Skip to main content

Table 1 Review of main functional and molecular imaging techniques for the evaluation of colorectal cancer

From: Advanced imaging of colorectal cancer: From anatomy to molecular imaging

Imaging technique

Biological basis of imaging technique

Evaluation parameters obtained

Pathophysiological correlation

Advantages

Disadvantages

Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI)

Contrast medium uptake rates

Transfer rates

Extra-cellular volume

Plasma volume fraction

Qualitative: evaluation of the type of time/signal intensity curve

* Semiquantitative evaluation: wash-in; wash-out; time to peak enhancement; etc.

* Quantitative analysis (based on mathematical models): Initial area under gadolinium curve (IAUGC); Transfer and rate constants (Ktrans, kep); Leakage space fraction (ve); Fractional plasma volume (vp)

Vessel density

Vascular permeability

Perfusion

Extravascular space

Plasma volume

Low toxicity of contrast agents

No ionizing radiation

Versatility in pulse sequences

Complex biological explanation of many parameters

Complex analysis in quantitative models

Perfusion CT (CTP)

Contrast medium uptake rate in tissues, which is influenced by:

• Perfusion & transfer rates

• Extra-cellular volume

• Plasma volume fraction

Qualitative evaluation of the type of time/signal intensity curve

* Semiquantitative evaluation: Maximum upslope; Peak enhancement; etc.

* Quantitative analysis (based on mathematical models): Blood flow; Blood volume; Transit time; Permeability, Ktrans

Vessel density

Vascular permeability

Perfusion

Tissue cell fraction

Plasma volume

Availability

Low cost

Contrast agent toxicity

Low sensitivity to contrast agents

Exposure to ionizing radiation

Imaging techniques based on water diffusion

Diffusivity of water - Monoexponential analysis (DWI)

Perfusion component: Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM)

Structural complexity: Diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI)

Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)

• Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)

• Perfusion fraction (f)

• Diffusion (D)

Non-Gaussian diffusion coefficient (D) and deviations from normal distribution (K)

Mean diffusivity, Diffusion anisotropy indices; Fiber orientation mapping

Tissue architecture: cell density & size, extracellular space tortuosity, gland formation, cell membrane integrity, necrosis

Microvessel perfusion

Quantifying the non-gaussianity of any distribution and may evaluate membrane integrity

Anisotropy of tissue structure

Availability

No contrast agents

No ionizing radiation

Technical complexity of advanced techniques (IVIM, DKI, and DTI)

MR Spectroscopy Imaging (MRSI)

Contrast medium uptake by macrophages of the lymph nodes

Ratios between metabolites

Abnormal Peaks of metabolites

Absence of normal metabolites

Analysis of metabolic pathways

Specificity

No contrast media

Technical complexity

Difficult analysis

MR-Lymphography (USPIO)

Contrast medium uptake by macrophages of the lymph nodes

• Qualitative evaluation: Change/No change of signal in lymph nodes

Function of the reticuloendothelial system

Specificity

Contrast agent availability

Spatial resolution for detecting micrometastases

Complexity

Positron Emission Tomography (PET)

Different metabolic pathways depending on the radiotracer:

1-Energetic Metabolism Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)

• SUV = standardized uptake value (ratio between tracer uptake and homogeneous distribution of the tracer within the patient).

Glucose uptake

Emission directly proportional to concentration of contrast agent

High sensitivity

Whole-body imaging

Relative specificity

High cost

Low spatial resolution (1–2 mm)

No morphological information

Radiation exposure

Short half-life in many radiotracers

-Very short radionuclide agent half-life

No evaluation of permeability

Technical complexity

2-Tumour Proliferation Fluorothymidine (FLT)

 

Activity of thymidine kinase 1

  

3-Hypoxia (F-MISO), (64CuATSM), (F-FAZA)

 

Uptake is influenced by the O2 level in tissue

  

4-Apoptosis (Annexin-V)

 

Exposure of phosphatidylserine in the cell membrane

  
  1. 64CuATSM = 64Cu-diacetyl-bis(N4-methylthiosemicarbazone; 18F-FAZA = 18F-fluoroazomycin-arabinozide; FDG = Fluorodeoxyglucose; 18F-FMISO = 18F-fluoromisonidazole; FLT = Fluorothymidine; SUV = standardized uptake value