Enteric duplication cysts in children: varied presentations, varied imaging findings
Insights into Imaging volume 9, pages 1097–1106 (2018)
Enteric duplication cysts (EDCs) are rare congenital malformations formed during the embryonic development of the digestive tract. They are usually detected prenatally or in the first years of life. The size, location, type, mucosal pattern and presence of complications produce a varied clinical presentation and different imaging findings. Ultrasonography (US) is the most used imaging method for diagnosis. Magnetic resonance (MR) and computed tomography (CT) are less frequently used, but can be helpful in cases of difficult surgical approach. Conservative surgery is the treatment of choice. Pathology confirms the intestinal origin of the cyst, showing a layer of smooth muscle in the wall and an epithelial lining inside, resembling some part of the gastrointestinal tract (GT). We review the different forms of presentation of the EDCs, showing both the typical and atypical imaging findings with the different imaging techniques. We correlate the imaging findings with the surgical results and the final pathological features.
• EDCs are rare congenital anomalies from the digestive tract with uncertain pathogenesis.
• More frequently, diagnosis is antenatal, with most EDCs occurring in the distal ileum.
• Ultrasonography is the method of choice for diagnosis of EDCs.
• Complicated EDCs can show atypical imaging findings.
• Surgery is necessary to avoid complications.
Enteric duplication cysts (EDCs) are rare congenital anomalies found anywhere along the gastrointestinal tract (GT) from the mouth to the rectum; most commonly in the ileum (33%), followed by the oesophagus (20%), colon (13%), jejunum (10%), stomach (7%) and duodenum (5%) [1,2,3,4].
EDCs are believed to occur between the 4th and 8th weeks of embryonic development. Their aetiology is still unknown; several theories have been proposed to explain their pathophysiology, but no single hypothesis can justify all duplications, locations and associated anomalies. Split notochord theory is often postulated . The luminal recanalisation theory explains duplications in those portions of the GT that have a solid stage, including the oesophagus, small bowel and colon; nevertheless, it does not explain duplications at other levels. Incomplete or partial twinning theory could explain the colorectal duplications that are associated with duplication of genital and urinary structures. Persistent embryonic diverticula theory suggests that small diverticula, usually transient along the antimesenteric border of the intestinal wall, persist and develop intestinal duplications, although most ECDs are in the mesenteric border. The intrauterine vascular accident theory suggests that gastrointestinal duplications arise from an intrauterine vascular accident during early fetal development and may be a valid explanation for isolated duplication. These different theories lead to think that the origin of EDCs can be multifactorial [1, 2, 4, 9, 10].
Associated anomalies such as spinal defects, cardiac or urinary malformations, are reported with an incidence rate of 16–26%. Other digestive anomalies are present in about 10% of cases. Therefore, once an EDC is found, a search for other anomalies is needed [6, 10,11,12].
EDCs must have three characteristics: an epithelial lining containing the mucosa of the alimentary tract, an envelope of smooth muscle, and the cyst must be closely attached to the GT by sharing a common wall (Fig. 1). The mucosal lining does not always correlate with the adjacent gastrointestinal tissue, but the duplications are named according to the part of the GT to which these are intimately attached. Ectopic gastric mucosa is found in 20–30% of these cysts, more frequently in oesophageal and small bowel duplications [13, 14]. Prominent gastric mucosa can also be seen as a polypoid mass covering the base of the cyst, being transmural (Fig. 2) . Ectopic pancreatic mucosa is most common in gastric duplications .
Structurally, EDCs can be either cystic or tubular. Spherical cysts are the most common duplications (80%) and typically do not communicate with the adjacent lumen. Tubular duplication cysts (20%) run parallel to the GT, being communicated with it (Fig. 3) [4, 12, 15, 16]. Then, when a duplication cyst is tubular, the connection with GT must be demonstrated for surgical planning .
Atypical EDC is a non-communicating isolated duplication cyst completely separated from the bowel with no communication or shared wall. A vascular insult could have led to the isolation. They are extremely rare [19, 20], especially multiple isolated EDCs, which are even rarer .
