- Pictorial Review
- Open Access
Computed tomography of complicated Meckel’s diverticulum in adults: a pictorial review
© European Society of Radiology 2010
- Received: 19 November 2009
- Accepted: 2 March 2010
- Published: 14 April 2010
To show various CT aspects of complicated Meckel’s diverticulum in adult patients to facilitate the preoperative diagnosis of this rare pathology in emergency settings.
A computer search of medical records over a 15 year period identified 23 adult patients who underwent surgery for acute abdomen generated by a complicated Meckel’s diverticulum. CT images available for review were analyzed, and some specific patterns leading to the diagnosis of complicated Meckel’s diverticulum are presented in this review.
Complications were related to inflammation (14 patients), bleeding (5 patients), intestinal obstruction (3 patients), and penetrating foreign body (1 patient). The presence of a Meckel’s diverticulum was usually suggested at CT scan by an abnormal outpouching, blind-ending digestive structure connected to the terminal ileum by a neck of variable caliber. Depending on the type of complications, the diverticulum was surrounded by mesenteric inflammatory changes, or presented as a localized fluid or air-fluid collection contiguous with the terminal ileum. The diverticulum was also the source of active bleeding or acted as the lead point to intestinal obstruction or intussusception.
CT findings of complicated Meckel’s diverticulum are polymorphic and should be considered in the evaluation of adult patients with acute abdomen.
- Meckel’s diverticulum
- Computed tomography
- Acute abdomen
Meckel’s diverticulum is a congenital anomaly of the gastrointestinal system due to incomplete obliteration of the omphalomesenteric duct. Meckel’s diverticulum is found with an incidence of 1–2% in the general population, and most of the diverticula remain asymptomatic . Complications result most commonly from bleeding, inflammation, and obstruction [1, 2]. A study performed over a 42 year period in a general population showed a lifetime risk of complications of 6.4% ; symptomatic Meckel’s diverticulum has been reported in 16% of patients with surgically proven diverticula . According to this latter study, younger (<4 years) patients tend to present with obstructions, whereas adult patients tend to present with hemorrhage. Complicated Meckel’s diverticulum usually manifests during the first years of life, and it is considered to be a rare pathology in adult life.
The purpose of our review is to show various CT aspects of complicated Meckel’s diverticulum in adult patients encountered over a 15 year period in our emergency department. We aim to facilitate the diagnosis of complicated Meckel’s diverticulum prior to surgery in emergency conditions.
The presence of the Meckel’s diverticulum is explained by the intrauterine evolution of the bowel. The initial embryological communication between the midgut and the yolk sac is made through the omphalomesenteric (vitelline) duct. During normal developmental evolution, this duct is obliterated and disappears; this process usually takes place during the 8th to 9th week of embryonic life. Different forms of congenital anomalies will result as a consequence of failure of closure and/or resorption of this embryological communication. The pattern of these anomalies depends on the degree of persistent ductal patency linking the ileum to the umbilicus; they may appear as fibrous cord, as ileo-umbilical fistula, or as omphalomesenteric cysts [2, 5].
However, the most frequent of all closure anomalies of the omphalomesenteric duct is Meckel’s diverticulum, which received its name in 1809, in honor of the German anatomist Johann Friedrich Meckel. Meckel’s diverticulum development is related to the persistent patency of the intestinal attachment of the omphalomesenteric duct, while its umbilical end obliterates. The result will be a true diverticulum, formed by all the layers of the intestinal wall; the diverticulum takes its origin from the antimesenteric border of the small bowel, within 40–100 cm of the ileocecal valve [2, 5]. The arterial supply comes from the vitelline artery, which is a branch of the superior mesenteric artery. The diverticulum is normally lined by intestinal mucosa, but a frequent histological finding is the presence of heterotopic gastric or pancreatic mucosa .
The majority of Meckel’s diverticulum cases remain clinically silent during the entire lifetime, and their presence may be discovered incidentally during surgery, autopsy, or when performing upper gastrointestinal studies [2, 5].
Bleeding is a frequent complication of Meckel’s diverticulum. It is reported to be more frequent in children and young adults and is usually associated with ulcerations produced by the acid secretion from the heterotopic gastric mucosa inside the diverticulum. The bleeding may present as acute massive hemorrhage or as anemia from chronic bleeding; stools can be melenic or have a currant jelly-like aspect [2, 5].
