Skip to main content

Table 4 Effects of the CT examination parameters and evaluation technique on the quantitative measurements with the obtained p-values stated in parentheses

From: Pancreatic CT perfusion: quantitative meta-analysis of disease discrimination, protocol development, and effect of CT parameters

 

Blood flow

Blood volume

Permeability

Effects on quantitative measurements

   

Amount of contrast agent

✔ (0.0422)

✘ (0.6681)

✘ (0.5636)

Amount of iodine

✘ (0.9605)

✘ (0.3591)

✘ (0.5063)

Total amount of iodine

✘ (0.0767)

✘ (0.7626)

✘ (0.5480)

Injection rate

✔ (0.0150)

✘ (0.4055)

✘ (0.3556)

Effective dose

✘ (0.7755)

✘ (0.1162)

✘ (0.3293)

Anatomical coverage

✘ (0.5885)

✘ (0.1600)

✘ (0.6122)

Tube potential

✘ (0.5329)

✘ (0.1386)

✘ (0.5088)

Tube current–time product

✘ (0.5742)

✔ (0.0152)

✘ (0.6112)

Lowest temporal sampling

✘ (0.2455)

✘ (0.1390)

✘ (0.9258)

Highest temporal sampling

✘ (0.0811)

✔ (0.0348)

✘ (0.6057)

Slice thickness

✘ (0.0960)

✘ (0.3996)

✘ (0.6851)

Total acquisition time

✘ (0.9281)

✘ (0.5947)

✘ (0.3858)

Use of variable temporal sampling

✘ (0.1041)

✔ (0.0078)

✘ (0.9196)

Use of saline flush

✔ (0.0067)

✘ (0.4341)

✘ (0.9693)

Perfusion model

✘ (0.1619)

✘ (0.2880)

✘ (0.3007)

  1. Bold values indicate a significant effect of the respective parameters on the quantitative measurement whereas non-bold values indicate a non-significant effect