is also demonstrated (empty white arrow). On mediastinal windowing level, the consolidations have homogenous density, appearing as soft attenuation masses (white arrows in C). A CT scan acquired at the cervical level, clearly demonstrate enlarged nodes in the supraclavicular spaces (white empty arrows in D); histological samples confirmed the development of a lymphoma in this SS patient. Consolidations, large nodules (> 1 cm) or pleural effusions; all these signs have been associated with lymphoma

Mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD)

MCTD has been defined “overlap syndrome”, since it is characterized by a mixture of signs and symptoms of SSc, PM and SLE; these clinical conditions may be revealed together, or sequentially during observation [84]. MCTD can affect all ages, with a peak incidence reached around the age of 40 years [85].

The first definition of MCTD as a separate CTD was introduced in 1972 by Sharp [86]; however, some rheumatologists believe that MCTD does not represent an overlap syndrome—but an early and unspecific phase of an evolving, more distinct CTD [19].

Diagnosis of MCTD should be considered in patients having positive anti-U1 RNP antibodies and presenting clinical manifestations such as Raynaud's phenomenon and diffuse hand edema (“puffy hands”); these patients, however, do not meet all the diagnostic criteria of other CTDs (SSc, PM and SLE) [19]. Patients must have at least two of the following clinical features: arthritis, myositis, leukopenia, esophageal dysmotility, pleuritis, pericarditis, ILD or PH [10, 85].

Lung involvement

A large number of patients with MCTD have pulmonary involvement; however, in the majority of cases, patients show relatively mild disease, and many are asymptomatic [87, 88].

According to Narula et al., approximately 50% of patients with MCTD develop a radiologic ILD pattern [89]. The presence of dysphagia is associate with ILD in MCTD patients; some case reports have also described associations between Raynaud’s phenomenon and development of ILD [90].

Radiological features

In patients with MCTD, the main radiological abnormalities resemble those seen in SLE, SS, and PM; thus, HRCT findings are heterogeneous [90] and most frequent alterations include interstitial pneumonitis and fibrosis (fibrotic NSIP), PH, pleural and pericardial effusion [28].

As in the other CTDs, ILD is associated with an increased risk of mortality [51] and its course is usually SSc-like; the progression is slow in the majority of patients.

Severe fibrosis has been associated with older age, but not with length of diagnosis or smoking. The positivity of anti-Ro52 antibodies can also be related to a severe degree of fibrosis, similarly to what happens in SS-ILD [84].

The most common radiological pattern is NSIP (Fig. 29), with predominant ground-glass attenuations; UIP is also common as interstitial pattern in patients having MCTD. In a recent case series, interstitial diseases varied from interstitial pneumonitis with bronchiectasis, to more specific NSIP pattern and UIP pattern [89].

Fig. 29
figure 29

A NSIP pattern in a female patient with diagnosis of MCTD. HRCT show ground-glass areas (white and black empty arrows) in figures A and B. Reticulations and small cystic areas are also evident, in this fibrosing pattern

Reticulations and bronchiectasis—signs of interstitial pneumonitis—are typically reported in these patients (Fig. 30); honeycombing, consolidations, and poorly defined centrilobular nodules are less commonly encountered [22]; in some cases, OP and DAD have been occasionally described in MCTD patients, and may be related to an acute exacerbation of disease [19]. Lastly, other important complications of MCTD include PH, vasculitis, pulmonary thromboembolism and esophageal dysmotility [91].

Fig. 30
figure 30

A 70-year-old man with MCTD, positive for ANCA antibodies. HRCT images show reticulations (black arrows in A, B) and bronchiectasis, with irregular course through the lung (white empty arrows), and cystic appearance, clearly recognizable in the basal regions in C


Pulmonary manifestations may be heterogeneous in CTDs, and ILDs are not the only alterations which can be found on imaging. All pulmonary compartments—such as airways, interstitium, pulmonary vessels and pleura may be interested, namely in RA, SSc and SS diseases. The heterogeneous lung involvement leads to “a broad spectra of clinical manifestations” [32], which may be not easily recognized by clinicians and radiologists.

Most frequent ILD patterns found on imaging are represented by UIP and NSIP; however, some other radiological scenarios—including OP and LIP—may be found, respectively, in PM/DM or ASSD, or in patients with Sjögren.

Drug induced diseases and/or aspiration pneumonia could be the radiological abnormalities found in PM/DM.

A classification—based on radiological involvement of pulmonary compartments—should be adopted by radiologists: a differentiation between CTDs with and without ILDs, should be considered of crucial significance—since some patterns of ILDs are related to disease severity and disease progression [92]. Among CTD-ILDs, it can be useful to distinguish clearly diseases which may reproduce UIP pattern on HRCT: in several studies, same IPF-like behaviors have been reported in RA or Interstitial Pneumonitis with Autoimmune Features (IPAF) having UIP patterns on imaging, or showing honeycombing on images. In this regard, a future classification based on radiological features—indicating bad worse prognosis or progressive phenotype—is needed.

In some CTDs, radiological abnormalities are not specific—so that a multidisciplinary approach is strongly recommended: a combination of serological markers, clinical findings and radiological features is required to achieve a correct and prompt diagnosis. In addition, research studies are needed to recognize serological and radiological markers—in order to predict disease progression in early phases; in this regard, the identification of progressive radiological abnormalities is mandatory, in order to introduce therapeutic options for patients with progressive phenotype ILDs. In the near future, quantitative CT will probably play an important role, increasing the identification of patients with ILD progression, characterized by increased extent of fibrosis on HRCT not clearly appreciable on radiological images.