Another frequent complication associated with Meckel’s diverticulum is intestinal obstruction. Clinical symptoms are nonspecific; patients may have abdominal pain and distension, vomiting and constipation. Intestinal obstruction occurs due to a volvulus or an internal hernia around a diverticulum associated with a fibrotic band attached to the abdominal wall, intussusception, or incarceration of the diverticulum in an inguinal (Littré) hernia .
Inflammation of the Meckel’s diverticulum leading to diverticulitis may be due to peptic ulceration from acid secretion related to heterotopic gastric mucosa or to obstruction of the diverticular neck by enteroliths or foreign bodies, with consecutive stasis and infection .
Diverticulitis is a complication that is more commonly reported in adult patients . Clinical symptoms of Meckel’s diverticulitis are frequently identical to the symptoms of acute appendicitis, with patients presenting with right lower quadrant pain, fever, and vomiting. Meckel’s diverticulitis may be complicated by perforation and peritonitis or may lead to inflammatory adhesion and intestinal obstruction.
Meckel’s diverticulum-related complications occur so infrequently that most articles have reported small series or isolated cases [6, 7]; in addition, many patients with Meckel’s diverticulitis have nonspecific abdominal complaints, often making preoperative correct diagnosis difficult . Traditionally, clinicians, when confronted with a patient with complicated Meckel’s diverticulum, relied on conventional gastrointestinal contrast studies, angiography, or scintigraphy [5, 8]. These methods have been progressively replaced by computed tomography scan (CT), which has become routinely used as the first-line imaging tool in the diagnostic work-up of the acute abdomen [6, 9, 10].
Radionuclide studies have some specific indications in diagnosing bleeding of a Meckel’s origin. Scintigraphy using Tc-99 m pertechnetate is targeted to the heterotopic gastric mucosa inside the Meckel’s diverticulum and is used mainly on pediatric patients . The sensitivity and the specificity of this method decrease in adult patients, due to the lower prevalence of gastric mucosa in symptomatic Meckel’s diverticulum in adult patients . In addition, this method is dedicated to the etiological diagnosis of occult, intermittent gastrointestinal bleeding and, therefore, it is not suitable for patients in unstable condition due to hemorrhage.
Scintigraphy with Tc-99 m-labelled red blood cells is the most sensitive imaging method to detect active gastrointestinal hemorrhage with bleeding rates as low as 0.1 ml/min . Despite this enormous advantage and its ability to offer prolonged examination time, it remains less used in emergency settings. The drawbacks of the method include its incapacity to clearly show the anatomic origin of the bleeding, the inherent long imaging time, and the sometimes-limited hospital availability in emergency conditions .
Angiographic diagnosis of the Meckel’s diverticulum lies in the identification of a persistent vitelline artery. This artery arises from the distal ileal branches and consists of a long vessel with few branches extending over the vasa recta of the adjacent ileal arteries; small tortuous branches at the distal part of this artery along with mucosal blush of the Meckel’s diverticulum can also be seen [14, 15]. In a small number of cases, patients with surgically proven Meckel’s diverticulum may have normal angiograms [14, 16].
During arteriography, contrast material extravasation into the bowel lumen is the most obvious sign of active gastrointestinal bleeding; this usually occurs when the bleeding rate is higher than 0.5 ml/min. Accumulation of contrast in a space connected with the bowel lumen suggests a bleeding diverticulum . Embolization of the bleeding vessel may control life-threatening hemorrhage from a Meckel’s diverticulum in poor surgical candidates. While embolization is not the final method in treating Meckel’s diverticulum, it may still act as a bridge toward surgery under more favorable hemodynamic situations .
For a long time, CT was considered of little interest in diagnosing Meckel’s diverticulum because of its suspected incapacity to differentiate the diverticulum from a loop of small bowel . However, our observations from the current series, along with published reports concerning both adult and child patients [6, 10] reveal new opportunities for CT in diagnosing this pathology.
The CT pattern associated with the presence of Meckel’s diverticulum is that of an outpouching blind-ended digestive structure arising from the antimesenteric side of the terminal ileum; this structure is found in the right lower quadrant or lower abdomen and is connected to the small bowel by a neck of varying caliber [6, 18]. The diverticulum is considered complicated if it is the site of bowel obstruction or if it presents surrounding features of infiltration or inflammation, signs of perforation, adjacent fluid collection, or active bleeding.
