Skip to main content

Table 3 Average performance of various machine learning models

From: Classification of nasal polyps and inverted papillomas using CT-based radiomics

Feature selection

Model name

AUC

Accuracy

Sensitivity

Precision

Specificity

F1 score

No

SVM

0.8969

0.8883

0.8270

0.9644

0.9668

0.8842

Naive Bayes

0.8604

0.8540

0.8543

0.8724

0.8666

0.8574

XGBoost

0.9220

0.9153

0.8510

0.9929

0.9929

0.9143

Boruta

SVM

0.9068

0.8984

0.8260

0.9838

0.9876

0.8938

Naive Bayes

0.9013

0.8916

0.8602

0.9368

0.9424

0.8901

XGBoost

0.9078

0.9018

0.8573

0.9568

0.9582

0.9017

Random forest

SVM

0.9077

0.9018

0.8512

0.9644

0.9643

0.8995

Naive Bayes

0.8872

0.8777

0.8466

0.9220

0.9278

0.8770

XGBoost

0.9184

0.9120

0.8896

0.9443

0.9473

0.9122

Correlation coefficient

SVM

0.8803

0.8714

0.8263

0.9310

0.9342

0.8682

Naive Bayes

0.8659

0.8576

0.8407

0.8842

0.8911

0.8567

XGBoost

0.9141

0.9086

0.8707

0.9603

0.9575

0.9093