Automatic segmentation of prostate zonal anatomy on MRI: a systematic review of the literature

Wu, Carine; Montagne, Sarah; Hamzaoui, Dimitri; Ayache, Nicholas; Delingette, Hervé; Renard-Penna, Raphaële

doi:10.1186/s13244-022-01340-2

Insights into Imaging

Table 3 Input MRI parameters (number of vendors, type of field, type of coil, input sequences)

From: Automatic segmentation of prostate zonal anatomy on MRI: a systematic review of the literature

First author, year of publication	Vendors				Type of coil		Field strenght		Data input
First author, year of publication	Number of vendors	Philips	GE	Siemens	ERC	SC	1.5T	3T	Mono-parametric	Sequence	Slice thickness*
Cuocolo et al. [43]	1	–	–	✓	–	✓	–	✓	✓	Axial T2W	3.6
Bardis et al. [42]	2	✓	–	✓	–	✓	–	✓	✓	Axial T2W	3.0
Lai et al. [41]	1	–	–	✓	–	✓	–	✓	×	Axial T2W + DWI + ADC	3.6
Nai et al. [18]	1	–	–	✓	–	✓	–	✓	×	Axial T2W + DWI + ADC	3.6
Sanford et al. [40]	3	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	Axial T2W	3.0
Aldoj et al. [39]	1	–	–	✓	–	✓	–	✓	✓	Axial T2W	3.6
Zavala-Romero et al. [6]	2	–	✓	✓	–	✓	–	✓	✓	3 planes T2W	3.6
Lee et al. [38]	1	–	–	✓	–	✓	–	✓	✓	Axial + sagittal T2W	3.0
Liu et al. [37]	1	–	–	✓	–	✓	–	✓	✓	Axial T2W	3.0–3.6
Qin et al. [36]	at least 2	✓	?	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	×	Axial T2W + ADC	3.6
Motamed et al. [35]	2	✓	–	✓	?	?	?	?	✓	DWI	3.0
Zabihollahy et al. [13]	1	–	✓	–	–	✓	–	✓	×	Axial T2W + ADC	3.0–4.0
Padgett et al. [8]	2	–	✓	✓	?	?	–	✓	✓	Axial T2W	2.5
Rundo et al. [15]¹	2	✓	–	✓	–	✓	–	✓	✓	Axial T2W	1.25–4.0
Meyer et al. [34]	1	–	–	✓	–	✓	–	✓	✓	Axial T2W	3.0
Liu et al. [16]	1	–	–	✓	–	✓	–	✓	✓	Axial T2W	3.6
Rundo et al. [33]²	2	✓	–	✓	–	✓	–	✓	✓	Axial T2W	1.25–3.0
Hambarde et al. [32]	1	✓	–	–	?	?	✓	–	✓	Axial T2W	5.0
Jensen et al. [31]	2	–	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	Axial T2W	1.5–3.0
Khan et al. [17]	2	✓	–	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	Axial T2W	3.0–4.0
Cheng et al. [30]	multiple	?	?	✓	✓	✓	?	✓	✓	Axial T2W	3.0
Zhu et al. [12]	1	✓	–	–	–	✓	–	✓	×	Axial T2W + DWI	4.0
Mooij et al. [29]	?	?	?	?	?	?	?	?	✓	3D T2W	3.6
Can et al. [28]	2	✓	–	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	Axial T2W	3.0–4.0
Clark et al. [14]	multiple	✓	?	?	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	DWI	?
Chilali et al. [9]	3	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	Axial T2W	3.0–4.0
Makni et al. [10]	1	✓	–	–	?	?	✓	–	×	Axial T2W + DWI + CE	1.25
Chi et al. [27]	1	–	–	✓	–	✓	–	✓	×	Axial T2W + ADC	3.3–3.75
Toth et al. [26]	?	?	?	?	✓	–	–	✓	✓	Axial T2W	3.0
Litjens et al. [7]	?	–	–	–	?	?	?	?	×	Axial T2W + ADC	4.0
Moschidis and Graham [25]	1	✓	–	–	–	✓	✓	–	✓	3D T2W	?
Yin et al. [24]	1	✓	–	–	✓	✓	–	✓	✓	Axial T2W	3.0
Makni et al. [23]	1	✓	–	–	–	✓	✓	–	×	Axial T2W + DWI + CE	2.5

ERC endorectal coil, SC Surface coil, T2W T2-weighted, DWI diffusion-weighted imaging, ADC apparent diffusion coefficient, CE contrast-enhanced
*Slice thickness in mm, when axial T2W slices used
?Not reported
¹Rundo et al., USE-Net: incorporating Squeeze-and-Excitation blocks into U-Net for prostate zonal segmentation
of multi-institutional MRI datasets [30]
²Rundo et al., CNN-based Prostate Zonal Segmentation on T2-weighted MR Images: A Cross-dataset Study[27]

Back to article page