Skip to main content

Table 2 Basic characteristics of included studies for quantitative analysis (clinical nomograms)

From: Diagnostic performance of prediction models for extraprostatic extension in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author (publication year)

Country

TRIPOD style

No

EPE rate

Whole-gland vs. side-specific

Nomogram name

Clinical variables

Boyce 2013 [50]

Ireland

4

603

0.30

Whole-gland

ND

PSA, cT, biopsy GS

DalMoro1 2018 [51]

Italy

4

94

0.58

Side-specific

Partin 1997

PSA, cT, biopsy GS

Egawa 1998 [52]

Japan

1a

81

0.43

Whole-gland

ND

PSA, cT, biopsy GS, number of cancer cores, maximum cancer length in biopsy cores

Majchrzak 2021 [58]

Poland

4

61

0.31

Side-specific

MSKCC

PSA, cT, biopsy GS, % positive cores, % Ca

Patin 1997 [56]

USA

1b

4133

0.40

Whole-gland

Partin 1997

PSA, cT, biopsy GS

Sighinolfi 2023 [57]

Italy

4

141

0.47

Side-specific

PRECE nomogram [63]

Age, PSA, cT, GS, % positive cores

Song 2004 [54]

Korean

4

317

0.40

Whole-gland

Partin 1997

PSA, cT, biopsy GS

Thalgott 2018 [55]

Germany

4

73

0.73

Whole-gland

MSKCC, Partin 2013

PSA, cT, bGS, % positive cores, % Ca

Tsao 2014 [53]

China

4

299

0.36

Whole-gland

Partin 2007

PSA, cT, biopsy GS sum

Wang 2018 [59]

China

4

541

0.54

Whole-gland

Partin 2017

PSA, cT, biopsy GS

Xiang 2022 [62]

China

4

105

0.42

Whole-gland

MSKCC, Partin

PSA, cT, bGS, % positive cores, % Ca

Xu 2021 [60]

China

4

130

0.48

Whole-gland

CAPRA 2005, MSKCC

age, PSA, cT, primary and secondary GS, positive cores ratio

Zanelli 2019 [61]

Italy

4

73

0.33

Whole-gland

Partin 2013, MSKCC, CAPRA 2017

age, PSA, cT, primary and secondary GS, positive cores ratio

  1. EPE extraprostatic extension, GS Gleason Score, cT clinical tumor stage, ND not described, MSKCCn Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center nomogram, CAPRA Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment