Skip to main content

Table 3 Overview for "follow-up"

From: Imaging in non-bacterial osteomyelitis in children and adolescents: diagnosis, differential diagnosis and follow-up—an educational review based on a literature survey and own clinical experiences

Article

Patients with WB-MRI

Patients with follow-up MRI

Time frame between MRIs

Total lesions in initial MRI

Total lesions in follow-up MRI

MRI sequences

Guerin-Pfyffer et al. [36]

9

5

6 months—4 years

28

14

STIR, T1w, T2w

Hofmann et al. [37]

8

8 (1 lost for last follow-up)

After 3 and 6 cycles of Pam, 6 months after last Pam

37

Not specified

T1-TSE, T1-TSE fatsat + C, TIRM

Beck et al. [8]

21

37 (21 WB-MRI)

After 3, 6 and 12 months

184

81 after 12 months

TIRM

Sağ et al. [38]

13

Not specified

Not specified

60

Not specified

Not specified

Miettunen et al. [39]

Only local MRI

9 (local MRI)

Within 4 weeks of symptom recurrence after end of Pam

Not specified, median 3,5

Not specified

T1-SE, T2 fatsat or STIR, T1w fatsat + C,

Moussa et al. [40]

 

7

Not specified

Not specified

Not specified

local MRI: pre- and post-contrast; WB-MRI: STIR

Gaal et al. [41]

1, rest only local MRI (mandible)

8

Not specified

Not specified

Not specified

T1w, STIR

Roderick et al. [42]

11

11

Before and after Pam therapy, median 16 months

75

32

T1w, STIR, T1w + C

Hospach et al. [43]

Not specified

12 (only with vertebral deformities)

Pam (7 patients): before therapy and after median 13 months

Only specified in patients with Pam

Only specified after Pam

STIR