Skip to main content

Table 3 Clinical and MRI characteristics of patients with SOC from institution B

From: A prediction nomogram for suboptimal debulking surgery in patients with serous ovarian carcinoma based on MRI T1 dual-echo imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging

Characteristics

ODS group

SDS group

Clinical characteristics

 Age

52.95 ± 11.01

55.27 ± 5.42

 Menopausal status

  Premenopause

4 (21.05)

4 (15.38)

  Postmenopause

15 (78.95)

22 (84.62)

 CA125

931.9 (391.90, 1384.22)

1000.50 (404.88, 2526.00)

 HE4

260 (129.60, 608.00)

694.5 (449.00, 1097.00)

 LDH

299.2 (200.60, 395.40)

424.45 (269.20, 545.40)

 NLR

3.52 (2.04, 4.19)

4.49 (3.28, 6.77)

 ASA

  I–II

19 (100)

19 (73.08)

  III–IV

0

7 (26.92)

 FIGO stage

  I–II

6 (31.58)

1 (3.85)

  III–IV

13 (68.42)

25 (96.16)

MRI characteristics

 Distribution

  Unilateral

12 (63.16)

12 (46.15)

  Bilateral

7 (36.84%)

14 (53.85)

 Mass feature

  Solid

9 (47.37)

12 (11.54)

  Complex cystic and solid

8 (42.11)

11 (42.31)

  Mainly cystic

2 (10.53)

12 (46.15)

 Relationship between the sigmoid colon/rectum and mass

  0 (clear, a hook edge existed)

7 (36.84)

0

  The hook edge disappeared

   1 (Close)

4 (21.05)

5 (19.23)

   2 (Bridge sign)

7 (36.84%)

12 (46.15)

   3 (Fusion)

1 (5.26)

9 (34.62)

 Bladder invaded

2 (10.53)

0

 Metastases of distant organs

0

3 (11.54%)

 Diaphragmatic metastasis

4 (21.05)

16 (61.54)

 Nodules or masses implanted on the omentum/peritoneum

9 (47.37)

25 (96.15)

 Hydroureter

0

0

 Retroperitoneal lymphadenectasis

5 (26.32)

1 (3.85)

 Amount of ascites

  No ascites or small

12 (63.16)

9 (34.62)

  Medium to large

7 (36.84)

17 (65.38)

  1. SOC Serous ovarian carcinoma, ODS optimal debulking surgery, SDS suboptimal debulking surgery