Fig. 2From: Clinicopathological and prognostic value of calcification morphology descriptors in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a systematic review and meta-analysisThe meta-analysis results for each clinicopathological factor in a forest plot. For the calcification morphology descriptor (CMD) risk groups, the pooled odds ratios (pORs), 95% confidence intervals and associated p-values are shown. Furthermore, associated heterogeneity measures (I2, P(Q)) and publication bias (Egger’s p-value), as well as certainty of evidence summarized in the GRADE score are given. The low-risk CMDs served as a reference. Per CMD risk-group, details on the studies (number, number of calcified lesions, and number of cases) are givenBack to article page