Skip to main content

Advertisement

An additional challenge for head and neck radiologists: anatomic variants posing a surgical risk – a pictorial review

Article metrics

  • 141 Accesses

Abstract

Anatomic variants in the head and neck are quite numerous and occur frequently: a minority of them increase the risk of complications during surgical procedures and may be visualized on cross-sectional images. As some of these complications are potentially fatal, awareness (and accurate reporting) of such variants is a basic responsibility of radiologists, particularly when surgery in the pertinent anatomic area is under consideration.

Key points

  • Anatomic variants in head and neck are numerous and frequently encountered

  • Some anatomic variants, if not known, can trigger serious complications during surgery

  • Radiologists should inform surgeons about the presence of relevant anatomic variants

Background

Anatomic variants in the head and neck are quite numerous and occur frequently, particularly in the sinonasal region. Some of them, mainly in the paranasal region, are known to predispose to pathology, whereas most bear little (if any) clinical significance. Only a minority of variants increase the risk of complications and iatrogenic damage during surgical procedures. As some of these complications are fatal, awareness and accurate reporting of such variants is a basic responsibility of radiologists. In this pictorial review, anatomic variants posing a surgical risk will be classified under four main categories: abnormal bone pneumatization, bone dehiscence and asymmetry, anomalous vessel course, and anomalous nerve course.

Abnormal bone pneumatization

In the paranasal area, the Onodi cell is probably the most alarming variant. This cell is the extension of an ethmoid cell above and/or lateral to the sphenoid sinus; hence, it is also referred to as a sphenoethmoid cell. Given its location, it may have an intimate relationship with the optic nerve canal.

In fact, a more restrictive definition of the Onodi cell includes an optic nerve canal protrusion or dehiscence. During endoscopic sinus surgery, the transgression of the walls of an overlooked Onodi cell may result in irreversible optic nerve injury and/or profuse hemorrhage. The prevalence of this anomaly is variable: Shin et al. [1] found an incidence of ~ 30% with a good correlation between multidetector CT (MDCT) and intraoperative findings. However, literature data on its prevalence are inconsistent, with incidence ranging between 10.9% [2] and 65% [3].

On cross-sectional scans, the Onodi cell can be best appreciated in coronal plane images, when a horizontal septum is seen crossing the sphenoid sinus lumen (Fig. 1). Then, axial and sagittal reconstructions should be carefully scrutinized to detect the sphenoethmoid recess (the reference point of the actual location of the sphenoid sinus) and confirm the location of the Onodi cell on top of the sphenoid sinus.

Fig. 1
figure1

Onodi cell. Coronal (a) and axial (b) MDCT images show a large air-cell (asterisk) along the superolateral aspect of the right sphenoid sinus (ss), corresponding to an Onodi cell. Pneumatization extends to the anterior clinoid process; consequently, the optic nerve canal protrudes slightly within the Onodi cell (arrowhead)

Another point of concern for optic nerve injury during surgery is the anterior clinoid process pneumatization. In this case, the risk of iatrogenic damage is related to the thickness of the bony walls of the process and to the degree of pneumatization surrounding the nerve. The prevalence of this variant is low (6–13%) [4].

The infraorbital (or Haller’s) cell is an extension of ethmoid pneumatization to the orbital wall, inferolateral to the ethmoid bulla (Fig. 2). This cell may obstruct the ethmoid infundibulum, thereby predisposing the patient to maxillary sinusitis and may increase the hazard of orbital penetration during endoscopic sinus surgery [4]; while opening such a cell, in fact, the surgeon may dangerously leverage on the inferomedial orbital wall.

Fig. 2
figure2

Haller’s cell. Coronal MDCT reformation shows a huge infraorbital cell (asterisk) along the inferior orbital wall, not affecting the caliber of the ethmoid infundibulum (arrows)

Both clinoid pneumatization and Haller’s cell are readily detected on coronal MDCT scans or on cone beam CT (CBCT) scans.

