Skip to main content

Table 4 Performance of five machine learning algorithms to predict HT in the training cohort

From: A clinical–radiomics model based on noncontrast computed tomography to predict hemorrhagic transformation after stroke by machine learning: a multicenter study

 

Training cohort

AUC

ACC

SEN

SPE

PPV

NPV

SGD

0.912

0.854

0.883

0.831

0.818

0.896

SVM

0.936

0.870

0.942

0.810

0.806

0.943

LR

0.874

0.813

0.832

0.798

0.775

0.850

RF

0.926

0.838

0.800

0.869

0.837

0.839

XGB

0.953

0.894

0.895

0.894

0.876

0.911

  1. HT, hemorrhagic transformation; SGD, Stochastic Gradient Descent; SVM, Support Vector Machine; LR, Logistic Regression; RF, Random Forest; XGB, eXtreme Gradient Boosting; AUC, area under the receiver operator characteristic curve; ACC, accuracy; SEN, sensitivity; SPE, specificity; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value