Skip to main content

Table 4 Qualitative image evaluations and inter-reader agreement for T2DL and T2S sequences

From: Comparison of a deep learning-accelerated T2-weighted turbo spin echo sequence and its conventional counterpart for female pelvic MRI: reduced acquisition times and improved image quality

Characteristics

Reader 1

Reader 2

Reader 3

Kendall’s W

T2DL

T2S

p values

T2DL

T2S

p values

T2DL

T2S

p values

T2DL

T2S

Sagittal

Overall image quality

5 (4–5)

4 (4–5)

 < 0.001

5 (4–5)

4 (4–5)

 < 0.001

5 (4–5)

4 (4–5)

 < 0.001

0.873

0.887

Artifacts

5 (4–5)

4 (4–5)

 < 0.001

5 (4–5)

4 (4–5)

 < 0.001

5 (4–5)

4 (4–5)

 < 0.001

0.903

0.914

Boundary sharpness

5 (4–5)

4 (4–5)

 < 0.001

5 (4–5)

4 (4–5)

 < 0.001

5 (5–5)

4 (4–5)

 < 0.001

0.801

0.771

Lesion conspicuity

5 (5–5)

4 (4–4)

 < 0.001

5 (4–5)

4 (4–4)

 < 0.001

5 (4–5)

4 (4–4)

0.002

0.847

0.871

Axial

Overall image quality

5 (4–5)

4 (4–4)

 < 0.001

5 (4–5)

4 (4–4)

 < 0.001

5 (4–5)

4 (4–4)

 < 0.001

0.851

0.871

Artifacts

5 (4–5)

4 (4–4)

 < 0.001

5 (4–5)

4 (4–4)

 < 0.001

5 (5–5)

4 (4–5)

 < 0.001

0.840

0.828

Boundary sharpness

5 (4–5)

4 (4–4)

 < 0.001

5 (4–5)

4 (4–4)

 < 0.001

5 (4–5)

4 (4–4)

 < 0.001

0.828

0.841

Lesion conspicuity

5 (4–5)

4 (4–4)

 < 0.001

5 (5–5)

4 (4–4)

 < 0.001

5 (4–5)

4 (4–4)

 < 0.001

0.896

0.884

Coronal

Overall image quality

5 (4–5)

4 (4–4)

 < 0.001

5 (4–5)

4 (4–4)

 < 0.001

5 (4–5)

4 (4–4)

 < 0.001

0.867

0.905

Artifacts

5 (4–5)

4 (4–5)

 < 0.001

5 (4–5)

4 (4–4)

 < 0.001

5 (4–5)

4 (4–5)

 < 0.001

0.876

0.890

Boundary sharpness

5 (4–5)

4 (4–4)

 < 0.001

5 (4–5)

4 (4–4)

 < 0.001

5 (4–5)

4 (4–4)

 < 0.001

0.903

0.882

Lesion conspicuity

5 (4–5)

4 (4–4)

0.001

5 (4–5)

4 (4–4)

0.003

5 (4–5)

4 (4–5)

0.021

0.864

0.879

  1. T2DL deep learning-accelerated T2-weighted turbo spin echo sequence; T2S standard T2-weighted turbo spin echo sequence