Opinion on “Current status of MSK radiology training: an international survey by the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR) Young Club”
Insights into Imaging volume 13, Article number: 15 (2022)
In the article written by Albano et al. titled “Current status of MSK radiology training: an international survey by the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR) Young Club” , the authors talk about training programs around the world, specifically on the musculoskeletal (MSK) field expressing their concern about education in this area worldwide. To have an initial approximation of the current status of MSK radiology training, the researchers made a 20-question survey and exposed the perception radiology residents have about their experience and exposure to MSK cases, academic reviews, meetings, and research.
Patients referred by specialties such as orthopedic surgery, internal medicine, family practice, emergency medicine, and rheumatology  for radiological MSK examinations have increased exponentially, and general radiologists must be well prepared to understand and correctly interpret the examinations as well as develop research skills, especially in academic centers.
We agree the survey had very few participants (only 86 countries included with 972 single surveys). For instance, our country Colombia only had 7 single surveys and now we have 18 radiology residency programs and 350 residents approximately.
Our residency program is one of the most demanding both academically and professionally in our country, with over 4,875 MRIs of the joints so far this year and 1–2 MSK radiologist dedicated to MSK MRI exclusively per day. Our residents have 2-month rotations during their radiology training with great exposure to MSK MRI. This is just an example of a residency program in South America, and like the authors we are also concerned about the quality in MSK training in young radiologists worldwide. A paper published by ACR on 2007  proposed that a radiology Residency program that satisfies ACGME´s requirements should include at least three 4-week rotations, which is far from what the survey showed and far from our reality.
Giving the extraordinary effort of the ESR and ESSR to improve MSK radiology training among young radiologist, we consider the effort should be expanded to older radiologists who in their daily practice are confronted to challenging MSK cases. Alliances with radiology societies could improve MSK training, for instance, implementing EDiMSK in countries like Colombia where there are no official MSK fellowship programs. Additionally, EDiMSK could also be accepted as an official postgraduate qualification as in some European Countries .
Availability of data and material
Albano D, Dalili D, Huber FA et al (2021) Current status of MSK radiology training: an international survey by the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR) Young Club. Insights Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-021-01070-x
Harkey P, Duszak R Jr, Gyftopoulos S, Rosenkrantz AB (2018) Who refers musculoskeletal extremity imaging examinations to radiologists? AJR Am J Roentgenol. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJr17.18591
Flemming D, Davis KW, Dinauer PA et al (2007) Musculoskeletal radiology curriculum for radiology residents. J Am Coll Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2007.04.001
Snoj Ž, Hebar T, Sconfienza LM et al (2020) Present Status of Musculoskeletal Radiology in Europe: International Survey by the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1713119
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Consent for publication
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Duarte, A., Borrero Leon, R. Opinion on “Current status of MSK radiology training: an international survey by the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR) Young Club”. Insights Imaging 13, 15 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-021-01148-6