- Pictorial Review
- Open Access
Multidetector CT cystography for imaging colovesical fistulas and iatrogenic bladder leaks
© European Society of Radiology 2012
- Received: 6 July 2011
- Accepted: 19 December 2011
- Published: 4 February 2012
Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) cystography currently represents the modality of choice to image the urinary bladder in traumatized patients. In this review we present our experience with MDCT cystography applications outside the trauma setting, particularly for diagnosing bladder fistulas and leaks. A detailed explanation is provided concerning exam preparation, acquisition technique, image reconstruction and interpretation. Colovesical fistulas most commonly occur as a complication of sigmoid diverticular disease, and often remain occult after extensive diagnostic work-up including cystoscopy and contrast-enhanced CT. We consistently achieved accurate preoperative visualization of colovesical fistulas using MDCT cystography. Urinary leaks and injuries represent a non-negligible occurrence after pelvic surgery, particularly obstetric and gynaecological procedures: in our experience MDCT cystography is useful to investigate iatrogenic bladder leaks or fistulas. In our opinion, MDCT cystography should be recommended as the first line modality for direct visualization or otherwise confident exclusion of both spontaneous enterovesical fistulas and bladder injuries following instrumentation procedures, obstetric or surgical interventions.
• Explanation of exam preparation, acquisition technique, image reconstruction and interpretation.
• Preoperative visualization of colovesical fistulas, usually secondary to sigmoid diverticulitis.
• Visualization or exclusion of iatrogenic bladder injuries following instrumentation or surgery.
- Computed tomography (CT)
- Urinary bladder
- Urinary bladder fistula
- Colonic diverticulitis
- Postoperative complications
In the past, suspected bladder injuries were investigated by means of conventional radiographic cystography, a time-consuming and cumbersome procedure in traumatized patients that provides very limited information on surrounding pelvic structures.
During the 1990s, computed tomography (CT) cystography was developed to complement body CT in patients with possible traumatic bladder lesions. Early experiences reported this technique to be at least as accurate as radiographic studies in the assessment of bladder integrity. Besides bladder configuration and lumen, CT provides extensive information on bones, rectosigmoid, genital organs, peritoneal cul-de-sac and extraperitoneal spaces [1–5].
Recently, volumetric CT cystography acquisition on multidetector (MD) scanners benefited from improved spatial resolution and image reconstruction on arbitrary planes. Allowing identification of small urine leaks in every possible direction, MDCT cystography approaches absolute sensitivity and specificity with no false-negative results reported [6, 7].
Multiplanar reformations represent a highly valuable complement to axial images in providing better anatomic delineation of the rupture site, and their similar orientation to surgical anatomy is appealing to most surgeons. Therefore, MDCT cystography is currently the most recommended imaging technique to detect and classify traumatic bladder lesions, including contusion (without extravesical leak), intraperitoneal, extraperitoneal or combined rupture [6, 7].
Just before MDCT cystography, diluted iodinated contrast is prepared by removing 40 ml from a 500-ml normal saline bag and injecting a similar amount of non-ionic contrast agent (such as 350 mgI/ml iomeprol or 370 mgI/ml iopromide). Standard intravenous infusion tubing is then connected to the bag and filled with diluted contrast to avoid instilling air in the bladder.
With the patient supine on the CT scanner table, the bladder is completely emptied by placing on the floor the Foley catheter bag, which is then disposed. Preliminary unenhanced scans are optional, since recent abdominal-pelvic CT or CT urography is available for most patients.
Tubing is then connected to the Foley catheter, with the diluted contrast bag positioned 50-60 cm higher than table level. When the flow control device is opened, retrograde drip infusion of diluted contrast starts. Pressure injection and bag squeezing are strongly discouraged since bladder injury may worsen. Some serial CT scanograms may be acquired to verify progressive bladder distension and opacification. At least 300 ml of diluted contrast medium is injected into the bladder, unless the patient complains of intolerable bladder distension or flow stops. The estimated amount of instilled contrast mixture is recorded in the radiology report.
Then, volumetric pelvic CT is acquired at maximum bladder distension. During initial experience, acquisition parameters on our four-slice MDCT included 120 kV tube voltage, 245-280 mA tube current, 4 × 2.5 mm collimation, 7.5 mm/gantry rotation table feed (pitch 0.75), and 2.5/1.25 mm slice thickness/reconstruction index. Currently, acquisition on a 64-slice scanner involves tube current adjusted to body weight using automatic dose modulation, 64 × 0.625 mm collimation, 0.891 MD pitch, and 2/1 mm slice thickness/reconstruction index. Additionally, intravenous contrast medium may be used, particularly when looking for neoplastic or inflammatory processes.
Borrowing from previous experiences with conventional cystography, it has been reported that bladder wall integrity may be confirmed, ruling out possible leakages, when retrograde filling with at least 250 ml of diluted contrast is obtained. The only recognized pitfall of this technique is the possible occlusion of a small tear located at the bladder trigone by the Foley catheter balloon .
Although rare, colovesical fistulas represent the most common form (65% of cases) of an acquired bladder–enteric fistula and most frequently occur between the recto-sigmoid and the bladder dome . Diverticular disease represents their major cause (two-thirds of cases), followed by colorectal carcinoma, whereas uncommon aetiologies include Crohn’s disease, bladder or uterine neoplasms, previous irradiation, female pelvic inflammatory diseases, periappendiceal abscesses penetrating trauma or foreign bodies [9, 10].
Clinical presentation of colovesical fistulas includes pneumaturia and fecaluria as the most pathognomonic complaints, along with variable degrees of fever, abdominal pain and weight loss [11, 12]. Treatment includes primary surgical resection of the involved bowel segment (most usually the sigmoid) and colorectal anastomosis, plus closure of the bladder defect or vesical windowectomy; sometimes a protective colostomy is created [8, 11]. Recently, safe and effective resection of diverticulitis complicated by enteric fistulae has been performed laparoscopically .
Despite an easy clinical diagnosis, precise identification of colovesical fistulas is often challenging and is obtained in only 55% of patients after extensive work-ups. Cystoscopy, conventional cystography, colonic enema, sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy have very limited accuracy in identifying these fistulas [9–11].
Contrast-enhanced CT with excretory phase or urographic acquisition is commonly used as the primary imaging technique to investigate suspected colovesical fistulas. Reported accuracy is variable and often limited, since tracks are directly identifiable only when filled by air, fluid or enteral contrast [10, 14]. Most commonly, fistulization is indirectly suggested by bowel-to-bladder adherence, focal bladder mural thickening and/or intraluminal air. Extraluminal CT findings such as bowel wall thickening, diverticula or an extravesical soft tissue mass corresponding to diverticulitis or carcinoma hint at the aetiology of the fistula [9, 10].
Recently, sigmoid–vesical fistulas have been preoperatively investigated using MRI with high accuracy in correct identification of the underlying disease, even though the fistulous tract might not be clearly identified [12, 15]. Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) represents an attractive technique when radiation dose is a concern, its use in the emergency setting is largely limited by cost, availability and lengthy examination time. Our experience recommends MDCT cystography as a fast, cheaper and highly accurate technique to depict colovesical fistulization, particularly when planning for surgical or laparoscopic treatment. Also, ileovesical (most often caused by Crohn’s disease) and rectovesical (associated with tumours or following trauma) fistulas can also be effectively imaged using the same modality.
Because of embryological development and anatomical proximity to the genital organs, most (61.5%) iatrogenic bladder injuries occur as complications of gynaecological surgery, such as hysterectomy, pelvic masses resection, Caesarean section, diagnostic laparoscopy, anti-incontinence or laparoscopically assisted vaginal procedures [16, 17]. Predisposing factors include distortion of the pelvic anatomy by post-surgical adhesions, radiation therapy, pelvic inflammatory disease, large uterine fibroids and advanced-stage malignancies, obesity, diabetes and postoperative surgical infection [17–19].
More rarely, lower urinary tract iatrogenic lesions may occur during general surgery (particularly for colorectal cancer, diverticulitis or inflammatory bowel disease), vascular and urological interventions (such as prostatectomy and ureteral reimplantation during renal transplant) with variable reported injury rates according to their complexity [16, 17, 20, 21].
Most iatrogenic bladder lesions are full-thickness tears, commonly located at the bladder dome, and half of them are identified and treated intraoperatively. Conversely, the diagnosis of urological complications is often made postoperatively following complaints of unexplained or persistent haematuria, fever, abdominal pain and oliguria [16, 20].
Imaging plays a key role in the diagnosis of urological postsurgical complications and often proves invaluable to the surgeon in choosing the correct therapeutic option . Since a urethral catheter is often present postoperatively, in the past conventional radiographic cystography was employed to visualize suspected bladder lacerations, with significant limitations related to obtaining an adequate distension and to superimposition of bowel and bony structures [2, 17]. Largely used to investigate postoperative pelvic abnormalities, CT can detect and classify fluid collections such as lymphocele, haematoma, abscess and urinoma with their relationship to the surrounding structures . Recently, MDCT cystography has been proposed to assess the integrity of the vesicourethral anastomosis after radical prostatectomy, allowing to identify very small urine leaks .
