Skip to main content

Table 3 Average image scores of coronary segments in NCMRA

From: 3D whole-heart noncontrast coronary MR angiography based on compressed SENSE technology: a comparative study of conventional SENSE sequence and coronary computed tomography angiography

 

Average image score

P

CS4 Versus SENSE

CS5 Versus SENSE

CS6 Versus SENSE

CS4 Versus CS5

CS4 Versus CS6

CS5 Versus CS6

SENSE

CS4

CS5

CS6

x2

Z

P

Z

P

Z

P

Z

P

Z

P

Z

P

RCApro

4 [3.25–4]

4 [4–4]

4 [3–4]

3 [3–4]

46.673

< 0.001*

1.414

0.157

1.897

0.058

4.2

< 0.001*

2.53

0.011*

4.413

< 0.001*

3.873

< 0.001*

RCAmid

3 [3–4]

3 [3–4]

3 [3–4]

3 [2.25–3]

38.533

< 0.001*

0.378

0.795

1.265

0.206

4.583

< 0.001*

1

0.317

4.264

< 0.001*

3.71

< 0.001*

RCAdis

3 [3–3]

3 [3–3]

3 [2.25–3]

2 [2–3]

22.635

< 0.001*

0.302

0.763

1.069

0.285

3.079

0.002*

1.89

0.059

3.508

< 0.001*

2.977

0.003*

LM

4 [3–4]

4 [3.25–4]

4 [3–4]

3 [3–3]

47.765

< 0.001*

0.333

0.739

1.387

0.166

4.707

< 0.001*

1.897

0.058

5

< 0.001*

4.359

< 0.001*

LADpro

3 [3–4]

3 [3–4]

3 [3–3]

3 [2–3]

39.483

< 0.001*

0.277

0.782

2.134

0.033*

4.044

< 0.001*

2.4

0.016*

4.735

< 0.001*

3.419

0.001*

LADmid

3 [3–3]

3 [3–3]

3 [2–3]

2 [2–3]

46.639

< 0.001*

0.447

0.655

3

0.003*

4.327

< 0.001*

3.051

0.002*

4.536

< 0.001*

3.606

< 0.001*

LCXpro

3 [3–3.75]

3 [3–4]

3 [2–3]

2.5 [2–3]

36.815

< 0.001*

0.816

0.414

1.604

0.109

4.185

< 0.001*

2

0.046*

4.413

< 0.001*

3.532

< 0.001*

LCXdis

3 [2–3]

3 [2–3]

2 [2–3]

2 [1–2]

33.103

< 0.001*

0

1

2.524

0.012*

4.184

< 0.001*

2.84

0.005*

3.841

< 0.001*

2.517

0.012*

All

3 [3–4]

3 [3–4]

3 [3–4]

3 [2–3]

302.348

< 0.001*

0.63

0.529

5.086

< 0.001

11.641

< 0.001*

6.263

< 0.001*

12.22

< 0.001*

9.823

< 0.001*

  1. Metric data are reported as median and interquartile range
  2. RCA right coronary artery; LAD left anterior descending artery; LCX left circumflex artery; pro proximal; mid middle; dis distal
  3. *The difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05)