Skip to main content

Muscle elasticity is different in individuals with diastasis recti abdominis than healthy volunteers



To determine the value of shear wave elastography (SWE) in assessing abdominal wall muscles, including rectus abdominis (RA), external oblique muscle (EO), internal oblique muscle, and transversus abdominis (TrA) in patients with diastasis recti abdominis (DRA) and healthy controls.


From October 2018 to December 2019, 36 postpartum DRA patients and 24 nulliparous healthy women were identified. Inter-rectus distance (IRD) measurements were taken by B-mode ultrasound. Shear wave speed (SWS) values were acquired by one operator at ten specific locations. Clinical and ultrasound variables, including demographics, IRD, muscle thickness, and muscle SWS, were compared between the two groups using Student’s t test or Fisher's exact test. Pearson correlation analyses were conducted for the variables of IRD, muscle thickness, and SWS in the 36 DRA patients.


The maximum diameter of recti abdominus separation was located at the umbilicus in DRA patients (4.59 ± 1.14 cm). The SWS value was significantly lower in the RA (p = 0.003) and higher in the TrA muscle (p < 0.001) in DRA patients compared with the age-matched controls. However, SWS in both muscles (RA and TrA) showed a statistically positive correlation with IRD (p < 0.05). In addition, the SWS value in EO statistically decreased in DRA patients compared with the healthy controls (1.65 ± 0.15 vs. 1.79 ± 0.14, p = 0.001).


The application of SWE to abdominal wall muscles in DRA patients is feasible. The correlation between SWS value and IRD in RA should be interpreted with caution.

Key points

  • Imaging assessment using shear wave elastography of abdominal muscle elasticity.

  • Abdominal muscle elasticity in DRA patients was different from healthy volunteers.

  • Abdominal muscle elasticity in DRA patients was correlated with inter-rectus distance.


Diastasis recti abdominis (DRA) is the enlargement of the distance between the edges of the recti abdominis along the linea alba with no fascial defect [1, 2]. Normally, the rectus muscles are fused at the midline with no more than 1 to 2 cm separation [3]. A significant number of women are affected by DRA during the prenatal and postnatal periods [4], resulting in functional problems, such as back pain and hernia [5].

Clinically, DRA is evaluated by finger breadth. The widths of the two recti abdominis muscles are assessed by palpation 4.5 cm above and 4.5 cm below the umbilicus, along the linea alba [6]. Separation is observed most commonly at the umbilicus. A width greater than or equal to the width of two fingers is defined as DRA [5]. No separation or a width of less than two fingers is defined as no DRA. However, in the past twenty years, the reliability of palpation has been debated [1, 3, 4]. Therefore, prior studies investigated the application of advanced imaging technology, like B-mode ultrasound (US), on the evaluation of inter-rectus distance (IRD) measurement. Most studies demonstrate the superior accuracy and validity of imaging tools compared to palpation [7,8,9].

Clinical management of DRA is challenging [10]. Based on the pathophysiology described by Baumann et al. [11], the combination of physiotherapy and surgical repair has the potential to improve the anatomical divarication and the laxity of the ventral abdominal muscles. In other words, the preoperative assessment of DRA is not solely a distance measurement problem. Individual preoperative evaluation of physiologic tension is important. Up to now, conventional modalities, including B-mode ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging, have been used to assess the IRD, but no functional biomechanical property evaluation was available. Therefore, an objective imaging assessment of the intrinsic abdominal muscle characteristics, such as the elasticity, is needed to predict successful treatment and disease progression.

In recent years, ultrasound shear wave elastography (SWE) has been increasingly used to measure physiologic and pathologic muscle behavior due to its non-invasiveness, high accuracy, user-friendliness, and availability in commercial ultrasound scanners [12,13,14]. However, to this end, no convincing evidence in the current literature has established the application of SWE for detecting muscle properties in DRA patients. Based on our previous study of SWE in incisional hernia patients [15], we hypothesize that the elasticity in rectus abdominis (RA) of DRA patients is significantly lower than that in healthy controls, while the elasticity of lateral abdominal wall muscles, including the external oblique (EO) muscle, internal oblique (IO) muscle, or transversus abdominis (TrA), is comparatively higher.

