Skip to main content

Table 5 Variations in radiographer responses in identifying different types of MR image-quality errors

From: Validation of the educational effectiveness of a mobile learning app to improve knowledge about MR image quality optimisation and artefact reduction

Error Category

Group Control N = 16 Experimental N = 19

Number of images

Total Number of responses

Number (%) correct (pre-test)

Number (%) Dis-improved

Number (%) incorrect (pre-test)

Number (%) improved

SNR (Signal to noise ratio)

Control

4

64

40 (62.5%)

7 (16.3%)

24 (37.5%)

6 (25%)

Experimental

76

44 (57.9%)

15 (34.1%)

32 (42.1%)

18 (56.3%)

CNR (Contrast to noise ratio)

Control

6

96

67 (69.8%)

10 (15.9%)

29 (30.2%)

7 (24.1%)

Experimental

114

65 (57.02%)

0 (0%)

49 (43%)

40 (81.6%)

SR (Spatial resolution)

Control

2

32

11 (34.4%)

3 (27.2%)

21 (65.6%)

4 (19%)

Experimental

38

17 (44.7%)

0 (0%)

21 (55.3%)

21 (100%)

Artefact

Control

7

112

51 (45.5%)

4 (7.8%)

61 (54.5%)

4 (6.6%)

Experimental

133

74 (55.6%)

3 (4.1%)

59 (44.4%)

37 (62.7%)

No Technical Error Evident

Control

5

80

62 (77.5%)

7 (11.3%)

18 (22.5%)

6 (33.3%)

Experimental

95

73 (76.9%)

7 (9.6%)

22 (23.2%)

19 (86.4%)

SNR and CNR

Control

1

16

10 (62.5%)

2 (20%)

6 (37.5%)

0 (0%)

Experimental

19

15 (78.9%)

0 (0%)

4 (21.1%)

4 (100%)