Table 1 Number and proportion of screening examinations with a score of 2, 3, 4, and 5 by radiologists in the blinded individual review of 19 screening examinations prior to interval cancer and 91 screening examinations resulting in consecutive round screen-detected cancer
Proportion assigned | Screening examinations prior to interval cancer (n = 19) | Screening examinations resulting in consecutive round screen-detected cancer (n = 91) | Total (n = 110) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | % (fraction) | n | % (fraction) | n | % (fraction) | |
Score 2 | ||||||
Radiologist 1 | 1 | 5.3 (1/19) | 11 | 12.1 (11/91) | 12 | 10.9 (12/110) |
Radiologist 2 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 12.1 (11/91) | 11 | 10.0 (11/110) |
Radiologist 3 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 15.4 (14/91) | 14 | 12.7 (14/110) |
Radiologist 4 | 1 | 5.3 (1/19) | 14 | 15.4 (14/91) | 15 | 13.6 (15/110) |
Radiologist 5 | 2 | 10.5 (2/19) | 24 | 26.4 (24/91) | 26 | 23.6 (26/110) |
Score 3 | ||||||
Radiologist 1 | 1 | 5.3 (1/19) | 20 | 22.0 (20/91) | 21 | 19.1 (21/110) |
Radiologist 2 | 2 | 10.5 (2/19) | 15 | 16.5 (15/91) | 17 | 15.5 (17/110) |
Radiologist 3 | 2 | 10.5 (2/19) | 20 | 22.0 (20/91) | 22 | 20.0 (22/110) |
Radiologist 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2.2 (2/91) | 2 | 1.8 (2/110) |
Radiologist 5 | 2 | 10.5 (2/19) | 9 | 9.9 (9/91) | 11 | 10.0 (11/110) |
Score 4 | ||||||
Radiologist 1 | 1 | 5.3 (1/19) | 11 | 12.1 (11/91) | 12 | 10.9 (12/110) |
Radiologist 2 | 1 | 5.3 (1/19) | 5 | 5.5 (5/91) | 6 | 5.5 (6/110) |
Radiologist 3 | 1 | 5.3 (1/19) | 15 | 16.5 (15/91) | 16 | 14.5 (16/110) |
Radiologist 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Radiologist 5 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3.3 (3/91) | 3 | 2.7 (3/110) |
Score 5 | ||||||
Radiologist 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3.3 (3/91) | 3 | 2.7 (3/110) |
Radiologist 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3.3 (3/91) | 3 | 2.7 (3/110) |
Radiologist 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3.3 (3/91) | 3 | 2.7 (3/110) |
Radiologist 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Radiologist 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |