Skip to main content

Imaging of haemodialysis: renal and extrarenal findings

Abstract

Electrolyte alterations and extra-renal disorders are quite frequent in patients undergoing haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. The native kidneys may be the site of important pathologies in patients undergoing dialysis, especially in the form of acquired renal cystic disease with frequent malignant transformation. Renal neoplasms represents an important complication of haemodialysis-associated acquired cystic kidney disease and imaging surveillance is suggested. Extra-renal complications include renal osteodistrophy, brown tumours, and thoracic and cardiovascular complications. Other important fields in which imaging techniques may provide important informations are arteriovenous fistula and graft complications.

Teaching points

Renal neoplasms represent a dreaded complication of haemodialysis.

In renal osteodystrophy bone resorption typically manifests along the middle phalanges.

Brown tumours are well-defined lytic lesions radiographically, possibly causing bone expansion.

Vascular calcifications are very common in patients undergoing haemodialysis.

Principal complications of the AV fistula consist of thrombosis, aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms.

Introduction

End-stage renal disease occurs when chronic renal failure progresses to the point that the kidneys are permanently functioning at less than 10 % of their capacity, namely the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is permanently lower than 15 ml/min/1.73 m2. End-stage renal disease used to be a lethal condition until the advent of long-term haemodialysis and renal transplantation. In the USA, diabetic nephropathy, hypertension and glomerulonephritis cause approximately 75 % of end-stage renal disease in patients undergoing haemodialysis.

The dialysis is the exchange of solutes and waste products via either an extracorporeal membrane (haemodialysis) or a peritoneal membrane (continuous ambulatory or cycling peritoneal dialysis). As far as haemodialysis is concerned, the solute removal primarily depends on passive diffusion across a semipermeable membrane. Blood and dialysate flow rates are adjusted to replenish the supply of incoming solute available for diffusion [1]. The efficiency of ultrafiltration depends on the water permeability of the device and the surface area [1]. Haemodialysis has a higher clearance rate for low-molecular-weight substances such as urea [1]. Peritoneal dialysis should be performed in infants and patients with relative contraindications to haemodialysis such as severe vascular disease, active bleeding, haemorrhagic diathesis or cardiovascular instability.

The clinical constellation of signs and symptoms of end-stage renal disease is known as uraemic syndrome. Various problems related to the vascular access in patients on haemodialysis [2] are also common since the peritoneal dialysis catheter leads to the risk of peritonitis and local infections. Patients with end-stage renal failure are susceptible to all the complications of any underlying condition such as diabetes and hypertension as well as other metabolic and physiologic derangements. In addition, chronic immunosuppression makes patients with end-stage renal disease prone to infections, tuberculosis included [3].

Imaging plays an essential role in the assessment of the possible renal and extra-renal complications in patients undergoing long-term haemodialysis.

Chronic renal failure

Chronic renal failure can result from numerous renal parenchymal diseases, the most common being glomerulonephritis, diabetes, hypertension and the polycystic kidney disease. Diabetes and hypertension are now recognised as the leading causes of chronic renal failure in the USA [4]. Often, patients only seek medical attention when the renal disease has progressed to the uraemic stage since adult patients are usually unaware of their advancing renal failure until the GFR has decreased to less than 15 ml per minute, namely end-stage renal disease [4].

Ultrasound (US) with Doppler US examination of intrarenal vessels is the imaging modality of choice to be employed in patients with renal failure and is commonly performed early in the clinical course [5]. Chronic renal failure manifests with a reduction of renal dimensions that develops over months or years. US reveals a reduced renal length and reduced renal cortical thickness with an increased renal cortical echogenicity often associated with poor visibility of the renal pyramids and the renal sinus, marginal irregularities, parenchymal cysts and also papillary calcifications (Fig. 1a–b). Colour Doppler US reveals a reduced renal vascularity and increased RI values measured at the level of the segmental and interlobular arteries [6, 7] according to the stage of chronic renal failure. The capability of renal RI to aid in the prediction of renal dysfunction progression has been demonstrated. US follow-up of native scarred kidneys is indicated in patients with chronic renal failure treated with dialysis or renal transplantation because they develop the acquired cystic kidney disease (ACKD) with a significantly increased risk of solid and cystic renal malignancies. CT confirms the US findings by revealing reduced renal length and cortical thickness (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1
figure 1

ab: a Grey-scale US and (b) unenhanced CT, coronal reformations. Papillary calcifications in a patient undergoing long-term dialysis, appearing as hyperchoic spots on renal pyramids. Papillary calcifications may also be observed in analgesic nephropathy, in sarcoidosis, primary hyperparathyroidism, diabetes mellitus and medullary sponge kidney

Fig. 2
figure 2

Chronic renal failure in a 76-year-old female. CT image of kidneys reveals a short length and diffuse reduction of renal cortical thickness

Renal abnormalities in long-term haemodialysis

Acquired cystic kidney disease

ACKD was first described by Dunnil et al. (1977) and is characterised by the development of numerous fluid-filled cysts in patients with end-stage renal disease who have undergone prolonged dialysis but without a history of hereditary cystic disease (Fig. 3a, b). After 1–3 years of haemodialysis, 10–20 % of patients have ACKD, 40–60 % after 3–5 years of haemodyalisis and more than 90 % after 5–10 years of haemodialysis. The cysts measure 0.5 to 2 cm in diameter, contain clear fluid, are lined by either a hyperplastic or a flattened tubular epithelium, and often contain calcium oxalate crystals. They probably form as a result of obstruction of tubules by interstitial fibrosis or oxalate crystals. Frequently, some cysts may develop a haemorrhagic pattern causing haematuria (Fig. 4a, b). The likelihood of the development of ACKD increases with the duration of haemodialysis, and it is higher in male and older patients. Other factors such as the underlying renal insufficiency and serum creatinine level have no significant influence on the development of ACKD. The development of renal cell carcinoma in the wall of the cysts is the most serious complication of ACKD. The prevalence of renal cell carcinoma in patients with dialysis-associated ACKD undergoing long-term haemodialysis is increased, being in the range of 3–6 %. The prevalence is similar in patients with ACKD undergoing renal transplantation.