The size, location, type, mucosal pattern and presence of complications produce different clinical presentations and several imaging findings of the EDCs. Ultrasonography (US) is the most used imaging method for diagnosis of abdominal EDCs. Magnetic resonance (MR) and computed tomography (CT) are utilised for oesophageal EDCs and for helping in difficult surgical approaches.
We review the different forms of presentation of EDCs, showing both typical and atypical image findings with the different imaging techniques. We correlate the imaging findings with the surgical results and the final pathological features.
The intrauterine presentation is increasing, mostly due to the improvement in prenatal screening US, routine second-trimester screening and improved imaging resolution. However, prenatal diagnosis of EDCs is often difficult, and US identifies only 20–30% of them, and sometimes they are discovered by chance (Fig. 5) [21, 22].
The natural history of EDCs is quite variable. The clinical presentation or onset symptoms of these malformations range from infancy and early childhood to adulthood. Almost 70% of EDCs present symptoms within the first year of life and 85% in the second one [3, 10, 14].
The signs and symptoms depend on the type and location of the duplication.
Gastric and intestinal duplications may produce nausea, vomiting, abdominal distention or palpable abdominal mass (Fig. 7). Recurrent abdominal pain is one of the most frequent forms of presentation and is usually attributed to high pressure inside the duplication cyst because of the accumulation of secretions. Intussusception is another complication in which the cyst serves as a head point and pain, obstruction or bleeding are possible forms of manifestation. Extrinsic compression of the adjacent bowel is also possible, which causes obstruction. However, the most serious complications are produced if gastric mucosa is present within the cyst, leading to inflammation, bleeding, ulceration and even perforation [6, 9, 13, 14, 24, 25].
Nonetheless, EDCs can sometimes be detected incidentally (Fig. 8).
Classical findings of uncomplicated EDC include: presence of a cyst in relation to the gut with double-wall or muscular rim sign (gut signature sign), which is caused by inner hyperechoic mucosa and outer hypoechoic smooth muscle layer (muscularis propia) (Figs. 1 and 7). However, the double-wall sign in other cystic lesions (mesenteric cyst, Meckel’s diverticulum or torsioned ovarian cyst) may be seen [1, 2, 11, 24, 28,29,30].
New US signs are described according to the characteristics of the EDCs:
As an EDC contains the same multi-layered wall architecture as the normal GT, the sign “five-layered cyst wall” is proposed. It corresponds to the innermost hyperechoic mucosa, hypoechoic muscularis mucosa, hyperechoic submucosa, hypoechoic muscularis propia and the outermost hyperechoic serosa. Identification of all five layers in a cyst is pathognomonic of EDC. However, this sign is difficult to demonstrate and needs expertise and high-resolution US (12–18 MHz) [27, 29, 30]. For this reason, the use of US linear probe is recommendable when the GT is examined.
An EDC shares wall with the adjacent GT. Therefore, the diagnosis is carried out if it is possible to demonstrate the “Y” sonographic configuration of the muscle layer caused by the splitting of the shared muscularis propria between the cyst and the adjacent loop. This sign is not described for other abdominal cysts and reflects one of the histological characteristics of the EDCs (Fig. 9) [29, 31].
US is a dynamic study and allows to visualise the peristalsis of the cyst wall. It appears as a transient change of the shape and contour of the cyst because of a concentric contraction of the cyst wall (Fig. 10) when the transductor stays still on the cyst for a while [2, 27].
Complicated EDCs rarely present the classic five layers or double-wall sign. Ectopic rest of pancreatic tissue can produce enzymatic destruction of the mucosa with inflammation, as well as loss of the wall layers showing a hyperaemic thick wall. In such cases, the “Y configuration” sign helps in establishing the correct diagnosis of EDC (Fig. 12) [3, 29, 30]. If ectopic gastric mucosa produces haemorrhage and bleeding, fluid levels or echogenic debris can be seen. When infection occurs, ulceration of mucosa can appear, and internal debris may be seen. The transmural extension can produce important inflammatory changes in the surrounding mesentery fat (Figs. 13 and 14) [3, 7, 24]. Ileal EDC, near the ileocecal valve, can act as intussusception head, showing on US a cystic mass inside the intussusception requiring emergency treatment (Fig. 15) .
