Skip to main content

Table 5 The prediction performance of radiomics for NAC response in osteosarcoma patients

From: An updated systematic review of radiomics in osteosarcoma: utilizing CLAIM to adapt the increasing trend of deep learning application in radiomics

Clinical question

MRI-driven radiomics prediction model for NAC response in osteosarcoma patients

Number of studies

4

Good responder/sample size

44/115

Pooled analysis

 DOR (95%CI)

28.83 (10.27–80.95)

 p value for DOR

p < 0.001

 Sensitivity (95% CI)

0.84 (0.70–0.92)

 Specificity (95% CI)

0.85 (0.74–0.91)

 PLR (95% CI)

5.43 (3.11–9.49)

 NLR (95% CI)

0.19 (0.09–0.37)

 AUC (95% CI)

0.91 (0.88–0.93)

Heterogeneity

 Higgins I2 test

I2 = 42.04%

 Cochran’s Q test

Q = 5.18, p = 0.160

Publication bias

 Egger’s test

p = 0.035

 Begg’s test

p = 0.089

 Deeks’ test

p = 0.069

Trim and fill method

 Number of missing studies

2

 Adjusted DOR (95%CI)

20.53 (7.80–54.06)

 p value for adjusted DOR

p < 0.001

 Level of Evidence

Weak

  1. AUC area under curve, CI confidential interval, DOR diagnostic odds ratio, NAC neoadjuvant chemotherapy, NLR negative likelihood ratio, n/a not applicable, PLR positive likelihood ratio