Anticentromere antibodies


American College of Rheumatology-European League against Rheumatism


Acute lupus pneumonitis




Antinuclear antibodies


Antisynthetase syndrome


Bronchoalveolar lavage


Cyclic citrullinated peptide


Creatine kinase


Connective tissue diseases


Computed tomography pulmonary angiogram


Diffuse alveolar damage


Diffuse alveolar hemorrhage


Desquamative interstitial pneumonia


Diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide




Forced vital capacity


Ground-glass opacities


High resolution computed tomography


Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies


Interstitial lung abnormalities


Interstitial lung diseases


Interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features


Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis


Lymphocytic interstitial pneumonia


Mixed connective tissue diseases


Non-specific interstitial pneumonia


Organizing pneumonia


Pulmonary function tests


Pulmonary hypertension




Rheumatoid arthritis


Rheumatoid factor




Lupus erythematosus systemic


Sjögren syndrome


Sjogren’s syndrome-related antigen


Systemic sclerosis


Usual interstitial pneumonia


  1. Spagnolo P, Cordier JF, Cottin V (2016) Connective tissue diseases, multimorbidity and the ageing lung. Eur Respir J 47:1535–1558.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wells AU, Denton CP (2014) Interstitial lung disease in connective tissue disease—mechanisms and management. Nat Rev Rheumatol 10:728–739.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fischer A, du Bois RM (2012) Interstitial lung disease in connective tissue disorders. Lancet 380:689–698.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mira-Avendano I, Abril A, Burger CD et al (2019) Interstitial lung disease and other pulmonary manifestations in connective tissue diseases. Mayo Clin Proc 94:309–325.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Strand MJ, Sprunger D, Cosgrove GP et al (2014) Pulmonary function and survival in idiopathic vs secondary usual interstitial pneumonia. Chest 146:775–785.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. George PM, Spagnolo P, Kreuter M et al (2020) Progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease: clinical uncertainties, consensus recommendations, and research priorities. Lancet Respir Med 8:925–934.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cottin V, Hirani NA, Hotchkin DL et al (2018) Presentation, diagnosis and clinical course of the spectrum of progressive-fibrosing interstitial lung diseases. Eur Respir Rev 27(150):180076.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wells AU, Flaherty KR, Brown KK et al (2020) Nintedanib in patients with progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases—subgroup analyses by interstitial lung disease diagnosis in the INBUILD trial: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial. Lancet Respir Med 8:453–460.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kvien TK, Uhlig T, Ødegård S, Heiberg MS (2006) Epidemiological aspects of rheumatoid arthritis: the sex ratio. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1069:212–222.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. De Lauretis A, Veeraraghavan S, Renzoni E (2011) Review series: Aspects of interstitial lung disease: connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease: how does it differ from IPF? How should the clinical approach differ? Chron Respir Dis 8:53–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Messina R, Guggino G, Benfante A, Scichilone N (2020) Interstitial lung disease in elderly rheumatoid arthritis patients. Drugs Aging 37:11–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shaw M, Collins BF, Ho LA, Raghu G (2015) Rheumatoid arthritis-associated lung disease. Eur Respir Rev 24:1–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim EA, Lee KS, Johkoh T et al (2002) Interstitial lung diseases associated with collagen vascular diseases: radiologic and histopathologic findings. Radiographics.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mathai SC, Danoff SK (2016) Management of interstitial lung disease associated with connective tissue disease. BMJ 352:h6819.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Wuyts WA, Cavazza A, Rossi G, Bonella F, Sverzellati N, Spagnolo P (2014) Differential diagnosis of usual interstitial pneumonia: when is it truly idiopathic? Eur Respir Rev 23:308–319.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. O’Donnell DE, Ora J, Webb KA, Laveneziana P, Jensen D (2009) Mechanisms of activity-related dyspnea in pulmonary diseases. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 167:116–132.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gabbay E, Tarala R, Will R et al (1997) Interstitial lung disease in recent onset rheumatoid arthritis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 156:528–535.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim EJ, Collard HR, King TE Jr (2009) Rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease: the relevance of histopathologic and radiographic pattern. Chest 136:1397–1405.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Vivero M, Padera RF (2015) Histopathology of lung disease in the connective tissue diseases. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 41:197–211.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chung JH, Cox CW, Montner SM et al (2018) CT features of the usual interstitial pneumonia pattern: differentiating connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease from idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 210:307–313.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hansell DM, Bankier AA, MacMahon H, McLoud TC, Müller NL, Remy J (2008) Fleischner society: glossary of terms for thoracic imaging. Radiology 246:697–722.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lynch DA (2009) Lung disease related to collagen vascular disease. J Thorac Imaging 24:299–309.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Derk CT, Jimenez SA (2003) Systemic sclerosis: current views of its pathogenesis. Autoimmun Rev 2:181–191.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. LeRoy EC, Black C, Fleischmajer R et al (1988) Scleroderma (systemic sclerosis): classification, subsets and pathogenesis. J Rheumatol 15:202–205

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sobolewski P, Maślińska M, Wieczorek M et al (2019) Systemic sclerosis—multidisciplinary disease: clinical features and treatment. Reumatologia 57:221–233.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Silver RM (1991) Clinical aspects of systemic sclerosis (scleroderma). Ann Rheum Dis 50(Suppl 4):854–861.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. van den Hoogen F, Khanna D, Fransen J et al (2013) 2013 classification criteria for systemic sclerosis: an American College of Rheumatology/European League against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum 65:2737–2747.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Papiris SA, Manali ED, Kolilekas L et al (2015) Investigation of lung involvement in connective tissue disorders. Respiration 90:2–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Walkoff L, White DB, Chung JH, Asante D, Cox CW (2018) The four corners sign: a specific imaging feature in differentiating systemic sclerosis-related interstitial lung disease from idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. J Thorac Imaging 33:197–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hassoun PM (2011) Lung involvement in systemic sclerosis. Presse Med 40(1 Pt 2):e3–e17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lange SM, Parekh M (2021) Collagen-vascular disease associated with interstitial lung. [Updated 2021 Jun 17]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021 Jan-.