Fig. 3
figure 3

a, b: Unenhanced (a) and contrast-enhanced CT (b). Acquired cystic kidney disease in a patient undergoing long-term haemodialysis

Fig. 4
figure 4

a, b: Haemorrhagic renal cyst (arrow) in the right kidney in a patient undergoing long-term haemodialysis. The cyst appears hypointense on T2-weighted MR sequences (a) and hyperintense on T1-weighted MR sequences (b)

Renal neoplasms

An increased incidence of renal tumours has been reported in patients with end-stage renal disease [8]. Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) presents with a frequency three to six times higher in patients receiving haemodialysis than in the general population [8]. Observations provide histological evidence that renal cell neoplasms are prone to develop in relatively young patients with renal failure when their uraemia is treated by long-term dialysis. The incidence of renal carcinoma increases with the duration of dialysis [8].

Other studies indicate that the stimulus for neoplastic growth comes with a cystic transformation of the kidneys. A very strong association with ACKD and an increased incidence of papillary renal tumours have been observed in many studies [9]. More than 80 % of all patients with end-stage renal disease developing a renal tumour actually have underlying ACKD [8]. Since these tumours are multiple and very often small in size, the ratio of histological RCC subtypes is shifted toward papillary renal carcinoma and papillary renal cell adenoma [8].

Renal tumours developing in patients undergoing haemodialysis present at an earlier age compared to the general population, with a higher incidence in males, [8, 1012], and they frequently are bilateral (9 %) and multi-centric (50 %) [5]. The papillary hyperplasia in the cyst is thought to be a precursor of the papillary carcinoma. Papillary-cell renal cell carcinoma accounts for about half the cases identified in patients undergoing haemodialysis, while it does not exceed 10 % in the general population (Fig. 5a–c) [1316].

Fig. 5
figure 5

ac: Unenhanced (a) and contrast-enhanced CT, transverse plane (b) and sagittal reformation (c). Rounded lesion (white arrow) of the right kidney in a patient after renal allograft transplantation (black arrow). The lesion shows indeterminate enhancement (an increase of 10 HU after contrast injection). The dissected specimen proved to be a papillary renal cell carcinoma. There was no sign of acquired cystic renal disease

CT seems to provide better diagnostic accuracy than US or MR imaging in the detection of renal tumours in patients undergoing haemodialysis (Fig. 6a–c) [17, 18].

Fig. 6
figure 6

ac: ACKD in a patient who has been undergoing haemodialysis for 10 years. a Unenhanced and contrast-enhanced CT, transverse plane (b) and coronal reformation (c). Both kidneys present multiple cysts; one of these at the inferior pole of the left kidney presents uniform thickening of the wall (Bosniak IIF) (arrowhead). Moreover a solid enhancing lesion, about 3 cm in size, is evident on the left kidney (arrow) corresponding to a clear-cell renal cell carcinoma

The leading sign of the tumour is the space occupied by the lesion localised in the atrophic renal parenchyma; the size of the distinguishable tumour is about 5 mm in diameter when causing the bulging of the renal surface [9]. Smaller lesions under the kidney surface may remain undetected, especially when ultrasound or plain CT is used [19]. Renal parenchymal atrophy in the end stage of glomerulonephritis or interstitial nephritis is the main limitation of ultrasound in imaging the kidneys in dialysis patients [9], while the enhancement of small nodular foci could help identify smaller tumours inside the renal parenchyma if multi-detector row computed tomography with isotropic resolution is used [9].

It is generally agreed that there is a need for regular surveillance of patients with ACKD for the early detection of renal cell carcinoma [17, 18].

Although regular follow-up trans-abdominal ultrasound or conventional helical CT is able to detect larger masses, Ferda et al. have shown that the capabilities of multi-detector row computed tomography offer more accurate imaging of multiple renal tumours in ESRD patients [9]. However, some authors maintain that the performance of periodic ultrasound controls allows achieving the early diagnosis and treatment of tumours of the kidney in patients in dialysis [20].

There is no clear consensus about screening in the long-term dialysis population. The current literature indicates that most patients will develop acquired renal cysts after 3–7 years on dialysis, the latter associated with a 1.6–7.0 % incidence of RCC. This has led some authors to recommend routine screening for RCC in patients who have been on dialysis for longer than 3 years, including subsequent transplant recipients [21]. Some authors have found that screening with computed tomography or ultrasound increases life expectancy by about 1.6 years among 20-year-old patients with a life expectancy of 25 years [22].

Extra-renal complications in patients undergoing long-term haemodialysis

Musculoskeletal system

Patients with chronic renal disease and on haemodialysis may develop many different musculoskeletal abnormalities, including secondary hyperparathyroidism, osteomalacia, osteosclerosis, osteoporosis, amyloidosis and a variety of crystal deposition diseases [23].

Other abnormalities related to the biochemical disturbance of chronic renal failure include soft tissue/vascular calcifications and crystalline arthropathies.

Musculoskeletal sequelae predominantly related to dialysis include an aluminium toxicity manifesting as osteomalacia from ingestion of aluminium salts in phosphate-binding antiacids used to control hyperphosphataemia, amyloidosis and destructive spondyloarthropathy.

Dialysis-related amyloidosis is a frequent and major complication in long-term dialysis patients, and it presents with carpal tunnel syndrome, cystic bone lesions, destructive spondylarthropathy, arthritis, periarthritis and systemic organ involvement [24].

Destructive spondyloarthropathy is characterised by rapidly progressive radiographic abnormalities, including the loss of intervertebral disc space, erosion of the subchondral bone in the adjacent vertebral bodies and new bone formation (Fig. 7). In some patients, destructive changes may be severe, simulating infective spondylitis: the persistence of low signal intensity on T2-weighted images generally permits excluding infections [23].

Fig. 7
figure 7

Plain x-ray film of the spine. Diffuse osteosclerosis of the spine in a patient undergoing chronic haemodialysis. Diffuse sub-endplate densities at multiple contiguous levels (arrows), a pattern known as “rugger-jersey spine”

Avascular necrosis, osteomyelitis (Fig. 8a, b), septic arthritis, tendinosis/tendon rupture and bursitis/synovitis are caused by a combination of chronic renal failure, steroid/immunosuppressants and dialysis [25].

Fig. 8
figure 8

a, b: Unhenanced CT axial (a), sagittal plane. Osteomyelitis of the tarsus in a 72-year-old male with chronic renal failure under dialysis. Extensive bone alterations involving all the tarsal bones with important areas of ostelysis associated with areas of osteosclerosis. The infection extensively involves the calcaneus with intraosseous fluid and gas components. A fistula with subcutaneous soft tissue is visible on the lateral side of the calcaneus (arrow)

Renal osteodystrophy

Abnormalities involving the musculoskeletal system are numerous and frequent in patients with chronic renal insufficiency. Chronic renal insufficiency, haemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, renal transplantation and administration of different medications provoke complex biochemical disturbances of the calcium-phosphate metabolism with a wide spectrum of bone and soft tissue abnormalities named renal osteodystrophy [26]. Renal osteodystrophy is a global term applied to all pathological features of bone in patients with chronic renal failure and it includes osteomalacia or rickets according to the age of the patient, secondary hyperparathyroidism with bone resorption, periosteal reaction, brown tumours, osteosclerosis, osteoporosis, soft tissue and vascular calcifications.

Multiple factors play a role in creating renal osteodystrophy including a deficiency in the active form of vitamin D due to impaired renal metabolism and an increase in the parathormone secretion due to hyperphosphataemia causing hypocalcaemia by precipitating calcium [5].

Radiography still represents the most important and widely performed technique [27] to identify the alterations of renal osteodystrophy. Radionuclide imaging, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging are less frequently indicated and are mainly used for more sensitive and precise identifications (aseptic bone necrosis, infection, Looser’s zones), morphological presentations (spinal infection with neural compromise) and the differential diagnosis of complications (destructive spondyloarthropathy versus spinal infection).

The osteoclastic bone resorption affects the surfaces of the bone and may be subperiosteal, intracortical, endosteal, trabecular, subchondral, subligamentous and subtendinous. Early radiographic changes of subperiosteal bone resorption may be demonstrated at the phalangeal tufts and the radial aspects of the middle phalanges of the second and the third hand fingers (Fig. 9a, b) [26]. Early subperiosteal resorption produces the loss of definition of the cortical bone with a characteristic lace-like appearance, which later on progresses to complete cortical disappearance. The advanced bone resorption of the terminal phalanges may result in acro-osteolysis with separation of the tuft and the base of the phalanx. Subperiosteal resorption is frequently combined with intracortical tunnelling and endosteal resorption, which causes scalloped defects of the inner cortical contour. In advanced disease, the widespread trabecular resorption within the medullary bone may be seen with a loss of definition and the disappearance of trabeculae. The most typical manifestation of trabecular bone resorption appears at the cranial vault and is named the ‘salt and pepper’ skull [26].

Fig. 9
figure 9

a, b: a Radiographic image of the left hand in a patient undergoing chronic haemodialysis. b Magnification. Secondary hyperparathyroidism with bone resorption along the radial aspects of the middle phalanges of the fingers (arrows)

Subchondral bone resorption may affect different articulations, most commonly the sacroiliac, sternoclavicular and acromioclavicular joints, intervertebral discs and the symphysis pubis. Radiographic changes at the sacroiliac joints are similar to those seen in ankylosing spondylitis and include the widening of the joint space and subchondral bone erosions surrounded by osteosclerosis [26].

Subligamentous and subtendinous bone resorption occurs at numerous sites, especially at the ischial tuberosities, femoral trochanters and the insertions of the coracoclavicular ligaments.

Periosteal new bone production may be seen in patients with advanced hyperparathyroidism affecting the metatarsals, femur, pelvis, humerus, radius, ulna, metacarpals and phalanges.

Osteosclerosis is frequently found in patients with renal osteodystrophy and secondary hyperparathyroidism (Fig. 10a, b). Bone sclerosis in renal osteodystrophy may affect different skeletal elements but it usually predominates in the axial skeleton. One of the typical findings includes broad osteosclerosis localised below the endplates of the vertebral bodies with normal density of the middle parts (‘rugger jersey’ appearance) [26].

Fig. 10
figure 10

a, b: Unenhanced CT. Sacral region, axial plane (a) and coronal reformation (b). Renal osteodystrophy of the left iliac wing with diffuse bone sclerosis and some areas of resorption (arrows) due to secondary hyperparathyroidism in a patient undergoing chronic haemodialysis

Radiographic signs of osteomalacia are a bone density decrease with a loss of definition of the cortical bone and coarsening of the trabecular pattern. Looser’s zones (i.e. Milkman’s fractures, pseudofractures) are rare but pathognomic features, which are most common in the medial part of the femoral neck, pubic rami, ilii, scapulae, ribs and acromion. Looser’s zones represent unmineralised osteoid and are seen as lucent lines perpendicular to the cortex, frequently symmetric in location.

Rickets-like changes may occur in the immature skeleton and reflect an abnormal endochondral ossification. Radiographic features include osteopenia with softening and bending of bones, widening of the growth plate as well as the cupping, expansion, demineralisation and disorganisation of the metaphysis [26].

The osteoporotic bone is characterised by the thinning of cortices and trabeculae. These features are most evident in skeletal elements rich in cancellous bone (spine, proximal femur and forearm). In advanced osteoporosis the loss of trabeculae with pathological fractures may occur. In the vertebral column the disappearance of transverse trabeculae with preservation of the vertical compression trabeculae results in characteristic vertical striations. The final results are pathological fractures with wedge-shaped, biconcave (fish vertebrae) or flattened vertebral bodies and vertebral column deformities. Vertebral fractures can be evaluated subjectively or using quantitative methods. In general, the sensitivity of radiography is poor; 30 % to 50 % of bone tissue has to be lost before osteoporosis can be detected on routine radiographs [26].

Brown tumours

Brown tumours are a form of cystic fibrous osteitis, the end stage of bone remodelling in primary or secondary hyperparathyroidism [28]. In patients with chronic renal failure brown tumours represent an extreme and serious complication of renal osteodystrophy [2831]. Brown tumours are caused by the localised replacement of bone by vascularised fibrous tissue (osteitis fibrosa cystica) resulting from parathyroid hormone-stimulated osteoclastic activity [5]. Patients with renal osteodystrophy who have brown tumours actually have autonomously functioning parathyroid glands or tertiary hyperparathyroidism [5]. The fibrous tissue contains giant cells, and the lesions may become cystic, following necrosis and liquefaction [5]. These lesions represent a reparative cellular process rather than a neoplastic process and are located in areas of intense bone resorption (Fig. 11a, b) [5, 32].

Fig. 11
figure 11

a, b: Unenhanced CT, coronal (a) and sagittal (b) reformations. Brown tumour in a patient undergoing chronic haemodialysis with tertiary hyperparathyroidism. The brown tumour appears as a lytic lesion of the ilium (arrow)

Brown tumours occur as single or multiple radiolucent lesions and can be found both within bone and in the adjacent soft tissues. When left untreated, they can undergo central necrosis and cyst formation [5]. Radiographically, brown tumours are well-defined lytic lesions, often eccentric or cortical, that may cause endosteal scalloping and bone expansion.

Soft tissue and vascular metastatic calcification

Biochemical disturbance of chronic renal failure includes vascular and soft tissue metastatic calcifications and crystalline arthropathies. Vascular calcifications manifest as both medial and intimal calcifications of the arteries and are a hallmark of the accelerated atherosclerosis observed in uraemia [33].

Calcific uraemic arteriolopathy is a rare but life-threatening complication estimated to occur in 1 % of patients with chronic renal disease and in 4.1 % of patients undergoing maintenance haemodialysis [34]. Articular calcinosis is characterised by the deposition of a large amount of calcium around the periarticular regions, and it is commonly noticed over the shoulder, elbow and hip joints [35]. Even visceral (myocardial and pericardial) calcifications may occur in patients undergoing haemodialysis.

Vascular calcifications are very common in end-stage renal disease, especially in patients undergoing haemodialysis (Fig. 12a, b) [36, 37]. The mechanisms of vascular calcification are hyperphosphataemia and elevated calcium (Ca) and phosphate (P) products [38, 39].

Fig. 12
figure 12

a, b: Radiographic images of several skeletal segments of different patients (all undergoing long-term haemodialysis) show diffuse calcifications of the peripheral arteries (arrows). Vascular calcifications appear as both medial and intimal calcifications of arteries

Vascular calcification induces the stiffening of the vessel wall and reduces the vascular compliance [40]. Iwasa et al. showed a much higher rate of intracranial artery calcification in haemodialysis patients than in the general population, and this finding has been reported to be an independent risk factor for ischaemic stroke. The most frequently involved sites of calcification in haemodialysis patients were the internal carotid artery and the vertebral arteries [41].

Cardiovascular complications

Cardiovascular complications are common in patients with chronic renal failure and are related to atherosclerosis and hyperlipidaemia, hypertension due to sodium retention and alterations in the renin-angiotensin axis, myocardial dysfunction and pericarditis. More than 50 % of end-stage renal disease patients treated with chronic haemodialysis die from cardiovascular diseases, including congestive heart failure due to the increase of the left ventricular afterload: volume overload between dialyses, hypertension, increased arterial stiffness, anaemia, vascular access flow (arteriovenous fistula) and sympathetic activation. Patients undergoing dialysis present a higher risk of atherosclerosis, also for underlying diabetes mellitus and/or hypertension as causes of end-stage renal disease [4]. Atherosclerosis involves the main and all the peripheral arteries including the intrarenal arteries. Calcifications of the myocardium, coronary arteries and cardiac valves are frequently observed in patients with end-stage renal disease [40, 42].