This study aimed to determine the utility of applying SWE to the evaluation of abdominal wall muscles, including rectus abdominis, external oblique muscle, internal oblique muscle, and transversus abdominis, in patients with DRA and healthy controls, to assist in clinical management. No study has been reported on the SWE of abdominal wall muscles in DRA patients.



This study was reviewed and approved by the Institute Ethics Committee of Huashan Hospital (No. KY2018-438). Informed consent forms were signed by all participants. The study protocol was registered in China Clinical Registry Center (No. ChiCTR1900023012). From October 2018 to December 2019, postpartum women suspected of DRA at the outpatient clinic in our institution were identified. Eligible subjects were recruited based on the following inclusion criteria: 1) age between 18 and 60 y/o; 2) IRD greater than or equal to 2-finger width on palpation, irrespective of the locations along the midline, measured in the standard supine crock-lying position with arms crossed over the chest; and 3) full-term fetus. The exclusion criteria for all postpartum women were as follows: (1) additional history of abdominal surgery or injury (except cesarean section); (2) chronic or degenerative pathology of the muscle (e.g., autoimmune myositis); (3) abdominal rehabilitation of neuromuscular electrical stimulation within the previous 6 months; and (4) inadequate clinical and ultrasound (US) imaging data. Nulliparous age-matched women were recruited from the physicians and nurses at our institution to participate as healthy controls. The exclusion criteria for the healthy participants were similar to that for DRA patients, including age (< 18 and > 60 y/o), surgery, and history. The clinical variables of age, weight, and height were recorded for each subject.

US data collection


Ultrasound images were obtained using a high-end scanner (Aixplorer, Supersonic Imagine, France) equipped with an SWE mode (general preset). The scanner was coupled with a linear array probe (SL10-2, Supersonic Imagine, France). Elastography was performed to evaluate tissue elasticity. Elasticity is the tendency of tissue to resist deformation against an applied force or to resume its original shape after removal of this force. A higher elastic modulus correlates with a higher resistance to deformation and an increased stiffness [16]. Shear wave speed is a quantitative measure of tissue stiffness and can be converted to shear modulus using the following equation:


where µ is shear modulus; Cs is shear wave speed (SWS) in this equation; and ρ is density, which can be assumed to be 1000 kg/m3 for all soft tissues [17]. Higher speed values are associated with increased tissue stiffness. A senior radiologist (XW.: with 10 years of experience in abdominal and musculoskeletal ultrasound imaging) performed the IRD measurement on B-mode US and SWS measurement on SWE.

IRD measurement

The DRA patients underwent B-mode US examination of their anterior rectus abdominis sheath to evaluate the width of rectus diastasis. To standardize the position of the transducer, each measurement location was marked on the skin when the participant was resting in the supine position, with their arms across their chests. Additionally, special attention was paid to the pressure imposed on the probe to avoid reflexive responses from the participants. A thick gel layer was applied to replace the air gap between the US transducer and the targeted region.

According to the European Hernia Society (EHS) classification of midline incisional hernias [3], the transducer was placed transversely along the midline at five specific locations identified with skin markers in the following order: subxiphoidal, epigastric, umbilical, infraumbilical, and suprapubic location. The aforementioned locations were recorded as M1, M2, M3, M4, M5, respectively (Fig. 1). Using the medial margins of both rectus abdominis muscles, the inter-rectus distance could be clearly identified, from one side of the anterior recti sheath to the corresponding position of its counterpart on the other side. Measurements were taken with an on-screen caliper to the nearest 0.1 cm (Fig. 2). Finally, the maximum diastasis was recorded as the width of the recti abdominus separation in this study.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Inter-rectus distance measurement at the following five locations along the midline of the abdomen: subxiphoidal, epigastric, umbilical, infraumbilical, and suprapubic location

Fig. 2
figure 2

Forty-year-old woman with one previous pregnancy. Diastasis (calipers) is present at the level of M2 (above the umbilicus, a 4.30 cm), at the level of M4 (below the umbilicus, b 3.40 cm). At the level of M2 (umbilicus), measurements were combined with two separate calipers (c 3.86 cm, d 1.26 cm). White arrows pointed to the locations of calipers

Further assessment of anatomical variations of rectus abdominis muscle diastasis by B-mode US was made based on a recent study by Corvino et al. [18], including the following five patterns: open only above the navel, open only below the navel, open at the navel level, open completely but wider above the navel, and open completely but wider below the navel.