A unilaterally shrunk maxillary sinus may indicate the collapse of the uncinate process along the inferomedial orbital wall. This anomalous position of the uncinate process enhances the risk of accidental orbital penetration during uncinectomy, a frequent procedure in the early stages of endoscopic sinus surgery. The pathophysiology in this anatomic variant is triggered by adhesion between the uncinate process and the orbital wall; in fact, this induces chronic hypoventilation and negative pressure within the maxillary sinus resulting in shrinkage of the lumen and inflammatory thickening of the mucosa. Negative sinus pressure also induces partial collapse of the orbital floor and increased vertical diameter of the orbit. All of these signs are referred to as silent sinus syndrome [5] and can be easily detected on (CB) MDCT or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure3

Uncinate process collapse. CBCT reformations on the coronal (a) and sagittal (b) plane. The right uncinate process (arrows) lies in contact with the inferomedial orbital wall. The maxillary sinus and ethmoid infundibulum are opacified by inflamed mucosa and shrinkage of the lumen, and its walls (arrowheads) are remodeled and display an abnormally concave shape. The condition is referred to as silent sinus syndrome

The anatomy of the frontal sinus is largely conditioned by the degree of pneumatization of surrounding air cells (mostly agger nasi cells) and by the cranial attachment of the uncinate process [6]. Some configurations (i.e., supraorbital ethmoid air cell and deep olfactory fossa) significantly influence the complexity of the procedure and may increase the relative risk of complications.

Bone dehiscence and asymmetry

Focal dehiscence of the orbital wall may occur as a result of trauma; when no history of trauma is reported by the patient, it is a matter of debate whether such an anomaly should be classified as congenital or secondary to minor, clinically overlooked, traumatic events [7]. The risk of iatrogenic orbital injury during endoscopic sinus surgery is quite obvious. (Fig. 4). On MDCT scans displayed with bone-windowing, herniation of the orbital content through gaps in the medial or inferior wall may be easily concealed when the ethmoid or maxillary mucosa is thickened; therefore, whenever gaps are seen on scans with bone windowing, soft tissue reconstructions should be obtained.

Fig. 4
figure4

Orbital wall dehiscence. The thin lamina papyracea is focally interrupted on the left side (arrows), where a small amount of extraconal fat tissue (asterisk) protrudes into the ethmoid labyrinth

The anatomic configuration of the ethmoid roof is quite variable. The depth of the cribriform plate is a key point for endoscopic sinus surgery planning; Keros classified it in three groups, according to the length of the vertical lamella of the ethmoid: type I indicates less than 3 mm depth, type III more than 7 mm, type II ranging from 3 mm to 7 mm [8] (Fig. 5). Pre-operative assessment of the depth of the olfactory fossa is crucial because, during surgery, the forces applied to the concha media may lead to breakage of the vertical lamella and to cerebrospinal fluid leak. The Keros type III configuration bears an increased risk of such complication [9, 10]. Meyers and Valvassori [11] proposed a more practical classification: a horizontal line is drawn connecting the cribriform plate to the lateral orbital wall and the depth is defined based on whether the line crosses the upper third of the orbit, the midline, or further below. Furthermore, asymmetry between the two sides, not an infrequent condition, portends an increased surgical risk and should therefore be accurately reported.

Fig. 5
figure5

Anatomic variants of the ethmoid roof. CBCT (a) shows clear asymmetry, the slope of the right vertical lamella (arrow) being more pronounced than on the contralateral side. b MDCT shows a deep olfactory fossa (type III according to the Keros classification)

When endoscopic surgery of the sphenoid sinus is planned, intraluminal protrusion or focal dehiscence of the vertical tract of the internal carotid artery (ICA) canal increases the risk of surgical injury (Fig. 6). Moreover, bone septa may act as leverage on the carotid canal.

Fig. 6
figure6

Carotid canal variants. a Both canals protrude into the sphenoid sinus cavities; the bony wall is thinned on the right side (arrows). b Incomplete bony septa stem from the bony walls of the canals (arrows): during endoscopic surgery, such septa may act as a leverage and facilitate injury of the ICA

In the temporal bone, the tympanic segment of the facial nerve may protrude into the middle ear cavity through a dehiscent bony canal. This is better appreciated on coronal reformations, showing the nerve hanging in the middle ear cavity, strictly contiguous to the oval window (Fig. 7); however, the variant may be obscured by middle ear disease. Bone dehiscence of the facial nerve canal may also be at the second genu; in a review of 202 patients treated surgically for chronic ear disease, dehiscence of the facial nerve canal (overall seen in 8.9%) was equally frequent in the tympanic segment and second genu [12].

Fig. 7
figure7

Facial nerve canal dehiscence. Coronal CBCT reconstruction shows dehiscence of the canal and minimal protrusion of the facial nerve (arrow) within the middle ear cavity

In addition, the sigmoid plate covering the jugular bulb may be dehiscent; large gaps will result in protrusion of the vein in the mesotympanum, often manifesting with tinnitus and a vascular tympanic membrane (Fig. 8). Occasionally, multiple tegmen defects (honeycomb tegmen) [13] may increase the risk of middle cranial fossa penetration during middle ear surgery.

Fig. 8
figure8

Jugular bulb protrusion. Coronal CBCT scan shows prominence of the right jugular bulb (asterisk) into the hypotympanic cavity; the bony plate covering the vein is thinned (arrow). Tympanic membrane (arrowhead)

Anomalous vessel course

The high-riding truncus brachiocephalicus is upwardly shifted in the lower neck, with the bifurcation lying close to the thyroid gland. This variant probably develops as a consequence of anomalous regression of the IV arch [14] (Fig. 9).

Fig. 9
figure9

High-riding truncus brachiocephalicus. MIP (a) and 3D volume rendering (b) reconstruction in an oblique frontal orientation depicting a high-riding truncus brachiocephalicus (arrows) in the lower neck coursing transverse in front of the trachea, high above the sternal manubrium

The caudal part of the thyroid gland can be supplied by a thyroid ima artery, a variant often associated with the absence of inferior thyroid arteries. A thyroid ima artery may arise from the aortic arch, the truncus brachiocephalicus, right common carotid artery, or internal thoracic artery and reaches the thyroid bed coursing along the anterior surface of the trachea [15] (Fig. 10).

Fig. 10
figure10

Thyroid ima artery. Axial CT scan: a thin artery arises from the right common carotid artery (arrow in c), bends inferiorly (arrow in d) and then turns upwards (arrowheads in b and c) to reach the lower pole of the left thyroid gland lobe (asterisk in a)

Both of these variant vessels may pose a surgical threat, principally when tracheostomy or thyroid/parathyroid surgery is planned; identification on cross-sectional imaging requires careful assessment of vascular structures in the peritracheal soft tissues.

A retropharyngeal carotid artery relates to the relatively common medial shift of the ICA (less frequently the common or external carotid artery); it can be bilateral, a condition referred to as “kissing carotids” and is prevalently seen at the oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal level [16] (Fig. 11).

Fig. 11
figure11

Retropharyngeal carotid artery. MRI 3D TOF, thick maximum intensity projection (MIP) reconstruction on coronal plane (a) and native axial partition (c); fat suppressed axial SE T1 with contrast administration (b). The right ICA (large arrows) bends medially reaching the midline behind the posterior oropharyngeal wall. Coiling of the left ICA (arrowhead). eca external carotid artery

The incidence of this variant is linearly related to patient age; thus, it is possibly explained by increased tortuosity and atherosclerotic changes or by hypertension. Severe complications may be generated by retropharyngeal carotid artery injury, even during routine surgery such as tonsillectomy or peritonsillar abscess drainage. Interestingly, a change in position (from and to retropharyngeal) on MDCT examinations acquired at different time points has been described in 6.3% of cases [17].

In the temporal bone, the vertical portion of the petrous internal carotid artery may be undeveloped and bypassed by hypertrophied inferior tympanic and caroticotympanic arteries, coursing in the hypotympanum: this condition is named an aberrant ICA [18] (Fig. 12). It may manifest as pulsatile tinnitus and mimic a vascular mass on otoscopy or may remain asymptomatic. CBCT/MDCT may indicate the absence of the vertical portion of the ICA, presence of a hypotympanic soft tissue mass, enlargement of the inferior canaliculus, and absence of bone coverage on the intratympanic segment of the vessel. As the hypotympanic soft tissue mass may be obscured by diffuse inflammatory opacification of the middle ear, awareness of this condition is crucial. On MRI, time-of-flight (TOF) angiography shows a pinched contour at the intersection of the vertical and horizontal segments of the ICA.

Fig. 12
figure12

Aberrant ICA. Axial MDCT scan (a) shows asymmetry of petrous ICA, the left coursing on the surface of the cochlear promontory (arrows). b MIP reconstruction in the coronal plane of a TOF sequence shows pinched contour of the ICA (arrows)

Rarely, hemorrhage during middle ear surgery may be produced by injury to a persistent stapedial artery. During fetal life, the stapedial artery provides a connection between branches of the external and internal carotid artery; in about 0.05% of cases, the vessel does not regress and may be seen in its entire course, arising from the petrous ICA [19]. The persistent stapedial artery crosses the antero-medial hypotympanum, courses between the crura of the stapes to reach the facial nerve canal, and follows retrogradely a short segment of its tympanic portion up to the geniculate ganglion, where it enters the extradural space in the middle cranial fossa [20]. When the stapedial artery persists, the middle meningeal artery arises from it, and thus MDCT and MRI images show the absence of the foramen spinosum; in addition, a small vascular canal may be seen along the cochlear promontory and the facial nerve canal will have an abnormally large diameter. High-resolution submillimetric (i.e., 0.9 mm or less isotropic voxel) MRI sequences with gadolinium will show the vessel, along with an abnormal enhancement along the second segment of the petrous facial nerve (Fig. 13).

Fig. 13
figure13

Persistent stapedial artery. Axial partitions, TOF sequence with selective venous flow suppression (a–c). A thin arterial structure (arrows) is seen close to the ICA (c) along the promontory (b) and along the tympanic segment of the facial nerve (a). CT of the brain (d,e): coronal multiplanar reformation (MPR) and native axial acquisition. A linear structure runs along the cochlear promontory (arrows), and the left foramen spinosum is absent (black arrowhead points to the right foramen, normally present). Findings are consistent with a persistent stapedial artery

Anomalous nerve course

In the sinonasal area, anomalous nerve course is often the consequence of abnormal pneumatization and/or dehiscence of the bony walls of their canals. As a result, cranial nerves in the maxillofacial area and temporal bone may be seen coursing within air cavities. The maxillary and vidian nerve may protrude into the sphenoid sinus when the pterygoid root is pneumatized thus creating a lateral recess. Less commonly, the infraorbital nerve may protrude into or hang in the maxillary sinus.

Surgical risk is amplified if the bony laminae surrounding such nerves are dehiscent (Fig. 14); an intrasinusal infraorbital nerve is at risk during endoscopic surgery when hidden by or coursing within the laminae of an infraorbital (Haller’s) cell [21].

Fig. 14
figure14

Anatomical variant of nerve course. Coronal CBCT reformation (a) showing dehiscence of the bony walls of the infraorbital canal (arrows) and minor protrusion of the nerve within the maxillary sinus; sagittal CBCT reformation (b) showing the nerve hanging in the maxillary sinus cavity (arrowheads), covered by intact nerve canal walls

Two nerve course variants in the mandible demand extreme caution during tooth extraction: the mandibular nerve canal may be completely encircled by molar teeth roots (Fig. 15); additionally, a retromolar canal is seen in ~ 25% of cases branching from the most proximal part of the mandibular canal to reach the retromolar fossa: nerves supplying molar teeth may be damaged during extraction of included elements. Both conditions are exquisitely demonstrated by CBCT images [22]. A retrospective review in 136 patients with 257 impacted third molars identified several risk factors for iatrogenic nerve damage: contact between tooth roots and nerve, absent cortication of the nerve canal, nerve shape (teardrop and dumb-bell shape), and nerve position relative to dental roots (lingual and interradicular) [23].

Fig. 15
figure15

Anatomical variant of nerve course. CBCT of the mandible, panorex reconstruction (a) indicating the range of the cross-sectional images in b. The roots (arrows) of the included right third molar encompass and remodel the mandibular canal (arrowheads), increasing the risk of nerve damage during tooth extraction

In the lower neck, relevant nerve course variants may be detected only during surgery, such as the extralaryngeal ramification of the recurrent nerve and the numerous variations of the course of the spinal accessory nerve [24].

Though not directly demonstrable on cross-sectional images, the presence of a non-recurrent right laryngeal nerve may be heralded by an indirect finding, namely the aberrant right subclavian artery (Fig. 16). During embryologic life, the inferior laryngeal nerves supply V–VI branchial arches; on the right side, as these arches disappear, the nerve course retracts cranially being finally “trapped” around the right subclavian artery. Anomalous regression of the right IV arch results in an independent origin of the subclavian artery from the arch and a non-recurrent inferior laryngeal nerve unrestrained by the subclavian artery retracts cranially in the neck [25]. A non-recurrent course of the right laryngeal nerve increases the risk of iatrogenic nerve injury during thyroid and parathyroid surgery.

Fig. 16
figure16

Aberrant right subclavian artery. Axial (a) and coronal (b) MIP thin reconstruction of a CT angiography of chest showing aberrant retroesophageal course of the right subclavian artery (arrowheads)

Conclusion

Some anatomic variants in the supra- and infrahyoid neck may increase surgical risk and, if overlooked, have the potential to generate serious complications. Often such variants produce subtle findings on cross-sectional images. It is the responsibility of the radiologist reporting a head and neck scan to carefully scrutinize the regional anatomy in search of variants and to report on them, particularly when surgery is under consideration.

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Abbreviations

CBCT:

Cone beam CT

CT:

Computed tomography

MDCT:

Multidetector CT

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

References

  1. 1.

    Shin JH, Kim SW, Hong YK et al (2011) The Onodi cell: an obstacle to sellar lesions with a transsphenoidal approach. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 145:1040–1042

  2. 2.

    Pérez-Piñas SJ, Carmona A, Catalina-Herrera CJ, Jiménez-Castellanos J (2000) Anatomical variations in the human paranasal sinus region studied by CT. J Anat 197(Pt 2):221–227

  3. 3.

    Tomovic S, Esmaeili A, Chan NJ et al (2012) High-resolution computed tomography analysis of the prevalence of Onodi cells. Laryngoscope 122(7):1470–1473

  4. 4.

    Arslan H, Aydınlıoglu A, Bozkurt M, Egeli E (1999) Anatomic variations of the paranasal sinuses: CT examination for endoscopic sinus surgery. Auris Nasus Larynx 26:39–48

  5. 5.

    Hourany R, Aygun N, Della Santina CC, Zinreich SJ (2005) Silent sinus syndrome: an acquired condition. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26(9):2390–2392

  6. 6.

    Pianta L, Ferrari M, Schreiber A et al (2016) Agger-bullar classification (ABC) of the frontal sinus drainage pathway: validation in a preclinical setting. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 6(9):981–989

  7. 7.

    Farina D, Ravanelli M, Borghesi A, Maroldi R (2010) Flying through congested airspaces: imaging of chronic rhinosinusitis. Insights Imaging 1(3):155–166

  8. 8.

    Keros P (1962) On the practical value of differences in the level of the lamina cribrosa of the ethmoid 41:808–813

  9. 9.

    Ohnishi T, Tachibana T, Kaneko Y, Esaki S (1993) High-risk areas in endoscopic sinus surgery and prevention of complications. Laryngoscope 103(10):1181–1185

  10. 10.

    Ashok MV, Santosh B (2017) A study of clinical significance of the depth of olfactory Fossa in patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 69(4):514–522

  11. 11.

    Meyers RM, Valvassori G (1998) Interpretation of anatomic variations of computed tomography scans of the sinuses: a surgeon’s perspective. Laryngoscope 108:422–425

  12. 12.

    Bayazit YA, Ozer E, Kanlikama M (2002) Gross dehiscence of the bone covering the facial nerve in the light of otological surgery. J Laryngol Otol 116(10):800–803

  13. 13.

    Suryanarayanan R, Lesser TH (2010) ‘Honeycomb’ tegmen: multiple tegmen defects associated with superior semicircular canal dehiscence. J Laryngol Otol 124(5):560–563

  14. 14.

    Ozlugedik S, Ozcan M, Unal A, Yalcin F, Tezer MS (2005) Surgical importance of highly located innominate artery in neck surgery. Am J Otolaryngol 26(5):330–332

  15. 15.

    Natsis KI, Tsitouridis IA, Didagelos MV, Fillipidis AA, Vlasis KG, Tsikaras PD (2009) Anatomical variations in the branches of the human aortic arch in 633 angiographies: clinical significance and literature review. Surg Radiol Anat 31(5):319–323

  16. 16.

    Avitia S, Hamilton J, Osborne RF (2007) Retropharyngeal carotid artery. Ear Nose Throat J 86:665

  17. 17.

    Lukins DE, Pilati S, Escott EJ (2016) The moving carotid artery: a retrospective review of the retropharyngeal carotid artery and the incidence of positional changes on serial studies. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 37(2):336–341

  18. 18.

    Sauvaget E, Paris J, Kici S et al (2006) Aberrant internal carotid artery in the temporal bone: imaging findings and management. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 132(1):86–91

  19. 19.

    Yilmaz T, Bilgen C, Savas R, Alper H (2003) Persistent stapedial artery: MR angiographic and CT findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 24(6):1133–1135

  20. 20.

    Hitier M, Zhang M, Labrousse M, Barbier C, Patron V, Moreau S (2013) Persistent stapedial arteries in human: from phylogeny to surgical consequences. Surg Radiol Anat 35(10):883–891

  21. 21.

    Ference EH, Smith SS, Conley D, Chandra RK (2015) Surgical anatomy and variations of the infraorbital nerve. Laryngoscope 125(6):1296–1300

  22. 22.

    von Arx T, Hänni A, Sendi P, Buser D, Bornstein MM (2011) Radiographic study of the mandibular retromolar canal: an anatomic structure with clinical importance. J Endod 7(12):1630–1635

  23. 23.

    Wang D, Lin T, Wang Y, Sun C, Yang L, Jiang H, Cheng J (2018) Radiographic features of anatomic relationship between impacted third molar and inferior alveolar canal on coronal CBCT images: risk factors for nerve injury after tooth extraction. Arch Med Sci 14(3):532–540

  24. 24.

    Overland J, Hodge JC, Breik O, Krishnan S (2016) Surgical anatomy of the spinal accessory nerve: review of the literature and case report of a rare anatomic variant. J Laryngol Otol 130(10):969–972

  25. 25.

    Hermans R, Dewandel P, Debruyne F, Delaere PR (2013) Arteria lusoria identified on preoperative CT and non recurrent inferior laryngeal nerve during thyroidectomy: a retrospective study. Head Neck 25:113–117

Download references

Author information

DF, DL, IZ, and MR contributed to the study concept and design. MB and GP contributed to the editing and reviewing of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Correspondence to Davide Farina.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Patients consent was waived according to the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for publication

Not applicable to our study.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Farina, D., Lombardi, D., Bertuletti, M. et al. An additional challenge for head and neck radiologists: anatomic variants posing a surgical risk – a pictorial review. Insights Imaging 10, 112 (2019) doi:10.1186/s13244-019-0794-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Head and neck
  • Anatomic variants
  • CT
  • MRI
  • Surgery