While there is no clinical presentation that is specific to a complicated Meckel’s diverticulum, the CT examination protocol is adapted to the patients’ clinical presentation and follows some general rules in assessing the origin of acute abdomen .
First, the CT is usually performed with intravenous contrast medium injection. Intravenous injection of contrast medium has several advantages: among other things, it allows the assessment of the normal or pathological enhancement of the digestive and extra-digestive structures, the presence and extent of inflammatory infiltration, and the evaluation of the intraabdominal vessels. The volume of injected contrast medium is adapted to the patient’s weight and ranges from 100 to 150 ml of nonionic contrast medium.
If a patient is referred for diffuse abdominal pain, to assess intraabdominal collections, or for signs of perforation, administration of water-soluble oral contrast material is helpful in delineating the digestive structures and, therefore, distinguishing between bowel loops and extradigestive collections. While looking for a Meckel’s diverticulum, it is of particular interest to assess the different structures in the right lower quadrant, with a special mention for the caecum, appendix, and the terminal ileum [6, 9].
However, the use of oral contrast has to be adapted to the clinical conditions that mandated the CT examination. Administration of water-soluble oral contrast material before scanning is possible only when the clinical condition of the patient allows waiting at least 1 h before the CT examination. Oral contrast material is completely prohibited in a patient with active bleeding because it may obscure the site of hemorrhage .
A CT angiography protocol is highly useful when evaluating patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding. CT angiography involves a sequential acquisition of images of the entire abdomen. First, unenhanced scanning of the abdomen is performed to identify the pre-existing spontaneous hyperattenuating material in the bowel lumen, which could be mistaken for hemorrhage. Afterwards, scanning is performed sequentially for the arterial and portal vein phases and also at a delayed time after intravenous contrast injection, in order to show both the active contrast extravasation and to identify the underlying source of bleeding [13, 19].
Generally, CT angiography is considered diagnostic for active bleeding when there is high-attenuating contrast material extravasating into the bowel lumen that was not reported at unenhanced CT acquisition, performed prior to intravenous contrast injection . Moreover, contrast extravasation and accumulation in a blind-ending digestive structure attached to the terminal ileum may be highly evocative for the presence of a Meckel’s diverticulum . Negative CT results are related to the intermittent nature of the bleeding or to the low extravasation rate, not seen on different acquisition sequences.
Our article reviews the CT scan findings of complicated Meckel’s diverticulum in adult patients encountered over a 15 year period in our emergency department, which provides medical assistance for over 50,000 emergency patients per year. The computer search of medical records identified 23 adult patients (more than 18 years old) who underwent surgery for acute abdomen generated by a complicated Meckel’s diverticulum. Our study group was composed of 12 men and 11 women, with a mean age of 42.6 years (range 20–86 years). The complications related to the diverticulum that were demonstrated at surgery were inflammation in 14 patients, bleeding in 5 patients, intestinal obstruction in 3 patients, and penetrating foreign body in 1 patient. There were no calcified enteroliths in the complicated Meckel’s diverticulum, substantiating the assertion that this is a rare finding [6, 10].
The CT images available for review have been analyzed, and some specific patterns that could lead to the diagnosis of complicated Meckel’s diverticulum are hereby presented in our review.
Diverticulitis was the most common presentation of a complicated Meckel’s diverticulum in our patients.
These particular CT patterns of an inflamed Meckel’s diverticulum are sometimes difficult to differentiate from other acute digestive inflammations in the same region, such as appendicitis, ileal diverticulitis, or Crohn’s disease.
Localization of the abscess on the antimesenteric side of the ileum is very characteristic of an inflamed Meckel’s diverticulum and helps with differentiation from ileal diverticulitis .
Bleeding is reported to be the most common complication of Meckel’s diverticula in children and young adults. Hemorrhage results from ulceration of normal ileal mucosa adjacent to a diverticulum lined with acid-secreting gastric ectopic mucosa. Bleeding may be occult and intermittent, and patients usually present different degrees of anemia, or it may be brisk and important, leading to hemodynamic impairment.
