Skip to main content
Fig. 2 | Insights into Imaging

Fig. 2

From: Radiomic features of breast parenchyma: assessing differences between FOR PROCESSING and FOR PRESENTATION digital mammography

Fig. 2

Bland–Altman analysis of (a) breast and (b) dense area (cm2) segmented with LIBRA on FOR PROCESSING and on FOR PRESENTATION images. Each marker represents an image. Robust linear fitting is reported in red (solid); identity line is dotted for reference. Spearman’s rank correlation index is (a) 0.88, (b) − 0.16 (p < 0.001). While a strong correlation exists betweeen breast areas, the negative correlation coefficient for dense area can be understood by the example in Fig. 1: often the dense area segmented on FOR PRESENTATION images is very small compared to the dense area segmented from FOR PROCESSING

Back to article page