Skip to main content

Table 2 Feedback Survey - The Current Status of Radiological Clinical Audit - EuroSafe Imaging Stars

From: The Current Status of Radiological Clinical Audit and Feedback on the ESR Guide to Clinical Audit in Radiology and the ESR Clinical Audit Tool (Esperanto) – an ESR Survey of European Radiology Departments

Q1YesNo         
Were you familiar with the ESR publication - Esperanto 2019, the ESR Guide to Clinical Audit in Radiology and the ESR Clinical Audit Tool before you were sent this survey?18 (38.30%)29 (61.70%)         
Q2Word of mouth /colleaguesECR 2019ESR email /twitter / publicationNational radiology societyOther      
How did you hear about Esperanto 2019?2 (11.11%)13 (72.22%)8 (44.44%)7 (38.89%)1 (5.56%)      
Q3Clinical relevanceReadabilityAccessibility        
Please grade the Esperanto 2019 document according to the following criteria (scale 1 = not useful, 10 = very useful)18 (see table below*)18 (see table below*)18 (see table below*)        
Q4Clinical utilityUsabilityRange of topics        
Please grade the Esperanto 2019 templates according to the following criteria (scale 1 = not useful, 10 = very useful)18 (see table below**)18 (see table below**)18 (see table below**)        
Q5YesNoIn development        
Does your radiology department engage in clinical audit - with a programme of clinical audit in place where findings, actions and re-audits are documented?36 (76.60%)4 (8.51%)7 (14.89%)        
Q6YesNo         
Do you have a nominated department lead for clinical audit?23 (48.94%)24 (51.06%)         
Q7Administrative supportInfrastructure /IT supportClinical leadershipClinical EngagementManagerial support 
Which of the following local requirements for effective clinical audit are present in your department?YesNoYesNoYesNoYesNoYesNo 
36 (78.26%)10 (21.74%)40 (86.96%)6 (13.04%)42 (91.30%)4 (8.70%)31 (68.89%)14 (31.11%)36 (76.60%)11 (23.40%) 
Q8YesNoIn development        
Currently, does your department have a clinical audit structure in place allowing compliance with the EU-BSS?21 (44.68%)9 (19.15%)17 (36.17%)        
Q9Yes - exists, participateNo - exists, do not participateNo - does not exist        
Does your department participate in a national radiology audit programme?21 (44.68%)2 (4.26%)24 (51.06%)        
Q10National radiology societyGovernmental bodyOther national societyOther       
How is the national audit programme organised?12 (25.53%)13 (27.66%)1 (2.13%)21 (44.68%)       
Q11YesYes - but additional resources requiredNo        
In principle, would your department be prepared to participate in pan-European surveys/audits co-ordinated by the ESR/national radiology societies?20 (42.55%)27 (57.45%)0 (0.00%)        
*12345678910TOTAL
Clinical relevance0 (0.00%)1 (5.56%)0 (0.00%)0 (0.00%)0 (0.00%)0 (0.00%)2 (11.11%)10 (55.56%)3 (16.67%)2 (11.11%)18
Readibility0 (0.00%)0 (0.00%)0 (0.00%)0 (0.00%)1 (5.56%)0 (0.00%)1 (5.56%)11 (61.11%)3 (16.67%)2 (11.11%)18
Accessibility0 (0.00%)0 (0.00%)0 (0.00%)0 (0.00%)0 (0.00%)0 (0.00%)7 (38.89%)3 (16.67%)5 (27.78%)3 (16.67%)18
**12345678910TOTAL
Clinical utility0 (0.00%)0 (0.00%)0 (0.00%)1 (5.56%)0 (0.00%)0 (0.00%)9 (50.00%)4 (22.22%)1 (5.56%)3 (16.67%)18
Usability0 (0.00%)0 (0.00%)1 (5.56%)0 (0.00%)0 (0.00%)1 (5.56%)3 (16.67%)9 (50.00%)3 (16.67%)1 (5.56%)18
Range of topics0 (0.00%)0 (0.00%)0 (0.00%)1 (5.56%)0 (0.00%)0 (0.00%)3 (16.67%)10 (55.56%)3 (16.67%)1 (5.56%)18