  32. Shao T, Shi X, Yang S et al (2021) Interstitial lung disease in connective tissue disease: a common lesion with heterogeneous mechanisms and treatment considerations. Front Immunol 12:684699.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Steen VD, Medsger TA (2007) Changes in cause of death in systemic sclerosis, 1972–2002. Ann Rheum Dis 66:940–944.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Widdifield J, Paternson JM, Huang A, Bernatsky S (2018) Causes of death in rheumatoid arthritis: how do they compare to the general population? Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 70:1748–1755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Singh AG, Singh S, Matteson EL (2016) Rate, risk factors and cause of mortality in patients with Sjogren’s syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Rheumatology (Oxford) 55:450–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Dobloug GC, Svensson J, Lundberg IE, Holmqvist M (2018) Mortality in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy: resultsfrom a Swedish nationwide population-based cohort study. Ann Rheum Dis 77:40–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ho KT, Reveille JD (2003) The clinical relevance of autoantibodies in scleroderma. Arthritis Res Ther 5:80–93.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Kuwana M, Kimura K, Hirakata M, Kawakami Y, Ikeda Y (2020) Differences in autoantibody response to Th/To between systemic sclerosis and other autoimmune diseases. Ann Rheum Dis 61:842–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Volkmann ER, Tashkin DP, Sim M, Kim GH, Goldin J, Clements PJ (2019) Determining progression of scleroderma-related interstitial lung disease. J Scleroderma Rel Disord 4:62–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Ciancio N, Pavone M, Torrisi SE et al (2019) Contribution of pulmonary function tests (PFTs) to the diagnosis and follow up of connective tissue diseases. Multidiscip Respir Med 14:17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Bouros D, Wells AU, Nicholson AG et al (2002) Histopathologic subsets of fibrosing alveolitis in patients with systemic sclerosis and their relationship to outcome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 165:1581–1586.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Solomon JJ, Olson AL, Fischer A, Bull T, Brown KK, Raghu G (2013) Scleroderma lung disease. Eur Respir Rev 22:6–19.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Saygin D, Domsic RT (2019) Pulmonary arterial hypertension in systemic sclerosis: challenges in diagnosis, screening and treatment. Open Access Rheumatol 11:323–333.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Kim EA, Johkoh T, Lee KS et al (2001) Interstitial pneumonia in progressive systemic sclerosis: serial high-resolution CT findings with functional correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 25:757–763.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Akira M, Sakatani M, Ueda E (1993) Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: progression of honeycombing at thin-section CT. Radiology 189:687–691.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Devaraj A (2014) Imaging: how to recognise idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Eur Respir Rev 23:215–219.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Bhalla M, Silver RM, Shepard JA, McLoud TC (1993) Chest CT in patients with scleroderma: prevalence of asymptomatic esophageal dilatation and mediastinal lymphadenopathy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 161:269–272.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Goh NS, Desai SR, Veeraraghavan S et al (2008) Interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis: a simple staging system. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 177:1248–1254.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Lundberg I, Chung Y (2000) Treatment and investigation of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Rheumatology (Oxford) 39(1):7–17.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Svensson J, Arkema EV, Lundberg IE, Holmqvist M (2017) Incidence and prevalence of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies in Sweden: a nationwide population-based study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 56:802–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Vacchi C, Sebastiani M, Cassone G et al (2020) Therapeutic options for the treatment of interstitial lung disease related to connective tissue diseases. A narrative review. J Clin Med 9:407.

