Table 3 Total radiomics quality score (RQS) with percentage of the total score of the included studies assessed by three independent readers

Chu [14]

11

30.6%

11

30.6%

14

38.9%

Duda [15]

1

2.8%

−1

0%

−6

0%

Hamn [16]

3

8.3%

8

22.2%

7

19.4%

Huang [17]

8

22.2%

4

11.1%

5

13.9%

Ji [18]

16

44.4%

13

36.1%

15

41.7%

Ji [19]

14

38.9%

15

41.7%

14

38.9%

King [20]

−4

0%

−5

0%

2

5.6%

Liang [21]

12

33.3%

14

38.9%

6

16.7%

Liu [22]

1

2.8%

5

13.9%

−2

0%

Mosconi [23]

0

0%

5

13.9%

−2

0%

Nakai [24]

4

11.1%

6

16.7%

14

38.9%

Park [25]

18

50.0%

18

50.0%

17

47.2%

Park [26]

−2

0%

3

8.3%

−4

0%

Ponnoprat [27]

9

25.0%

2

5.6%

11

30.6%

Qin [28]

15

41.7%

11

30.6%

15

41.7%

Sadot [29]

−5

0%

−4

0%

−1

0%

Silva [30]

−1

0%

5

13.9%

−3

0%

Tang [31]

8

22.2%

7

19.4%

13

36.1%

Tang [32]

13

36.1%

8

22.2%

15

41.7%

Wang [33]

−1

0%

−1

0%

2

5.6%

Wang [34]

12

33.3%

14

38.9%

13

36.1%

Xu [35]

9

25.0%

10

27.8%

12

33.3%

Xu [36]

10

27.8%

9

25.0%

7

19.4%

Xu [37]

16

44.4%

13

36.1%

13

36.1%

Xue [38]

13

36.1%

15

41.7%

13

36.1%

Xue [39]

11

30.6%

16

44.4%

14

38.9%

Yang [40]

8

22.2%

7

19.4%

9

25.0%

Yao [41]

9

25.0%

9

25.0%

11

30.6%

Zhang [42]

8

22.2%

2

5.6%

5

13.9%

Zhang [43]

2

5.6%

6

16.7%

4

11.1%

Zhang [44]

15

41.7%

12

33.3%

14

38.9%

Zhang [45]

3

8.3%

−1

0%

9

25.0%

Zhao [46]

15

41.7%

12

33.3%

6

16.7%

Zhao [47]

15

41.7%

13

36.1%

15

41.7%

Zhao [48]

−2

0%

−2

0%

6

16.7%

Zhou [49]

9

25.0%

11

30.6%

12

33.3%

Zhu [50]

−5

0%

3

8.3%

11

30.6%

Zhu [51]

13

36.1%

12

33.3%

9

25.0%

Median

(IQR)

9

(1–13)

25.0

(2.8–36.1)

8

(3–12)

22.1

(8.3–33.3)

10

(5–14)

27.8

(13.9–38.9)