Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of studies reporting on mammographic morphology of calcifications associated with clinicopathological factors

From: Clinicopathological and prognostic value of calcification morphology descriptors in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study characteristics

Patients

Assessment clinicopathological factors

Molecular subtype

Ref., country, recruitment period

(Observational) study design

Setting of recruitment

Single- or multi-center

Follow-up (years)

No. of DCIS patients with calcifications used in analysis

No. of lesions presenting as calcifications only

Mean age in years (range/SD) of study population

Mean histologic size of DCIS in cm (range/SD)

Assay receptor expression

Cut-off

Avdan Aslan et al. 2021 [16], Turkey, 2007–2013

Cohort

University hospital

Single

N/A

66

NS

53 (24–73)a

NS (0.4–13.4)

IHC NOS

ER/PR: ≥ 10% nuclear staining Her2: IHC 3+

Bae et al. 2013 [17], South Korea, 2006–2011

Cohort

University hospital

Single

N/A

101

101

36 (27–83)

3.7 (0.5–12.3)a

IHC NOS; FISH PathVysion

ER/PR: ≥ 10% nuclear staining Her2: IHC 3+ or (IHC 2+ and FISH+)

Bagnall et al. 2001 [18], England, 1994–1999

Cohort

City hospital

Single

N/A

DCIS: 78 DCIS + IBC: 38

116

58 (40–80)

NS

N/A

N/A

Barreau et al. 2005 [19], France, 1980–1999

Cohort

Regional cancer center

Single

N/A

686

NS

52.4 (19–88)

NS

N/A

N/A

de Roos et al. 2006 [21], The Netherlands, 1991–2003

Cohort

Hospital

Single

N/A

77

NS

58.8 (NS)a

2.6a

N/A

N/A

de Roos et al. 2004 [20], the Netherlands, 1986–2000

Cohort

Hospital

Single

N/A

87

70

59 (NS)

3.6 (NS)

N/A

N/A

Dinkel et al. 2000 [22], Germany, 1993–1998

Cohort

University hospital

Single

N/A

47

NS

53.4 (26.5–77.3)

1.28 (0.4–4)

N/A

N/A

Evans et al. 2010 [23], UK, NS

Cohort

Nationwide cohort

Multi

N/A

1783

NS

NS (50–69)

NS (NS)

N/A

N/A

Hofvind et al. 2011 [24], Norway, 1995–2007

Cohort

Nationwide cohort

Multi

N/A

202

NS

58.3 (49.3–71.2)

NS (NS)

N/A

N/A

Holmberg et al. 2013 [25], Sweden, 1987–1999

Case-cohort study within a randomized trial

Nationwide cohort

Multi

8

162

NS

Subcohort: 56.7

Cases outside: 55.4

NS (NS)

N/A

N/A

Kessar et al. 2002 [26], England, 1989–1996

Cohort

Hospital

Single

N/A

102

58

58 (25–89)

NS (NS)

N/A

N/A

Kim et al. 2015 [27], South Korea, 2007–2013

Cohort

University hospital

Single

N/A

77

66

53.8 (26–74)

Non-calcified: 2.2 (2.1) Calcified 2.8 (2.2)

IHC NOS; SISH NOS

ER/PR: Allred score ≥ 3 Her2: IHC 3+ or (IHC 2+ and SISH+)

Kong et al. 2020 [28], China, January 2018–December 2018

Cohort

University hospital

Single

N/A

79

NS

48 (40–57)

NS

N/A

N/A

Lee et al. 2000 [29], US, 1992–1999

Cohort

Yale University School of Medicine

Single

N/A

DCIS: 42 DCIS + IBC: 17

NS

59 (36–86)

NS

N/A

N/A

Lee et al. 2021 [30], South Korea, 2009–2019

Cohort

University hospital

Single

N/A

83

NS

52.3 (31–83)

NS (NS)

IHC NS; dual ISH (Ventana medical systems)

NS

Lilleborge et al. 2021 [31], Norway, 1995–2016

Case-control

BreastScreen Norway

Multi

Mean 5.2

DCIS: 131 DCIS + IBC: 80

211

Cases: 59.8 (55.2–65.7) controls: 59.4 (54.1–63.7)

Cases: 2 (1.3–3.8) Controls: 2 (0.9–3.5)

N/A

N/A

Nishimura et al. 2004 [33], Japan, 1995–2001

Cohort

Cancer institute

Single

N/A

DCIS: 124 IBC: 33

NS

NS (NS)

NS

N/A

N/A

Rauch et al. 2016 [34], US, 1996–2009

Cohort 

University hospital

Single

Mean 7 (range 1–16)

1438a

NS

55 (11)

2.25 (2.5)

N/A

N/A

Rominger et al. 2015 [35], US, 2002–2003

Cohort

Academic tertiary-care institution

Single

Mean 6.8

DCIS: 57 IBC: 42

NS

NS (NS)

NS

IHC NOS

NS

Stomper et al. 2003 [37], US, 1991–2001

Cohort

Mammography center and a multidisciplinary breast clinic in a cancer institute

Multi

N/A

DCIS: 198 DCIS + IBC: 96 IBC: 10

304

Median: 54 (29–86)

NS

N/A

N/A

Szynglarewicz et al. 2016 [38], Poland, 2009–2014

Cohort

University hospital

Single

N/A

127

127

59.6 (50–69)

NS (NS)

N/A

N/A

Tabar et al. 2011 [40], Sweden, 1977–2007

Cohort

University hospitals

Multi

Falun: mean 5, Roanoke: mean 3

DCIS: 498 IBC: 353

NS

NS (NS)

NS (0.1–1.4)

N/A

N/A

Tan et al. 2000 [41], Singapore, 1993–1996

Cohort

Singapore breast screening project

Multi

N/A

32

25

Median: 57 (51–66)

NS

N/A

N/A

Thurfjell et al. 2002 [43], Sweden, 1988–1994

Cohort

University hospital

Single

N/A

DCIS: 57 IBC: 71

DCIS: 50 IBC: 29

Median: 61 (33–87)

NS

N/A

N/A

Wang et al. 2019 [44], China, 2012–2015

Cohort

University hospital

Single

N/A

60

60

DCIS: 48 (11) DCISM: 46 (8)

DCIS 2.1 (1.5) DCISM 3.4 (1.5)

N/A

N/A

Woodard et al. 2019 [45], US, 2012–2017

Cohort

University hospital

Single

N/A

58

58

54.8 (9.7)

NS (NS)

N/A

N/A

Zhang et al. 2021 [46], China, 2016–2020

Cohort

University hospital

Single

N/A

395

171

Median: 50 (27–87)

DCIS: 67.8% < 2.7 DCIS-MI: 42.1% < 2.7

N/A

N/A

Zhou et al. 2017 [47], Sweden, 1986–2004

Cohort

From Uppland and Västmanland counties

Multi

Mean 15.4

310

NS

57.5 (NS)a

NS (NS)

Tma data, IHC dako HercepTest; SISH NOS

ER/PR: > 10% HER2: SISH+ or IHC 3+

Zhou et al. 2014 [48], Sweden, 2005–2006

Cohort

Academic hospital and central hospital

Multi

N/A

DCIS: 32 DCIS + IBC: 42

NS

Majority (60.8%) > 55 yearsa

NS

N/A

N/A

Study characteristics

Assessment clinicopathological factors

Assessment calcification morphology

(molecular subtype)

Other

Ref., country, recruitment period

(Observational) study design

Assay grade

Number of readers

Assay

Imaging system (manufacturer)

Method of detection

No. of readers

Blinded

Calcification classification system

Avdan Aslan et al. 2021 [16], Turkey, 2007–2013

Cohort

Modified Bloom-Richardson Grading System

1 (reviewed)

Comedonecrosis

Selenia (Hologic)

NS

2 (reviewed)

Yes

BIRADS 5th edition (2013)

Bae et al. 2013 [17], South Korea, 2006–2011

Cohort

N/A

N/A

N/A

Senographe 2000D (GE Healthcare); Selenia (Hologic)

NS

3 (reviewed)

Yes

BIRADS 4th edition (2003)

Bagnall et al. 2001 [18], England, 1994–1999

Cohort

N/A

N/A

Invasion

NS

SD and non-SD

NS

NS

NS (punctate, granular or linear)

Barreau et al. 2005 [19], France, 1980–1999

Cohort

WHO breast tumor classification 6th edition

NS

Comedocarcinoma, necrosis

NS

NS

1 (reviewed)

NS

BIRADS (1993–2003) 1st - 4th edition

de Roos et al. 2006 [21], The Netherlands, 1991–2003

Cohort

N/A

Reclassified by 1

Margin status

NS

SD and non-SD

1 (reclassified)

Yes

Holland R, Hendriks JHCL (1994)

de Roos et al. 2004 [20], the Netherlands, 1986–2000

Cohort

EPWG and Van Nuys

1 (reviewed)

N/A

NS

SD and non-SD

1 (reviewed)

Partial, to histopathological subtype

Holland R, Hendriks JHCL (1994)

Dinkel et al. 2000 [22], Germany, 1993–1998

Cohort

Nuclear malignancy grade and EORTC grading

1 (reviewed)

N/A

Mammomat 2 (Siemens)

NS

 ≥ 1 (reviewed)

Yes

Holland R, Hendriks JHCL (1994)

Evans et al. 2010 [23], UK, NS

Cohort

Cytonuclear grade

NS (pathology dataset)

Microscopic tumor size

NS

SD

NS

No

NS (Groups: casting/linear, granular/irregular, or punctate)

Hofvind et al. 2011 [24], Norway, 1995–2007

Cohort

Van Nuys

1 (reviewed)

Distribution of calcifications

Rotolux/Planilux 400 (Siemens); Advanced Workstation 4.4 (GE Healthcare)

SD

4 (reviewed)

yes, to side, site, size, clinical findings, and further histologies Information

Modified BIRADS 4th edition (2003)

