Skip to main content

Evidence levels in radiology: the insights into imaging approach

Medicine is based on knowledge from scientific studies and the validation of clinical experience. Medical knowledge must be well established before it can be considered as the basis for decision making. Journals have a clear responsibility to help readers recognize the level of evidence for the claims published in their manuscripts. Levels of evidence alone do not determine the quality of the article but help readers to understand the significance of the claims.

We recognize that our discipline, radiology and medical imaging, also suffers from a certain lack of reproducibility of its results when translated into practice. Although our clinical work is firmly based on years of practice and well-known criteria and characteristics, new proposals and some older standards are not free of errors and biases.

This is the main reason why our journal encourages authors to follow this guideline when analyzing referenced papers and their own work (Table 1). The level and confidence in the evidence and the degree of consideration of the recommendations and their wordings are based on the type and quality of the references and the results of the paper. Authors are encouraged to specify in the manuscript the appropriate level and recommendation of their claims, following the criteria of this journal. The categorization into only three levels is based on publications in addition to critical approach to technical and clinical studies related to medical imaging [1,2,3,4,5]. These levels attempt to reconcile scientific knowledge and clinical certainty. We hope that this classification and grading will enlighten readers to better understand the relevance of published results and claims.

Table 1 Levels of evidence and recommendation

Availability of data and materials

All relevant data are published in this Editorial.


  1. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE et al (2008) GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 336:924–926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Schweitzer ME (2016) Evidence level. J Magn Reson Imaging 43:543–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Evidence-Based Radiology Working Group (2001) Evidence-based Radiology: a new approach to the practice of radiology. Radiology 220:566–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. European Association for the Study of the Liver (2018) EASL clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 69:182–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fryback DG, Thornbury JR (1991) The efficacy of diagnostic imaging. Med Decis Making 11:88–94

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



This paper was written and revised by LMB. The author read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luis Martí-Bonmatí.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Luis Martí-Bonmatí is the Editor-in-Chief of Insights into Imaging. For this reason, he was not involved in any way in the revision/decision process, which was completely managed by the Deputy Editor, Prof. Bela Purohit (Singapore/SG).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Martí-Bonmatí, L. Evidence levels in radiology: the insights into imaging approach. Insights Imaging 12, 45 (2021).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: