Skip to main content
Insights into Imaging
Fig. 5 | Insights into Imaging

Fig. 5

From: What MRI-based tumor size measurement is best for predicting long-term survival in uterine cervical cancer?

Fig. 5

Bland–Altman plots depicting the difference in histological tumor size and MRI-assessed tumor size: for MAXhistology and MAXimaging (n = 212) (a), tumor size based on microscopy (micro-MAXhistology) and MAXimaging (n = 158) (b) and tumor size based on macroscopic assessment (macro-MAXhistology) and MAXimaging (n = 72) (c). Mean MAXhistology was 1.5 mm larger than MAXimaging (a), mean micro-MAXhistology was 1.3 mm larger than MAXimaging (b), and mean macro-MAXhistology was 2.0 mm larger than MAXimaging (c)

Back to article page