Cardiovascular calcification lesions can lead to the development of a number of clinically significant complications, including myocardial ischaemia, myocardial infarction, impaired myocardial function, congestive heart failure, cardiac valve insufficiency and cardiac arrhythmias [43, 44]. It has been demonstrated that B2-microglobulin amyloid deposits are extensively localised in the hearts of long-term haemodyalisis patients [45], in particular at the level of the endocardium, myocardium and wall of the small vessels [24].

Thoracic complications

Patients with chronic renal failure may present several abnormal findings visible on chest radiography due to changes in the phosphorus and calcium metabolism, changes in haemostasis, arterial hypertension, fluid retention or due to dialysis.

The thoracic complications of haemodialysis may be classified into two main topics: cardiovascular and pulmonary [46].

Cardiovascular findings include aortic calcification, cardiomegaly, calcifications of the coronary arteries, pericardial effusion, pulmonary thromboembolism and intra-atrial thrombus [46].

The most frequent pulmonary abnormalities include interstitial and alveolar oedema due to congestive heart failure, pleural effusion, lung atelectasis, metastatic pulmonary calcifications and calcifications of the bronchial walls, pleura and chest wall vessels. Lung parenchymal abnormalities visible on CT include areas of ground-glass opacity, interlobular septal thickening, parenchymal fibrosis scars, emphysema bullae, peribronchovascular interstitial thickening, increased vascular calibre, bronchiectasis, and thickening of the pleura and fissures [46].

The frequency of pulmonary infections in uraemic patients is higher compared to the general population, with evidence of parenchymal consolidation and/or pleural effusion [46].

Staphylococcus aureus continues to be the most common (20.8 %) cause of bacterial infection among patients on long-term haemodialysis [46]. Patients on haemodialysis are at increased risk of developing active tuberculosis after primary infection, activation of quiescent disease or reactivation of pre-existing tuberculosis infection [46].

Neurologic complications

Patients with end-stage renal disease frequently have central nervous system abnormalities, some of them related to end-stage renal disease itself and others related to problems secondary to haemodialysis [47].

The most common neurologic complications in this patient group include focal white matter lesions, cerebral atrophy, dialysis encephalopathy, hypertensive encephalopathy, cerebral infarction, intracerebral haemorrhage, posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, osmotic demyelination syndrome, cerebral infection, sinus vein thrombosis and dialysis disequilibrium syndrome. Peripheral neuropathy is also common in patients with chronic renal failure [5].

Acute cerebrovascular disease is one of the most frequent causes of morbidity and mortality in patients on long-term haemodialysis treatment. Cerebral ischaemia and infarction are important risk factors for stroke and are caused by the occlusion of the small, deeply penetrating cerebral arteries. Haemodialysis patients are at greater risk of cerebral haemorrhage because of anticoagulant therapies (e.g., heparin and low-molecular-weight heparins), defects of platelet adhesion, anaemia and inadequate control of hypertension. Cerebral haemorrhage may be intraparenchymal, subdural, epidural or subarachnoid. Patients with end-stage renal disease also have predisposing factors that lead to sinus vein thrombosis.

Haematologic abnormalities

Haematologic abnormalities are among the most consistent manifestations of uraemia [4]. These abnormalities include anaemia, bleeding and granulocyte and platelet dysfunction. The primary causes of anaemia in chronic renal failure are deficiency of erythropoietin, which is a glycoprotein normally produced by the kidney, and iron deficiency due to a reduced iron intake and frequent blood sampling. Erythropoietin therapy has improved the general status of patients with chronic renal failure. In patients with uraemic syndrome the fat bone marrow is progressively replaced by haematopoietic marrow content with a hypointense appearance on T1-weighted MR images in various anatomical regions (especially the spine and upper and lower limb bones). A haemorrhagic diathesis is common in patients with chronic renal failure. Spontaneous non-traumatic bleeding may affect the perinephric and subcapsular spaces, renal parenchyma or collecting system. Gastrointenstinal bleeding is also common in uraemic patients [5].

Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis

Although medical considerations may dictate the choice of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) or haemodialysis for some patients, most cases of renal failure are treatable with either method.

Therefore, it is important to recognise some potentially fatal complications of CAPD that must be detected at an early stage in order to allow a prompt interruption of CAPD and direct the patient toward the haemodialysis treatment only.

Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis is an uncommon serious complication of CAPD [48] associated with significant morbidity and mortality.

In a large study by Rigby and Hawley [49], the overall prevalence of encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis is 0.7 %; however, the prevalence increases to 19.4 % in patients who have been on CAPD [49] for more than 8 years.

Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis is a condition characterised by fibrotic thickening of the peritoneum, which can progress to the encasement or encapsulation of the small-bowel loops with a resultant bowel obstruction. The peritoneal thickening can be smooth or irregular and nodular, and mild peritoneal thickening typically progresses to diffuse, severe peritoneal thickening and eventually peritoneal calcification.

Peritoneal thickening progresses to peritoneal encapsulation of the involved small-bowel loops, a process that has been described as the “cocooning” of the small bowel, by a sheath of fibrous, sclerosed peritoneum.

The small-bowel loops are often centrally collected by encapsulating the fibrotic peritoneum. The fibrotic process may appear as a mass of small bowel loops tethered together. Ultimately, small-bowel necrosis with perforation may occur.

In encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis, the fibrotic, thickened peritoneal membranes can result in loculated ascites. Since the small bowel becomes involved, tethered and mass-like, the tethered small bowel may also produce loculated fluid collections.

Numerous other complications related to peritoneal dialysis have been described, including catheter dysfunction, haematoma, dialysate leak and hydrothorax [50].

Dialysis access complications

Repeated access to the circulation is essential to perform an adequate maintenance haemodialysis. End-stage renal failure patients requiring long-term haemodialysis need a durable vascular access, and the maintenance of an acceptable vascular access is an important issue for patients with renal failure. Haemodialysis is usually performed with an internal arteriovenous fistula (AVF) or polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE, Teflon) graft, also known as a prosthetic bridge graft (PBG). Surgically constructed arteriovenous (AV) fistulas (radio- or brachiocephalic), synthetic AV grafts or a venous catheter positioned in a central vein are common means of establishing a vascular access for long-term haemodialysis.

Vascular stenosis is the major cause of access failure. The treatment of stenosis with percutaneous interventions, angioplasty, endoluminal vascular stents or thombolysis as an alternative to surgery has been shown to increase the chance of survival for patients with AVF and PBG dialysis [51]. Several surveillance techniques can be used for the prompt detection of access stenosis development. Colour Doppler US [52] and digital subtraction angiography [53] are most commonly used for the detection of access stenosis, while contrast-enhanced multi-detector CT [54] and MR angiography of shunts [55] have recently been introduced. Angiographic evaluation via puncture of the brachial artery is indicated when an interventional procedure is planned.

Arteriovenous fistulas

The AV fistula is considered the best long-term vascular access for haemodialysis because it provides adequate blood flow, is long-lasting and has a lower complication rate than other types of access. A nephrologist or surgeon creates an AV fistula. As a result, the vein grows larger and stronger, making repeated needle insertions for haemodialysis treatments easier. AV fistulas also present some disvantages, including the incomplete maturation of the vein, and a 1–4-month period may be required before the AV fistula can be used. Fistula dysfunction is the most common reason for a second intervention and recurrent hospitalisation. The rate of AVF complications increases with age and the erythropoietin dose as well as among patients with a history of a previous failed shunt [56]. The clinical symptoms include poor flow with loss of thrill in the graft, enlarging pseudoaneurysm or ipsilateral limb swelling.

The main complications of AV fistula include thrombosis with occlusion or stenosis of the venous outflow (Fig. 13a, c) as well as aneurysm or pseudoaneurysm of the venous tract (Fig. 14a, c) close or distal to the anastomosis with the radial artery [57]. In particular, the venous outflow obstruction is the most common cause of AVF thrombosis and poor dialysis. Most typically, pseudoaneurysms are found in areas of repeated puncture or surgical anastomosis.

Fig. 13
figure 13

ac: An 80-year-old male patient with chronic renal failure undergoing haemodialysis. Stenosis (about 5 cm in length) of outflow of AVF of the arm (arrow) (a), treated by angioplasty (b) with recovery of the normal patency (c)

Fig. 14
figure 14

ac: AVF of the forearm at the level of the metaphysis of the radius in a 70-year-old patient with chronic renal failure under dialysis. Outflow perianastomotic pseudoaneurysms (arrows). Vein aneurysms or pseudoaneurysms are located in the puncture site

Complications of the arterial tract of AVFs are rare. Proximal arterial disease, the occlusion or arterial anastomotic stenosis are readily shown by digital subtraction angiography. The arterial stenosis appears as a narrowed area adjacent to or between areas of graft ectasia. The laceration of the radial artery may determine a haematoma with compression of the nervous structures in the carpal tunnel.

Arteriovenous grafts

The AV fistula with its long patency rate and low complication profile is usually the first choice for vascular access creation. However, when superficial veins are not suitable for the AV fistula creation, or they have all been exhausted as a result of repeated AV fistula procedures, arteriovenous grafts using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) are an alternative [58]. The PTFE graft—prosthetic bridge graft (PBG)—consists of a synthetic catheter inserted and sutured into an artery, usually the radial artery, and a vein, usually the cephalic or the basilic vein.

Unlike the arteriovenous fistula used for chronic haemodialysis, the AV graft can be used immediately. Just as in natural AVF, the non-dominant arm should be used first [58]. Compared to properly formed fistulas, grafts tend to have more problems with clotting and infections and require earlier replacement. However, a well-cared-for graft can last several years.

The overall complication rate for AV grafts is twice as that of AV fistulas. The most common complication associated with the AV graft is venous outflow obstruction with graft thrombosis, which accounts for 85 to 90 % of problems with haemodialysis. PBGs have a shorter mean patency than native AVFs. The most common causes of failure include the surgical twisting or kinking of the graft during implantation, arterial plugs, stenosis of the venous anastomosis or an unsuspected venous stenosis. Venous stenosis results in problems that have the net effect of causing inadequate dialysis. Stenosis most frequently involves the venous anastomosis, but it may occur anywhere within the system composed by the graft, anastomosis and its draining veins. Complete thrombosis is easily identified when it involves the graft or the entire venous limb. Moreover, AV grafts may produce complications related to arterial inflow stenosis, arterial anastomotic stenosis, intragraft stenosis, graft pseudoaneurysm and graft degeneration. Treatment options are either a surgical revision or endovascular stent graft placement.

Dialysis access catheters

The high thrombosis rate of AVF and PBGs and the high recurrence rates after thrombolysis and angioplasty have led to consideration of performing haemodialysis with percutaneously inserted venous catheters. Nowadays, venous catheters are often taken into consideration as a long-term solution for haemodialysis because of the improvement in biomaterials available for catheters. Percutaneous venous catheters present the advantage of being placed on an outpatient basis; moreover, they do not require any maturation period, and they prevent repeated punctures of the AVF. The disavantages are represented by the fact that venous catheters are cosmetically less acceptable, and the achievable peak of flow rates are lower than with AVFs and PBGs.

A venous catheter positioned in a central vein (usually the right internal jugular vein or, less frequently, the femoral or subclavian veins) through the subclavian vein for a temporary access has two chambers to allow a two-way flow of blood. Once a catheter has been placed, the needle insertion is not necessary. Catheters are not ideal for permanent access, and their patency is maintained via a heparin-saline infusion by flushing the catheter with 2 or 3 ml of heparin (2,000–3,000 units) twice daily (every 12 h). They can clog, become infected, and cause stenosis or complete thrombosis of the central vein in which they are placed. However, if there is a need to starting haemodialysis immediately, a catheter will work for several weeks or months while the permanent access is gradually developing.

References

  1. Cohen AJ, AH ed (MP1991) Use of dialytic procedures in the intensive care units. Intensive care medicine, ed. I.R. Rippe JM, Alpert JS, Fink, Little, Brown and Company: Boston. 742–764

  2. Stuart S et al (2009) Complications of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Radiographics Rev Public Radiol Soc North Am Inc 29(2):441–460

    Google Scholar 

  3. Richardson RM (2012) The diagnosis of tuberculosis in dialysis patients. Semin Dial 25(4):419–422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. DG W (ed) (1992) Chronic renal failure. Cecil textbook of medicine, ed. S.L. Wyngaarden JB, Bennett JC, Saunders: Philadelphia. 533–541

  5. Quaia E, SS (ed) (2011) Imaging of Dialysis Radiological Imaging of the Kidney, ed. Q. Springer. 793–810

  6. Petersen LJ et al (1995) The pulsatility index and the resistive index in renal arteries in patients with hypertension and chronic renal failure. Nephrol Dial Transplant Off Public Eur Dial Transplant Assoc Eur Ren Assoc 10(11):2060–2064

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Petersen LJ et al (1997) The pulsatility index and the resistive index in renal arteries. Associations with long-term progression in chronic renal failure. Nephrol dial Transplant Off Public Eur Dial Transplant Assoc Eur Ren Assoc 12(7):1376–1380

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Denton MD et al (2002) Prevalence of renal cell carcinoma in patients with ESRD pre-transplantation: a pathologic analysis. Kidney Int 61(6):2201–2209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ferda J et al (2007) Computed tomography of renal cell carcinoma in patients with terminal renal impairment. Eur J Radiol 63(2):295–301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Doublet JD et al (1997) Renal cell carcinoma of native kidneys: prospective study of 129 renal transplant patients. J Urol 158(1):42–44

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pope JC, Koch MO, Bluth RF (1994) Renal cell carcinoma in patients with end-stage renal disease: a comparison of clinical significance in patients receiving hemodialysis and those with renal transplants. Urology 44(4):497–501

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kliem V et al (1997) Risk of renal cell carcinoma after kidney transplantation. Clin Transplant 11(4):255–258

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hoshida Y et al (1999) Renal neoplasias in patients receiving dialysis and renal transplantation: clinico-pathological features and p53 gene mutations. Transplantation 68(3):385–390

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ishikawa I, Kovacs G (1993) High incidence of papillary renal cell tumours in patients on chronic haemodialysis. Histopathology 22(2):135–139

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Takebayashi S et al (2000) Renal cell carcinoma in acquired cystic kidney disease: volume growth rate determined by helical computed tomography. Am J Kidney Dis the off J National Kidney Found 36(4):759–766

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Roy C et al (2005) Papillary renal cell carcinoma in allograft kidney. Eur Radiol 15(4):661–665

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Scandling JD (2007) Acquired cystic kidney disease and renal cell cancer after transplantation: Time to rethink screening? Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2(4):621–622

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schwarz A et al (2007) Renal cell carcinoma in transplant recipients with acquired cystic kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2(4):750–756

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fleischmann D (2003) Multiple detector-row CT angiography of the renal and mesenteric vessels. Eur J Radiol 45(Suppl 1):S79–S87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bellido JA et al (2007) [Early ultrasound detection of renal tumors in patients with end stage renal disease in dialysis]. Arch Esp Urol 60(9):1 079–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Filocamo MT et al (2009) Renal cell carcinoma of native kidney after renal transplantation: clinical relevance of early detection. Transplant Proc 41(10):4197–4201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hurst FP et al (2011) Incidence, predictors and associated outcomes of renal cell carcinoma in long-term dialysis patients. Urology 77(6):1271–1276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Theodorou DJ, Theodorou SJ, Resnick D (2002) Imaging in dialysis spondyloarthropathy. Semin Dial 15(4):290–296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Niwa T (2001) Dialysis-related amyloidosis: pathogenesis focusing on AGE modification. Semin Dial 14(2):123–126

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Katz R, ML (2007) Carmichael J, et al., Musculoskeletal manifestations of chronic renal failure and dialysis, in Radiological Society of North America scientific assembly and annual meeting program, Chicago

  26. Jevtic V (2003) Imaging of renal osteodystrophy. Eur J Radiol 46(2):85–95

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. States LJ (2001) Imaging of metabolic bone disease and marrow disorders in children. Radiol Clin North Am 39(4):749–772