In emergency setting, CT examination is a very useful tool in diagnosing both the localization and the source of overt gastrointestinal hemorrhage.
CT is fast, non-invasive, and requires no specific preparation of the patient. CT is ready available in the emergency department, and patients can be imaged during active clinical bleeding, thus increasing the chances of correctly diagnosing the origin of the hemorrhage .
When active extravasation of contrast occurs in the terminal ileal loops, without underlying anomalies seen on CT, the diagnosis of bleeding Meckel’s diverticulum is most likely . The differential diagnosis of an active hemorrhage in the terminal ileum takes into consideration bleeding from ruptured aneurysm of the ileocolic artery  or bleeding from vasculitis or angiodysplasia; the differential diagnosis also includes hemorrhage associated with an underlying small bowel tumor . Bleeding Meckel’s diverticulum is suggested when extravasated contrast accumulates into an outpouching of the terminal ileum .
Retention of foreign body
Surgeons have previously reported cases of perforation of Meckel’s diverticulum by foreign bodies such as a chicken bone or a toothpick [30, 31], but, as far as we know, there is no imaging documentation of this rare complication.
Tumors arising in the Meckel’s diverticulum are very rare; the reported histological types are carcinoid, gastrointestinal stromal tumors and adenocarcinomas . We did not find any tumors developed in the Meckel’s diverticulum in the patients included in our analysis.
Complicated Meckel’s diverticula often constitute a challenging diagnosis for both the clinician and the radiologist. The presence of a Meckel’s diverticulum is strongly suggested by CT scan demonstrating an abnormal outpouching, blind-ending digestive structure connected to the terminal ileum by a neck of varying caliber. Depending on the type of complication, the diverticulum may have surrounding mesenteric inflammatory changes or may look like a localized fluid or air-fluid collection, with normal aspect of the small bowel proximal and distal to the diverticular inflammation. The Meckel’s diverticulum may be the source of active bleeding or may act as a lead point to intestinal obstruction and intussusception. CT findings of complicated Meckel’s diverticulum are very polymorphic and should be remembered in the evaluation of adult patients with acute abdomen; we hope that our series will be helpful for the radiologist to better understand some of the presentations of this entity.
The authors thank Dr. Katharina Bider and Dr. Christopher Beynon (Institute of Radiology, Triemli Hospital, Zürich) for their contribution to the illustration of this article.
- Stone PA, Hofeldt MJ, Campbell JE, Vedula G, DeLuca JA, Flaherty SK (2004) Meckel diverticulum: ten-year experience in adults. South Med J 97:1038–1041PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Levy AD, Hobbs CM (2004) Meckel diverticulum: radiologic features with pathologic correlation. Radiographics 24:565–587PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cullen JJ, Kelly KA, Moir CR, Hodge DO, Zinsmeister AR, Melton LJ 3rd (1994) Surgical management of Meckel's diverticulum. An epidemiologic, population-based study. Ann Surg 220:564–568, discussion 568–569PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Park JJ, Wolff BG, Tollefson MK, Walsh EE, Larson DR (2005) Meckel diverticulum: the Mayo Clinic experience with 1476 patients (1950–2002). Ann Surg 241:529–533PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rossi P, Gourtsoyiannis N, Bezzi M, Raptopoulos V, Massa R, Capanna G, Pedicini V, Coe M (1996) Meckel's diverticulum: imaging diagnosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166:567–573PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bennett GL, Birnbaum BA, Balthazar EJ (2004) CT of Meckel's diverticulitis in 11 patients AJR. Am J Roentgenol 182:625–629View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Miele V, De Cicco ML, Andreoli C, Buffa V, Adami L, David V (2001) US and CT findings in complicated Meckel diverticulum. Radiol Med (Torino) 101:230–234Google Scholar
