Skip to main content

Table 2 Imaging findings of the training, internal validation and external validation sets

From: Predictive models and early postoperative recurrence evaluation for hepatocellular carcinoma based on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging

Variables

Training set

(n = 120)

Internal validation set

(n = 38)

External validation set (n = 51)

p value

Cirrhosis

49 (40.83)

12 (31.58) ^

34 (66.67) #

0.003*

Multifocality

21 (17.5)

7 (18.42)

20 (39.22) #

0.009*

Satellite lesions

44 (36.67)

12 (31.58)

26 (50.98)

0.121

Presence of non-hypervascular HBP hypointense nodules

26 (21.67)

11 (28.95)

15 (29.41)

0.458

Tumor in vein

49 (40.83)

12 (31.58)

26 (50.98)

0.179

APHE

   

0.879

 No

1 (0.83)

0 (0.00)

0 (0.00)

 

 Non-rim

114 (95.00)

36 (94.74)

48 (94.12)

 

 Rim

5 (4.17)

2 (5.26)

3 (5.88)

 

Corona enhancement

52 (43.33)

14 (36.84)

22 (43.14)

0.768

Washout

   

0.127

 No

8 (6.67)

5 (13.16)

4 (7.84)

 

 Non-rim

112 (93.33)

33 (86.84)

45 (88.24)

 

 Rim

0 (0.00)

0 (0.00)

2 (3.92)

 

“Capsule” appearance

   

0.734

 No “capsule”

19 (15.83)

7 (18.42)

6 (11.76)

 

 Enhancing capsule

76 (63.33)

22 (57.89)

30 (58.82)

 

 Non-enhancing capsule

25 (20.83)

9 (23.68)

15 (29.41)

 

Incomplete capsule

83 (69.17)

25 (65.79)

40 (78.43)

0.358

Blood products in mass

53 (44.17)

16 (42.11)

22 (43.14)

0.973

Nodule in nodule

52 (43.33)

11 (28.95)

14 (27.45)

0.077

Mosaic architecture

67 (55.83)

19 (50)

25 (49.02)

0.655

Non-smooth Tumor margin

6 (5)

1 (2.63)

2 (3.92)

0.949

Eggel’s growth classification

    

 Single nodular type

55 (45.83)

20 (52.63)

26 (50.98)

 

 Single nodule type with extra-nodular growth

49 (40.83)

10 (26.32)

20 (39.22)

 

 Contiguous multinodular type

16 (13.33)

8 (21.05)

5 (9.80)

 

Restricted Diffusion

120 (100.00)

38 (100.00)

51 (100.00)

1.000

Mild-moderate T2 hyperintensity

120 (100)

36 (95.74)

51 (100.00)

0.578

TP hypointensity

119 (99.17)

36 (94.74)

49 (96.08)

0.213

HBP intensity

  

0.540

 

 Hypointensity

117 (97.5)

37 (97.37)

48 (94.11)

 

 Isointensity

1 (0.83)

1 (2.63)

2 (3.92)

 

 Hyperintensity

2 (1.67)

0 (0.00)

1 (1.96)

 

Targetoid TP or HBP appearance

2 (1.67)

1 (2.63)

1 (1.96)

0.935

Peritumoral hypointensity on HBP

67 (55.83)

15 (39.47)^

39 (76.47) #

0.002*

Size of the largest tumor(cm)

5.83 ± 3.12

5.38 ± 3.46

4.73 ± 3.52#

0.010*

  1. Data are represented in mean ± SD or frequency (%). And Data were evaluated by Analysis of variance (ANOVA) or Kruskal–Wallis test for continuous variables and the Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables. *referred to p < 0.05; &referred to p < 0.016 (Training set vs. Internal validation set); #referred to p < 0.016 (Training set vs. External validation set); ^referred to p < 0.016 (Internal validation set vs. External validation set). HBP Hepatobiliary phase, APHE Arterial phase hyperenhancement, T2WI T2-weighted imaging, TP Transitional phase