|
Author (year of publication)
|
Data source
|
# Abnormal/normal nodes
|
# Patients
|
Magnet field strength, manufacturer
|
Study design
|
|---|
|
Hongna Tan (2020)
|
Single institution
|
119/210
|
329
|
3.0 T GE
|
Retro
|
|
Thomas Ren (2020)
|
Single institution
|
66/193
|
99
|
1.5 T GE
|
Retro
|
|
Xiao Zhang (2019)
|
Single institution
|
55/91
|
146
|
1.5 T Philips
|
Retro
|
|
Jia Liu (2019)
|
Single institution
|
35/27
|
62
|
3.0 T GE
|
Retro
|
|
Karl D Spuhler (2019)
|
Single institution
|
55/108
|
163
|
1.5 T GE
|
Retro
|
|
Lu Han (2019)
|
Single institution
|
148/263
|
411
|
1.5 T GE
|
Retro
|
|
Jiaxiu Luo (2018)
|
Single institution
|
74/98
|
172
|
1.5 T Philips
|
Retro
|
|
Chunling Liu (2019)
|
Single institution
|
55/108
|
163
|
1.5 T GE
|
Retro
|
|
Yuhao Dong (2018)
|
Single institution
|
55/91
|
146
|
1.5 T Philips
|
Retro
|
|
Meijie Liu (2020)
|
Single institution
|
78/86
|
164
|
3.0 T GE
|
Pros
|
|
Xiaoyu Cui (2019)
|
Single institution
|
52/63
|
102
|
3.0 T Siemens
|
Retro
|
|
Demircioglu (2020)
|
Single institution
|
34/50
|
84
|
1.5 T Siemens
|
Retro
|
|
Arefan (2020)
|
Single institution
|
80/74
|
154
|
3.0 T Siemens
|
Retro
|
|
Fusco (2018)
|
Single institution
|
48/46
|
52
|
1.5 T Aurora
|
Retro
|
- Retro, retrospective; Pros, prospective