In case of atypical or isolated EDC, the pseudokidney sign is described when there is a complete loss of typical wall layers because of severe congestion, thus producing a thick hypoechoic rim with a hyperechoic central layer .
US prenatal diagnosis of EDCs includes the same signs as postnatal cyst: the double–wall sign and the presence of peristalsis. However, on the prenatal US, the “double wall” is not always seen or can be partial [10, 33, 34], and it may require the differential diagnosis with other cystic lesions such as mesenteric, omental, ovarian and choledochal cysts. If it is possible to demonstrate the presence of peristalsis in the cyst wall, an intestinal origin is probed. MR imaging is suggested to have a supplemental value in the assessment of fetal abdominal cysts (Fig. 16) [10, 35, 36].
CT is not typically performed for evaluation of EDCs due to radiation. CT may depict the location and extension of the cyst, as well as complications, the associated anomalies and anatomical relationship with surrounding structures. At CT, an EDC manifests as a cystic mass with a thin and slightly enhancing wall adjacent to the gastrointestinal wall. A high attenuation inside the cyst may be seen due to haemorrhage or proteinaceous material. A thick enhancing wall, air bubbles inside and cyst-surrounding inflammation may indicate an EDC complicated by infection (Fig. 17) [1, 11, 12, 15].
Like CT, MR is not routinely used as a diagnostic method for EDCs, especially due to sedation requirement. On MR imaging, most duplications have low signal intensity on T1-weighed images and very high intensity on T2-weighted images (Fig. 18). Both CT and MR play a major role prior to surgery in establishing the relationship between the cyst and its adjacent structures , and in locations where US presents a limited use, particularly in oesophageal and rectal duplications [1, 2, 6, 12].
The main considerations in the management of EDCs are: the condition of the patient, the location of the cyst, whether it involves one or more anatomic locations, whether its structure is cystic or tubular, and if it is communicated with the true intestinal lumen.
With the widespread availability of antenatal diagnosis, EDCs are often diagnosed prenatally. The optimal time to perform the resection in children with antenatal diagnosis is not defined. These patients should undergo early investigation, followed by early resection even within the first 6 months of life [3, 37, 38].
Treatment of asymptomatic EDCs remains controversial. The clinical behaviour of EDCs is unpredictable. EDCs tend to increase in size gradually and can cause symptoms and important complications that might be fatal, such as obstruction, massive bleeding or even a potential risk for malignant transformation in the adulthood [13, 14, 17, 39].
Early excision is associated with less morbidity and a shorter length of stay compared to excision in symptomatic patients. There are significant post-operative morbidities after resection of complicated EDCs, compared with its elective surgery. Cyst excision alone could be considered, but if there is a communication, sometimes a resection of the adjacent bowel is necessary. It is important to ensure that the cyst is entirely resected because recurrence or malignant changes may occur .
Currently, minimally invasive surgery is becoming the elective approach, and most of the cysts can be resected successfully, either thoracoscopically or laparoscopically, as long as an exhaustive imaging diagnosis is available .
EDCs are uncommon congenital abnormalities arising anywhere along the GT. Their clinical presentations vary according to the site of duplication; ileum appears as the most commonly involved. Nowadays, antenatal diagnosis is becoming more frequent. US is the method of choice to diagnose gastrointestinal EDCs. Although double-wall US sign in a cyst is the most typical for diagnosis of EDCs, the findings of the five layers sign or the “Y configuration” of the muscular layer are more specific features. Complicated cysts present atypical imaging findings. CT and MR imaging can be required in oesophageal or rectal EDCs for planning complicated surgical approach. Surgery is necessary because of the severe complications they can develop. The diagnosis is confirmed by histological examination.