Shear wave elastography measurement

After the IRD measurements, SWE was measured in the DRA patients and healthy nulliparous participants. Tissue SWS of the RA and lateral muscles (EO, IO, and TrA) were bilaterally measured. Based on our previous experience [15] and the suggestions of Rath et a. [19], SWE measurements were taken on both the left and right sides of the abdomen as per the following guidelines (Fig. 3):

  1. 1.

    Three locations were identified on each side of the RA region, the supraumbilicus (4.5 cm above the umbilicus), umbilicus, and subumbilicus (4.5 cm below the umbilicus).

  2. 2.

    Two locations were identified on each side of the abdomen along the anterior axillary line equidistant between the costal margin at the level of the ninth rib and a point anterior to the anterior superior iliac spine.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Ten specific locations for shear wave elastography measurements

Each measurement was initiated with a B-mode acquisition of the muscle. The transducer was placed with light pressure to obtain the transverse view of the target muscle. To maximize intra-operator reliability and minimize the duration of transducer repositioning at the same location in each subject, 10 waterproof skin landmarks were drawn with a marker under 2D-mode monitoring by the same operator before SWE. The depth was set to optimize the target muscle centrally. Muscle thickness was obtained by measuring the length between the anterior and posterior layers of the sheath or myofascial.

After landmarks were identified, the SWE mode was turned on. The rectangle-shaped SWE box was centrally placed to contain the target muscle, avoiding the tendons, aponeurosis, blood vessels, and fascial tissues. Laterally, the size of the SWE box was set to the maximum diameter. The anterior–posterior diameter of the SWE box was adjusted to contain the whole muscle in the transverse view. A static SWE image was acquired and stored when the real-time color map was as homogeneous as possible for at least 5 s. The operator then manually drew a new region of interest ROI based on the anatomic contour of the muscle. The shear modulus (μ) and shear wave speed (Cs) values were both automatically reported by the scanner. In the current study, the mean shear wave speed was adopted as the outcome measure, based on prior experience [15] (Fig. 4). After SWE measurements were taken at ten specific locations, additional two SWE sessions were performed to assess the intra-operator reliability. Consequently, the mean SWS value of the three sessions represented the final SWS value of the muscle.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Ultrasound images of shear wave speed measurement in upper right rectus abdominis. A new region of interest (dotted line) was drawn to obtain the parameter of mean shear wave speed

Statistical analysis

The results are presented as mean ± standard deviation for the numerical variables of muscle thickness and shear wave speed. The Student’s t test and Fisher's exact test were adopted to compare the clinical variables, B-mode, and SWE parameters in DRA patients and healthy volunteers. A p value < 0.05 indicated a significant difference. The intra-operator reliability was calculated using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). The ICC was interpreted as follows: 1.00–0.75, excellent; 0.74–0.60, moderate; 0.59–0.40, fair; and < 0.40, poor [20]. The Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated to assess the correlation between IRD, muscle thickness, and SWS. The DRA patients were divided into three subgroups based on their IRD. SWS values were compared among the subgroups using one-way ANOVA. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS for Windows version 21 (SPSS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).


