Skip to main content

Table 4 Criteria raking (mean values based in Kendall’s W) comparison between first and second Delphi rounds regarding craniocaudal images performed with Eklund manoeuvre combining the opinions of both groups (radiologists and radiographers)

From: Consensus about image quality assessment criteria of breast implants mammography using Delphi method with radiographers and radiologists

Criteria for craniocaudal projection of breast implant mammograms with Eklund manoeuvre

Criteria

1st round (average)

Criteria

2nd round (average)

Sharpness of breast tissue

5.5

Sharpness of breast tissue

5.4

Absence of artefacts

5.6

Maximum retropulsion of implant

5.8

Spread of breast tissue

6.2

Visualisation of medial breast tissue

6.1

Nipple in profile

6.8

Adequate image contrast

6.1

Maximum retropulsion of implant

6.9

Adequate image penetration

6.1

Breast aligned with the detector’s centre

7.1

Visualisation of retroglandular adipose tissue

6.8

Visualisation of medial breast tissue

8.1

Breast aligned with the detector’s centre

7.0

Absence of skin folders

8.1

Absence of artefacts

7.2

Visualisation of implant’s anterior edge

8.6

Absence of skin folders

7.6

Visualisation of retroglandular adipose tissue

9.0

Spread of breast tissue

7.7

Nipple angle +/− 10°

9.9

Nipple in profile

8.5

Images in mirror

10.1

Visualisation of implant’s anterior edge

9.1

Axillary tail visible

10.5

Images in mirror

10.3

Skin line visible

11.6

Axillary tail visible

11.3

Visualisation of vascular anatomy

11.8

Visualisation of pectoral muscle

Left out

Visualisation of pectoral muscle

13.5

Nipple angle +/− 10°

Left out

Skin line visible

14.0

Visualisation of vascular anatomy

Left out

Adequate image contrast

Not included

Visualisation of pores along the skin

Left out

Adequate image penetration

Not included

Skin line visible

Left out