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Bohan A, Peter JB (1975) Polymyositis and dermatomyositis (first of two parts). N Engl J Med 292:344–347.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Bohan A, Peter JB (1975) Polymyositis and dermatomyositis (second of two parts). N Engl J Med 292:403–307.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Vacchi C, Manfredi A, Cassone G, Erre GL, Salvarani C, Sebastiani M (2021) Efficacy and safety of rituximab in the treatment of connective tissue disease-related interstitial lung disease. Drugs Context.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Kalluri M, Oddis CV (2010) Pulmonary manifestations of the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Clin Chest Med 31:501–512.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Long K, Danoff SK (2019) Interstitial lung disease in polymyositis and dermatomyositis. Clin Chest Med 40:561–572.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Zhang L, Wu G, Gao D et al (2016) Factors associated with interstitial lung disease in patients with polymyositis and dermatomyositis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 11(5):e0155381.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Cen X, Zuo C, Yang M, Yin G, Xie Q (2013) A clinical analysis of risk factors for interstitial lung disease in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathy. Clin Dev Immunol 2013:648570.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Atluri RB (2016) Inflammatory myopathies. Mo Med 113:127–130

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Miller SA, Glassberg MK, Ascherman DP (2015) Pulmonary complications of inflammatory myopathy. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 41:249–262.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Saketkoo LA, Ascherman DP, Cottin V et al (2010) Interstitial lung disease in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy. Curr Rheumatol Rev 6:108–119.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Shappley C, Paik JJ, Saketkoo LA (2019) Myositis-related interstitial lung diseases: diagnostic features, treatment, and complications. Curr Treatm Opt Rheumatol 5:56–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. McCarty DJ, Manzi S, Medsger TA Jr, Ramsey-Goldman R, LaPorte RE, Kwoh CK (1995) Incidence of systemic lupus erythematosus. Race and gender differences. Arthritis Rheum. 38:1260–1270.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Kyttaris VC (2010) Systemic lupus erythematosus: from genes to organ damage. Methods Mol Biol 662:265–283.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Hannah JR, D’Cruz DP (2019) Pulmonary complications of systemic lupus erythematosus. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 40:227–234.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Amarnani R, Yeoh SA, Denneny EK, Wincup C (2021) Lupus and the lungs: the assessment and management of pulmonary manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus. Front Med (Lausanne) 7:610257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Aguilera-Pickens G, Abud-Mendoza C (2018) Pulmonary manifestations in systemic lupus erythematosus: pleural involvement, acute pneumonitis, chronic interstitial lung disease and diffuse alveolar hemorrhage. Reumatol Clin (Engl Ed) 14:294–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Kinder BW, Freemer MM, King TE Jr et al (2007) Clinical and genetic risk factors for pneumonia in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 56:2679–2686.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Jatwani S, Handa R, Jatwani K, Chugh K (2018) Bronchiolitis obliterans organising pneumonia as an initial manifestation in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus: a rare presentation. BMJ Case Rep.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Keane MP, Lynch JP 3rd (2000) Pleuropulmonary manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus. Thorax 55:159–166.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Choudhury S, Ramos M, Anjum H, Ali M, Surani S (2020) Shrinking lung syndrome: a rare manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus. Cureus 12:e8216.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Dhala A (2012) Pulmonary arterial hypertension in systemic lupus erythematosus: current status and future direction. Clin Dev Immunol 2012:854941.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Annangi S, Dammalapati TR, Nutalapati S, Henriques King MN (2017) Prevalence of pulmonary embolism among systemic lupus erythematosus discharges: a decade of analysis of the national hospital discharge survey. J Clin Rheumatol 23:200–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Buvry C, Cassagnes L, Tekath M et al (2020) Anti-Ro52 antibodies are a risk factor for interstitial lung disease in primary Sjögren syndrome. Respir Med 163:105895.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Patel R, Shahane A (2014) The epidemiology of Sjögren’s syndrome. Clin Epidemiol 6:247–255.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Pillemer SR, Matteson EL, Jacobsson LT et al (2001) Incidence of physician-diagnosed primary Sjögren syndrome in residents of Olmsted County. Mayo Clin Proc 76:593–599.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Shiboski CH, Shiboski SC, Seror R et al (2017) 2016 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for primary Sjögren's syndrome: a consensus and data-driven methodology involving three international patient cohorts. Ann Rheum Dis 76(9): 16.

  78. Uffmann M, Kiener HP, Bankier AA, Baldt MM, Zontsich T, Herold CJ (2001) Lung manifestation in asymptomatic patients with primary Sjögren syndrome: assessment with high resolution CT and pulmonary function tests. J Thorac Imaging 16:282–289.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Parambil JG, Myers JL, Lindell RM, Matteson EL, Ryu JH (2006) Interstitial lung disease in primary Sjögren syndrome. Chest 130:1489–1495.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Ito I, Nagai S, Kitaichi M et al (2005) Pulmonary manifestations of primary Sjogren’s syndrome: a clinical, radiologic, and pathologic study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 171:632–638.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Egashira R, Kondo T, Hirai T et al (2013) CT findings of thoracic manifestations of primary Sjögren syndrome: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 33:1933–1949.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Bryson T, Sundaram B, Khanna D, Kazerooni EA (2014) Connective tissue disease-associated interstitial pneumonia and idiopathic interstitial pneumonia: similarity and difference. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 35:29–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Hare SS, Souza CA, Bain G, Seely JM, Frcpc GMM, Quigley M (2012) The radiological spectrum of pulmonary lymphoproliferative disease. Br J Radiol 85:848–864.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Maddison PJ (1991) Overlap syndromes and mixed connective tissue disease. Curr Opin Rheumatol 3:995–1000.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Gunnarsson R, Hetlevik SO, Lilleby V, Molberg Ø (2016) Mixed connective tissue disease. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 30:95–111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Sharp GC, Irvin WS, Tan EM, Gould RG, Holman HR (1972) Mixed connective tissue disease—an apparently distinct rheumatic disease syndrome associated with a specific antibody to an extractable nuclear antigen (ENA). Am J Med 52:148–159.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Bodolay E, Szekanecz Z, Dévényi K et al (2005) Evaluation of interstitial lung disease in mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD). Rheumatology (Oxford) 44:656–661.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Gutsche M, Rosen GD, Swigris JJ (2012) Connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease: a review. Curr Respir Care Rep 1:224–232.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Narula N, Narula T, Mira-Avendano I, Wang B, Abril A (2018) Interstitial lung disease in patients with mixed connective tissue disease: pilot study on predictors of lung involvement. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 201836(4):648–651

    Google Scholar 

  90. Lota HK (2013) Interstitial lung disease in patients with mixed connective tissue disease. Thorax 68:186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Prakash UB (1998) Respiratory complications in mixed connective tissue disease. Clin Chest Med 19(733–746):ix.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Wells AU, Brown KK, Flaherty KR, Kolb M, Thannickal VJ; IPF Consensus Working Group (2018) What's in a name? That which we call IPF, by any other name would act the same. Eur Respir J 51:1800692.

Download references


Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



SP, FG, GF, AF, GS, DS and PVF prepared and wrote the manuscript; SP, GC, AM, GS, DS and LAM revised the manuscript and collected data from articles and database. SP, FG, GF, AF and GZ prepared figures and captions. SP, FG and AF prepared the table. SP, PVF, CV, and AB revised the final draft. All authors have read and approved the submission of the final draft.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefano Palmucci.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

SP reports personal consulting fees and/or speaker fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and F. HoffmannLa Roche Ltd. outside the submitted work. GS reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim outside the submitted work. CV is part of the F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. and Boehringer Ingelheim Scientific board. He has received consulting fees and/or speaker fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd and Menarini.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Palmucci, S., Galioto, F., Fazio, G. et al. Clinical and radiological features of lung disorders related to connective-tissue diseases: a pictorial essay. Insights Imaging 13, 108 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Connective tissue disease
  • Multidetector computed tomography
  • Lung disease (Interstitial)
  • Autoimmune diseases
  • Pulmonary fibrosis