Skip to main content

Table 4 Univariate analysis of clinical and MRI variables

From: A prediction nomogram for suboptimal debulking surgery in patients with serous ovarian carcinoma based on MRI T1 dual-echo imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging

Variables

N

p value

Age

 ≤ 45 years

36

 

 > 45 years

169

0.2081

CA-125

 ≤ 1484

118

 

 > 1484

87

 < 0.001

HE-4

 ≤ 241

78

 

 > 241

127

 < 0.001

LDH

 ≤ 227

107

 

 > 227

98

 < 0.001

NLR

 ≤ 3.56

115

 

 > 3.56

90

 < 0.001

Menopausal status

 Premenopause

68

 

 Postmenopause

137

0.3806

FIGO stage

 I/II

36

 

 III/IV

169

 < 0.001

ASA

 I/II

145

 

 III/IV

60

0.8418

Distribution

 Unilateral

98

 

 Bilateral

107

0.1395

Mass feature

 Mainly cystic

113

 

 Complex cystic and solid

56

0.0424

 Solid

36

0.0040

Relationship between the sigmoid colon/rectum and mass

 0 (clear, a hook edge existed)

38

 

 The hook edge disappeared

  

  1 (Close)

26

 < 0.001

  2 (Bridge sign)

90

 < 0.001

  3 (Fusion)

51

 < 0.001

Bladder invaded

 No

191

 

 Yes

14

0.1469

Metastases of distant organs

 No

187

 

 Yes

18

0.9647

Diaphragmatic metastasis

 No

141

 

 Yes

64

 < 0.001

Nodules or masses implanted on the omentum/peritoneum

 No

49

 

 Yes

156

 < 0.001

Hydroureter

 No

201

 

 Yes

4

0.9835

Retroperitoneal lymphadenectasis

 No

191

 

 Yes

14

0.1469

Amount of ascites

 No ascites or small

79

 

 Medium to large

126

 < .0001

  1. FIGO International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, ASA American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification, N number