- Feller AA, Movson J, Shah SA (2003) Meckel diverticulum: a geriatric disease masquerading as common gastrointestinal tract disorders. Arch Intern Med 163:2093–2096PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Wildermuth S, Marincek B (2005) Multi-detector computed tomography of acute abdomen. Eur Radiol 15:2435–2447PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Olson DE, Kim YW, Donnelly LF (2009) CT findings in children with Meckel diverticulum. Pediatr Radiol 39:659–663PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mariani G, Pauwels EKJ, AlSharif A, Marchi S, Boni G, Barreca M, Bellini M, Grosso M, de Bortoli N, Mumolo G, Costa F, Rubello D, Strauss HW (2008) Radionuclide evaluation of the lower gastrointestinal tract. J Nucl Med 49:776–787PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Graça BM, Freire PA, Brito JB, Ilharco JM, Carvalheiro VM, Caseiro-Alves F (2010) Gastroenterologic and radiologic approach to obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: how, why, and when? Radiographics 30:235–252PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Laing CJ, Tobias T, Rosenblum DI, Banker WL, Tseng L, Tamarkin SW (2007) Acute gastrointestinal bleeding: emerging role of multidetector CT angiography and review of current imaging techniques. Radiographics 27:1055–1070PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mitchell AW, Spencer J, Allison DJ, Jackson JE (1998) Meckel’s diverticulum: angiographic findings in 16 patients. AJR 170:1329–1333PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Okazaki M, Higashihara H, Saida Y, Minami M, Yamasaki S, Sato S, Nagayama H (1993) Angiographic findings of Meckel’s diverticulum: the characteristic appearance of the vitelline artery. Abdom Imaging 18:15–19PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Danzer D, Gervaz P, Platon A, Poletti PA (2003) Bleeding Meckel's diverticulum diagnosis: an unusual indication for computed tomography. Abdom Imaging 28:631–633PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Okazaki M, Higashihara H, Yamasaki S, Akita Y, Toriya H, Shirai Z (1990) Arterial embolization to control life-threatening hemorrhage from a Meckel’s diverticulum. AJR 154:1257–1258PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Elsayes KM, Menias CO, Harvin HJ, Francis IR (2007) Imaging manifestations of Meckel's diverticulum. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:81–88PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yoon W, Jeong YY, Shin SS, Lim HS, Song SG, Jang NG, Kim JK, Kang HK (2006) Acute massive gastrointestinal bleeding: detection and localization with arterial phase multi-detector row helical CT. Radiology 239:160–167PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gayer G, Zissin R, Apter S, Shemesh E, Heldenberg E (1999) Acute diverticulitis of the small bowel: CT findings. Abdom Imaging 24:452–455PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hughes JA, Hatrick A, Rankin S (1998) Computed tomography findings in an inflamed Meckel diverticulum. Br J Radiol 71:882–883PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Furukawa A, Saotome T, Yamasaki M, Maeda K, Nitta N, Takahashi M, Tsujikawa T, Fujiyama Y, Murata K, Sakamoto T (2004) Cross-sectional imaging in Crohn disease. Radiographics 24:689–702PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schwenter F, Gervaz P, De Saussure P, MacKee T, Morel P (2009) Perforated Meckel's diverticulitis complicating active Crohn's ileitis: a case report. J Med Case Reports 3:12PubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Munroe CA, Copland A, Pai R, Friedland S, Triadafilopoulos G (2010) Meckel's diverticulum with gastrointestinal bleeding: role of computed tomography in diagnosis. Dig Dis Sci 55(2):242–244PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Poletti PA, Vargas MI, Becker CD (2001) Successful treatment of a ruptured mycotic aneurysm of the ileocolic artery with transcatheter embolization and antibiotic therapy. Abdom Imaging 26:651–653PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Filippone A, Cianci R, Milano A, Valeriano S, Di Mizio V, Storto ML (2008) Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding and small bowel pathology: comparison between wireless capsule endoscopy and multidetector-row CT enteroclysis. Abdom Imaging 33:398–406PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Azar T, Berger DL (1997) Adult intussusception. Ann Surg 226:134–138PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kim YH, Blake MA, Harisinghani MG, Archer-Arroyo K, Hahn PF, Pitman MB, Mueller PR (2006) Adult intestinal intussusception: CT appearances and identification of a causative lead point. Radiographics 26:733–744PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hamada T, Ishida O, Yasutomi M (1996) Inverted Meckel diverticulum with intussusception: demonstration by CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr 20:287–289PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yagci G, Cetiner S, Tufan T (2004) Perforation of Meckel's diverticulum by a chicken bone, a rare complication: report of a case. Surg Today 34:606–608PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zingg U, Vorburger S, Metzger U (2000) Perforation of Meckel's diverticulum by a toothpick. Chirurg 71:841–843PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar