Skip to main content

Table 2 Classification of the results of the experienced and inexperienced readers and the software analysis. The agreement of the respective readersā€™ results and the semi-automated software is presented as the weighted kappa value

From: Density is in the eye of the beholder: visual versus semi-automated assessment of breast density on standard mammograms

Ā 

Experienced reader

Inexperienced reader

Software analysis

Total patients classified

200 (100.0%)

200 (100.0%)

200 (100.0%)

BI-RADS 1 classification (%)

91 (45.5%)

70 (35.0%)

127 (63.5%)

BI-RADS 2 classification (%)

79 (39.5%)

56 (28.0%)

68 (34.0%)

BI-RADS 3 classification (%)

27 (13.5%)

53 (26.5%)

5 (2.5%)

BI-RADS 4 classification (%)

3 (1.5%)

21 (10.5%)

0 (0.0%)

Correct classification (%)

117 (58.5%)

84 (42.0%)

Ā 

Classification overestimated (%)

71 (35.5%)

112 (56.0%)

Ā 

Classification underestimated (%)

12 (6.0%)

4 (2.0%)

Ā 

Weighted kappa

0.367

0.232

Ā