Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of branch characteristics and used BSG types in general and for each branch individually

From: Structural failure in bridging stentgrafts for branched endovascular aneurysm repair: a case–control study

 

BSG failure from database (23 branches)

BSG failure cohort single center (13 branches)

Control cohort single center (94 branches)

p*

Main body

   

1.000

 Jotec

21 (91.3%)

11 (84.6%)

77 (81.9%)

 

 Cook

2 (8.7%)

2 (15.4%)

17 (18.1%)

 

Reintervention before

15 (65.22%)

13 (100%)

39 (41.5%)

< 0.001

BSG failure

    

BSG

    

 Br, n

   

0.665

  CT

4 (17.4%)

2 (15.4%)

26 (27.7%)

 

  SMA

9 (39.1%)

3 (23.1%)

27 (28.7%)

 

  Renal

10 (43.5%)

8 (61.5%)

41 (43.6%)

 

 Type, n

   

0.004

  Advanta V12

4 (17.4%)

4 (30.8%)

43 (45.7%)

 

  VBX

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

15 (16%)

 

  E-ventus

16 (69.6%)

6 (46.2%)

14 (14.9%)

 

  BeGraft

3 (13%)

3 (23.1%)

3 (3.2%)

 

  BeGraft Plus

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

16 (17%)

 

  Viabahn

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

3 (3.2%)

 

 Length, mm

55.78 (± 5.65)

54.62 (± 7.41)

58.02 (± 13.17)

0.010

 Ø, mm

7.26 (± 0.96)

7.15 (± 0.90)

7.05 (± 1.14)

0.850

 Angle, °

 

50.46 (± 15.18)

28.36 (± 16.69)

< 0.001

 Religning, n

10

10

67

 

 Religning/br

0.44 (± 0.51)

0.77 (± 0.44)

0.71 (± 0.46)

0.672

 Extensions, n

11

7

39

 

 Extensions/br

0.48 (± 0.59)

0.54 (± 0.66)

0.41 (± 0.58)

0.502

  1. CT celiac trunk, SMA superior mesenteric artery
  2. *Between single center cohorts (columns 2 and 3)