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bereket A et al (2000) Brown tumour as a complication of secondary hyperparathyroidism in severe long-lasting vitamin D deficiency rickets. Eur J Pediatr 159(1–2):70–73

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cicconetti A, Matteini C, Piro FR (1999) [Differential diagnosis in a case of brown tumor caused by primary hyperparathyroidism]. Minerva stomatol 48(11):553–558

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Jeren-Strujic B et al (2001) Secondary hyperparathyroidism and brown tumor in dialyzed patients. Ren Fail 23(2):279–286

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Fatma LB et al (2010) Brown tumors in patients with chronic renal failure and secondary hyperparathyroidism: report of 12 cases. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl an Off Publ Saudi Cent Organ Transpl Saudi Arabia 21(4):772–777

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lessa MM et al (2005) Brown tumor of the facial bones: case report and literature review. Ear Nose Throat J 84(7):432–434

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ketteler M et al (2005) Pathogenesis of vascular calcification in dialysis patients. Clin Exp Nephrol 9(4):265–270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Trent JT, Kirsner RS (2001) Calciphylaxis: diagnosis and treatment. Adv Skin Wound Care 14(6):309–312

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Datta C et al (2005) Tumoral calcinosis. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 71(4):293–294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Raggi P et al (2002) Cardiac calcification in adult hemodialysis patients. A link between end-stage renal disease and cardiovascular disease? J Am Coll Cardiol 39(4):695–701

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Jono S et al (2000) Phosphate regulation of vascular smooth muscle cell calcification. Circ Res 87(7):E10–E17

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Gelev S et al (2008) Vascular calcification and atherosclerosis in hemodialysis patients: what can we learn from the routine clinical practice? Int Urol Nephrol 40(3):763–770

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Giachelli CM et al (2001) Vascular calcification and inorganic phosphate. Am J Kidney Dis Off J National Kidney Found 38(4 Suppl 1):S34–S37

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Guerin AP et al (2000) Arterial stiffening and vascular calcifications in end-stage renal disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant off Publ Eur Dial Trans Assoc Eur Ren Assoc 15(7):1014–1021

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Iwasa Y et al (2012) Prevalence of intracranial artery calcification in hemodialysis patients–a case-control study. Int Urol Nephrol 44(4):1223–1228

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Braun J et al (1996) Electron beam computed tomography in the evaluation of cardiac calcification in chronic dialysis patients. Am J kidney dis Off J National Kidney Found 27(3):394–401

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. London GM et al (2000) Calcification of the aortic valve in the dialyzed patient. J Am Soc Nephrol JASN 11(4):778–783

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Ribeiro S et al (1998) Cardiac valve calcification in haemodialysis patients: role of calcium-phosphate metabolism. Nephrol Dial Transplant Off Public Eur Dial Transplant Assoc Eur Ren Assoc 13(8):2037–2040

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Takayama F et al (2001) Dialysis-related amyloidosis of the heart in long-term hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int Suppl 78:S172–S176

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Lakadamyali H, Ergun T (2008) Thorax CT findings in symptomatic hemodialysis patients. Transplant Proc 40(1):71–76

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Brouns R, De Deyn PP (2004) Neurological complications in renal failure: a review. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 107(1):1–16

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Kawaguchi Y et al (2005) Recommendations on the management of encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis in Japan, 2005: diagnosis, predictive markers, treatment, and preventive measures. Perit Dial Int J Int Soc Perit Dial 25(Suppl 4):S83–S95

    Google Scholar 

  49. Rigby RJ, Hawley CM (1998) Sclerosing peritonitis: the experience in Australia. Nephrol Dial Transplant Off Publ Eur Dial Transplant Assoc Eur Ren Assoc 13(1):154–159

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Zandieh S et al (2014) Radiological diagnosis of dialysis-associated complications. Insights Imaging 5(5):603–617

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. van der Linden J et al (2002) Short- and long-term functional effects of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in hemodialysis vascular access. J Am Soc Nephrol JASN 13(3):715–720

    Google Scholar 

  52. Doelman C et al (2005) Stenosis detection in failing hemodialysis access fistulas and grafts: comparison of color Doppler ultrasonography, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography, and digital subtraction angiography. J Vasc Surg 42(4):739–746

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Froger CL et al (2005) Stenosis detection with MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography in dysfunctional hemodialysis access fistulas and grafts. Radiology 234(1):284–291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Rooijens PP et al (2008) Multi-slice computed tomographic angiography for stenosis detection in forearm hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas. J Vasc Access 9(4):278–284

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Pinto C et al (2006) Time-resolved MR angiography with generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisition and time-resolved echo-sharing angiographic technique for hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas and grafts. J Vasc Interv Radiol JVIR 17(6):1003–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Salahi H et al (2006) Complications of arteriovenous fistula in dialysis patients. Transplant Proc 38(5):1261–1264

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Rodriguez HE et al (2005) Arteriovenous access: managing common problems. Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther 17(2):155–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Nikeghbalian S, Bananzadeh A, Yarmohammadi H (2006) Difficult vascular access in patients with end-stage renal failure. Transplant Proc 38(5):1265–1266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ferruccio Degrassi.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Degrassi, F., Quaia, E., Martingano, P. et al. Imaging of haemodialysis: renal and extrarenal findings. Insights Imaging 6, 309–321 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-015-0383-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-015-0383-3

Keywords