Skip to main content

Table 2 Radiologists’ thinking processes based on types of bias

From: Errors, discrepancies and underlying bias in radiology with case examples: a pictorial review

Types of bıas

Thınkıng process

Attribution bias

“According to the patient demographics, the diagnosis is X / the diagnosis cannot be Y.”

Alliterative bias (Satisfaction of report)

“Before me, other radiologists have ~ evaluated this study in favor of X. They cannot be wrong.”

Availability Bias

“Just the other day, I saw a patient who had a lesion very similar to this one. If this finding is present, the diagnosis should be X. Their association is always correct.”

Regret bias

“Once, I had overlooked the disease of X. If I miss the possibility of X this time, I may have problems. Let me talk about this in the report.”

Framing Bias

“X is suspected in the clinical note. I should focus on X as the diagnosis to be confirmed or excluded.”

Premature Closure

"My first impression is that it looks like X. So it should be X. It is not necessary to think about other probable diagnoses."

Inattentional bias

"They are investigating X disease. I expect to see the Y finding in this disease." (The obvious Z finding is overlooked)

Hindsight bias

“It is obvious that the patient has X. How could they miss this?” (After the diagnosis is made)

Zebra retreat

"I think I am exaggerating a little. The diagnosis of X is very unusual. Better not to make people laugh at me."

Scout neglect

“There are already cross-sectional images. How can scenogram contribute to the diagnosis? No need to look at it.”

Anchoring Bias

"Against all odds, I think the diagnosis should be X. The existence of the counterarguments does not completely exclude X."

Confirmation Bias

“I believe that the diagnosis is X. I should find previous reports in the literature to support my theory.”