Holmberg et al. 2013 [25], Sweden, 1987–1999

Case-cohort study within a randomized trial

Nuclear grade

NS

Local recurrence in the ipsilateral breast, age, necrosis, tumor size

NS

SD and non-SD

1 (reviewed)

Yes

Tabar, L (2005)

Kessar et al. 2002 [26], England, 1989–1996

Cohort

Van Nuys

NS

N/A

NS

SD and non-SD

3 (reviewed)

NS

NS (groups: pleomorphic, linear branching, punctate)

Kim et al. 2015 [27], South Korea, 2007–2013

Cohort

N/A

N/A

N/A

Selenia (Hologic)

SD

2 (reviewed)

Yes

BIRADS 5th edition (2013)

Kong et al. 2020 [28], China, January 2018–December 2018

Cohort

NS

NS

N/A

Selenia (Hologic)

SD and non-SD

NS

NS

BIRADS 5th edition (2013)

Lee et al. 2000 [29], US, 1992–1999

Cohort

N/A

N/A

Invasion, defined as clear evidence of carcinoma in the stroma

NS

SD

1 (reviewed)

Yes

BIRADS 1st edition (1993)

Lee et al. 2021 [30], South Korea, 2009–2019

Cohort

Van Nuys

NS

Comedonecrosis, ki67

NS

NS

2

Yes

BIRADS 5th edition (2013)

Lilleborge et al. 2021 [31], Norway, 1995–2016

Case-control

N/A

N/A

Invasion, defined as breast cancer > 6 months after the diagnosis of DCIS

NS

SD

1 (reviewed)

Yes

BIRADS 5th edition (2013)

Nishimura et al. 2004 [33], Japan, 1995–2001

Cohort

N/A

N/A

Invasion

NS

SD

NS

NS

BIRADS 3rd edition (1998)

Rauch et al. 2016 [34], US, 1996–2009

Cohort

NS

1 of 11 (reviewed)

Presence of comedonecrosis, multicentricity and local recurrence

NS

NS

2 (1 original reading and 1 rereading)

NS

BIRADS 5th edition (2013)

Rominger et al. 2015 [35], US, 2002–2003

Cohort

Van Nuys

NS

Local recurrence

NS

SD

NS

NS

BIRADS 5th edition (2013)

Stomper et al. 2003 [37], US, 1991–2001

Cohort

N/A

N/A

Invasion, extent of invasion and calcification size

High-resolution film-screen mammography including orthogonal magnification projections

SD

NS

Yes

Holland R, Hendriks JHCL (1994)

Szynglarewicz et al. 2016 [38], Poland, 2009–2014

Cohort

Nuclear grade based on College of American Pathologists

NS

Comedonecrosis, age (only p value), calcification distribution

NS

SD

3 (1 reviewed)

Yes

Tabar, L (2005)

Tabar et al. 2011 [40], Sweden, 1977–2007

Cohort

N/A

N/A

Invasion

NS

SD and non-SD

1

Yes

Tabar, L (2004)

Tan et al. 2000 [41], Singapore, 1993–1996

Cohort

Nuclear pleomorphism based on Lagios

NS

Necrosis

NS

SD

NS

NS

Tabar, L (1997)

Thurfjell et al. 2002 [43], Sweden, 1988–1994

Cohort

Nuclear grade based on Elston and Ellis

1

Invasion

NS

SD and non-SD

1 (reviewed)

NS

Tabar, L (1983) and BIRADS 3rd edition (1998)

Wang et al. 2019 [44], China, 2012–2015

Cohort

N/A

N/A

Micro invasion, defined as a microscopic focus of invasion ≤ 1 mm in the longest diameter within an area of DCIS

Planmed Nuance (Planmed)

NS

2 (reviewed)

Yes

BIRADS 5th edition (2013)

Woodard et al. 2019 [45], US, 2012–2017

Cohort

N/A

N/A

Local recurrence (the Oncotype DX Breast DCIS assay)

NS

NS

1 (reviewed)

Yes

BIRADS 5th edition (2013)

Zhang et al. 2021 [46], China, 2016–2020

Cohort

N/A

N/A

Microinvasion defined as the extension of cancer cells beyond the basement membrane into the adjacent tissues with no focus > 0.1 cm in the greatest dimension

Selenia (Hologic)

SD and non-SD

2

NS

BIRADS 5th edition (2013)

Zhou et al. 2017 [47], Sweden, 1986–2004

Cohort

EORTC

NS

Age, neoductgenesis, Tenascin-C, proliferation and recurrence

NS

SD and non-SD

2 (reviewed)

Yes

Tabar, L (2004)

Zhou et al. 2014 [48], Sweden, 2005–2006

Cohort

N/A

N/A

Neoductgenesis

NS

NS

2

Yes

Tabar, L (2004)

  1. Abbreviations: DCIS Ductal carcinoma in situ, IBC Invasive breast cancer, N/A Not available (e.g., if not related to CMD), NS Not specified, NOS Not otherwise specified, SD Screen detected
  2. aCalculated for subgroups