Patients summary

A power analysis was performed to determine the number of patients needed. We assumed that the mean value for mean trunk rotation torque was 37 (N·m) in DRA patients and 45.3 (N·m) in non-DRA patients, based on the data reported by Hills et al. [21]. The probability was 80 percent that the study would detect a difference of 8.3, based on a standard deviation of 3.6, the mean trunk rotation torque, and a two-sided 0.05 significance level. Thus, 44 subjects (22 patients and 22 controls) were required for this retrospective study. Accordingly, 24 nulliparous healthy women were recruited for this study. From October 2018 to December 2019, 42 postpartum women suspected of DRA at our outpatient clinic were identified. After removing 6 patients, 36 patients were enrolled for the final analysis. Among the excluded patients were (a) 2 patients with IRD less than 2-finger width, (b) 1 patient with additional surgical history except for cesarean section, (c) 1 patient with recent abdominal rehabilitation of neuromuscular electrical stimulation, and (d) 2 patients without adequate ultrasound data (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Patient recruitment flowchart

Intra-operator reliability analyses of shear wave speed

A total of 3240 SWS values were acquired by one operator, including three measurements per location for sixty subjects. Interclass correlation analyses showed good moderate to excellent intra-operator reliability in terms of each abdominal wall muscle (Table 1), with coefficients ranging from 0.681 to 0.851.

Table 1 Intra-operator reliability analyses of shear wave speed measurement

Demographics and elastographic results

The clinical and sonographic features of the 60 subjects (DRA = 36, non-DRA = 24) are summarized in Table 2. No statistically significant differences were found in the age, height, and BMI between the two groups (p > 0.05). Among the DRA patients, 94.4% (34/36) had lumbopelvic pain. IRD measurements revealed that the maximum diameter of recti abdominus separation was located at the umbilicus (M3) in the DRA patients (4.59 ± 1.14 cm). The rectus muscles were fused at the midline without separating in the 24 healthy participants. The RA, EO, and TrA in DRA patient groups were significantly thinner than those in the control group (7.97 ± 1.60 vs. 9.99 ± 1.33 mm, p < 0.001; 5.11 ± 1.05 vs. 6.18 ± 1.07 mm, p < 0.001; 2.42 ± 0.45 vs. 2.96 ± 0.78 mm, p = 0.004, respectively). In addition, SWS propagated significantly slower in the RA and EO of DRA patients (p = 0.003, p = 0.001, respectively). Conversely, the SWS propagated significantly faster in the TrA of DRA patients (p < 0.001).

Table 2 Frequency of clinical and US features in 36 DRA patients and 24 nulliparous healthy controls

As shown in Table 3, the SWS values for the RA, EO, IO, and TrA varied at different locations between the groups. Specifically, in the DRA patients, the SWS showed significantly lower SWS value in the upper RA and at the umbilicus (locations of 1, 2, 3, and 4, p < 0.05) than that in the healthy controls. However, with respect to TrA, SWS in the lower abdominal wall (locations of 9 and 10) of DRA patients displayed higher value than that of the healthy controls (p = 0.007, p < 0.001, respectively).

Table 3 Comparison of shear wave speed of abdominal wall muscles at different locations

The Pearson correlation analyses exhibited significant correlations between IRD and SWS in the 36 DRA patients (Table 4), specifically for the RA, IO, and TrA (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.003, respectively). In contrast, no statistically significant correlation was found between SWS and muscle thickness (p > 0.05). In addition, the Pearson analysis between SWS and muscle thickness in the overall dataset (n = 60) revealed a significant correlation (γ = 0.238, 95%: [0.126, 0.360], p < 0.001).

Table 4 Correlation coefficients among the US variables in the 36 DRA patients

A total of 36 DRA patients were reclassified to 3 subgroups in terms of RA separation distance (subgroup1: IRD ≥ 5 cm, subgroup2: 4 cm < IRD < 5 cm, subgroup3: IRD ≤ 4 cm). Of note, the mean value of RA SWS in subgroup3 was significantly lower than that in the other two subgroups (subgroup3 vs. subgroup1, subgroup3 vs. subgroup2, p < 0.001, p = 0.011, respectively, Fig. 6). The larger the separation, the higher the shear wave speed in the RA. The mean SWS value of subgroup1 was 1.82 ± 0.17 m/s. No significant difference in SWS was found between subgroup1 and the control group (1.82 ± 0.17 m/s vs. 1.82 ± 0.13 m/s, p = 0.988).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Boxplot of RA shear wave speed distribution in 36 DRA patients (IRD inter-rectus distance, RA rectus abdominis, SWS shear wave speed)

