Skip to main content

Table 1 Baseline patients’ data

From: Computed tomography versus fluoroscopic guided-sacroiliac joint injection: a prospective comparative study

 

All patients

(n = 52)

Fluoroscopic group

(n = 29)

CT group

(n = 23)

P value

Age

46 ± 12.1 (30–67)

44.4 ± 11.3 (32–60)

48.2 ± 13.9 (30–67)

0.56

Sex, n (%)

   

0.79

 Male

29 (55.8)

15 (51.7)

14 (60.9)

 

 Female

23 (44.2)

14 (48.3)

9 (39.1)

 

BMI (kg/m2)

26.9 ± 7.5 (20.2–34.8)

27.3 ± 8.2 (21.5–33.1)

25.9 ± 6.5 (20.2–34.8)

0.58

Side of pain, n (%)

   

0.57

 Right

28 (53.8)

17 (58.6)

11 (47.8)

 

 Left

24 (46.2)

12 (41.4)

12 (52.2)

 

Duration of pain (years)

4.9 ± 3.5 (1–12)

5.4 ± 3.7 (2–12)

4.3 ± 3.4 (1–10)

0.61

NRS

7.3 ± 0.94 (5–9)

7.4 ± 0.91 (6–9)

7.2 ± 0.98 (5–9)

0.45

ODI

59.5 ± 16.1 (30–90)

59.0 ± 17.0 (30–90)

60.2 ± 15.2 (35–85)

0.79

  1. Unless otherwise indicated, data are mean ± standard deviation and data in parentheses are range. CT = computed tomography; NRS = Numerical Rating Score; ODI = Oswestry Disability Index