Skip to main content

Table 3 The predictive performance results of radiomics machine learning signatures without SMOTE

From: Preoperative CT-based deep learning radiomics model to predict lymph node metastasis and patient prognosis in bladder cancer: a two-center study

Set

Classifier

AUC (95%CI)

ACC

SEN

SPE

PPV

NPV

Training

SVM

0.932 (0.889–0.975)

0.795

0

1.000

0

0.795

LR

0.749 (0.660–0.839)

0.811

0.105

0.993

0.800

0.811

XGBoost

1 (1.000–1.000)

0.995

0.974

1.000

1.000

0.993

NaiveBayes

0.720 (0.631–0.809)

0.373

1.000

0.211

0.247

1

AdaBoost

0.879 (0.828–0.930)

0.854

0.447

0.959

0.739

0.870

LightGBM

0.932 (0.888–0.977)

0.805

0.053

1.000

1.000

0.803

KNN

0.781 (0.715–0.848)

0.805

0.237

0.952

0.563

0.828

MLP

0.745 (0.657–0.833)

0.795

0

1.000

0

0.795

GradientBoosting

0.945 (0.895–0.996)

0.843

0.237

1.000

1.000

0.835

External test

SVM

0.659 (0.465–0.853)

0.815

0

1.000

0

0.815

LR

0.689 (0.480–0.897)

0.815

0

1.000

0

0.815

XGBoost

0.720 (0.524–0.917)

0.815

0

1.000

0

0.815

NaiveBayes

0.764 (0.604–0.924)

0.704

0.700

0.705

0.350

0.912

AdaBoost

0.699 (0.510–0.888)

0.815

0.100

0.977

0.500

0.827

LightGBM

0.639 (0.447–0.830)

0.815

0

1.000

0

0.815

KNN

0.682 (0.531–0.833)

0.796

0

0.977

0

0.811

MLP

0.727 (0.570–0.884)

0.815

0

1.000

0

0.815

GradientBoosting

0.616 (0.385–0.847)

0.815

0

1.000

0

0.815

  1. AUC area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, CI confidence interval, ACC accuracy, SEN sensitivity, SPE specificity, PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value