Enteric duplication cyst
Hur J, Yoon CS, Kim MJ, Kim OH (2007) Imaging features of gastrointestinal tract duplications in infants and children: from esophagus to rectum. Pediatr Radiol 37:691–699
Berrocal T, Hidalgo P, Gutiérrez J, De Pablo L, Rodríguez-Lemos R (2004) Imagen radiológica de las duplicaciones del tubo digestivo. Radiología 46:282–292
Sharma S, Yadav AK, Mandal AK, Zaheer S, Yadav D, Samie A (2015) Enteric duplication cysts in children: a clinicopathological dilemma. J Clin Diagn Res 9:8–11
Macpherson RI (1993) Gastrointestinal tract duplications: clinical, pathologic, etiologic, and radiologic considerations. Radiographics 13:1063–1080
Tiwari C, Shah H, Waghmare M, Makhija D, Khedkar K (2017) Cysts of gastrointestinal origin in children: varied presentation. Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr 20:94–99
Okur MH, Arslan MS, Arslan S et al (2014) Gastrointestinal tract duplications in children. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 18:1507–1512
Van Zitteren LM, Ruppert M, Op de Beeck B, Wojciechowski M (2017) Infected enteric duplication cyst. BMJ Case Rep 21:2017
Qi BQ, Beasley SW, Williams AK (2001) Evidence of a common pathogenesis for foregut duplications and esophageal atresia with tracheo-esophageal fistula. Anat Rec 264:93–100
Letelier AM, Barría CM, Beltrán MS, Marcelo A, Moreno CH (2009) Duplicación intestinal: Diagnóstico y tratamiento de una condición inusual. Rev Chil Cir 61:171–175
Palacios A, De Vera M, Martínez-Escoriza JC (2013) Prenatal sonographic findings of duodenal duplication: case report. J Clin Ultrasound 41(Suppl 1):1-4
Udiya AK, Shetty GS, Chauhan U, Singhal S, Prabhu SM (2016) Multiple isolated enteric duplication cysts in an infant—a diagnostic dilemma. J Clin Diagn Res 10:TD15–TD16
Rasool N, Safdar CA, Ahmad A, Kanwal S (2013) Enteric duplication in children: clinical presentation and outcome. Singapore Med J 54:343–346
Erginel B, Soysal FG, Ozbey H et al (2017) Enteric duplication cysts in children: a single-institution series with forty patients in twenty-six years. World J Surg 41:620–624
Górecki W, Bogusz B, Zajac A, Soltysiak P (2015) Laparoscopic and laparoscopy assisted resection of enteric duplication cysts in children. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 25:838–840
Lee NK, Kim S, Jeon TY et al (2010) Complications of congenital and developmental abnormalities of the gastrointestinal tract in adolescents and adults: evaluation with multimodality imaging. Radiographics 30:1489–1507
Ben-Ishay O, Connlly SA, Buchmiller TL (2013) Multiple duplication cysts diagnosed prenatally: case report and review of the literature. Pediatr Surg Int 29:397–400
Olajide AR, Yisau AA, Abdulrasees NA, Kashim IO, Olaniyi AO, Morohunfade AO (2010) Gastrointestinal duplications: experience in seven children and a review of the literature. Saudi J Gastroenterol 16:105–109
Chuquisana-Mostacero C, Enríquez de Salamanca-Celada J, Azorín-Cuadrillero D (2017) Dos casos de quiste de intestino anterior en cavidad oral. Cir Plast Iberolatinoam 43:179–185
Mandham P, Ehsan TM, Al-Sibai S, Khan AM, Sankhla D (2014) Noncommunicating multiple intra-abdominal enteric duplication cysts. Afr J Paediatr Surg 11:276–278
Seydafkan S, Shibata D, Sanchez J, Tran ND, Leon M, Coppola D (2016) Presacral noncommunicating enteric duplication cyst. Cancer Control 23:170–174
Basany L, Aepala R, Mohan Reddy Bellary M, Chitneni M (2015) Intestinal obstruction due to ileal duplication cyst and malrotation in a preterm neonate. J Neonatal Surg 4:48
Nishizawa C, Cajusay-Velasco S, Mashima M et al (2014) HDlive imaging of fetal enteric duplication cyst. J Med Ultrason (2001) 41:511
Cuch B, Nachulewicz P, Wieczorek AP, Wozniak M, Pac-Kozuchowska E (2015) Esophageal duplication cyst treated thoracoscopically during the neonatal period. Medicine (Baltimore) 94:e2270
Di Serafino M, Mercogliano C, Vallone G (2016) Ultrasound evaluation of the enteric duplication cyst: the gut signature. J Ultrasound 19:131–133
Tong SC, Pitman M, Anupindi SA (2002) Ileocecal enteric duplication cyst: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 22:1217–1222
Anupindi SA, Halverson M, Khwaja A, Jeckovic M, Wang X, Bellah RD (2014) Common and uncommon applications of bowel ultrasound with pathologic correlation in children. AJR Am J Roentol 202:946–959
Liu R, Adler D (2014) Duplication cysts: diagnosis, management, and the role of endoscopic ultrasound. Endosc Ultrasound 3:152–160
Fonseca EKUN, Sameshima YT (2018) Gut signature sign in enteric duplication cysts. Abdom Radiol (NY). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1620-2
Kumar D, Ramamathan S, Haider E, Khanna M, Otero C (2015) Gastroenterology: revisiting the forgotten sign: five layered gut signature and Y configuration in enteric duplication cysts on high-resolution ultrasound. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 30:1111
Cheng G, Soboleski D, Daneman A, Poenaru D, Hurlbut D (2005) Sonographic pitfalls in the diagnosis of enteric duplication cysts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:521–525
Tritou I, Sfakianaki E, Prassopoulos P (2015) Letter: the sonographic multilaminar appearance is not enough for the diagnosis of enteric duplication cyst in children. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204:222–223
Peng HL, Su CT, Chang CY, Lau BH, Lee CC (2012) Unusual imaging features of completely isolated enteric duplication in a child. Pediatr Radiol 42:1142–1144
Gerscovich EO, Sekhon S, Loehfelm TW, Wootton-Gorges SL, Greenspan A (2017) A reminder of peristalsis as a useful tool in the prenatal differential diagnosis of abdominal cystic masses. J Ultrasound 17:129–132
Laje P, Flake AW, Adzick NS (2010) Prenatal diagnosis and postnatal resection of intraabdominal enteric duplications. J Pediatr Surg 45:1554
Recio Rodríguez M, Martínez de Vega V, Cano Alonso R, Carrascoso Arranz J, Martínez Ten P, Pérez Pedregosa J (2012) MR imaging of thoracic abnormalities in the fetus. Radiographics 32:E305–E321
Veyrac C, Couture A, Saguintaah M, Baud C (2004) MRI of fetal gastrointestinal tract abnormalities. Abdom Imaging 29:411–420
Laje P, Flake AW, Adzick AS (2010) Prenatal diagnosis and postnatal resection of intra-abdominal enteric duplications. J Pediatr Surg 45:1554–1558
Foley PT, Sithasanan N, McEwing R, Lipsett J, Ford WD, Furness M (2003) Enteric duplications presenting as antenatally detected abdominal cysts: is delayed resection appropriate? J Pediatr Surg 38:1810–1813
Ribaux C, Meyer P (1995) Adenocarcinoma in a ileal duplication. Ann Pathol 15:443–445
Patiño Mayer J, Bettolli M (2014) Alimentary tract duplications in newborns and children: diagnostic aspects and the role of laparoscopic treatment. World J Gastroenterol 20:14263–14271
Scarpa AA, Ram AD, Soccorso G, Singh M, Parikh D (2017) Surgical experience and learning points in the management of foregut duplication cysts. Eur J Pediatr Surg. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1607293
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Sangüesa Nebot, C., Llorens Salvador, R., Carazo Palacios, E. et al. Enteric duplication cysts in children: varied presentations, varied imaging findings. Insights Imaging 9, 1097–1106 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-018-0660-z