Skip to main content

Table 2 Overview of the studies on USE for endometrium diseases

From: Advances in the clinical application of ultrasound elastography in uterine imaging

Year

Authors

Patient numbers and type of lesions

Type of elastography

Type of study

Diagnostic parameters

Diagnostic performance or research results

Endometrium tumors

2022

Vora et al. [45]

AEH = 11, EC = 29, Submucosal UF = 13, endometrial polyp = 14, Focal AM = 7

SWE

Prospective control study

E, E/M ratio

The elasticity of five pathologies was significant difference (p < 0.001). E mean of endometrial polyp was lowest (p < 0.01), and no significant difference was noted in E mean of EC and AEH (p = 0.19)

2021

Ma et al. [44]

benign lesions = 85 and EC including AEH = 37

SWE

Prospective case–control study

E max, E mean

E max and E mean were identified as independent risk factors for EC and AEH

2021

Du et al. [43]

Endometrial polyps = 45, AEH = 29 and EC = 66

SWE

Prospective diagnostic study

E mean, E max, and E min

E max has the highest diagnostic value with the truncation values of 52.45 kPa to distinguish between normal endometrium and EC

2016

Gultekin et al. [41]

AEH = 22, endometrial polyps = 20, and NU = 64

SE

Prospective control study

B/A ratio

AEH and endometrial polyps had significantly lower B/A ratios than NU (p < 0.01); however, there is no significant difference between them (p > 0.05)

2016

Czuczwar et al. [42]

endometrial polyps = 29 and submucosal fibroids = 18

SE

Prospective diagnostic study

Elastographic color map

The accuracy for SE in distinguishing endometrial polyps and submucosal fibroids was 89.4% and had the highest proportion of correct findings(p < 0.001)

Infertility

2021

Kabukçu et al. [62]

197 IUI cycles (148 infertility women)

SE

Prospective diagnostic study

SR (endometrium/parametrial tissue)

The SR was not different between pregnant and non-pregnant groups (p = 0.651). SR was not predictive for pregnancy

2021

Shui et al. [63]

117 of infertility and 35 of pregnancy

SWE

Prospective diagnostic study

SR (endometrial/subendometrial areas)

The AUC up to 0.949 for predicting pregnancy by using age and ultrasonographic factors including uterine peristalsis, uterine spiral artery, and SR. The sensitivity was 0.83, and specificity was 0.96

2017

Swierkowski-Blanchard et al. [61]

100 women for IUI

SE

Prospective diagnostic study

SR

The SR was significantly higher (2.4 ± 1.3 vs. 1.5 ± 0.7, p < 0.001) in future pregnant women

  1. USE ultrasound elastography, EC endometrial carcinoma, AEH atypical endometrial hyperplasia, UF uterine fibroids, E/M ratio the ratio of mean elasticity of the endometrial lesion to myometrial elasticity, SE strain elastography, SWE shear wave elastography, SR strain ratio, E Young’s modulus, E max Young’s modulus maximum, E mean Young’s modulus mean, B/A ratio the ratio of mean elasticity of the endometrium to adjacent myometrium, AUC area under the curve, IUI intrauterine insemination. References were presented in Supplementary text