Similarly, the mean value of TrA SWS in subgroup3 was significantly lower than that in the other two subgroups (subgroup3 vs. subgroup1, subgroup3 vs. subgroup2, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively, Fig. 7). No significant difference was found between subgroups 1 and 2 (p > 0.05).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Boxplot of TrA shear wave speed distribution in 36 DRA patients (IRD inter-rectus distance, TrA transversus abdominis, SWS shear wave speed)


Ultrasound is becoming more popular in the evaluation of different musculoskeletal abnormalities with excellent reproducibility [22]. With the recent developments in ultrasound elastography, it is now possible to quantitatively evaluate the stiffness of muscle [12,13,14]. There are several ultrasound elastography methods investigated around the world in the past twenty years, including strain elastography, acoustic radiation force impulse, shear wave elastography, and transient elastography [23]. As a semiquantitative approach, strain ratio values generated by strain elastography depend significantly on reference and target region of interest being above the same tissue, while not influenced by depth [24]. Shear wave speeds would probably decrease with increasing scanning depth [24]. Comparatively, more recent studies demonstrated that, in terms of inter- or intra-operator variability, shear wave elastography is a more reliable and widely used tool for quantitatively assessing muscle stiffness [25,26,27,28,29].

The main purpose of this study was to compare elasticity of abdominal wall musculature in individuals with and without DRA. Partially consistent with the first part of our hypothesis, we found a significantly lower SWS in the RA (p = 0.003) and a higher SWS in the TrA muscle (p < 0.001) in participants with DRA compared with the age-matched control group without previous pregnancy. However, the correlation between muscle elasticity and IRD should be interpreted with caution (Fig. 8). As SWS in both muscles were positively correlated with IRD (p < 0.05), the greater the IRD, the higher the SWS in RA. In addition, the value of SWS in EO unexpectedly decreased in DRA patients (1.65 ± 0.15 vs. 1.79 ± 0.14, p = 0.001). To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to reveal these findings about muscle elasticity in DRA patients based on the specific 10-location setting.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Shear wave elastography of patients with DRA. One forty-year-old patient with inter-rectus distance of 5.12 cm showed higher shear wave speed in RA and TrA (a 1.7 m/s, b 1.9 m/s). Comparatively, another thirty-two-year-old patient with inter-rectus distance of 3.36 cm exhibited lower shear wave speed in RA and TrA (c 1.4 m/s, d 1.5 m/s)

The reliability of IRD measurement in postpartum women using B-mode ultrasound has been widely validated by multiple studies in the past decade [7,8,9]. In response to our primary goal of muscle elasticity assessment, the ICC values obtained in the current study indicate moderate to high intra-operator reliability, especially for the RA and TrA muscles. This finding was in agreement with our previous study of SWE in incisional hernia patients [15]. However, it was noted that the ICC values for EO and IO were relatively lower, which might be attributed to the impact of patient breathing on superficial oblique muscles [30].

The maximum separation distance was located at the umbilicus, which is in line with the DRA classification system suggested by Rath et al. [19]. Contrary to Liaw’s finding, no inter-rectus separation was found among the 24 nulliparous healthy subjects, irrespective of the locations along the midline (M1–M5). Of note, the mean age of the control subjects differed between the two studies (31.9 ± 4. 1 vs. 26.7 ± 4.7 mm). However, both studies complied with the commonly accepted definition of DRA, with no more than 1 to 2 cm separation [3].