Based on our experience, MDCT cystography should be recommended as the most effective and accurate technique for direct visualization or exclusion of both spontaneous enterovesical fistulas and bladder leaks or fistulas following instrumentation procedures, obstetric or surgical interventions.
We would like to thank the professional nurses Nerea Bevilacqua, Claudio Bonomi, Eugenia Ferron, M. Teresa Meloni and Giacomo Nocera for their valuable contribution in developing and performing the MDCT cystography technique, as well as for their daily care of our patients in the Radiology Department.
- Lis LE, Cohen AJ (1990) CT cystography in the evaluation of bladder trauma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 14:386–389PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Peng MY, Parisky YR, Cornwell EE 3rd et al (1999) CT cystography versus conventional cystography in evaluation of bladder injury. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173:1269–1272PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Morgan DE, Nallamala LK, Kenney PJ et al (2000) CT cystography: radiographic and clinical predictors of bladder rupture. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:89–95PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vaccaro JP, Brody JM (2000) CT cystography in the evaluation of major bladder trauma. Radiographics 20:1373–1381PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Deck AJ, Shaves S, Talner L et al (2000) Computerized tomography cystography for the diagnosis of traumatic bladder rupture. J Urol 164:43–46PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chan DP, Abujudeh HH, Cushing GL Jr et al (2006) CT cystography with multiplanar reformation for suspected bladder rupture: experience in 234 cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:1296–1302PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ishak C, Kanth N (2011) Bladder trauma: multidetector computed tomography cystography. Emerg Radiol 18:321–327PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Carvajal Balaguera J, Camunas Segovia J, Pena Gamarra L et al (2006) Colovesical fistula complicating diverticular disease: one-stage resection. Int Surg 91:17–23PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yu NC, Raman SS, Patel M et al (2004) Fistulas of the genitourinary tract: a radiologic review. Radiographics 24:1331–1352PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Goldman SM, Fishman EK, Gatewood OM et al (1985) CT in the diagnosis of enterovesical fistulae. AJR Am J Roentgenol 144:1229–1233PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Melchior S, Cudovic D, Jones J et al (2009) Diagnosis and surgical management of colovesical fistulas due to sigmoid diverticulitis. J Urol 182:978–982PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ravichandran S, Ahmed HU, Matanhelia SS et al (2008) Is there a role for magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing colovesical fistulas? Urology 72:832–837PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nguyen SQ, Divino CM, Vine A et al (2006) Laparoscopic surgery for diverticular disease complicated by fistulae. JSLS 10:166–168PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Werner A, Diehl SJ, Farag-Soliman M et al (2003) Multi-slice spiral CT in routine diagnosis of suspected acute left-sided colonic diverticulitis: a prospective study of 120 patients. Eur Radiol 13:2596–2603PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Koketsu S, Watanabe T, Minami M et al (2009) Preoperative evaluation of enterovesical fistula using magnetic resonance imaging: case report. Hepatogastroenterology 56:696–698PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Siow A, Nikam YA, Ng C et al (2007) Urological complications of laparoscopic hysterectomy: a four-year review at KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore. Singapore Med J 48:217–221PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Paspulati RM, Dalal TA (2010) Imaging of complications following gynecologic surgery. Radiographics 30:625–642PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Armenakas NA, Pareek G, Fracchia JA (2004) Iatrogenic bladder perforations: longterm followup of 65 patients. J Am Coll Surg 198:78–82PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ostrzenski A, Ostrzenska KM (1998) Bladder injury during laparoscopic surgery. Obstet Gynecol Surv 53:175–180PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gilmour DT, Dwyer PL, Carey MP (1999) Lower urinary tract injury during gynecologic surgery and its detection by intraoperative cystoscopy. Obstet Gynecol 94:883–889PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lind MY, Hazebroek EJ, Kirkels WJ et al (2004) Laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy: ureteral complications in recipients. Urology 63:36–39PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gayer G, Zissin R, Apter S et al (2002) Urinomas caused by ureteral injuries: CT appearance. Abdom Imaging 27:88–92PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lee HJ, Shin CI, Hwang SI et al (2008) MDCT cystography for detection of vesicourethral leak after prostatectomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:1847–1851PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar