Skip to main content

Table 3 Mixed Method Appraisal Tool quality appraisal for the included studies

From: Interventions and methods to prepare, educate or familiarise children and young people for radiological procedures: a scoping review

 

Screening questions

 

2. Randomised controlled trials

    

Paper

S1. Are there clear research questions?

S2. Do the collected data allow to address the research questions?

2.1. Is randomisation appropriately performed?

2.2. Are the groups comparable at baseline?

2.3. Are there complete outcome data?

2.4. Are outcome assessors blinded to the intervention provided?

2.5 Did the participants adhere to the assigned intervention?

Bharti et al. (2016) [24]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Fegley (1988) [25]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Gebarski et al. 2013 [26]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Cannot tell

Cannot tell

Yes

No

Han et al. (2019) [27]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Hartman et al. (2009) [28]

Yes

Yes

Cannot tell

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Hogan et al. (2018) [29]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Johnson et al. (2014) [30]

Yes

Yes

Cannot tell

Cannot tell

Yes

Yes

No

Ong et al. (2018) [31]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Cannot tell

No

Rothmann et al. (2016) [32]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

 

Screening questions

 

3. Non-randomised studies

    

First author

S1. Are there clear research questions?

S2. Do the collected data allow to address the research questions?

3.1. Are the participants representative of the target population?

3.2. Are measurements appropriate regarding both the outcome and intervention (or exposure)?

3.3. Are there complete outcome data?

3.4. Are the confounders accounted for in the design and analysis?

3.5. During the study period, is the intervention administered (or exposure occurred) as intended?

Carter et al. (2010) [55]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Cannot tell

Yes

Cavarocchi et al. (2019) [38]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Cedja et al. (2012) [56]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Cannot tell

Yes

deAmorin e Silva (2006) [57]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Cannot tell

Yes

Johnson et al. (2009) [46]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Karakas et al. (2015) [40]

Yes

Yes

Cannot tell

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Mastro et al. (2019) [58]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Cannot tell

Yes

McGlashan et al. (2017) [4]

Yes

No

Yes

Cannot tell

No

No

Yes

Morel et al. (2020) [47]

Yes

Cannot tell

Cannot tell

Cannot tell

Yes

No

Yes

Thung et al. (2018) [51]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Tornqvist et al. (2015) [42]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Train et al. (2006) [43]

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes

Waitayawinyu & Wankan (2016) [52]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Cannot tell

Yes

Williams & Green (2015) [44]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Cannot tell

Yes

 

Screening questions

 

4. Quantitative descriptive studies

    

First author

S1. Are there clear research questions?

S2. Do the collected data allow to address the research questions?

4.1. Is the sampling strategy relevant to address the research question?

4.2. Is the sample representative of the target population?

4.3. Are the measurements appropriate?

4.4. Is the risk of nonresponse bias low?

4.5. Is the statistical analysis appropriate to answer the research question?

Ashmore et al. (2019) [34]

No

Cannot tell

Yes

Yes

Yes

Cannot tell

Can't tell

Barnea-Goraly et al. (2014) [35]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Capurso et al. (2020) [36]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

de Bie et al. (2010) [37]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Durand et al. (2015) [45]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Fraser et al. (2019) [39]

Cannot tell

Cannot tell

Cannot tell

Yes

Cannot tell

Cannot tell

Cannot tell

Hallowell et al. (2008) [54]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Nordahl et al. (2016) [48]

Cannot tell

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Pressdee et al. (1997) [59]

No

Cannot tell

Yes

Yes

Cannot tell

Yes

Cannot tell

Pua et al. (2020) [49]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yamada

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Cannot tell

Yes

Yes

 

Screening questions

 

5. Mixed methods studies

    

First author

S1. Are there clear research questions?

S2. Do the collected data allow to address the research questions?

5.1. Is there an adequate rationale for using a mixed methods design to address the research question?

5.2. Are the different components of the study effectively integrated to answer the research question?

5.3. Are the outputs of the integration of qualitative and quantitative components adequately interpreted?

5.4. Are divergences and inconsistencies between quantitative and qualitative results adequately addressed?

5.5. Do the different components of the study adhere to the quality criteria of each tradition of the methods involved?

Szerzak et al. (2016) [50]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Cannot tell

Cannot tell