Our study is unique in the use of SWE in 10-location settings to better quantify the elasticity of abdominal muscles in an objective approach. Given the current evidence of morphological changes and abdominal muscle functional deficits present during pregnancy [8], a group of nulliparous healthy women was enrolled as controls in this study. Generally, the range of SWS values acquired in the four abdominal wall muscles (0.85–2.08 m/s) was similar to the values reported by others [15, 25,26,27,28]. From a biomechanical viewpoint, the abdominopelvic cavity is a cylinder enveloped by muscles, tendons, and bony structures. According to Pascal's principle [31], any pressure generated within the abdominopelvic cavity is transmitted equally to the walls of that cavity. In response to increased abdominal pressure, the muscular abdominal wall contracts to generate counter-pressure. If intra-abdominal pressure exceeds abdominal wall pressure, the abdominal wall will rupture at its weakest point, causing herniation. Correspondingly, the rectus abdominis in DRA patients, which is considered the margin of the weakest point, displayed a lower SWS value than that in healthy controls, especially for the locations above and at the umbilicus. This difference in muscle elasticity should be considered when making treatment plans that include a combination of physiotherapy and surgical repair [11]. However, subgroup analysis in 36 DRA patients showed a positive correlation between IRD and SWS. This can be explained by the biomechanical and pathological changes in muscle fibers as the inter-rectus separation increases [25,26,27]. The composition of the RA, including muscle fibers, connective tissue, and adipose tissue infiltration, might vary at different stages of DRA progression, resulting in changes in shear wave speed at the later stage.

Converse to our results in incisional hernia patients [15], the SWS of the EO muscle in DRA patients decreased in comparison with healthy subjects. This decrease mainly resulted from the biological and physical differences between the two studies. According to the law of Laplace [31], once a hernia has formed, it will continue to enlarge in size due to the increase in wall tension at that location. The wall tension is greatest at the point of the largest radius and the thinnest wall. Hence, it could be hypothesized that these muscles are more likely to be subjected to higher tension. In this study, no hernia was found among the 36 DRA patients. In addition, the positive correlation between SWS and muscle in the overall dataset (γ = 0.238, p < 0.001) may be explained by the significantly decreased EO muscle thickness (p < 0.001) with less volume of fibers in postpartum women that leads to slower shear wave propagation.

Similar to the EO muscle, the mean thickness of the TrA muscle decreased in DRA patients. Nonetheless, the tension of the TrA muscle increased. This finding is in agreement with the results of the anatomical study by Wingerden et al. [32], which demonstrated that the TrA muscle, as the deep abdominal wall muscle, played an important role in the etiology of DRA. Typical for pregnancy is the space requirement of the growing uterus, which increases intra-abdominal pressure. The muscular tissue adapts more rapidly and to a further extent than collagenous fascial sheets [33]. Hence, the posterior rectus fascia sheath, mainly formed by the aponeuroses of the TrA, is not expected to be as lax as the muscular dominant tissue. Comparison of the TrA SWS values among different locations also implicates the significance of the lower abdominal wall in preoperative treatment, including exercise the antenatal and postnatal periods.

Consistent with a prior study by Murillo et al. [34], the symptom of lumbopelvic pain was significantly increased in the DRA group (p < 0.001). The differences in shear wave speed between lumbopelvic pain and asymptomatic individuals can be attributed to the increase of connective tissue due to fibrotic proliferation.

The present study establishes a method for measuring the shear wave speed of the abdominal wall muscles in DRA patients. In agreement with other researchers [13, 14], shear wave elastography provides a direct estimation of muscle force. Since the management options of DRA vary and will depend not only on the degree of separation but the flaccidity of the anterior abdominal wall as well [35], accurate and objective assessment of muscle elasticity may potentially assist in the clinical management. For example, simple physical therapy might be effective for those who present mild to moderate diastasis with normal muscle elasticity. On the other side, surgical complications following rectus diastasis repair, such as infection, mesh extrusion, and recurrence, could be avoidable based on the comprehensive preoperative evaluation by shear wave elastography.

Nevertheless, imaging of only a few parts of the muscle is insufficient to generalize the results to the whole muscle. Furthermore, postprocessing steps are necessary for more representative results. Moreover, we only recruited limited patients and nulliparous healthy controls in our study. Thus, whether these results apply to postpartum subjects without DRA is unclear. Further research is warranted.

To summarize the main findings of our study, the application of SWE for assessing abdominal wall muscles is feasible and credible in DRA patients. Our study revealed lower SWS in the RA and higher SWS in the TrA. Meanwhile, SWS positively correlated with IRD in the two muscles (RA and TrA, respectively). Thus, further caution should be paid to the interpretation of the correlation between SWS value and IRD in the RA.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.



Diastasis recti abdominis


European Hernia Society


External oblique muscle


Intra-class correlation coefficient


Internal oblique muscle


Inter-rectus distance


Rectus abdominis


Shear wave elastography


Shear wave speed


Transversus abdominis




  1. Sperstad JB, Tennfjord MK, Hilde G, Ellström-Engh M, Bø K (2016) Diastasis recti abdominis during pregnancy and 12 months after childbirth: prevalence, risk factors and report of lumbopelvic pain. Br J Sports Med 50(17):1092–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Doubkova L, Andel R, Palascakova-Springrova I, Kolar P, Kriz J, Kobesova A (2018) Diastasis of rectus abdominis muscles in low back pain patients. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 31(1):107–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Reinpold W, Köckerling F, Bittner R et al (2019) Classification of rectus diastasis—a proposal by the German Hernia Society (DHG) and the International Endohernia Society (IEHS). Front Surg 6:1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Keshwani N, Mathur S, McLean L (2018) Relationship between interrectus distance and symptom severity in women with diastasis recti abdominis in the early postpartum period. Phys Ther 98(3):182–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang Q, Yu X, Chen G, Sun X, Wang J (2020) Does diastasis recti abdominis weaken pelvic floor function? A cross-sectional study. Int Urogynecol J 31(2):277–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bø K, Hilde G, Tennfjord MK, Sperstad JB, Engh ME (2017) Pelvic floor muscle function, pelvic floor dysfunction and diastasis recti abdominis: prospective cohort study. Neurourol Urodyn 36(3):716–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. de Mendes A, Nahas FX, Veiga DF et al (2007) Ultrasonography for measuring rectus abdominis muscles diastasis. Acta Cir Bras 22(3):182–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Liaw LJ, Hsu MJ, Liao CF, Liu MF, Hsu AT (2011) The relationships between inter-recti distance measured by ultrasound imaging and abdominal muscle function in postpartum women: a 6-month follow-up study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 41(6):435–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mota P, Pascoal AG, Sancho F, Carita AI, Bø K (2013) Reliability of the inter-rectus distance measured by palpation. Comparison of palpation and ultrasound measurements. Man Ther 18(4):294–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nahabedian MY (2018) Management strategies for diastasis recti. Semin Plast Surg 32(3):147–54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Baumann DP, Butler CE (2019) Diastasis recti and primary midline ventral hernia: the plastic surgery approach. Hernia 23(5):1017–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Phan A, Lee J, Gao J (2019) Ultrasound shear wave elastography in assessment of skeletal muscle stiffness in senior volunteers. Clin Imaging 58:22–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. MacDonald D, Wan A, McPhee M, Tucker K, Hug F (2016) Reliability of abdominal muscle stiffness measured using elastography during trunk rehabilitation exercises. Ultrasound Med Biol 42(4):1018–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lima K, Costa Júnior JFS, Pereira WCA, Oliveira LF (2018) Assessment of the mechanical properties of the muscle-tendon unit by supersonic shear wave imaging elastography: a review. Ultrasonography 37(1):3–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang X, He K, Zhu Y et al (2020) Use of shear wave elastography to quantify abdominal wall muscular properties in patients with incisional hernia. Ultrasound Med Biol 46(7):1651–1657.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sigrist RMS, Liau J, Kaffas AE, Chammas MC, Willmann JK (2017) Ultrasound elastography: review of techniques and clinical applications. Theranostics 7(5):1303–29.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Eby SF, Zhao H, Song P et al (2017) Quantifying spasticity in individual muscles using shear wave elastography. Radiol Case Rep 12(2):348–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Corvino A, Rosa D, Sbordone C et al (2019) Diastasis of rectus abdominis muscles: patterns of anatomical variation as demonstrated by ultrasound. Pol J Radiol 84:e542–e548.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Rath AM, Attali P, Dumas JL, Goldlust D, Zhang J, Chevrel JP (1996) The abdominal linea alba: an anatomo-radiologic and biomechanical study. Surg Radiol Anat 18(4):281–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Linek P, Wolny T, Sikora D, Klepek A (2019) Supersonic shear imaging for quantification of lateral abdominal muscle shear modulus in pediatric population with scoliosis: a reliability and agreement study. Ultrasound Med Biol 45(7):1551–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hills NF, Graham RB, McLean L (2018) Comparison of trunk muscle function between women with and without diastasis recti abdominis at 1 year postpartum. Phys Ther 98(10):891–901.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Razek AA, El-Basyouni SR (2016) Ultrasound of knee osteoarthritis: interobserver agreement and correlation with Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis. Clin Rheumatol 35(4):997–1001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Shimoyama D, Shitara H, Hamano N et al (2001) (2021) Reliability of shoulder muscle stiffness measurement using strain ultrasound elastography and an acoustic coupler. J Med Ultrason 48(1):91–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ewertsen C, Carlsen F, Christiansen R, Jensen A, Nielsen B (2016) Evaluation of healthy muscle tissue by strain and shear wave elastography—dependency on depth and ROI position in relation to underlying bone. Ultrasonics 71:127–133.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bortolotto C, Lungarotti L, Fiorina I, Zacchino M, Draghi F, Calliada F (2017) Influence of subjects’ characteristics and technical variables on muscle stiffness measured by shear wave elastosonography. J Ultrasound 20(2):139–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Chino K, Kawakami Y, Takahashi H (2017) Tissue elasticity of in vivo skeletal muscles measured in the transverse and longitudinal planes using shear wave elastography. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 37(4):394–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gabrielsen DA, Carney MJ, Weissler JM et al (2018) Application of ARFI-SWV in stiffness measurement of the abdominal wall musculature: a pilot feasibility study. Ultrasound Med Biol 44(9):1978–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gennisson JL, Deffieux T, Macé E, Montaldo G, Fink M, Tanter M (2010) Viscoelastic and anisotropic mechanical properties of in vivo muscle tissue assessed by supersonic shear imaging. Ultrasound Med Bio 36(5):789–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Šarabon N, Kozinc Ž, Podrekar N (2019) Using shear-wave elastography in skeletal muscle: a repeatability and reproducibility study on biceps femoris muscle. PLoS One 14(8):e0222008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Kim SH, Park SY (2018) Effect of hip position and breathing pattern on abdominal muscle activation during curl-up variations. J Exerc Rehabil 14(3):445–50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Rajkumar JS, Chopra P, Chintamani A (2015) Basic physics revisited for a surgeon. Indian J Surg 77(3):169–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. van Wingerden JP, Ronchetti I, Sneiders D, Lange JF, Kleinrensink GJ (2020) Anterior and posterior rectus abdominis sheath stiffness in relation to diastasis recti: abdominal wall training or not? J Bodyw Moe Ther 24(1):147–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Brauman D (2008) Diastasis recti: clinical anatomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 122(5):1564–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Murillo C, Falla D, Rushton A, Sanderson A, Heneghan NR (2019) Shear wave elastography investigation of multifidus stiffness in individuals with low back pain. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 47:19–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Nahabedian MY (2018) Management strategies for diastasis recti. Semin Plast Surg 32(3):147–154.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references



Author information

Authors and Affiliations



KH, XZ, YZ, HC, and XW had contributed to the literature research, study design and manuscript drafting. KH, XZ, YZ, BW, XF, and QY had contributed to the data acquisition and analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hao Chen or Xiaohong Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Approval for the research was received from the Institute Ethics Committee of Huashan Hospital (No. KY2018-438). Informed consent forms were signed by all the participants. The study protocol was registered in China Clinical Registry Center (No. ChiCTR1900023012).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Kai He and Xiuling Zhou are co-first authors and have contributed equally to this work

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, K., Zhou, X., Zhu, Y. et al. Muscle elasticity is different in individuals with diastasis recti abdominis than healthy volunteers. Insights Imaging 12, 87 (2021).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: